Atheism+, wtf?!

doctoremma

Galvasean wrote: »

Screw that, hairy men rule:

Jellicoe

Sounds like its 'Men that look like Women' Vs 'Men that look like Men'

Sir Digby Chicken Caesar

related...maybe?

Galvasean

I really wanna find one of those bus adverts for men's perfume (manfume?) that is an extreme close up of Sawyer from Lost's face and stick it over Avercomvriere man's body and create a super man.

Genghiz Cohen

Galvasean wrote: »

I really wanna find one of those bus adverts for men's perfume (manfume?) that is an extreme close up of Sawyer from Lost's face and stick it over Avercomvriere man's body and create a super man.

robindch

doctoremma wrote: »

Screw that, hairy men rule:

doctoremma

robindch wrote: »

For me in the night time, the fuzzy tingle time.

Galvasean

I googled 'fuzzy tingle time'. I really shouldn't have.

doctoremma

Galvasean wrote: »

I googled 'fuzzy tingle time'. I really shouldn't have.

:eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:

I was just quoting The Mighty Boosh (Crack Fox). I didn't realise the definition of "fuzzy tingle time" would appear in Urban Dictionary as something rather, less, um, fuzzy.

Nodin

Galvasean wrote: »

P



.

Poor lad hasn't even grown a belly yet. And not even a decent pair of y-fronts to cover the fact he's gone baldy down below...terrible stuff.

Sarky

doctoremma wrote: »

Screw that, hairy men rule:

Woo, vindication! \o/

<hairy gangnam style victory dance>

equivariant

Skepchick goes all 'hyper skeptical'

http://skepchick.org/2012/10/leo-traynor-anti-semitism-and-the-sticky-problem-of-facts/

One can only imagine the level of squealing were a similar post made about, oh say, someone being propositioned in an elevator

Sir Digby Chicken Caesar

. For me, though, the story needs to be verified because it is a very nasty example of anti-semitism.

lol
ah, she's fantastic really.

--edit

ah, wasn't watson wrote that

General Relativity

robindch wrote: »

Endor?

Sarky

The bedroom :coolface:

Nodin

equivariant wrote: »

Skepchick goes all 'hyper skeptical'

http://skepchick.org/2012/10/leo-traynor-anti-semitism-and-the-sticky-problem-of-facts/

One can only imagine the level of squealing were a similar post made about, oh say, someone being propositioned in an elevator

Skepiticism begins abroad, t'would appear.

Rev Hellfire

Pah, evidence is for other people it would seem.

robindch

Nodin wrote: »

Skepiticism begins abroad, t'would appear.

Don't mention broads.

Zombrex

equivariant wrote: »

Skepchick goes all 'hyper skeptical'

http://skepchick.org/2012/10/leo-traynor-anti-semitism-and-the-sticky-problem-of-facts/

One can only imagine the level of squealing were a similar post made about, oh say, someone being propositioned in an elevator

There isn't a face palm in existence that conveys the face palm of that. Face palm.

Obliq

robindch wrote: »

Don't mention broads.

Ooopsie. You mean us women? I'll jump on that while I'm waiting for more evangalistic dogma in another thread Talk to me....what seems to be the problem here? :cool:

Oh wait. It's the A+ thing hey? I still haven't got that. Butting out....

Nodin

Obliq wrote: »

Ooopsie. You mean us women? I'll jump on that while I'm waiting for more evangalistic dogma in another thread Talk to me....what seems to be the problem here? :cool:

Oh wait. It's the A+ thing hey? I still haven't got that. Butting out....

Body facist eh?

Obliq

Nodin wrote: »

Body facist eh?

Tis my finest feature, my friend. I think all behinds should be as fine as mine. :eek:

Galvasean

Anyone want to give me the jist of the article? I don't wanna click on their website and give them my precious bodily fluids (AKA web hits).

Obliq

Galvasean wrote: »

Anyone want to give me the jist of the article? I don't wanna click on their website and give them my precious bodily fluids (AKA web hits).

This the article about the fella getting anti-semitic trolling in a bad way? If not, tough, here goes anyway.

Fella twitters like mad, gets jew-hating tweets the whole time. Wife joins twitter, she gets them too, in relation to him. Can't shake off stalker, police no help. He leaves twitter. Before long, gets a parcel through the post with note saying here's the ashes of your dead ancestors, you'll be next - that kinda thing. Lovely. Friend of fella tracks down IP address to Ireland (3 different and specific places) and it is discovered to be the teenage son of people that they know. Confronts teen. Tears and tribulations. The end.

THIS article is by a fella JUSTIFIABLY picking holes in the story. Not saying he doesn't believe it, and even says it sounds for real. But HIS premise is, 'sounds' real isn't good enough, there's no evidence. We all believe stories such as this, but it ain't on to provide no backing facts, eg. police report, wife's testimony, no photo's of evidence, no screen shots of tweets, no nothing. IP addresses can't be as specific as actual houses. Why did he not say to the wife don't go on twitter cos there's some serious hatemail happening? why did he follow back everyone who followed him? Did his wife have the same policy? when he said he cancelled the account, how long for, cos twitter deletes unused accounts?

Basically, he asked all the questions I should have asked myself when I read the original fella's article, but didn't. I preferred to believe the horror/stalking/box of ashes/IP address stuff, but with NO EVIDENCE.

there.

Galvasean

Evidence? You want evidence? What are ya, some kinda skeptic or something?

Obliq

Jesuits hate me. Sad face

yawha

Not clicking the link is a bit extreme, no? It's a blog site with posts you generally don't agree with, not Stormfront.

Is the insinuation that it's hypocritical that they're defensive about women's experiences of sexual harassment being picked apart unjustly, while simultaneously seeming to do the same thing to an antisemitism case?

Nodin

yawha wrote: »

Not clicking the link is a bit extreme, no? It's a blog site with posts you generally don't agree with, not Stormfront.

Is the insinuation that it's hypocritical that they're defensive about women's experiences of sexual harassment being picked apart unjustly, while simultaneously seeming to do the same thing to an antisemitism case?

The oul loaded question. Its a great man.

No, its an insinuation that the same level of examination isn't fired at certain parties, but is at others. Actually, its not an insinuation, it's a statement of fact.

King Mob

I personally liked this quote from the edit in the article:

If I was the only one asking questions I would have just tweeted them.

I also notice that I’ve received abuse merely for asking these questions. I would say that if that’s your tactic for defending the story, you’re not helping change my mind about questioning victims.

Not even a hint of irony...

Galvasean

yawha wrote: »

Not clicking the link is a bit extreme, no? It's a blog site with posts you generally don't agree with, not Stormfront.

I find the best way to deal with dramaqueenspeople is to not give them attention*


*bah! Curse my hypocritical curiosity for continuing to post in this thread.