Half-baked Republican Presidential Fruitcakes (and fellow confections)

King Mob

Galvasean wrote: »

Run_to_da_hills, do you think 'Obamacare' make healthcare in America better or worse? Your picture postings suggest the latter, but I'd like to see some reasoning behind them if you have the time?

RtdH believes that Obama is the antichrist and that he plans to implant everyone with RFID chips as per biblical prophesy.
There is no reasoning behind it.

Corkfeen

Galvasean wrote: »

Run_to_da_hills, do you think 'Obamacare' make healthcare in America better or worse? Your picture postings suggest the latter, but I'd like to see some reasoning behind them if you have the time?

He believes that it's a plot by Obama(who is the devil or something) to put microchips in all Americans to constantly monitor them. I'm seriously not making this up.... :pac: Also some ill conceived Hitler comparisons and right wing propoganda which is where the pictures tend to come from.

This seems appropriate...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uVRl8prQawY

robindch

Penn wrote: »

Have you ever agreed with anything anyone has ever said anywhere?

I'd be interested to know if jank has ever held a conversation with anybody.

jank wrote: »

You mean posting childish youtube clips or images from the left gets you in the cool gang, while doing the same from the right gets you the above tap on the shoulder.

Paranoid conspiracy gags, or at least, things that are supposed to be funny in the PCT world, are best kept and enjoyed most in the PCT forum. Why deprive everybody there of that kind of stuff? Go for it!

jank

Penn wrote: »

Have you ever agreed with anything anyone has ever said anywhere?

Yes.

jank

Galvasean wrote: »

But does he ever give a solid reason as to why this man, a war veteran, deserves less rights than himself? The answer is simply no. Repeating, "I believe marriage is between a man and a woman" in no way justifies not giving gay people the same rights afforded to straight people. That's what ticked the vet off. While he appreciated that Romney answered his question truthfully, he was annoyed that Romney (or indeed anyone) couldn't explain a legitimate reason as to why he is not entitled to the same rights as everyone else. "I believe marriage is between a man and a woman" does not explain why gay people should have less rights.

The answer is right there in black and white. It may not be to your satisfaction but it is an answer. Legitimacy is all subjective in this case. By all means dissagree with him, I know I do but not sure what the use is banging on the drum.

jank

robindch wrote: »

I'd be interested to know if jank has ever held a conversation with anybody.Paranoid conspiracy gags, or at least, things that are supposed to be funny in the PCT world, are best kept and enjoyed most in the PCT forum. Why deprive everybody there of that kind of stuff? Go for it!

Which Paranoid Conspiracy gags are here? Lizard men? fake moon landings? Elvis is still alive?

robindch

jank wrote: »

Which Paranoid Conspiracy gags are here? Lizard men? fake moon landings? Elvis is still alive?

Have a look at rtth's gag again - black-suited policemen, new world order logo, skeletons, sick elderly, crying children, Obama laughing over the lot. As before, I've no idea why this could be considered funny, but perhaps over in PCT it is.

/shrugs

The Mad Hatter

jank wrote: »

The answer is right there in black and white. It may not be to your satisfaction but it is an answer. Legitimacy is all subjective in this case. By all means dissagree with him, I know I do but not sure what the use is banging on the drum.

You can't disagree with a person's opinion, but a politician shouldn't run on their opinion anyway. Politicians are supposed to represent their constituents. The answer to "why am I not entitled to the same rights?" Should not begin with "Because I believe…"

jank

Well I dont find it funny either but I understand the sentiment behind it, the fear of a government mandate in dictating health care provisions. However as I said, two sides of the same coin here.

jank

The Mad Hatter wrote: »

You can't disagree with a person's opinion, but a politician shouldn't run on their opinion anyway. Politicians are supposed to represent their constituents. The answer to "why am I not entitled to the same rights?" Should not begin with "Because I believe…"

Romney is the GOP nomination for president. You do know what the GOP's stance on Gay marriage is right? So what the hell are you saying other than building a strawman.

Corkfeen

Just read this article that was posted in the Politics forum about how Romney's firm Bain operated and it's rather shoddy record of rescuing companies that it had ruined....

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/greed-and-debt-the-true-story-of-mitt-romney-and-bain-capital-20120829

joseph brand

Sarah 'mad as a box of frogs' Palin can't understand how John Kerry could possibly have heard of her, or know her name.

“I think he diminished himself by even mentioning my name,” Palin said. “How does he even know my name? I mean aren’t these guys supposed to be these big wig elites who don’t waste their time on the little people like me — me representing the average American.”

It's not like she ran for VP or anything. She's still got her 'folksy charm', "you betcha!", but her head looks plastic. Like one of the Thunderbirds.

She represents the mentally lazy.

"I learned my kids all they knows". S. Palin

The Mad Hatter

jank wrote: »

Romney is the GOP nomination for president. You do know what the GOP's stance on Gay marriage is right? So what the hell are you saying other than building a strawman.

How about a reason rather than an opinion?

Run_to_da_hills

Galvasean wrote: »

Run_to_da_hills, do you think 'Obamacare' make healthcare in America better or worse? Your picture postings suggest the latter, but I'd like to see some reasoning behind them if you have the time?

Yes socialised medicine is a good thing but before any decisions are made one must study the small print and possible trade offs.

You will not get much of this mentioned in main stream media on the breakdown and possible implications of Obamacare.

One in particular worrying possibility would be the Federal Government’s proposed health insurance will mean mandatory vaccinations/immunizations.

The Center for Disease Control (CDC) says that for anyone who refuses to keep up-to-date vaccinations, under the new health reform, you will not be able to obtain any health care you may need until immunizations are current.

King Mob wrote: »

RtdH believes that Obama is the antichrist and that he plans to implant everyone with RFID chips as per biblical prophesy.
There is no reasoning behind it.

Yes indeed and as far fetched and apocalyptic it may seem, Obama has made provisions for a class 3 device in the Senate Healthcare bill HR3200. The Obama administration is also the first Government in US history to even consider the topic

H.R. 3200 section 2521, Pg. 1001, paragraph 1. The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that— ‘‘is or has been used in or on a patient; ‘‘and is— ‘‘a class III device; or ‘‘a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining.”

http://polidics.com/news/another-hidden-secret-in-obamacare-rfid-chip-implants.html

robindch wrote: »

Have a look at rtth's gag again - black-suited policemen, new world order logo, skeletons, sick elderly, crying children, Obama laughing over the lot. As before, I've no idea why this could be considered funny, but perhaps over in PCT it is. /shrugs

The situation is in America is becoming more apparent by the day, We are hearing of arrests and people getting interrogated over social network blogging and this prior to any known NDAA cases. Under current executive orders People can now be arrested and detained indefinitely without charge. No different to the 70's internment without trial in Northern Ireland.

The Department of Homeland security Ramps Up To Subdue And Kill Americans.



Look at the size of these trucks, they make PSNI Land-rovers look like Tonka toys. These will soon be a common site across the streets of america.

Galvasean

jank wrote: »

The answer is right there in black and white. It may not be to your satisfaction but it is an answer. Legitimacy is all subjective in this case. By all means dissagree with him,

Despite your protests the stock answer, "I believe marriage is between a man and a woman" still does not explain why gay couples should have less rights than gay ones, particularly in relation to the rights cited specifically by the vet in the video.

jank wrote: »

I know I do but not sure what the use is banging on the drum.

Grand so. We should never talk about anything ever again. In the spirit of leading by example, you go first.

King Mob

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Yes indeed and as far fetched and apocalyptic it may seem, Obama has made provisions for a class 3 device in the Senate Healthcare bill HR3200. The Obama administration is also the first Government in US history to even consider the topic

H.R. 3200 section 2521, Pg. 1001, paragraph 1. The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that— ‘‘is or has been used in or on a patient; ‘‘and is— ‘‘a class III device; or ‘‘a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining.”

http://polidics.com/news/another-hidden-secret-in-obamacare-rfid-chip-implants.html

Listen RtdH, you really shouldn't post your nonsense here if you're not going to defend it.
It's been repeatedly shown to you why this claim you are making is simply not true. It's clearly not true to any with the barest levels of reading comprehension.

