Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Odd Rugby Trivialities

  • 10-04-2011 11:31pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 312 ✭✭


    Just remembered a year or two back the AIL club final got decided by some mad old ancient rule, can't quite remember it, but something to do with either the alphabet or how many times each team'd beaten each other in the league beforehand? Think it was Shannon and Clontarf?


«1

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 28,140 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Think it was who had scored the first try in the match after it was tied at the end of extra time. Was a hideously unfair way to finish.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,320 ✭✭✭Teferi


    Why didn't they go for kicks?


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 28,140 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Teferi wrote: »
    Why didn't they go for kicks?

    Just wasn't in the laws of the competition. I think they just hadn't envisaged the possibility. Amusingly it happened the week or so after the penalties in the HEC semi-final.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,889 ✭✭✭tolosenc


    I don't like the HEC rule for the end of extra time, ie that the team with more tries over the 100mins wins. It has about as much effect on a teams willingness to score tries as the colour of the paint on the grass. If anything, it'd encourage the team with that lead to just give away penalties in extra-time.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,632 ✭✭✭ormond lad


    i only agree with the first try rule at underage level where extra time is not allowed but at adult level it should be extra time and if scores are still level sudden death, and then a shootout where only 3 or 5 players and only those 3-5 be allowed take kicks as to stop another martyn williams moment


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,889 ✭✭✭tolosenc


    ormond lad wrote: »
    a shootout where only 3 or 5 players and only those 3-5 be allowed take kicks as to stop another martyn williams moment

    The problem with that is that most teams have about 4 guys you'd expect to make such a sitter 100% of the time. Take Ireland at the world cup (hypothetically): I'd fancy Sexton/O'Gara, Kearney/Earls, McFadden/D'arcy, O'Driscoll/Wallace to make what is, essentially, a conversion of a try under the posts. You have to bring in the big guys to get people who miss.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,048 ✭✭✭Amazotheamazing


    tolosenc wrote: »
    The problem with that is that most teams have about 4 guys you'd expect to make such a sitter 100% of the time. Take Ireland at the world cup (hypothetically): I'd fancy Sexton/O'Gara, Kearney/Earls, McFadden/D'arcy, O'Driscoll/Wallace to make what is, essentially, a conversion of a try under the posts. You have to bring in the big guys to get people who miss.

    Make the kicks harder. You'd expect Geordan Murphy, Tommy Bowe or Paddy Wallace (to use non Leinster/Munster examples) to get a kick in front of the posts so why not move the kick to 5ms from the touchline etc and stick to a pool of nominated kickers.

    For example, afaik, in the Munster squad the following players used to be kickers at underage, Deasy, Cusack, O'Gara, O'Leary, Murray, J. Murphy, Warwick, Jones and Leamy (who was meant to be pretty useful).


  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 3,807 ✭✭✭castie


    Make the kicks harder. You'd expect Geordan Murphy, Tommy Bowe or Paddy Wallace (to use non Leinster/Munster examples) to get a kick in front of the posts so why not move the kick to 5ms from the touchline etc and stick to a pool of nominated kickers.

    For example, afaik, in the Munster squad the following players used to be kickers at underage, Deasy, Cusack, O'Gara, O'Leary, Murray, J. Murphy, Warwick, Jones and Leamy (who was meant to be pretty useful).

    Youd think so :) 3:05



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,699 ✭✭✭bamboozle


    Just remembered a year or two back the AIL club final got decided by some mad old ancient rule, can't quite remember it, but something to do with either the alphabet or how many times each team'd beaten each other in the league beforehand? Think it was Shannon and Clontarf?

    i was there cheering on Tarf, it was 19 all at final whistle and referee awarded match after extra time to shannon as they had scored the first try. Desperate way to decide the game especially considering clontarf fans had outnumbered shannon supporters by 3 or 4 to 1.

    on an even more interesting note the referee that day was Alain Rolland, the following weekend he refereed Leicester v Cardiff in the HC Semi final which went to extra time and then onto penalty kicks...a few strange weeks for Rollers!


