Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Boards Division 6 Thread

13468940

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,514 BigBadRob83
    ✭✭✭


    Anyone interested in trading WR's?

    Could do a 2-for-1 from Randall Cobb/Brandon Lloyd/Torrey Smith for an elite receiver.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,012 BizzyC
    ✭✭✭


    CJC86 wrote: »
    Anyone interested in Calvin Johnson? I'm willing to hear offers.

    I could give up Stephens-Howling and Jeremy Kerley?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,012 BizzyC
    ✭✭✭


    Hi Guys,

    looks like we've had incorrect scoring set up for QB's throwing ints.
    Checking versus the charter, if I have to update the setting it will retrospectively change results to fall in line.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,012 BizzyC
    ✭✭✭


    Not going to change the setting, leavin results as are.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,514 BigBadRob83
    ✭✭✭


    Sorry about that guys, must have missed that one when setting up the league


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,514 BigBadRob83
    ✭✭✭


    Myself and CJC86 agreed a trade and put it through on Tuesday
    Tony Romo & Vick Ballard for Rashad Jennings & Jay Cutler.
    Ballard and Jennings both playing Thursday night, and site says trade won't process until Friday morning so not sure how the site is going to handle this.

    There have been no votes against it, so is there any way we can push it through before tonight's game to make sure that it goes through?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,012 BizzyC
    ✭✭✭


    Yeah, that is a bit harsh.

    Not sure how to get around it though.
    There's no options available to me to let it pass ahead of tonight.
    Even if I turn off the trade review period temporarily, it'll only be effective tomorrow morning.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,514 BigBadRob83
    ✭✭✭


    BizzyC wrote: »
    Yeah, that is a bit harsh.

    Not sure how to get around it though.
    There's no options available to me to let it pass ahead of tonight.
    Even if I turn off the trade review period temporarily, it'll only be effective tomorrow morning.

    Can go into people's teams and add/drop the players using the MANAGE function, commish add/drops overrule waivers etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 360 CJC86
    ✭✭


    BizzyC wrote: »
    Yeah, that is a bit harsh.

    Not sure how to get around it though.
    There's no options available to me to let it pass ahead of tonight.
    Even if I turn off the trade review period temporarily, it'll only be effective tomorrow morning.

    I just had a look there to see why the trade was scheduled to go through on Friday rather than Thursday, and I think it's because you messed around with the setting on Wednesday. Hopefully it won't affect the game between myself and Rob this week, but you shouldn't go messing with trade settings while a trade is happening.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,306 Guffy
    ✭✭✭


    Shouldn't be messing around with trade settings during the season at all. Also was there a change to waiver wire?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,012 BizzyC
    ✭✭✭


    Dont worry, wont be.

    No change to waiver, has been set to a 2 day period from day 1, hasn't been touched.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 385 deise_boi
    ✭✭


    Forgot to set my line-up before 6 :( Left Dez on the bench and he would've had the victory for me. Disaster!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,012 BizzyC
    ✭✭✭


    CJC86 wrote: »
    I just had a look there to see why the trade was scheduled to go through on Friday rather than Thursday, and I think it's because you messed around with the setting on Wednesday. Hopefully it won't affect the game between myself and Rob this week, but you shouldn't go messing with trade settings while a trade is happening.

    Effective date on the trade was Friday before I took a look at settings and friday afterwards.

    Could be the fact that two of the players involved had a Thursday game that pushed it another day.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,514 BigBadRob83
    ✭✭✭


    Below is note on the fantasy site for the trade:

    "Accepted Trade: Greystones Mariners and The Islanders pending until the morning of Friday, November 9, 2012. Note that if a player involved in the transaction has already completed his game for the week, the trade will process Tuesday of the following week"

    Wouldn't have gone through until Tuesday anyway, unless commish had over-ridden


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,012 BizzyC
    ✭✭✭


    This league is getting tight...

    After this week I reckon Chain Reactions will be 9-2, with 3 teams at 8-3 and a few more at 7-4.
    It's going to be tough to come out with a top 4 place for promotion.
    Especially with the trend of form my team has been on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 360 CJC86
    ✭✭


    Barring a very surprising run of results, I've been knocked out of contention for the playoffs at this point. It's unfortunate because I'm on a run of 2 tough losses; I would have beaten 13 of the 15 teams last week, and 9 of the 15 this week. My team is looking quite strong, but it'll be no use to me sitting outside looking in on the playoffs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,012 BizzyC
    ✭✭✭


    Top 6 will get you in the playoffs...
    There are very few teams without a legitamite chance of making them.

    As long as some of the 5-5 teams lose this week, you'll still be in contention.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,306 Guffy
    ✭✭✭


    With the top 4 being promoted is it possible for the div 6 champ not to be one of those? What I mean is is it possible for the sixth seed in playoffs to get promoted by reaching the semi's or is it the top four league positions before the playoffs?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,012 BizzyC
    ✭✭✭


    I's the final top 4, as in the semi-finalists.

    Top 2 seeds get automatic promotion since they get a bye, 3-6th have a playoff to determine the other 2 spots.

    9. Promotion and relegation will take place via a '4 up 4 down' system. The 4 teams that make the semi's of the playoffs in a League will be promoted to the league above the next season. If there is inactive players in whichever division (say 2 for example) then they are removed from the league and only 2 are relegated to lower division, The four promoted then will keep that division at 16. As for the division below as only 2 are coming down and four going up there leaves a shortfall of two. This can be fixed by only relegating 2 from that division and along with the four promoted teams will keep that division at 16. This goes on all the way to the bottom division.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,504 davetherave
    ✭✭✭


    That doesn't seem right OR fair. Say the #6 team is two games behind the #3 team. They play in a quarterfinal and the #6 team wins. The #6 team is now 1 game behind and faces the #1 team in a semi final which it loses. The #6 team gets promoted even though it has a worse record?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,012 BizzyC
    ✭✭✭


    That's the way football works.

    Final standings for the year are a result of the playoffs, not of the divisional standings.

    A few years ago the Patriots won the AFC East, but lost to the Jets in the playoffs. As such the Jets finished the year ranked higher.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 95 robluvshandegg
    ✭✭


    That doesn't seem right OR fair. Say the #6 team is two games behind the #3 team. They play in a quarterfinal and the #6 team wins. The #6 team is now 1 game behind and faces the #1 team in a semi final which it loses. The #6 team gets promoted even though it has a worse record?

    2010 Wild Card Round

    New Orleans Saints (11 - 5)

    Seattle Seahawks ( 7 - 9)

    Fudged up world of the NFL and its divisional league. :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 360 CJC86
    ✭✭


    After two tough losses I decided to have a look at actual standings versus the breakdown standings (record if you played every team every week), to see how much luck of the draw factored into the standings. I'm a shocking 28.6% worse off than I would be expected to do at random.

    I did them for the whole league. Would people be interested in seeing them? (Might make you think about what's fair davetherave ;) )


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,504 davetherave
    ✭✭✭


    :o Yeah, I suppose I wasn't thinking of the real world.
    I thought it would have just been simpler to have 16 weeks of Head2Head match-ups and then when it is all said and done the teams in 1,2,3 and 4 get promoted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,012 BizzyC
    ✭✭✭


    Team did much better than expected last night, but unfortunately so did SuperChamps...

    Need Vernon Davis to out score Brandon Marshall and Michael Bush by 4 points tonight.
    Based on recent form I think I'll be lucky to get 4 points total from him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 360 CJC86
    ✭✭


    The overtimes in the early games and Andre Johnson finally putting in a big game really saved me this week. I really have the worst luck with selecting which QB to start; Romo has an average game and Schaub rips it up on my bench.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 95 robluvshandegg
    ✭✭


    BizzyC wrote: »
    Team did much better than expected last night, but unfortunately so did SuperChamps...

    Need Vernon Davis to out score Brandon Marshall and Michael Bush by 4 points tonight.
    Based on recent form I think I'll be lucky to get 4 points total from him.

    Considering I need the Bears Defense to score more than 11 points, it seems that the top 2 teams could lose in the same week!! :eek: :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 95 robluvshandegg
    ✭✭


    CJC86 wrote: »
    The overtimes in the early games and Andre Johnson finally putting in a big game really saved me this week. I really have the worst luck with selecting which QB to start; Romo has an average game and Schaub rips it up on my bench.

    I'd say your a cert for that Snickers award this week. :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 360 CJC86
    ✭✭


    I'd say your a cert for that Snickers award this week. :D

    Nah, you need to lose to get that. I've got it twice already in this league, in two really close games. :/


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,012 BizzyC
    ✭✭✭


    Wow, wasn't expectin to win that but Davis pulled it out.
    Won by a whopping 0.16 points...

    Only 2 weeks left for playoff qualification, getting tense.
    1 team at 9-2, 3 at 8-3, 4 at 6-5.

    Top 4 are pretty much locked in, question is who will get the top 2 spots with automatic promotion and who of the 6-5 teams will get a shot at promotion in the playoffs....


Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.
Advertisement