No one here is stupid enough to buy your propaganda, especially since it's based on something as silly as your interpretation of the Bible.

Run_to_da_hills

King Mob wrote: »

Listen RtdH, you really shouldn't post your nonsense here if you're not going to defend it.

The best defence is Google.

I wouldn't exactly recommend looking up FOX news or BBC websites for information concerning Obama's NDAA indefinite internment without trial or 3200 section 2521 in relation to Class 3 implantable devices.

King Mob wrote: »

It's been repeatedly shown to you why this claim you are making is simply not true. It's clearly not true to any with the barest levels of reading comprehension.

No one here is stupid enough to buy your propaganda, especially since it's based on something as silly as your interpretation of the Bible.

I would agree with you that David DEE clip art is Propaganda because it shows a skeleton in a waiting room, people getting sick everywhere, military police, CCTV and a triangle with an eye in it.

The picture with the clown in the operating theatre could possibly true if there are any allegations that Obamacare bears resemblance to Adolph Hitler T4 programme, there again people can Google this up and see for themselves.

King Mob

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

The best defence is Google.

I wouldn't exactly recommend looking up FOX news or BBC websites for information concerning Obama's NDAA indefinite internment without trial or 3200 section 2521 in relation to Class 3 implantable devices.

That's because that only exists in your head. Or more likely the head of whatever crank you're copy pasting from.

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

I would agree with you that David DEE is Propaganda because it shows a skeleton in a waiting room, military police, CCTV and a triangle with an eye in it.

The picture with the clown in the operating theatre could possibly true if there are any allegations that Obamacare bears resemblance to Adolph Hitler T4 programme, there again people can Google this up and see for themselves.

You realise that propaganda is bad right? That it's fundamentally dishonest and manipulative?
Or is it ok because that propaganda happens to agree with you?

Run_to_da_hills

King Mob wrote: »

You realise that propaganda is bad right? That it's fundamentally dishonest and manipulative?
Or is it ok because that propaganda happens to agree with you?

No worse than the dishonesty and dirty lies we get from politicians.

joseph brand

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

No worse than the dishonesty and dirty lies we get from politicians.

Hey! You leave Romney Ryan outta this!

Run_to_da_hills

joseph brand wrote: »

Hey! You leave Romney Ryan outta this!

All politics are the same.

I had to laugh at this one.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QkOluULXTGw

joseph brand

Republican Rep. Roscoe Bartlett of Maryland believes that federal student loans could possibly lead to...the Holocaust?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dyeBrwoHfB8

King Mob

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

No worse than the dishonesty and dirty lies we get from politicians.

It's worse than even the most underhanded stuff you imagine that "they" are using.
So why do you use it?

Gumbi

King Mob wrote: »

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

No worse than the dishonesty and dirty lies we get from politicians.

It's worse than even the most underhanded stuff you imagine that "they" are using.
So why do you use it?

It's worse by definition - the very fact that politicians ARE underhanded demonstrates it's superiority to propaganda.

Corkfeen

Good to see that he finally admitted that he's posting propaganda. :pac:

Hotblack Desiato

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

One in particular worrying possibility would be the Federal Government’s proposed health insurance will mean mandatory vaccinations/immunizations.

Good. This is an area where the free riders benefit from what everyone else does, while simultaneously endangering those who do the right thing.

robindch

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

One in particular worrying possibility would be the Federal Government’s proposed health insurance will mean mandatory vaccinations/immunizations. The Center for Disease Control (CDC) says that for anyone who refuses to keep up-to-date vaccinations, under the new health reform, you will not be able to obtain any health care you may need until immunizations are current.

Well, if they're mandatory, then you can't refuse. That's what the word "mandatory" means.

Otherwise, well, do you write for The Onion?

http://www.theonion.com/articles/obama-help-us-destroy-jesus-and-start-a-new-age-of,29478/

The Onion wrote:

Obama: 'Help Us Destroy Jesus And Start A New Age Of Liberal Darkness'

CHARLOTTE, NC—With the savage roar of the heathen Democratic horde rising all around him, President Barack Obama delivered an incendiary speech to close his party’s national convention Thursday night, commanding the ultraprogressive minions in attendance to help him “destroy Jesus and usher in a new age of liberal darkness that shall reign o’er the earth for a thousand years.”

The thunderous 45-minute address—during which the president argued for a second term so that he could “finally kill Jesus once and for all, as well as all those who worship him”—was well received by the frenzied, wild-eyed audience, whose piercing chants of “Four more years!” and “Slaughter the believers!” echoed throughout the Time Warner Cable Arena.

“My fellow Americans and godless infidels, I command you to join me as we cast an endless pall of far-left evil across the hills and valleys of our nation!” Obama bellowed from the stage, as thousands in attendance moaned in compliance and gyrated their hips and groins in a lascivious dance. “Together, as a barbarian people forged by the wicked flames of irreligiosity and united by visions of a liberal dystopia, we will rise up as one to scorch the earth with boundless amorality.”

“The streets shall run red with the blood of forced sodomy, performed daily upon every American man, woman, and child!” the commander-in-chief shouted, froth forming around his mouth as the crowd threw hundreds of aborted fetuses onto the stage. “Die, Christians, die!”

Slamming his fists on the lectern until his hands began to bleed, Obama proceeded to lay out a “three-point plan of sin and lechery” for his second term. If reelected, the president said, he would begin by banning organized religion entirely—starting with Christianity—and burning all churches to the ground, preferably “with their wretched, Jesus-loving congregants still huddled inside like rats.”

As members of the audience violently tugged at their genitals and howled like sex-starved, atheist wolves, Obama stated that his administration would then seek to make free, taxpayer-funded abortions legal at any stage of pregnancy, even up to one full year after birth, in order to supply his newly created “federal stem-cell harvesting plants” with raw materials.

In addition, the cackling president vowed to “end traditional marriage as we know it” by passing legislation that would allow only homosexuals to raise children, a longtime Democratic policy goal.

“A glorious new age of sinister, unconstrained liberalism is dawning! Oh, dear Satan, I can feel it coursing through my veins at this very moment!” shrieked Obama, ripping off his shirt to reveal an ornate tattoo of a pentagram, with a different homosexual act positioned at each of the star’s five points. “Agnosticism, contempt for human life, and radical sexual experimentation shall rule the day! Any good, virtuous, family-values-oriented Christian Americans who seek to topple our magnificent liberal kingdom of eternal darkness will be powerless to stop us! We will crush them!”

Added Obama, “Thank you, may Satan reward you all, and may God tremble in fear at the United States of America!”

The president was then handed an unbaptized, orphaned newborn baby drenched in the blood of 666 slaughtered Christians, which he handed over to its new, gleefully squealing homosexual parents.

lynski

ok, for a moment leaving aside that on this forum most people believe most religious beliefs are total codswollop, can someone please tell me when mormons became electable? I am having a really big problem getting my head around how someone who is a mormon can be elected dog-catcher nevermind anything else.
I know most beliefs are totally risible, but the LDS beliefs are nuts, a layer of extra crunchy nuttiness untop of standard christian nuts and they are a recognised cult too. How can someone who is a former bishop of a a cult and only stepped aside from his 'ministry' for his political career be considered in anyway sane enough to run anything?
What am i missing here?

Gbear

Surely as soon as Obama and Romney are seen side by side in a debate people will see what a lying, hypocritical flip-flopper Romney is?

It's going to be the cringe comedy hit of the autumn.

I mean, Obama is going to have plenty to defend himself on and having to dance around saying he made mistakes (because if a politician does that the droolers all assume that that means he's completely incompetent) but Romney has absolutely nothing. No leg to stand on.

It works in the Republican convention because it's a circle jerk and nobody tests him. As soon as he gets attacked I think he'll just crumble.

Pretty sure even as it is now that someone without up-to-date vaccinations will get "punished" if it comes to light. I've got philosophical and economic reasons for not liking government involvement in healthcare but in America my main problem with what they've done is that it doesn't go far enough. In the last 3 years I've very, very rarely heard an any way logical argument against "Obamacare" from a politician, it's all half-truths and scaremongering.