  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 3,807 ✭✭✭castie


    bamboozle wrote: »
    i was there cheering on Tarf, it was 19 all at final whistle and referee awarded match after extra time to shannon as they had scored the first try. Desperate way to decide the game especially considering clontarf fans had outnumbered shannon supporters by 3 or 4 to 1.

    on an even more interesting note the referee that day was Alain Rolland, the following weekend he refereed Leicester v Cardiff in the HC Semi final which went to extra time and then onto penalty kicks...a few strange weeks for Rollers!

    Christ either he was getting overtime or he was thinking "Not this **** again"


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 312 ✭✭DerTierarzt


    tolosenc wrote: »
    The problem with that is that most teams have about 4 guys you'd expect to make such a sitter 100% of the time. Take Ireland at the world cup (hypothetically): I'd fancy Sexton/O'Gara, Kearney/Earls, McFadden/D'arcy, O'Driscoll/Wallace to make what is, essentially, a conversion of a try under the posts. You have to bring in the big guys to get people who miss.

    I would say have three positions for the kicks, centre, left and right. Then do away with the pool of kickers, forcing you to rank your kick takers, and put say O' Gara on the left touchline, Wallace on right, or whatever, you know? Wonder if the rules are like soccer in that only the players on the pitch at full time are the only ones eligible to kick? Is that not the way it would happen under RWC rules, no?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,787 ✭✭✭prospect


    Back in the late 1800's/early 1900'2 New Zealand did a tour of G.B.

    They caused a bit of a stir with their previously unseen performances of the Haka before each match.

    When they were due to play Wales, the Welsh captain responded by singing the Welsh national anthem and the crowd joined in.

    This was the first time a National Anthem was sung prior to a sporting event.




    Now, that's trivial.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 312 ✭✭DerTierarzt


    prospect wrote: »
    Back in the late 1800's/early 1900'2 New Zealand did a tour of G.B.

    They caused a bit of a stir with their previously unseen performances of the Haka before each match.

    When they were due to play Wales, the Welsh captain responded by singing the Welsh national anthem and the crowd joined in.

    This was the first time a National Anthem was sung prior to a sporting event.




    Now, that's trivial.

    Is that actually true? Surely national anthems were being sung in soccer first, no?


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 28,140 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    bamboozle wrote: »
    on an even more interesting note the referee that day was Alain Rolland, the following weekend he refereed Leicester v Cardiff in the HC Semi final which went to extra time and then onto penalty kicks...a few strange weeks for Rollers!

    Was it not the other way round? I remember everyone expecting a penalty shoot-out having seen it in the HEC and being exceedingly confused when Shannon were declared winners.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,969 ✭✭✭hardCopy


    Podge_irl wrote: »
    Was it not the other way round? I remember everyone expecting a penalty shoot-out having seen it in the HEC and being exceedingly confused when Shannon were declared winners.

    Yep, although the stadium announcer did announce the rule at full time when we were waiting for extra time to start.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 312 ✭✭DerTierarzt


    What's the protocol now, extra time, then whoever scored most tries, if that's equal then whoever finished higher in league or does it go to penalties?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 312 ✭✭DerTierarzt


    I remember one of the coolest things about rugby was the alternate jersey rule, harking back to the old days where if the visiting team had the same colour tops, the home team went back to their wives and got a different colour.

    As far as I can ascertain, this rule only applies to international matches now. Sometimes not even, as was the case with last November's match against South Africa just so we could don a shoddy cotton centenary jersey.

    In other competitions soccer-style rules are employed, but was it ever the case in either the H-Cup or Celtic/Magners League that the home team had to wear an alternate jersey where there was a colour clash?

    Sometimes it makes no sense regardless, such as when Munster played Cardiff Blues last. Cardiff have a home blue jersey, Munster obviously red, so no clash, right? But Cardiff wore their pink alternate and Munster their black alternate jersey? Even though if Cardiff felt compelled to wear their alternate, surely Munster's red home jersey wouldn't've been that much of a clash?


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,266 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    Sometimes it makes no sense regardless, such as when Munster played Cardiff Blues last. Cardiff have a home blue jersey, Munster obviously red, so no clash, right? But Cardiff wore their pink alternate and Munster their black alternate jersey? Even though if Cardiff felt compelled to wear their alternate, surely Munster's red home jersey wouldn't've been that much of a clash?

    the only reason i can think of this is that the pink cardiff jersey could be viewed as an attack on the eyes. munster not wanting cardiff to have an unfair advantage wore a jersey that was equally offensive to the eyes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,026 ✭✭✭B0X


    I think in the world cup if it goes through extra time with both teams on equal points/tries it goes to a drop goal competition between the outhalves.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 28,140 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I'm pretty sure the teams are contracted to wear their "away" jersey a certain number of times, and even a third jersey now so they can sell more of them.

    I was under the impression in the world cup it was a penalty kick off, but with each penalty from a different place.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,889 ✭✭✭tolosenc


    Each team should nominate a kicker and have them play HORSE... (call it RUGBY to get past linguistic issues)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,537 ✭✭✭Downtime


    Podge_irl wrote: »
    Was it not the other way round? I remember everyone expecting a penalty shoot-out having seen it in the HEC and being exceedingly confused when Shannon were declared winners.

    The funny thing is that the rules for the competition are published on the IRFU website at the start of every year and people were confused on the last day. Each club gets the handbook and the referee and club officials are emailed a few days before the final to clarify.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,247 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    Edit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 312 ✭✭DerTierarzt


    Drop kick competition would be class, but I think it does go to penalty kicks. From various positions would be best...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 312 ✭✭DerTierarzt


    Edit.

    Edit what?


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators Posts: 24,028 Mod ✭✭✭✭Clareman


    I like the fact that you can get a try without crossing the try line in so many different ways

    Penalty try
    Base of the post
    On the line
    On the ref's foot (long shot I know)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 312 ✭✭DerTierarzt


    Clareman wrote: »
    I like the fact that you can get a try without crossing the try line in so many different ways

    Penalty try
    Base of the post
    On the line
    On the ref's foot (long shot I know)


    Yeah I know, I always wondered why people don't just tap it off the padding around the posts more often if they're clear through...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,200 ✭✭✭kensutz


    It needs to be the base of the padding and not just a tap on any part of it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,247 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    kensutz wrote: »
    It needs to be the base of the padding and not just a tap on any part of it.

    Does it though? It's been a while since i read my laws book but afair it doesnt specify the base.

    Clareman wrote: »


    On the ref's foot (long shot I know)

    Anywhere on the pitch you like? :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,200 ✭✭✭kensutz


    Does it though? It's been a while since i read my laws book but afair it doesnt specify the base.

    Yes it has to be the base. David McHugh told us that.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 28,140 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Does it though? It's been a while since i read my laws book but afair it doesnt specify the base.

    It has to touch both the padding and the ground as far as I recall.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,247 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    kensutz wrote: »
    Yes it has to be the base. David McHugh told us that.

    `
    i've always been told that by refs alright.

    Just checked the laws again.

    22.4 OTHER WAYS TO SCORE A TRY
    (a) Grounded on the goal line. The goal line is part of the in-goal. If an attacking player is first
    to ground the ball on the opponents’ goal line, a try is scored.
    (b) Grounded against a goal post. The goal posts and padding surrounding them are part of
    the goal line, which is part of in-goal. If an attacking player is first to ground the ball against
    a goal post or padding, a try is scored.


    The word ground in therewould suggest it has to be at the base alright.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 312 ✭✭DerTierarzt


    `
    i've always been told that by refs alright.

    Just checked the laws again.

    22.4 OTHER WAYS TO SCORE A TRY
    (a) Grounded on the goal line. The goal line is part of the in-goal. If an attacking player is first
    to ground the ball on the opponents’ goal line, a try is scored.
    (b) Grounded against a goal post. The goal posts and padding surrounding them are part of
    the goal line, which is part of in-goal. If an attacking player is first to ground the ball against
    a goal post or padding, a try is scored.


    The word ground in therewould suggest it has to be at the base alright.

    It would be pretty hilarious to just casually tap it against the posts though!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    The word ground in therewould suggest it has to be at the base alright.
    I don't understand why nobody has ever taken advantage of this and mauled towards he posts - with the padding, the post must be at least a foot wide. You couldn't get anyone behind it to get under the ball, it would be more or less indefensible.


  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 3,807 ✭✭✭castie


    I don't understand why nobody has ever taken advantage of this and mauled towards he posts - with the padding, the post must be at least a foot wide. You couldn't get anyone behind it to get under the ball, it would be more or less indefensible.

    Wouldnt you first have to drive the opposition threw the post so you could get to it? And then somehow get the ball at the back to the level of the posts.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,889 ✭✭✭tolosenc


    I've seen it a few times where there was a ruck right beside the post and the SH didn't think to touch it down...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    tolosenc wrote: »
    I've seen it a few times where there was a ruck right beside the post and the SH didn't think to touch it down...
    That's exactly the situation I had in mind.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,288 ✭✭✭crisco10


    I remember felipe doing it. He was being tackled and was never going to reach the line but he managed to ground it in front of the post against the pad. Clever work.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,168 ✭✭✭Frank Spencer


    Clareman wrote: »
    I like the fact that you can get a try without crossing the try line in so many different ways

    Penalty try
    Base of the post
    On the line
    On the ref's foot (long shot I know)

    How does this work?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    How does this work?
    Presumably it counts only if the ref is standing in the goal area.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,207 ✭✭✭durkadurka


    It wold be pretty funny if it counted elsewhere


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    durkadurka wrote: »
    It wold be pretty funny if it counted elsewhere
    It would certainly change the game as a spectacle: the team with the ball would be chasing the ref around the pitch, and the defending team would have to form a bodyguard around him. Perhaps the most radical reshaping of a game since this episode in a soccer match a few years back:
    It concerns a match played between Barbados and Grenada in cup competition.

    Barbados needed to win the game by two clear goals in order to progress to the next round. Now the trouble was caused by a daft rule in the competition which stated that in the event of a game going to penalty kicks, the winner of the penalty kicks would be awarded a 2-0 victory.

    With 5 minutes to go, Barbados were leading 2-1, and going out of the tournament (because they needed to win by 2 clear goals). Then, when they realized they were probably not going to score against Grenada's massed defence, they turned round, and deliberately scored on their own goal to level the scores and take the game into penalties. Grenada, themselves not being stupid, realized what was going on, and then attempted to score an own goal themselves. However, the Barbados players started defending their opponents goal to prevent this.

    In the last five minutes, spectators were treated to the incredible sight of both team's defending their opponents goal against attackers desperately trying to score an own goal and goalkeepers trying to throw the ball into their own net. The game went to penalties, which Barbados won and so were awarded a 2-0 victory and progressed to the next round.

    http://www.snopes.com/sports/soccer/barbados.asp


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 697 ✭✭✭pajunior


    Please tell me there is a video of that somewhere. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,207 ✭✭✭durkadurka


    There's a brief video on The link.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 312 ✭✭DerTierarzt


    durkadurka wrote: »
    It wold be pretty funny if it counted elsewhere

    Can you imagine! Trying to chase the ref's bootlaces!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,247 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    I smell an ELV. :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 312 ✭✭DerTierarzt


    In my head I've a vague recollection of the kicker for Japan being their prop at one point or another, does anyone have any examples of similarly unusual kickers for teams?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    I mentioned recently watching Anthony Foley take the place kicks for St. Munchins in the Munster Schools competitions back in the day. Does that count? Actually he took the kicks to touch too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,889 ✭✭✭tolosenc


    I am/was a backrower and scored a game winning drop goal at u-16 level, that count? (I did get laps for trying it, though)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,053 ✭✭✭Gracelessly Tom


    In my head I've a vague recollection of the kicker for Japan being their prop at one point or another, does anyone have any examples of similarly unusual kickers for teams?

    John Eales kicked for Australia on a fair few occasions and was a very good kicker in fairness. They nicknamed him "Nobody" as in "nobody's perfect".


  • Advertisement
Advertisement