Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Off-Topic Thread

1189190192194195389

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,698 ✭✭✭Gumbi


    http://www.hardwareversand.de/120mm/49250/ARCTIC+COOLING+ARCTIC+F12.article

    4 of these at medium speed should get some god cooling through my case. Was messing around with my 7950 yesterday. If I can control VRM temps (specifically VRM 1) at 1.1v, I can potentially maintain over 1200mhz on my 7950. The core temp is manageable. You mentioned cool air blowing over the the card can help a lot with the VRM temps.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,299 ✭✭✭✭BloodBath


    I was talking about the mainboard vrm's. Do you have the Phenom overclocked. The northbridge on my old machine used to get crazy hot with my overclocked e8400. I had to put a fan on the back of the graphics card blowing up at it to keep it cool.

    My old case had horrible airflow though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,698 ✭✭✭Gumbi


    BloodBath wrote: »
    I was talking about the mainboard vrm's. Do you have the Phenom overclocked. The northbridge on my old machine used to get crazy hot with my overclocked e8400. I had to put a fan on the back of the graphics card blowing up at it to keep it cool.

    My old case had horrible airflow though.

    Hmm, OK. How hot would be considered OK for 7950 VRMs? I've seen conflicting reports. Some say they're designed to operate safely up to 120 degrees, others say less.

    I don't think I have voltage control on my motherboard. It's greyed out in the BIOS. I could easily OC it if I could by modifying the FSB (it idles at 22 degrees and never goes above 37).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,930 ✭✭✭✭TerrorFirmer


    Guy on Adverts selling a Pentium D system and saying it runs Battlefield 3 and Far Cry 3 at high settings perfectly. Actually makes my blood boil.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,299 ✭✭✭✭BloodBath


    I don't know to be honest. I'd try keep them below 90c anyway.

    What motherboard is it?
    Guy on Adverts selling a Pentium D system and saying it runs Battlefield 3 and Far Cry 3 at high settings perfectly. Actually makes my blood boil.

    Link? :)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,930 ✭✭✭✭TerrorFirmer


    http://www.adverts.ie/desktops/gaming-pc/2975509

    I'd actually love to see a Pentium D struggle with Battlefield 3.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,698 ✭✭✭Gumbi


    BloodBath wrote: »
    I was talking about the mainboard vrm's. Do you have the Phenom overclocked. The northbridge on my old machine used to get crazy hot with my overclocked e8400. I had to put a fan on the back of the graphics card blowing up at it to keep it cool.

    My old case had horrible airflow though.
    I need to figure out how to tame my VRM temps at higher voltages. My card is stable at 975mhz at 1000mv. That's it's ballpark OCing capability. (If that makes sense). At 1.1v I can go 1200mhz but the VRM temps climb quite a bit. (110degrees). I haven't tweaked much (I can probably go lower than 1.1v for 1.2ghz) but that's what I'm working with so far.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,815 ✭✭✭Burgo


    http://www.adverts.ie/desktops/gaming-pc/2975509

    I'd actually love to see a Pentium D struggle with Battlefield 3.

    Struggle? I'm pretty sure it would catch on fire.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,699 ✭✭✭Brian


    What's going on with the text wrapping, it's horrible.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,698 ✭✭✭Gumbi


    Gumbi wrote: »
    Hmm, OK. How hot would be considered OK for 7950 VRMs? I've seen conflicting reports. Some say they're designed to operate safely up to 120 degrees, others say less.

    I don't think I have voltage control on my motherboard. It's greyed out in the BIOS. I could easily OC it if I could by modifying the FSB (it idles at 22 degrees and never goes above 37).
    Figured it out. The voltages are greyed out, yes, but I can use +/- to configure them - only the +/- on the number pad though :P Not the ones by the backspace.

    OK. I'll see if I can't get 3.6ghz out of this baby.

    What would be a safe voltage for a Phenom II chip? I'm finding it really hard to boot at 3.36ghz by modifying the FSB to be 240 instead 200 (this is the correct way to OC it, right?). At the moment I'm at 1.375v and it blue screens as it's booting into desktop.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,299 ✭✭✭✭BloodBath


    If it's the same as old pentium / core2 overclocking then raising the fsb would be increasing your ram speed and your pci speed. If there is an option to lock the pci at a certain speed then lock it at whatever it's supposed to be.

    If it's changing the ram speed then set it back to clocks it can handle.

    Just look for a guide specific to your processor, there should be loads.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,698 ✭✭✭Gumbi


    BloodBath wrote: »
    If it's the same as old pentium / core2 overclocking then raising the fsb would be increasing your ram speed and your pci speed. If there is an option to lock the pci at a certain speed then lock it at whatever it's supposed to be.

    If it's changing the ram speed then set it back to clocks it can handle.

    Just look for a guide specific to your processor, there should be loads.

    I will thanks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,698 ✭✭✭Gumbi


    Probably a horribly optimised OC (but not something I can't fix), by I have a 3.4ghz OC stable so far in Prime at 1.3v. I just had to keep the ratio for the memory such that it was near enough it's rated speed. It's currently at 1280mhz.

