When atheists go too far

Canis Lupus · 13-06-2011 10:06pm

Mark200 wrote: »

Ah that's convenient, so if everyone in the world becomes atheist and doesn't tell their children about the history of belief in god(s) then everyone will go to heaven

lol, problem solved

ihateirony · 13-06-2011 10:07pm

philologos wrote: »

For the umpteenth time that isn't what I want at all. I don't want that for anyone.

Honestly you should be a tabloid writer. You can make anything out of what people say.

I think what he's trying to say is your desire is for that to happen if they don't convert, which they're not going to. Is that not true?

drkpower · 13-06-2011 10:07pm

philologos wrote: »

For the umpteenth time that isn't what I want at all. I don't want that for anyone.

IF I continue to reject god, do you want me to burn for eternity?

dvpower · 13-06-2011 10:12pm

ihateirony wrote: »

But like, where's the line drawn? Like if I hear someone mention it in the streets, but no info on it and keep walking, to I go to hell then? Or what if someone misrepresents God and I reject him based on that? Do I go to hell then?

The rules are unclear. All you need to know is that God is just and if you do go to hell, you bloody well deserve it.

dvpower · 13-06-2011 10:14pm

philologos wrote: »

For the umpteenth time that isn't what I want at all. I don't want that for anyone.

For unrepentant atheists that have already died? Do you want them to go to hell?

Mark200 · 13-06-2011 10:17pm

philologos wrote: »

For the umpteenth time that isn't what I want at all. I don't want that for anyone.

Honestly you should be a tabloid writer. You can make anything out of what people say.

First of all, why don't you want them to go to hell?

Second of all, do you agree that your god does want it for some people? (Presumably he wouldn't allow people to go to hell who he felt didn't deserve it).

ihateirony · 13-06-2011 10:28pm

dvpower wrote: »

The rules are unclear. All you need to know is that God is just and if you do go to hell, you bloody well deserve it.

That's not true. He's not infallible or something, he even admitted after the flood that he shouldn't have done it and promised not to do it again. He makes mistakes and whether his actions are just or not it's not determined by whether he did them or not.

MagicMarker · 13-06-2011 10:36pm

ihateirony wrote: »

That's not true. He's not infallible or something, he even admitted after the flood that he shouldn't have done it and promised not to do it again. He makes mistakes and whether his actions are just or not it's not determined by whether he did them or not.

Not sure if serious.

Chuck Stone · 13-06-2011 10:42pm

philologos wrote: »

For the umpteenth time that isn't what I want at all. I don't want that for anyone.

Why do you want your god to kill us with fire?

Do you really unwant us that much?

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_2R7KGeDSKQg/TJ6KKBGzuxI/AAAAAAAAAHs/AEoem_y3wWM/s640/kill-it-with-fire-demotivational-poster-1235695993.jpg

ihateirony · 13-06-2011 10:43pm

MagicMarker wrote: »

Not sure if serious.

Depends on your definition of serious, but I'm presuming truth in everything those on the God side are saying so I can try to figure out the contradictions reduce them and form a more a more comprehensible understanding of what they actually think. It's easier to argue with people if you help them know what they're talking about.

Cú Giobach · 13-06-2011 10:53pm

philologos wrote: »

It's not comparable at all with rape. God is Lord over the universe, He has given us standards for our benefit and will punish us if we turn away from Him. Much like other authorities. I can't cry to the judge if I am arrested and claim that the law is unjust.

The only "law" most decent living atheists are breaking is that they do not love god with all their heart, mind and soul. This is why I said earlier the only authorities your god could be compared to are totalitarian regimes, ie, ones where no discontent is allowed.
I must obey the laws of the land but I do not have to love the government.
In Stalin's Russia I could not have stood up and shouted "I hate Stalin", here I can shout from the rooftops "I hate Enda".
If I say "I hate Yahweh" the result would be in a similar vein to the one I would receive from the old NKVD (only much much worse).

philologos · 13-06-2011 11:07pm

^^ We also fundamentally fail in loving others as ourselves. Something which follows from the first in many cases.

Cú Giobach · 13-06-2011 11:11pm

philologos wrote: »

^^ We also fundamentally fail in loving others as ourselves. Something which follows from the first in many cases.

Indeed, but this is true for believers and non-believers alike.

philologos · 13-06-2011 11:12pm

Cú Giobach wrote: »

Indeed, but this is true for believers and non-believers alike.

