Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The Thylacine Thread

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭Adam Khor


    Were Australian thylacines killed by dingoes?

    This is a study about the comparative size of dingoes and mainland thylacines (it seems that dingoes were larger on average than female mainland thylacines but smaller than Tasmanian thylacines), and whether direct predation by dingoes may have caused or accelerated the extinction of the marsupial in Australia.

    http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0034877

    Thylacine1.jpg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    Well - Dingoes were thought to have been introduced to Australia by humans when they arrived. It is certainly possible that competition for the same food sources hurt it's population. Not sure about completely killing it off however... I'd attribute that to humans.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭Adam Khor


    dlofnep wrote: »
    Well - Dingoes were thought to have been introduced to Australia by humans when they arrived. It is certainly possible that competition for the same food sources hurt it's population. Not sure about completely killing it off however... I'd attribute that to humans.

    Same here, I seriously doubt the dingoes were the only culprits. I didn´t know Tasmanian thylacines were larger than dingoes, tho- that bit surprised me.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    The curious thing is how large Australia is, but how dependent animals are on it's coastline for survival. Had that not been the case, it probably would still be alive today - out of the reaches from humans.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭Adam Khor


    dlofnep wrote: »
    The curious thing is how large Australia is, but how dependent animals are on it's coastline for survival. Had that not been the case, it probably would still be alive today - out of the reaches from humans.

    Is there really something as "out of the reaches from humans"? :(


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    Adam Khor wrote: »
    Is there really something as "out of the reaches from humans"? :(

    Emperor penguins, and those weird fish that live in the extreme depths of the ocean. Anything else is fair game unfortunately.. :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭Adam Khor


    dlofnep wrote: »
    Emperor penguins, and those weird fish that live in the extreme depths of the ocean. Anything else is fair game unfortunately.. :(

    I think those animals even are affected by human activity too :/ The blobfish is one of those weird deep-water fish, and it seems that its endangered due to trawling. Ironically, it is endemic to Australia and Tasmania...
    raros+.+blobfish.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 510 ✭✭✭animan


    Adam Khor wrote: »

    I think those animals even are affected by human activity too :/ The blobfish is one of those weird deep-water fish, and it seems that its endangered due to trawling. Ironically, it is endemic to Australia and Tasmania...
    raros+.+blobfish.jpg

    Dont really have anything to contribute to the thread but dont think many people would mind if the blobfish died out


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    animan wrote: »
    Dont really have anything to contribute to the thread but dont think many people would mind if the blobfish died out

    I would, he's the best fish.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 510 ✭✭✭animan


    I'd say its in with a shot at ugliest animal in the world


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭Adam Khor


    animan wrote: »
    I'd say its in with a shot at ugliest animal in the world

    More than half of humanity is uglier. :P

    I personally find the fish adorable, in its own quirky way. Besides, it looks quite a lot better in its natural habitat, where it actually has a shape.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 510 ✭✭✭animan


    A shape would help I'd say


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    That fish needs some conditioner. Poor blobfish :(

    For an article that is about one species driving another to extinction, the pair in that picture in the OP sure look like they're having a grand aul time!


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 93,581 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    so far we haven't killed any species with world wide distribution , but they are relatively few and can evade us so not saying much


    did the thylacines hunt in packs or alone ?

    a pack of dogs would make short work of most similar sized predators




    angler fish are even uglier

    and what was that yoke that ate fish longer than itself , so much that they'd be found on the surface bloated by the meal that decomposed faster than it could be digested.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    so far we haven't killed any species with world wide distribution , but they are relatively few and can evade us so not saying much

    Rats, Roaches, Ravens... We'll never get them. The secret is in the R....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭Adam Khor


    did the thylacines hunt in packs or alone ?a pack of dogs would make short work of most similar sized predators

    As far as I know, they were loners, although this may actually have been due to their low numbers- some hunters said that thylacines would sometimes work cooperatively to drive prey into an ambush, and captive thylacines were extremely docile and even tolerated children well, much like dogs, which has led some to believe that they may have lived in family groups or wolf-like packs (that is, a breeding pair aided by non-breeding relatives). This may have been the case in mainland Australia or even in Tasmania before the thylacines were decimated- eventually they were so rare that they had more trouble to find a mate.

    But even as loners it seems they did defend themselves succesfully against dogs- there are recorded cases of them killing attacking dogs. It was guns, poison and snares that finished them eventually.
    and what was that yoke that ate fish longer than itself , so much that they'd be found on the surface bloated by the meal that decomposed faster than it could be digested.

    That would be the Black Swallower:

    black_swallower.jpg


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 93,581 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    yeah that's the greedy little critter

    judging by the angle thylacines could open their mouths they might have a similar MO. to sabre toothed cats ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭Adam Khor


    yeah that's the greedy little critter

    judging by the angle thylacines could open their mouths they might have a similar MO. to sabre toothed cats ?

    Hardly... the reason why sabertooths could open their jaws that much is because of the extreme length of the fangs which couldn´t be used properly without a very wide gape. In the case of the thylacine, it has been said once and again that it killed by "crushing the skull". The teeth were blunt and more apt for crushing than slashing- and there's a rather gory report of a thylacine killing a dog like that:

    ""A bull terrier once set upon a Wolf and bailed it up in a niche in some rocks. There the Wolf stood with its back to the wall, turning its head from side to side, checking the terrier as it tried to butt in from alternate and opposite directions. Finally the dog came in close and the Wolf gave one sharp, fox-like bite, tearing a piece of the dog’s skull clean off, and it fell with the brain protruding, dead."

    So I suposse
    the wide gape would probably help them "grab" the entire skull of even their largest prey for a crushing bite.
    Then again, other marsupials such as opossums and the Tasmanian devil also can open their jaws very wide...
    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQgIsbib6dpDGv3sjQe0hma3Uw98pd7vVk_MrLn4gUUqoLIzQDZ

    Tasmanian_tiger.jpg

    Thylacine_gape.jpg

    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSiGB7xe17RjwKMQ9GYGhYwahion5F31P8buMP-Kje4IZtw68wpqg

    Tasmanian devil:

    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRCYp1_lAILk5W6_5l0zR-lcXyuXGCsp17wE_r9AwKDiBdNtGX6Cg

    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRIeE-WdKisatzasEEZlatWK_E201sfgaMdNP0wqSHe4vmeKYnf_Q



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    Good post Adam. I have nothing really to say though, except...
    Adam Khor wrote: »
    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSiGB7xe17RjwKMQ9GYGhYwahion5F31P8buMP-Kje4IZtw68wpqg

    That picture is frigging hilarious! :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    Hope they do find it, but alas, I feel it is to late for the thylacine...


  • Administrators, Computer Games Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 32,530 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Mickeroo


    Galvasean wrote: »
    Hope they do find it, but alas, I feel it is to late for the thylacine...

    Hey, if there's giant polar bears wandering the himalayas I'm not ruling anything out from now on :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,551 ✭✭✭Rubecula


    I am afraid I agree with Galvasean on this. It would be wonderful but in my own opinion so unlikely it is as close to impossible as you can get. As much chance of finding a stegosaurus on your front lawn.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭Adam Khor


    Rubecula wrote: »
    I am afraid I agree with Galvasean on this. It would be wonderful but in my own opinion so unlikely it is as close to impossible as you can get. As much chance of finding a stegosaurus on your front lawn.

    I do think it's unlikely, but not THAT unlikely...


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,217 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Tasmania is a big place with a lot of wild regions, rarely visited by people, so it's possible. I don't doubt a few survived the official last one in the zoo, but for how long and whether they're still around is up in the air.

    That all said, I'd not just look in Tasmania. IIRC they existed in mainland Australia in the past, up until Europeans showed up, though small in number, so there may be a hidden population there. Another place they may still survive is in New Guinea.

    Here's an interesting clip by a Spanish wildlife film crew back in the 90's and one ye've maybe not seen before. Shot in Australia. They thought "dingo" at first, but it looks odd for a dingo. Sadly no shots of it's back, but the head looks very strange for a dog.
    Go to around 45 seconds for the clip.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭Adam Khor


    I watched the video like this :eek:

    But then I thought there was something just way too canid about the creature. I don´t think it's a thylacine at all.

    Here's a still from the video you linked to, with the animal looking at the camera, along with a still from an actual thylacine from another video:

    thylacine.jpg?noCache=1383653874

    Even considering that the animal in the Spanish video is apparently mangy, I think the shape of the head is different, and it has smaller eyes and larger ears proportionally than the thylacine's. It looks too canid to me... maybe a fox? (I think they're an important pest in Tasmania as well as in Australia?)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,204 ✭✭✭dodderangler


    Looking at a program about the sightings of chupacabra and the description and the body of the animal that was knocked down looks a lot like a thylacine.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,024 ✭✭✭Owryan


    As much as i would love to see a population being discovered. Wouldnt a small population mean more inbreeding and all the defects that come with it ? So would their gene pool even be viable for IVF if science wanted to increase their numbers.

    Besides the worst possible outcome if they are re discovered could well be man trying to interfere with them .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭Adam Khor


    Looking at a program about the sightings of chupacabra and the description and the body of the animal that was knocked down looks a lot like a thylacine.

    Guess I know what you mean; those "chupacabras" are mangy canids (coyotes, coyote-dog hybrids etc) and without their bushy tails they do look a bit like the thylacine although they're rather unfortunate looking...
    Owryan wrote: »
    As much as i would love to see a population being discovered. Wouldnt a small population mean more inbreeding and all the defects that come with it ? So would their gene pool even be viable for IVF if science wanted to increase their numbers.

    Besides the worst possible outcome if they are re discovered could well be man trying to interfere with them .

    Guess ur right... if they are indeed out there, they must be few and near extinction all the same. But I bet any zoo would love to keep one, and maybe they could be used to attract attention of the public to the situation of other endangered animals... I bet they would be safer in a zoo than in the wild these days...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭Adam Khor




  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,217 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Crossing all my digits.... I would love to know they were still out there, somewhere. Though I'd add places like New Guinea to the list. Apparently local tribes have said they've seen them when shown pictures.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭Adam Khor


    Indeed, they call it "dobsegna". And New Guinea was home to other interesting species in prehistoric times. Wouldn´t it be cool if they found, say, a Protemnodon tumbuna, aka short-legged, non-hopping, rainforest-dwelling kangaroo? 
    68388ac4e38418dae4dfb32403458354.jpg
    (Weirdly, the tall guy is also a Protemnodon, except from a species that could hop AND was taller than a man).


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,217 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Adam Khor wrote: »
    Indeed, they call it "dobsegna".
    You know, I just knew you would know the name involved. #bows

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭Adam Khor


    Interesting paper on the pre-Pleistocene fossil record of thylacinids and how the Tasmanian tiger/wolf came to be:

    https://peerj.com/articles/7457/

    fig-5-1x.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭Adam Khor


    Although not new (it was found in 1966), as far as I can tell this spectacular find is little known and seldom mentioned. The thylacine remains have been preserved in an Australian cave for 4000 to 5000 years!

    nullarbor.jpg

    The-mainland-thylacine-of-Australia-This-mummified-carcase-was-found-in-a-cave-on-the.png

    http://www.naturalworlds.org/thylacine/palaeontology/prehistoric/prehistoric_range_4.htm

    The specimen is very interesting because its from a mainland thylacine- which went extinct before the Tasmanian population, shortly after the introduction of the dingo by humans.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭Adam Khor


    Can we really clone the thylacine?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭Adam Khor


    Previously unknown, preserved thylacine pelt discovered in New Zealand:

    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-08-29/tasmanian-tiger-thylacine-colourful-pelt-from-nz-reveals/12597682

    9246960-3x2-xlarge.jpg?v=6

    12597464-3x2-xlarge.jpg?v=2


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,904 Mod ✭✭✭✭igCorcaigh




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭Adam Khor


    igCorcaigh wrote: »

    Hopefully will turn out to be true, but I am very cautious about this. Tasmania has high roadkill incidence. It would beg the question of how thylacines went for so long without ever being hit by a car...


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,217 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    https://twitter.com/s_maunder/status/1364080020877053954

    Sadly it appears to be misidentification. I still reckon if any are around it'll be in somewhere like New Guinea where they roamed once and is far less crowded with people and roads etc.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭Adam Khor


    Wibbs wrote: »
    https://twitter.com/s_maunder/status/1364080020877053954

    Sadly it appears to be misidentification. I still reckon if any are around it'll be in somewhere like New Guinea where they roamed once and is far less crowded with people and roads etc.

    I agree.

    Meanwhile, a bit overshadowed by the thylacine fiasco, the black browed babbler (Malacocincla perspiscillata) a bird thought extinct for 180 years has just been rediscovered alive. That's abour 100 years longer than the thylacine's been officially extinct!
    It was previously known only from a specimen collected in Borneo in the 19th century:

    464px--Naturalis_Biodiversity_Center_-_RMNH.AVES.89412_-_Malacocincla_perspicillata_%28Bonaparte%2C_1850%29_-_Black-browed_Babbler_-_specimen_-_video.webm.jpg

    The live bird:

    _117311722_mediaitem117311491.jpg


Advertisement