Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

UFC/MMA Gambling. **NO AFTER-TIMING**

Options
1…2627293132…190

Comments

  • Options
    #842
    PrettyBoy
    Registered Users Posts: 4,213 ✭✭✭PrettyBoy


    Tomorrow Night:

    Michael Johnson
    Alexander Gustafsson
    Neil Seery
    Gunnar Nelson

    €30 would give a return of €450.

    Thoughts?


  • Options
    #843
    Ray Mond
    Closed Accounts Posts: 536 ✭✭✭Ray Mond


    PrettyBoy wrote: »
    Tomorrow Night:

    Michael Johnson
    Alexander Gustafsson
    Neil Seery
    Gunnar Nelson

    €30 would give a return of €450.

    Thoughts?

    Think seery will be stopped. I hope im wrong but Pickett is gonna make a run for the title i think . He will be too much . Id love neill to ko him but cant see it.
    Im going picket , johnson, gus by ko and gunni by sub .
    Accum pays over a grand for 20 quid


  • Options
    #844
    mailburner
    Registered Users Posts: 23,839 ✭✭✭✭mailburner


    PrettyBoy wrote: »
    Tomorrow Night:

    Michael Johnson
    Alexander Gustafsson
    Neil Seery
    Gunnar Nelson

    €30 would give a return of €450.

    Thoughts?

    with ray on that one bigtime
    Really can't see it at all
    other three look good


  • Options
    #845
    peejay1986
    Registered Users Posts: 1,736 ✭✭✭peejay1986


    Ray Mond wrote: »
    Think seery will be stopped. I hope im wrong but Pickett is gonna make a run for the title i think . He will be too much . Id love neill to ko him but cant see it.
    Im going picket , johnson, gus by ko and gunni by sub .
    Accum pays over a grand for 20 quid

    Where you getting those odds? I'm getting no where near that price!


  • Options
    #846
    mailburner
    Registered Users Posts: 23,839 ✭✭✭✭mailburner


    peejay1986 wrote: »
    Where you getting those odds? I'm getting no where near that price!

    method of victory by each though which works out big


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #847
    PrettyBoy
    Registered Users Posts: 4,213 ✭✭✭PrettyBoy


    peejay1986 wrote: »
    Where you getting those odds? I'm getting no where near that price!

    Paddy Power.


  • Options
    #848
    peejay1986
    Registered Users Posts: 1,736 ✭✭✭peejay1986


    mailburner wrote: »
    method of victory by each though which works out big

    Aaah. I thought it was just one by KO.


  • Options
    #849
    califano
    Registered Users Posts: 5,440 ✭✭✭califano


    Think Seery will have the game to get 3 rds. So backed Picket 9/4 decision.
    Backed Michael Johnson to win 8/11
    Backed Alexander Gustafsson by KO 11/8
    And too late to post i backed Gunnie by sub 11/8!.


  • Options
    #850
    jimpump
    Registered Users Posts: 830 ✭✭✭jimpump


    Come on neil


  • Options
    #851
    jimpump
    Registered Users Posts: 830 ✭✭✭jimpump


    califano wrote: »
    Think Seery will have the game to get 3 rds. So backed Picket 9/4 decision.
    Backed Michael Johnson to win 8/11
    Backed Alexander Gustafsson by KO 11/8
    And too late to post i backed Gunnie by sub 11/8!.

    Guillard will ruin that bet for ya


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #852
    mailburner
    Registered Users Posts: 23,839 ✭✭✭✭mailburner


    jimpump wrote: »
    Guillard will ruin that bet for ya

    looks like 4 singles to me so im sure he would
    take three


  • Options
    #853
    califano
    Registered Users Posts: 5,440 ✭✭✭califano


    jimpump wrote: »
    Guillard will ruin that bet for ya

    Should have been clear to note they are all singles. I like Guilliard its a very close one and i backed him in that no contest recently he should have won against Pearson but his overall record swayed it away from him for me in this as hes too inconsistent.


  • Options
    #854
    jimpump
    Registered Users Posts: 830 ✭✭✭jimpump


    Pickett the lnp pussy!!


  • Options
    #855
    mailburner
    Registered Users Posts: 23,839 ✭✭✭✭mailburner


    califano wrote: »
    Should have been clear to note they are all singles. I like Guilliard its a very close one and i backed him in that no contest recently he should have won against Pearson but his overall record swayed it away from him for me in this as hes too inconsistent.

    with you on that
    guillard is inconsistent
    price short enough on mj saying that
    i thought he'd be more a 6/5 shot


  • Options
    #856
    mailburner
    Registered Users Posts: 23,839 ✭✭✭✭mailburner


    very underwhelming performance by guillard
    you would expect him to put away mj a couple of years ago
    but mg not the same fighter these days
    very poor performance for someone of his calibre but mj wasnt
    a good match for him either


  • Options
    #857
    Davei141
    Registered Users Posts: 4,541 ✭✭✭Davei141


    Had Nelson by Sub and Johnson by KO, disppointed Johnson didn't get the KO but he takes Guillard any day of the week. MJ is a force in the lightweight division IMO


  • Options
    #858
    mailburner
    Registered Users Posts: 23,839 ✭✭✭✭mailburner


    califano wrote: »
    Think Seery will have the game to get 3 rds. So backed Picket 9/4 decision.
    Backed Michael Johnson to win 8/11
    Backed Alexander Gustafsson by KO 11/8
    And too late to post i backed Gunnie by sub 11/8!.

    credit where it's due
    Great picks


  • Options
    #859
    califano
    Registered Users Posts: 5,440 ✭✭✭califano


    mailburner wrote: »
    credit where it's due
    Great picks

    Cheers!
    Boom!!


  • Options
    #860
    peejay1986
    Registered Users Posts: 1,736 ✭✭✭peejay1986


    Had Barnatt, Gunni (by Sub in Rd1), Pickett, Johnson (by KO) and Gustafson

    When I seen Guillard's gameplan I could've cried. Needed him to come at Johnson for a chance of the KO.

    Balls :(


  • Options
    #861
    broders3
    Registered Users Posts: 85 ✭✭broders3


    Just lumped on lawler at 11\4. When I say lumped I mean I had a fiver in my paddy power account and put it on lawler!! :)

    Expect the line to change soon based on hendricks struggles to make weight.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #862
    johnybean
    Registered Users Posts: 372 ✭✭johnybean


    Was gonna go for an accumulator
    Lawlor
    Condit
    Sanchez
    Lombard
    Thoughts??


  • Options
    #863
    themandan6611
    Registered Users Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭themandan6611


    johnybean wrote: »
    Was gonna go for an accumulator
    Lawlor
    Condit
    Sanchez
    Lombard
    Thoughts??

    Condit and Sanchez to lose


  • Options
    #864
    weemcd
    Registered Users Posts: 6,419 ✭✭✭weemcd


    johnybean wrote: »
    Was gonna go for an accumulator
    Lawlor
    Condit
    Sanchez
    Lombard
    Thoughts??

    I like it apart from Lombard. I know he's a motherfúcker and all that, but Shields is one tough guy to beat. Look at his last run of fights, only lost to GSP and Ellenberger, while having wins over Daley, Lawler, Hendo, Kampman, Woodley & Maia.


  • Options
    #865
    PrettyBoy
    Registered Users Posts: 4,213 ✭✭✭PrettyBoy


    johnybean wrote: »
    Was gonna go for an accumulator
    Lawlor
    Condit
    Sanchez
    Lombard
    Thoughts??

    I was thinking of doing the same but the last 2 posts put a stop to that :o


  • Options
    #866
    Wrongway1985
    Registered Users Posts: 6,350 ✭✭✭Wrongway1985


    Gonna go with : Bermudez,Pennington,Lombard,Condit & Lawler.


  • Options
    #867
    Wrongway1985
    Registered Users Posts: 6,350 ✭✭✭Wrongway1985


    weemcd wrote: »
    I like it apart from Lombard. I know he's a motherfúcker and all that, but Shields is one tough guy to beat. Look at his last run of fights, only lost to GSP and Ellenberger, while having wins over Daley, Lawler, Hendo, Kampman, Woodley & Maia.

    Kampmann win was one of the worst decisions of all time!! Your're right though think I might rethink putting in Lombard though hmmmm....


  • Options
    #868
    johnybean
    Registered Users Posts: 372 ✭✭johnybean


    weemcd wrote: »
    I like it apart from Lombard. I know he's a motherfúcker and all that, but Shields is one tough guy to beat. Look at his last run of fights, only lost to GSP and Ellenberger, while having wins over Daley, Lawler, Hendo, Kampman, Woodley & Maia.
    I hedged my bets and stuck 10 on an accumulator with lombard and 10 on the same accumulator with shields. Really looking forward to this card regardless of results


  • Options
    #869
    Devastator
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,480 ✭✭✭Devastator


    broders3 wrote: »
    Just lumped on lawler at 11\4. When I say lumped I mean I had a fiver in my paddy power account and put it on lawler!! :)

    Still 11/4 :cool: apparently weight issue was just a dodgy scale his team were using :D


    I've gone for quad:- Story, Sheilds, Sanchez & Condit at about 15/1


  • Options
    #870
    PrettyBoy
    Registered Users Posts: 4,213 ✭✭✭PrettyBoy


    Small bet on Shields, Sanchez, Condit and Hendricks.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #871
    Devastator
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,480 ✭✭✭Devastator


    Devastator wrote: »


    I've gone for quad:- Story, Sheilds, Sanchez & Condit at about 15/1


    So now I've got a treble running for the rest....damn internet gambling makes it too easy :D

    Good luck to everyone with bets running on main card


Advertisement