    OCing a 3570k is too easy! :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,047 ✭✭✭Bazzo


    http://www.adverts.ie/2665760

    Got my laugh for the day in at least. Yes, I will take that brand new 2013 eircom router, at €50 it's a steal!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,756 ✭✭✭✭Headshot


    That Radeon HD 7990 looks a bit of a beast


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,600 ✭✭✭Eboggles


    Headshot wrote: »
    That Radeon HD 7990 looks a bit of a beast

    It's nothing revolutionary; the only good thing to come of it are the new prototype drivers that seem to be awesome :).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,306 ✭✭✭BobbyPropane


    Have an AM3+ Motherboard and currently a Black Edition 965 @ 3.4ghz. FX 8350, yay or nay?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,325 ✭✭✭smileyj1987


    Have an AM3+ Motherboard and currently a Black Edition 965 @ 3.4ghz. FX 8350, yay or nay?

    I would say Yay especially because you could sell the 965 and make it a fairly cheap upgrade .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,181 ✭✭✭Serephucus


    Gumbi wrote: »
    Probably a horribly optimised OC (but not something I can't fix), by I have a 3.4ghz OC stable so far in Prime at 1.3v. I just had to keep the ratio for the memory such that it was near enough it's rated speed. It's currently at 1280mhz.

    OCing a 3570k is too easy! :P

    At 1.3 I can hit 4.6... Might want to lower the volts a bit. ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,698 ✭✭✭Gumbi


    Serephucus wrote: »
    At 1.3 I can hit 4.6... Might want to lower the volts a bit. ;)

    I'm referring to my Phenom II x4 925 :D:D. It isn't very well optimised, but I assure you, it's not as badly optimised as a 3570k at 1.3v would be haha. I'm not THAT tech-illiterate :P My own 3570k will do 4.6 at less than that.

    I'm awaiting a new motherboard from Amazon as my AsRock one failed, and HWVS effed up the RMA (gotta wait another 10 days to get it returned).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,181 ✭✭✭Serephucus


    Talk about a brain fart... I knew that, I swear...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,894 ✭✭✭Nolars


    http://instagram.com/p/YgRKhOSbOi/

    i7 -4770k LGA 1150 linus has 1 no mobo tho


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 17,150 Mod ✭✭✭✭cherryghost


    http://www.adverts.ie/desktops/gaming-pc/2975509

    I'd actually love to see a Pentium D struggle with Battlefield 3.

    I've played BF3 on a Pentium D (3.2ghz) and ATI 4670. It was surprisingly playable on lowest settings at sub-720p res (about 20-25fps)

    EDIT: Here's the game maxed out on a 2.8 Pentium D and a GTX550ti


    Gets about 15FPS :P But it raises the question... who in their right mind pairs a 550 and a crappy pentium D together?!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,299 ✭✭✭✭BloodBath


    BF3 isn't really that stressful. He said it runs far cry 3 on high as well though. No ways.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,182 ✭✭✭Genghiz Cohen


    I could nearly get 30FPS on low settings on a E6600 and a HD4870.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,930 ✭✭✭✭TerrorFirmer


    BloodBath wrote: »
    BF3 isn't really that stressful. He said it runs far cry 3 on high as well though. No ways.

    Single Player isn't but Multiplayer is. I couldn't even get a respectable framerate on 64 man servers with a G620 and that's twice as fast as a Pentium D. It would dip to as low as 15 in intense situations, which realistically is going to happen a lot playing online. Even the 6600 is miles faster than a Pentium D!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,299 ✭✭✭✭BloodBath


    My e8400 @ 4.3ghz served me well but still struggled with 64 man multi.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,775 ✭✭✭✭Gbear


    What sort of gains do you actually see with an overclocked cpu?

    I have everything I need to start overclocking the CPU but I'm just wondering is it worth the effort or do people do it purely for the fun of it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,698 ✭✭✭Gumbi


    Gbear wrote: »
    What sort of gains do you actually see with an overclocked cpu?

    I have everything I need to start overclocking the CPU but I'm just wondering is it worth the effort or do people do it purely for the fun of it?
    Well, it makes your CPU operate more quickly, put simply. Whether you'll see a difference depends on what you use the computer for.

    I play SC2, which is very heavily CPU-bound, which means if I overclock my CPU by ~30% I see my FPS jump 30%, which is massive.

    What's your current setup? Do you have an aftermarket cooler?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,775 ✭✭✭✭Gbear


    Gumbi wrote: »
    Well, it makes your CPU operate more quickly, put simply. Whether you'll see a difference depends on what you use the computer for.

    I play SC2, which is very heavily CPU-bound, which means if I overclock my CPU by ~30% I see my FPS jump 30%, which is massive.

    What's your current setup? Do you have an aftermarket cooler?

    Gaming. I also play SC2 but plenty of FPS/RPG type things as well.

    Case: Corsair Carbide 500R
    CPU: i5 3570k
    Cooler: Arctic Cooling Freezer 13 Pro
    GPU: XFX HD7950 3GB
    RAM: 8GB G.Skill DDR3 PC3-12800 1600MHz Ares
    MOBO: ASRock Extreme 4 Z77
    PSU: OCZ 700W Extreme


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement