Rangers FC On Field Gossip & Rumour Thread 2017 Mod Note in OP(Updated 14/08)

Savage Tyrant

Fans could have a whip around to pay it??? 😂😂😂 .... pack up and start "Club 3" seems more likely.

You're a gas man Jelle.

LiamoSail

So they've a problem with BT this week, they threw a strop at Sky last week, and are the BBC still banned?

Each of the three major broadcasters can maintain a working relationship with every club in the UK except one, there's only one reason for that, and it's not the broadcasters.

Rangers need to take a few Valium and relax. The world's not out to get you, but the obnoxious attitude that disguises a football club as a circus is making them an absolute laughing stock.

Here's a novel idea; why not just behave like a normal football club do, like the 100's in the UK seem to manage and stop all this nonsense. Stop jumping from trench to trench, putting out statement after ridiculous statement whipping the hoarded into a frenzy. Give people a break ffs, the majority of their decent fans must be well and truly tired of this carry on by now

Jelle1880

A Dub in Glasgo wrote: »

The gift that keeps on giving :pac:

The irony of that probably went way over your head.

TheCitizen

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/chris-sutton-slams-petulant-mark-9059092

Sutton slams Warbs:pac:

Big Sutton telling it like it is.

bobmalooka

TheCitizen wrote: »

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/chris-sutton-slams-petulant-mark-9059092

Sutton slams Warbs:pac:

Big Sutton telling it like it is.

Hits the nail on the head, if Rangers think anyone at BT/SKY/whoever is wrong then they can correct the record.

Another case if anyone who isn't cheerleading being put in the naughty step, childish stuff.

It's consistent with the poor ethical and corporate governance which has been the source of Rangers woes for a long time, the culture at the club is a belief that they are beyond reproach.we've seen before how that culture manifests itself and if they don't cop in we'll see it again.

weldoninhio

bobmalooka wrote: »

Hits the nail on the head, if Rangers think anyone at BT/SKY/whoever is wrong then they can correct the record.

Another case if anyone who isn't cheerleading being put in the naughty step, childish stuff.

It's consistent with the poor ethical and corporate governance which has been the source of Rangers woes for a long time, the culture at the club is a belief that they are beyond reproach.we've seen before how that culture manifests itself and if they don't cop in we'll see it again.

You can see the attitude from replies in here. Claiming that a manager is within his rights to ignore a contract because he took a bit of criticism.

Dempsey

Old habits were transferred to the new club with the intellectual property.

Laws, rules, contracts are only followed when it suits them.

Jim Traynor should be sacked tbh

TheCitizen

TheCitizen wrote: »

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/chris-sutton-slams-petulant-mark-9059092

Sutton slams Warbs:pac:

Big Sutton telling it like it is.

In fairness, references to democracy and freedom of speech are a bit hilarious. Plus Sutton apparently doesn't understand that freedom of speech embraces freedom not to speak...which is amusing. But then again, as a former footballer, he may not be the deepest thinker of all time.

On the other hand, his point about contracts is valid. Tv companies pay lots of money to cover football, and part of the deal is that managers make themselves available for interviews. For that reason, and nothing to do with democracy, Warburton deserves criticism.

bobmalooka

[Deleted User] wrote: »

In fairness, references to democracy and freedom of speech are a bit hilarious. Plus Sutton apparently doesn't understand that freedom of speech embraces freedom not to speak...which is amusing. But then again, as a former footballer, he may not be the deepest thinker of all time.

On the other hand, his point about contracts is valid. Tv companies pay lots of money to cover football, and part of the deal is that managers make themselves available for interviews. For that reason, and nothing to do with democracy, Warburton deserves criticism.

Free speach and democracy is over the top language to be using in the conversation. I'd agree that it adds nothing to the discussion.

Every club would know that the Broadcasters will be discussing them for better or for worse. They all agreed to actively participate by supplying comment within 30 minutes of a game.

Now Rangers have decided this doesn't apply to them in the same way they decided paying bills doesn't apply to them.

Jelle1880

Krancjar likely to be out for the rest of the season (suspected ligament damage), **** sake.

And if it's as bad as feared might even be the end of his career full stop.

Berserker

Jelle1880 wrote: »

Krancjar likely to be out for the rest of the season (suspected ligament damage), **** sake.

And if it's as bad as feared might even be the end of his career full stop.

Disaster, feel for him. Hope we see him back at the start of next season. Where did you hear about it being career threatening?

Jelle1880

It's mostly because of the point where his career is atm.

If it's his ligaments (which it's likely to be) then he'll be out for the entire season, he's not getting any younger and is already kind of on the way back.

weldoninhio

Another training ground row. This time before a heavy loss. Lol. Must have been two of the low earners because there's no move to try to get them off the books.

Jelle1880

Kiernan and Hill at the back fills me with no confidence at all...

Tav up front is a weird one but might prove to be a great move.

Broxi_Bear_Eire

Jelle1880 wrote: »

Kiernan and Hill at the back fills me with no confidence at all...

Tav up front is a weird one but might prove to be a great move.

While I agree about Kieran and Hill we don't have much choice Wilson is still injured

Jelle1880

I would honestly rather have a youth player there, Kiernan really is that bad.

Shirt on, feet up, beers ready! Hope it's a good one for us today!

Jelle1880

McKay and Windass can come off, they've offered absolutely nothing.

edit: 66 mins and still no change, ffs Warburton get them off.

Jelle1880

And then he takes Miller off and leaves McKay on ? At least Waghorn and Garner are on, hopefully adds a bit to the attack.

At least it's a tightening up after the 5-1 loss,could be more penaltys!

Jelle1880

Gilks making a huge claim to be nr. 1

What a game he's had.

Jelle1880

Ah well, that was coming.

Absolutely pathetic from Wallace.

Savage Tyrant

That goalie had a stormer. Between himself and the referee, they saved yous from another hammering.

A Dub in Glasgo

A 1-0 hammering if ever there was one

Broxi_Bear_Eire

Savage Tyrant wrote: »

That goalie had a stormer. Between himself and the referee, they saved yous from another hammering.

Funny I thought the keeper did as he is paid to do strange that.
Celtic deserved there win if that there's no doubt

Jelle1880

And once again a kid injured by some scum throwing a bottle.

weldoninhio

Mark Warburton: "The gap is a lot more narrow than people think...."

If it is, it's because we are so far ahead of you, we're coming up to lap yas!!!!!!!

Coillte_Bhoy

weldoninhio wrote: »

Mark Warburton: "The gap is a lot more narrow than people think...."

If it is, it's because we are so far ahead of you, we're coming up to lap yas!!!!!!!

Define 'narrow'

A Dub in Glasgo

Coillte_Bhoy wrote: »

Define 'narrow'

Savage Tyrant

Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: »

Funny I thought the keeper did as he is paid to do strange that.
Celtic deserved there win if that there's no doubt

The keeper DID do his job. Nothing strange about it. I think I said he played a stormer.... is that not a generally accepted term for having a great game?
I don't get your confusion... pretty straightforward statement. Between the keeper and the ref, yous avoided a score line hammering.