Indeed, but as Christians would see it it doesn't end there. We need to strive to do this better with God's help. Ultimately that's something I don't see as being such a bad motivation in life.

drkpower · 13-06-2011 11:13pm

And Jakkass completely ignores 4 or 5 questions on this page alone, because he cannnot admit to himself how disgusting his views are.

drkpower · 13-06-2011 11:15pm

philologos wrote: »

Ultimately that's something I don't see as being such a bad motivation in life.

Its a great motivation! Because if you dont believe, you will burn for eternity. Sick.

Cú Giobach · 13-06-2011 11:23pm

philologos wrote: »

Indeed, but as Christians would see it it doesn't end there. We need to strive to do this better with God's help. Ultimately that's something I don't see as being such a bad motivation in life.

It's not just Christians who are striving for a better world, far from it.
Charity and morality are not only the concern of Christians, I need no god to tell me wrong from right and live as best I can, hurting no other living creature, to the best of my abilities. I would be more (though not quite) on the Buddhist side of things.

philologos · 13-06-2011 11:24pm

I never said that Cú Globach. I was commenting on the fact that we all fail to love our neighbour as ourselves and its not easy. I'm suggesting that we can do with God's help irrespective of who we are.

rower93 · 13-06-2011 11:31pm

First post here. Like all this atheist stuff.

At the end of the day nobody cares what you believe in or do not believe in....
Simples:)

Cú Giobach · 13-06-2011 11:39pm

philologos wrote: »

I never said that Cú Globach. I was commenting on the fact that we all fail to love our neighbour as ourselves and its not easy. I'm suggesting that we can do with God's help irrespective of who we are.

This is where we differ in absolute terms, humans don't need a god to know wrong from right, it is actually within us.
For me killing is wrong, I don't need a god to make a law prohibiting it for me to know that.
What use is your god to say a Buddhist monk who lives his whole life hurting physically or emotionally no living creature? If this monk lives a perfect life yet never accepts Jehovah as the supreme ruler of the universe he will still suffer eternal torment after his death according to your beliefs, won't he.

philologos · 13-06-2011 11:41pm

^^ That depends on what the nature of right and wrong is. Is it subjective or objective?

Chuck Stone · 13-06-2011 11:41pm

rower93 wrote: »

First post here. Like all this atheist stuff.

At the end of the day nobody cares what you believe in or do not believe in....
Simples:)

Well y'all got yourself a li'l problem thar son.

This ol' thread has done gotten itself over 800 posts an 16,500 views in a short space space of time.

So it sure do seems as if folks do care.

johnmcdnl · 13-06-2011 11:42pm

rower93 wrote: »

First post here. Like all this atheist stuff.

At the end of the day nobody cares what you believe in or do not believe in....
Simples:)

well I care if my children's teachers beliefs that the earth is 6000 years old and my children come home telling me this despite me raising them telling them to belief science and to make your own morals on what you belief is right rather than basing them on a 2000 year old book...

no one cares if you keep your beliefs to yourself but the second they start infringing on someone else's views there's a problem...

I'd also have a problem with a parent telling their children that if they don't go to mass and say their prayers that they're going to burn in hell for all eternity... but I suppose there's nothing I can really do about that only hope the children grow up and see the lies for what it is..

rower93 · 13-06-2011 11:57pm

I think it's that people are afraid that all this indoctrination or ramming down throats of beliefs of a certain majority is set in concrete.

For those worried about their children I think it's silly. It just goes in one ear and out the other. They are more worried about who's on top of the premier league or when the next session is tbh.

Cú Giobach · 14-06-2011 12:05am

philologos wrote: »

^^ That depends on what the nature of right and wrong is. Is it subjective or objective?

Well, we could get into quite a long philosophical discussion on that one, but I will say both, to truly understand right from wrong one has to see things from all angles. The word here is empathy.

It seems the basic rule that evolution seems to have given us, because societies across the planet all seem to have this ideal in common is, do no harm and try to improve the life of others.

(Off to bed now, I hope there are no locks overnight, am enjoying this thread)

T2daK · 14-06-2011 12:35am

who's god haha

pragmatic1 · 14-06-2011 12:44am

rower93 wrote: »

I think it's that people are afraid that all this indoctrination or ramming down throats of beliefs of a certain majority is set in concrete.

For those worried about their children I think it's silly. It just goes in one ear and out the other. They are more worried about who's on top of the premier league or when the next session is tbh.

I dont know about that. I remember not being able to sleep one night as a kid because the concept of eternity scared the shyte out of me.

KeithAFC · 14-06-2011 1:02am

FTGFOP wrote: »

I knew of him only as a science writer until Creationism started to be taken seriously in the US. I see his current role as an inevitable response to the rise of Creationism.

Why? What does it matter if people believe in that? Its wacko but so what.

Its almost as if people don't like it if you believe in wacko ****.