Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Arsenal Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread 12/13 MOD POST #232

1322323325327328333

Comments

  • Site Banned Posts: 2,719 ✭✭✭DB10


    12 days left no transfer links. 2 quality signings needed for me, I cant see where they are coming from.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,478 ✭✭✭✭gnfnrhead


    DB10 wrote: »
    That's delusional, if we won or had a realistic chance of winning trophies he would have stayed. He did not move for money I doubt even Wenger would say as much. He could have got more at City if he wanted it. Hes a world class player on his last contract why would he stay with us in all fairness. All things said and done it still rangles seeing him there.
    We could have won the Champions League and he'd still have left. He wanted the money that United were willing to offer. Simple as. Hardly a coincidance that he got such a huge pay rise at his new club.


  • Site Banned Posts: 2,719 ✭✭✭DB10


    gnfnrhead wrote: »
    We could have won the Champions League and he'd still have left. He wanted the money that United were willing to offer. Simple as. Hardly a coincidance that he got such a huge pay rise at his new club.
    If we won the Champions League last May there was no chance he would have moved to United. They are a level above us and have been for most of the last decade, they win major trophies on a regular basis, we do not. That is the bottom line if we're honest with ourselves.

    We are not one of the big guns anymore. We are on the Spurs, Liverpool, Everton level. Clubs like this lose their players to the likes of Barca, Real , City, Chelsea and United. City would have paid more to him, and were league champions he still wasnt interested.

    I think he would have loved to finish his days here winning trophies but like many before could see we were not on that level and made the correct decision for himself and his career.

    Thats the rational view of it. Its hard not to hate him seeing him this season though, he fits in well there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,053 ✭✭✭✭L'prof


    It was Stewart Robson, he just said how we'd let players like Hleb, Fabregas, RVP go without breaking the bank for them and then when we did do it we chose "the least intelligent player out of all of them". then he says "i don't even know if the top 4 clubs (chelsea, united, city and liverpool) would pay 60k/70k a week for him on a free let alone 100k".

    i've been critical of Walcott but this lad really took the biscuit.

    I wouldn't pay any attention to Robson at all. It's hardly breaking the bloody bank either when we've got other players on similar contracts at the club!


  • Posts: 12,836 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Jaysus your man on ESPN press pass just destroyed Walcott.
    It was Stewart Robson, he just said how we'd let players like Hleb, Fabregas, RVP go without breaking the bank for them and then when we did do it we chose "the least intelligent player out of all of them". then he says "i don't even know if the top 4 clubs (chelsea, united, city and liverpool) would pay 60k/70k a week for him on a free let alone 100k".

    i've been critical of Walcott but this lad really took the biscuit.

    I've had to mute our games on ESPN in the past, his bias against us is ridiculous, makes some of our games unwatchable with him commentating.
    I didn't see the interview but based on your synopsis I'd completely agree with Robson. I'm sure the majority of fellow gunners will disagree but deep down you know Robsons right.

    Walcott has pace and a nice finish of late. He really lacks the intellegence, strength, spacial awareness and technical ability of Fab, RvP, Hleb, Ade, Nasri etc
    Seriously? Every team in the top half of the league would take him for 60/70k, ridiculous to think otherwise. City/Chelsea/Liverpool don't have wingers. Hes better than Lennon, United would take him for impact sub/Nani replacement.

    And please tell me people don't still think Nasri's good? Half a good season for us and nothing since.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,478 ✭✭✭✭gnfnrhead


    DB10 wrote: »
    If we won the Champions League last May there was no chance he would have moved to United. They are a level above us and have been for most of the last decade, they win major trophies on a regular basis, we do not. That is the bottom line if we're honest with ourselves.

    We are not one of the big guns anymore. We are on the Spurs, Liverpool, Everton level. Clubs like this lose their players to the likes of Barca, Real , City, Chelsea and United. City would have paid more to him, and were league champions he still wasnt interested.

    I think he would have loved to finish his days here winning trophies but like many before could see we were not on that level and made the correct decision for himself and his career.

    Thats the rational view of it. Its hard not to hate him seeing him this season though, he fits in well there.

    If Newcastle offered him £200,000 a week whereas everyone else was only offering £100,000 per week, he'd be a Newcastle player now despite it being a step down. The fact that United win things is secondary to the money he was offered.


  • Posts: 12,761 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    gnfnrhead wrote: »
    If Newcastle offered him £200,000 a week whereas everyone else was only offering £100,000 per week, he'd be a Newcastle player now despite it being a step down. The fact that United win things is secondary to the money he was offered.



    TBF, it was widely reported that City offered more money to RVP. He wanted trophies as well as cash...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,631 ✭✭✭batistuta9


    Anyone who thinks players are leaving Arsenal just because of money is insane


  • Site Banned Posts: 2,719 ✭✭✭DB10


    Money is just an easy excuse. Most left for trophies, or for an opportunity at a tier 1 club (Hleb, Song). I wouldnt even say Flamini left for money, AC Milan are a bigger club than us and hes half Italian. For run of the mill players like those they had to take their chances when a big offer came in.

    Adebayor strikes me as the only one who left for monetary gain. And even then its questionable. Newcastle offering RVP 200K would not have even tempted him for one second IMO. Doesnt strike me as that type of man.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,222 ✭✭✭✭Marty McFly


    DB10 wrote: »
    Money is just an easy excuse. Most left for trophies, or for an opportunity at a tier 1 club (Hleb, Song). I wouldnt even say Flamini left for money, AC Milan are a bigger club than us and hes half Italian. For run of the mill players like those they had to take their chances when a big offer came in.

    Adebayor strikes me as the only one who left for monetary gain. And even then its questionable. Newcastle offering RVP 200K would not have even tempted him for one second IMO. Doesnt strike me as that type of man.


    Hleb left when we were still considered title challengers and one the top teams ;), Song well from what Ive read was basically told he was getting sold ;), when Flamini left after we had just lost a Champions League Final we are one of the top clubs in Eurpope were just not performing that way lately lets not discount our history as a club because of the current situation Arsenal are one of the biggest clubs in the world.

    As for RVP of coarse he left for money as soon he released that statement he was basically whoring himself around on purpose by sounding out publicly that statement basically making his position at the club unattainable. He was just left with the two Manchester clubs because neither of the Spanish giants had a need for him, Juventus havent got the spending power these days which left him with the two Manchester clubs both willing to pay him 200k plus.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,608 ✭✭✭✭cson


    As much as I hate the ****er, and I really do, he moved as much to win trophies as for the money imo. And its grating that he's being proved right this season.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,053 ✭✭✭✭L'prof


    cson wrote: »
    As much as I hate the ****er, and I really do, he moved as much to win trophies as for the money imo. And its grating that he's being proved right this season.

    He moved to United where he's almost guaranteed at least one trophy every season. We hadn't won any in 7 when he left and he's 29 now, it was a no brainier really. We'll come good eventually, but it's a bit unfair to ask a player to sacrifice his career for our future success.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 196 ✭✭no12


    We are being linked this morning with Florian Thauvin https://twitter.com/deadlinedaylive/status/292536853893107713

    Not the signing we are all hoping for another one under the "promising" heading. Though if he turns out to be anything like Cabaye I'd be happy with that


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,783 ✭✭✭emergingstar


    Can't wait till Jack Wilshere walks up a lifts a throphy
    And we can forget about evey Cnut that left us.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,783 ✭✭✭emergingstar


    no12 wrote: »
    We are being linked this morning with Florian Thauvin https://twitter.com/deadlinedaylive/status/292536853893107713

    Not the signing we are all hoping for another one under the "promising" heading. Though if he turns out to be anything like Cabaye I'd be happy with that

    Seen the links never heard if the player is he any good


  • Users Awaiting Email Confirmation Posts: 15,001 ✭✭✭✭Pepe LeFrits


    I didn't see the interview but based on your synopsis I'd completely agree with Robson. I'm sure the majority of fellow gunners will disagree but deep down you know Robsons right.
    No, I really don't.

    Walcott would get what he's getting here at any of the other big clubs.
    Walcott has pace and a nice finish of late. He really lacks the intellegence, strength, spacial awareness and technical ability of Fab, RvP, Hleb, Ade, Nasri etc
    He also lacks the aerial ability of Vermaelen and the shot-stopping ability of Chesney. So what?

    At any rate, the key point here is that all of those lads forced moves out of the club... and it isn't like we didn't reward them with contracts. Adebayor got a big one the summer before he left, Cesc got a rise without an extension, as did Nasri.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 560 ✭✭✭andrew241983


    Clockenders blog say the 30 million bud was to a German club and that goetze has a 30 million buyout clause.. So take from it what you want bud it would be an excellent signing for arsenal


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 560 ✭✭✭andrew241983


    DB10 wrote: »
    12 days left no transfer links. 2 quality signings needed for me, I cant see where they are coming from.

    Do we ever see where they're coming from?? Have a little faith


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,478 ✭✭✭✭gnfnrhead


    Clockenders blog say the 30 million bud was to a German club and that goetze has a 30 million buyout clause.. So take from it what you want bud it would be an excellent signing for arsenal

    Surely if it's only £30m a ton of other clubs would have already bid for him? Would be an amazing signing but I'd be surprised if his buyout clause was that low and yet to be triggered.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 196 ✭✭no12



    Seen the links never heard if the player is he any good

    Don't know anything about him he's no Goetze that much I do know


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,783 ✭✭✭emergingstar


    no12 wrote: »

    Don't know anything about him he's no Goetze that much I do know

    I'm not to bothered about names, as long as he is ready for the first team now, we will give him a chance anyway


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,300 ✭✭✭HazDanz


    I'm not to bothered about names, as long as he is ready for the first team now, we will give him a chance anyway

    Well if the newcastle scouts are sniffing around him he probable is a goodin. They've been pretty good at finding talent the last few years.

    Like you are saying if he can do a job for the team that's the main thing.

    I do think we will sign one big player this window, but it'll probable be on the last day with minutes only to spare.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,828 ✭✭✭gosplan


    People need to lay off the Walcott hate.

    1: Young - 130k pw, Nani 90k pw, Nasri - 173k pw, Downing 70k pw, Milner - over 100K pw. (this is all just taken from google btw, can't vouch for it's exactitude). It's fiar to say based on that that Walcott is worth 100K pw. Maybe he doesn't deserve to be our highest earner but he'd make 100K is he went, for sure.

    2: Of the ten games Walcott has started in the premiership this season, he's scored or assisted in 7 of them. that's a pretty good contribution.

    3: This flat track bully stuff is rubbish. They said the same about Henry and Ronaldo and in a way they were right. If your main asset is speed, then playing against Paul McShane is a better prospect than playing Ashley Cole. It's fairly straightforward really.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,393 ✭✭✭Ed Winchester


    Stewart Robson should just be flat ignored by Arsenal fans. He's a bitter man with a bitter agenda. He has zero credibility as a pundit.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 560 ✭✭✭andrew241983


    gosplan wrote: »
    People need to lay off the Walcott hate.

    1: Young - 130k pw, Nani 90k pw, Nasri - 173k pw, Downing 70k pw, Milner - over 100K pw. (this is all just taken from google btw, can't vouch for it's exactitude). It's fiar to say based on that that Walcott is worth 100K pw. Maybe he doesn't deserve to be our highest earner but he'd make 100K is he went, for sure.

    2: Of the ten games Walcott has started in the premiership this season, he's scored or assisted in 7 of them. that's a pretty good contribution.

    3: This flat track bully stuff is rubbish. They said the same about Henry and Ronaldo and in a way they were right. If your main asset is speed, then playing against Paul McShane is a better prospect than playing Ashley Cole. It's fairly straightforward really.

    Ye but the two players you named in part 3 had a lot of skill and great football brains. They didnt just kick and run which is what Walcott tries to do 95% of the time. And even If Ronaldo and Henry didnt have their speed they would still get more goals than theo because they have the brain... As what was said before Walcott is an Olympic sprinter who threw on a pair of boots.. But I still hope he does what he is paid 100k a week to do against Chelsea


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,629 ✭✭✭wonga77


    Walcott was right to get what is best for him financially. However he has set himself up for alot of abuse if things dont go his way. The very first ball he doesnt control or shot that he skies 30 ft over the bar are going to lead to the inevitable taunts from some sections. I hope he has a good game tomorrow


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,752 ✭✭✭Mr Blobby


    Clockenders blog say the 30 million bud was to a German club and that goetze has a 30 million buyout clause.. So take from it what you want bud it would be an excellent signing for arsenal

    Don't see that being true.

    Mainly because Gotze just signed a new contract. So there would be no way Dortmund would be stupid enough to leave a buyout clause at only 30mill.

    I still say its Lewandowski.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 560 ✭✭✭andrew241983


    wonga77 wrote: »
    Walcott was right to get what is best for him financially. However he has set himself up for alot of abuse if things dont go his way. The very first ball he doesnt control or shot that he skies 30 ft over the bar are going to lead to the inevitable taunts from some sections. I hope he has a good game tomorrow

    So do I but chances are if he plays well tomorrow and scores we won't see him do anything for the 4 games after that.. I hope I'm wrong but past experience has shown that's what will happen


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,783 ✭✭✭emergingstar


    If Walcott sees out his contract he will be able to have a testimonial, least he showed a bit of loyalty


  • Advertisement
  • Administrators, Computer Games Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 32,704 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Mickeroo


    Chamakh 13/2 first goalscorer for West Ham, he's starting too. Easy money. :pac:


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement