Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest
9/11 Attacks
Comments
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
I find the second note folding part most relevant here.My name is URL wrote: »I did read it, but you're basing your belief on specific factors which were selectively chosen for the means of giving a particular outcome
I did laugh at the Tolkien reference alright but after a quick google it seems there's a lot of people trying to make a connection between him and Freemasonry. It's quite amusing actually, especially when you consider the fact he got most of his inspiration from pagan sources such as Kalevala and The Ring Cycle of the Niebulung along with other ancient Celtic and Germanic mythology.0 -
-
namloc1980 wrote: »What does the book have to do with 9/11??
Because Sauromans tower was taken down by a controlled explosion. It was an inside job!! Don't believe me? Explain this so!
0 -
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
I find the second note folding part most relevant here.
I did laugh at the Tolkien reference alright but after a quick google it seems there's a lot of people trying to make a connection between him and Freemasonry. It's quite amusing actually, especially when you consider the fact he got most of his inspiration from pagan sources such as Kalevala and The Ring Cycle of the Niebulung along with other ancient Celtic and Germanic mythology.
Patternicity tbh.. I think everyone displays it though. It's abundant in this forum.. from both sides when you think about it
When you notice that your microwave is displaying 12.34, it's actually the "trademark" prompt of a group of just 1,234 fun-loving hellraisers, or spirits.. or whatever else you're into, and the 12:34 prompt is their way of using our innate ability for pattern recognition to let us know that they are here.
on the eleventh of November 2011, I bet people will pay attention to the fact that there's a pattern in the date.. even though there is no logical reason to do so0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
Happyman42 wrote: »Alastair, I apologise for my post. You are correct, it was alcohol fueled. As you have quoted it, it is kinda pointless deleteing the insults in it, but I will.
I totally agree with Demonspawn that we should be silent today. To all who have given their lives and happiness on that day and as a result of that day: rest in peace.
Ha Ha, withdraw nothing. Drink fuelled posts are the best, most honest 
Happy 9/11 everyone 0 -
princeofparma wrote: »[
No that hand symbol is the international sign language symbol for "love"
The number 9 is left out because it is sacred to the Illuminati. 5/5/1776 is when the Illuminati was founded. 5 + 1 + 1 + 7 + 7 + 6 => 27 = 2 + 7 = 9.
Thats nothing did you know that the towers are actually Capricorns?0 -
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
You know you can feel when you're stepping over people !
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
I believe that the commission achieved what it set out to achieve successfully within the remit of what it did. The committee chair agrees.
Rather than demand I find my own flaws in my own beliefs, perhaps you'd like to do you own work. You're unsatisfied with my opinion as to what happened on 9/11 don't expect me to make your argument for you.
Thomas Keane, Chairman of the 9/11 commission report :
"it was destined to fail"
You believe what you want di0genes, actually !!! the chairman said it failed to achieve what it set out to achieve.
0 -
Advertisement
-
You believe what you want di0genes, actually !!! the chairman said it failed to achieve what it set out to achieve.
No he doesn't. He says quite the opposite. You do understand the difference between accusations of being 'set up to fail' and actually 'failing'?0 -
-
-
Do you know anything about what happened that day?
As is well known - when the plane hit the building a fireball came down the lift shaft and into the lobby - killing and burning a number of people and damaging some of the lobby.
http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/9...gz/blaich.htmlLobby & 3rd floor: Firefighter Peter Blaich
As we got to the third floor of the B stairway, we forced open an elevator door which was burnt on all three sides. The only thing that was remaining was the hoistway door. And inside the elevator were about I didn’t recognize them initially, but a guy from 1 Truck said oh my God, those are people. They were pretty incinerated. And I remember the overpowering smell of kerosene. That’s when Lieutenant Foti said oh, that’s the jet fuel. I remember it smelled like if you’re camping and you drop a kerosene lamp.
The same thing happened to the elevators in the main lobby. They were basically blown out. I do’nt recall if I actually saw people in there. What got me initially in the lobby was that as soon as we went in, all the windows were blown out, and there were one or two burning cars outside. And there were burn victims on the street there, walking around. We walked through this giant blown-out window into the lobby.
There was a lady there screaming that she didn’t know how she got burnt. She was just in the lobby and then next thing she knew she was on fire. She was burnt bad. And somebody came over with a fire extinguisher and was putting water on her.
That’s the first thing that got me. That and in front of one of the big elevator banks in the lobby was a desk and I definitely made out one of the corpses to be a security guard because he had a security label on his jacket. I’m assuming that maybe he was at a table still in a chair and almost completely incinerated, charred all over his body, definitely dead. And you could make out like a security tag on his jacket. And I remember seeing the table was melted, but he was still fused in the chair and that elevator bank was melted, so I imagine the jet fuel must have blown right down the elevator shaft and I guess caught the security guard at a table, I guess at some type of checkpoint.0 -
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
Security wasn't tight for internal flight's back then and the weapons were just box cutters not ak47's
Also WTC was not designed to survive a hit by an aircraft. Some people just had a chat about it
That is a far cry from being specifically designed to survive a hit
ugghhh
Video's have been posted of the towers architects stating they were designed to take several hits from 707 jets.
Then someone stated that the plane that hit was larger than a 707 jet.
Then I stated, it's only a bit bigger, plus a 707 is faster and they were designed for several hits from a 707 !!
Then someone pointed out that the architects didn't take into account that the planes could have a full fuel load.
And now I am pointing out, do you take us for fuking retards and expect us to believe they didn't take fuel into account ?
Were they solar or wind powered plane they thought might hit the towers on a foggy day ? 0 -
ugghhh
Video's have been posted of the towers architects stating they were designed to take several hits from 707 jets.
Then someone stated that the plane that hit was larger than a 707 jet.
Then I stated, it's only a bit bigger, plus a 707 is faster and they were designed for several hits from a 707 !!
That was a construction manager said that before 9/11. It's akin to saying the Titanic was unsinkable before she sailed.Then someone pointed out that the architects didn't take into account that the planes could have a full fuel load.
And now I am pointing out, do you take us for fuking retards and expect us to believe they didn't take fuel into account ?
Were they solar or wind powered plane they thought might hit the towers on a foggy day ?
The Chief Structural Engineer Leslie Robertson said they never took into account a plane with a full fuel load being deliberately crashed into the building. They only considered a slow flying plane low on fuel lost in fog on a landing pattern as the only example they had of a plane crashing into a building was the B25 in 1945. What you state is incorrect.0 -
ugghhh
Video's have been posted of the towers architects stating they were designed to take several hits from 707 jets.
Then someone stated that the plane that hit was larger than a 707 jet.
Then I stated, it's only a bit bigger, plus a 707 is faster and they were designed for several hits from a 707 !!
Then someone pointed out that the architects didn't take into account that the planes could have a full fuel load.
And now I am pointing out, do you take us for fuking retards and expect us to believe they didn't take fuel into account ?
Were they solar or wind powered plane they thought might hit the towers on a foggy day ?
ON that note.
September 11: planes that hit WTC were not Boeing 767s
http://www.voltairenet.org/article166661.htmlThe official report by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) relating to the two planes that crashed into WTC on September 11, 2001 shows that they were traveling at a speed of 945 km/h and 796 km/h respectively.
Pilots for 9/11 Truth, an international organization of pilots and aviation professionals, has pointed out that, according to the manufacturer, the Boeing 767 develops structural failure and dismembers at a speed surpassing 660 km/h when flying at near sea level in thick air. This has also been certified by a former senior NASA executive, Dwain Deets.
It necessarily follows that the aircraft that slammed into the World Trade Center could not have been the planes corresponding to commercial flights United 175 and American 11.
In his book The Big Lie, Thierry Meyssan had entertained the possibility that the two aircraft had actually been substituted by military planes according to the procedure contemplated in Operation Northwoods (p. 168).
The NTSB report, which was declassified at the request of Pilots for 9/11 Truth, had already revealed that the cockpit door of flight American 77 had remained locked from the time of take-off until it disappeared from radar screens and allegedly crashed at the Pentagon site. The logical conclusion is that it would have been materially impossible to highjack the flight.0 -
-
Advertisement
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ssuAMNas1us
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zv7BImVvEyk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nyKtNHPeKxg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3uFvOiTNz4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tzrv-e37Es8
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement