Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Pro-Israel BBC bias on Flotilla Massacre documentary.

Options
1356

Comments

  • Site Banned Posts: 8,331 ✭✭✭Brown Bomber


    alastair wrote: »
    Red herring my arse

    Flattered. But thanks but no thanks - your not my type.
    alastair wrote: »
    there's no evidence that anyone was shot prior to the boarding - as reflected in the UN report. So when you state: It's a supposition not endorsed by the UN report.

    1. Eye-witness testimony is evidence.
    2. The UN report clearly states (for the umpteenth time)
    However, it has concluded that live ammunition was used from the helicopter onto the top deck prior to the descent of the soldiers.

    So who were they firing at then FFS if not the passengers? The Muslim passengers who had gathered on the top deck for dawn prayers.

    I don't know what your game is but it's getting on my tits at this stage to be honest. You selectively quote from all my posts and don't address any of the real points. I can't work out if your in denial, afraid to admit you were wrong or simply taking the piss.
    alastair wrote: »
    The IDF certainly shouldn't have boarded as they did, but spare the 'crime against humanity' exaggerations and fabricated claims for the UN report.

    here we go again. According to the ICC any of these offenses committed systematically is a crime against humanity.
    (a) Murder;
    (b) Extermination;
    (c) Enslavement;
    (d) Deportation or forcible transfer of population;
    (e) Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law;
    (f) Torture;

    (g) Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity;
    (h) Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as defined in paragraph 3, or other grounds that are universally recognized as impermissible under international law, in connection with any act referred to in this paragraph or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court;
    (i) Enforced disappearance of persons;
    (j) The crime of apartheid;
    (k) Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health.

    I make that 6.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,309 ✭✭✭✭alastair


    6 arbitary selections from a list that doesn't have anything to do with the boarding of the ship? Has anyone been charged with murder, let alone found guilty? Nope.

    The UN report is quite clear about the sequence of deaths and what point they happened. It makes clear that the first four deaths occurred in the 15 minutes of the initial boarding - they make no mention of any deaths prior to the boarding - end of story.
    • Shot in the chest from the helicopter. i.e. before any IDF had boarded. Therefore not IDF self-defense.

    'Fraid not.


  • Site Banned Posts: 8,331 ✭✭✭Brown Bomber


    alastair wrote: »
    6 arbitary selections from a list that doesn't have anything to do with the boarding of the ship? Has anyone been charged with murder, let alone found guilty? Nope.

    The UN report is quite clear about the sequence of deaths and what point they happened. It makes clear that the first four deaths occurred in the 15 minutes of the initial boarding - they make no mention of any deaths prior to the boarding - end of story.



    'Fraid not.

    It's impossible to have any kind of meaningful engagement with you. You are clearly in denial.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,980 ✭✭✭meglome


    It's impossible to have any kind of meaningful engagement with you. You are clearly in denial.

    I still don't know which parts of that documentary are biased.


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,230 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    meglome wrote: »
    I still don't know which parts of that documentary are biased.
    The bits that show Israelis as human beings and not evil death machines for whatever bollocks BB buys into?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭uprising2


    King Mob wrote: »
    The bits that show Israelis as human beings and not evil death machines for whatever bollocks BB buys into?


    Hang on a fukking minute, never has BB painted Israeli citizens as anything but human, its the zionist scum he has a problem with, well it's not a problem, its Indignation.

    You can cover your eyes and humm all you like, doesn't mean others have to.


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,230 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    uprising2 wrote: »
    Hang on a fukking minute, never has BB painted Israeli citizens as anything but human, its the zionist scum he has a problem with, well it's not a problem, its Indignation.

    He makes a distinction?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭uprising2


    King Mob wrote: »
    He makes a distinction?

    PM him, now fukk off taking another thread off course.

    Your forever trying to shoot the messanger.
    Your shooting blanks into a barrel with no fish in it, try realize that.

    He does make the distinction, you just don't/won't see it.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,869 ✭✭✭Mahatma coat


    Just one thing, the UN Report that BB Keeps Quoting, that seems to me to be a genuine UN Report, and it CLEARLY States that shots were fired from he Helicopter PRIOR To Boarding, or Have I read that wrong???

    Alastair, if thats not what it says Would you like to show us what it actually says??

    oh BB you missed J on that list;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,410 ✭✭✭old_aussie


    Maybe the BBC believes that any nation has a right to, by any means, stop support being given to a terrorist run country.

    The people elected the terrorists to run their country so the people are nothing but terrorists themselves.

    The Israelis should have sunk the flotilla.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,869 ✭✭✭Mahatma coat


    old_aussie wrote: »
    Maybe the BBC believes that any nation has a right to, by any means, stop support being given to a terrorist run country.
    And who decides which camp People get put in??? One mans Freedom Fighter Etc, Do We the Irish have a right to Exterminate any Israeli that comes to our Country because they MIGHT Steal someones Passport, therby compromising National Security?????
    The people elected the terrorists to run their country so the people are nothing but terrorists themselves.
    And if the Other side Elect a LandStealing Apartheid Rgieme they shouldnt be Surprised if a Large Portion of the World Consider them SCUMBAGS
    The Israelis should have sunk the flotilla.
    Lovely Fella aint ya, Realisticly t5he Flotilla Passengers would have been well within their Rights to Kill the soldiers and carry on, The 'Pirates' Had no Rights they acted illegally and deserve to Swing from a Yardarm somewhere


  • Site Banned Posts: 8,331 ✭✭✭Brown Bomber


    Just one thing, the UN Report that BB Keeps Quoting, that seems to me to be a genuine UN Report, and it CLEARLY States that shots were fired from he Helicopter PRIOR To Boarding, or Have I read that wrong???

    Alastair, if thats not what it says Would you like to show us what it actually says??

    oh BB you missed J on that list;)

    I think when the report says "live" fire alastair gets mixed and thinks it says "live" (as in live forever) fire, fire that makes you live longer.

    Yeah here is the report - http://unispal.un.org/pdfs/FlotillaReport.pdf

    Point 114

    http://unispal.un.org/pdfs/FlotillaReport.pdf
    However, it has concluded that live ammunition was used from the helicopter onto the top deck prior to the descent of the soldiers.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,309 ✭✭✭✭alastair


    Just one thing, the UN Report that BB Keeps Quoting, that seems to me to be a genuine UN Report, and it CLEARLY States that shots were fired from he Helicopter PRIOR To Boarding, or Have I read that wrong???

    Alastair, if thats not what it says Would you like to show us what it actually says??

    oh BB you missed J on that list;)

    It says shots were fired prior to the boarding alright - it also says that no-one was killed before the boarding started.
    I'd have thought the distinction between shooting and actually killing someone was fairly self-evident?
    During the operation to secure control of the top deck, the Israeli forces landed
    soldiers from three helicopters over a fifteen-minute period
    .71 The Israeli forces used
    paintballs, plastic bullets and live ammunition, fired by soldiers from the helicopter above
    and soldiers who had landed on the top deck. The use of live ammunition during this period
    resulted in fatal injuries to four passengers
    ,


  • Site Banned Posts: 8,331 ✭✭✭Brown Bomber


    alastair wrote: »
    It says shots were fired prior to the boarding alright - it also says that no-one was killed before the boarding started.
    I'd have thought the distinction between shooting and actually killing someone was fairly self-evident?

    So why didn't you quote the part were it says no one was killed before boarding then :confused::confused::confused:

    So you do accept that there was live rounds fired before boarding then? So what in your opinion does that mean for the IDF story of self-defense?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,007 ✭✭✭Phill Ewinn


    alastair wrote: »
    Has anyone been charged with murder, let alone found guilty?

    Stand out the most ridiculous argument I've had the displeasure of reading on this thread. Do you honestly expect the soldiers to man up and face prosecution? The jist of the UN report so far points to a grave wrong doing by the Israeli pirates on that day. I think you should accept that and move on.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,309 ✭✭✭✭alastair


    So why didn't you quote the part were it says no one was killed before boarding then :confused::confused::confused:
    Sorry for your ongoing confusion - if mortalities didn't occur until the boarding - as reported by the UN, then the converse is equally true - no-one was killed prior to the boarding.
    So you do accept that there was live rounds fired before boarding then? So what in your opinion does that mean for the IDF story of self-defense?

    Sure I do. It means nothing if they didn't shoot anyone until they were attacked themsleves - as indicated by the UN report.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,410 ✭✭✭old_aussie


    The 'Pirates' Had no Rights they acted illegally and deserve to Swing from a Yardarm somewhere

    Those pirates are just as bad as people who denigrate another countries National Flag :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,309 ✭✭✭✭alastair


    Stand out the most ridiculous argument I've had the displeasure of reading on this thread. Do you honestly expect the soldiers to man up and face prosecution? The jist of the UN report so far points to a grave wrong doing by the Israeli pirates on that day. I think you should accept that and move on.

    'Man up' eh?

    We know that there were homicides. It's for a court to determine if there were murders, and until then it's a moot point whether that fact causes you displeasure or not.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,869 ✭✭✭Mahatma coat


    alastair wrote: »
    It says shots were fired prior to the boarding alright
    OK so they Shot People from the Helicopter BEFORE they Landed

    dosent that Destroy the Myth that the initial intention was NON Lethal
    - it also says that no-one was killed before the boarding started[/quote
    But People HAD been shot and were DYING on the Deck prior to them landing to 'Confirm the Kill'
    I'd have thought the distinction between shooting and actually killing someone was fairly self-evident?
    :rolleyes: right, imagine this, I follow you home, as you reach your front gate I shoot you in the Stomach with a HK MP5, 6-8 9MM Rounds rip yer internal organs to bits and your stomach acid start burning the rest, You crawl into your house, collapse in the doorway and an Ambulance is called, now I didnt Kill you, when I left at high speed in my 535 you were Still alive, By your logic I havent Killed you.

    Somehow I doubt the coroner will record a verdict of Death by Natural causes tho :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,309 ✭✭✭✭alastair


    OK so they Shot People from the Helicopter BEFORE they Landed

    Who said that?

    Not the UN for sure.


  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 8,331 ✭✭✭Brown Bomber


    alastair wrote: »
    Sorry for your ongoing confusion - if mortalities didn't occur until the boarding - as reported by the UN, then the converse is equally true - no-one was killed prior to the boarding.



    Sure I do. It means nothing if they didn't shoot anyone until they were attacked themsleves - as indicated by the UN report.

    Are you reading it upside down? It doesn't seem like you have read it all, just pretending to.

    2nd time of asking - Show where is says nobody was killed, or fatally wounded prior to boarding.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,309 ✭✭✭✭alastair


    Are you reading it upside down? It doesn't seem like you have read it all, just pretending to.

    2nd time of asking - Show where is says nobody was killed, or fatally wounded prior to boarding.

    I'd suggest you try to ramp up those reading comprehension skills:
    During the operation to secure control of the top deck, the Israeli forces landed soldiers from three helicopters over a fifteen-minute period.71 The Israeli forces used paintballs, plastic bullets and live ammunition, fired by soldiers from the helicopter above and soldiers who had landed on the top deck. The use of live ammunition during this period resulted in fatal injuries to four passengers,


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,869 ✭✭✭Mahatma coat


    old_aussie wrote: »
    Those pirates are just as bad as people who denigrate another countries National Flag :rolleyes:
    this is MY Country Too, and thats My Flag, but anyway we digress


  • Site Banned Posts: 8,331 ✭✭✭Brown Bomber


    alastair wrote: »
    I'd suggest you try to ramp up those reading comprehension skills:

    That doesn't say what you claim. Your clutching at straws, big time.
    It means nothing if they didn't shoot anyone until they were attacked themsleves

    So firing a gun at civilians is not an attack in alistair world?


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,309 ✭✭✭✭alastair


    That doesn't say what you claim. Your clutching at straws, big time.

    It says exactly what it appears to say. No fatal injuries / mortalities until boarding began.


  • Registered Users Posts: 215 ✭✭harryd2


    alastair wrote:
    Has anyone been charged with murder, let alone found guilty?
    Stand out the most ridiculous argument I've had the displeasure of reading on this thread. Do you honestly expect the soldiers to man up and face prosecution? The jist of the UN report so far points to a grave wrong doing by the Israeli pirates on that day. I think you should accept that and move on.
    Indeed reminds me of the arguments after the fallout from Bloody Sunday & Widgery
    Clutching at straws..


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,473 ✭✭✭robtri




    So firing a gun at civilians is not an attack in alistair world?

    and attacking a solider with bars is also an attack.....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,007 ✭✭✭Phill Ewinn


    robtri wrote: »
    and attacking a solider with bars is also an attack.....

    Defending yourself against pirates (using non lethal means I add) isn't criminal either.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,473 ✭✭✭robtri


    Defending yourself against pirates (using non lethal means I add) isn't criminal either.

    purposely provoking another and being armed isnt criminal, stupid but not criminal i will agree ... and tthe opposing side arent pirates....


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,007 ✭✭✭Phill Ewinn


    robtri wrote: »
    purposely provoking another and being armed isnt criminal, stupid but not criminal i will agree ... and tthe opposing side arent pirates....

    That's a point worth debating.
    noun
    a person who attacks and robs ships at sea

    How is it that you've come to the conclusion that this description doesn't fit?


Advertisement