Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

New Boards.ie Terms of Use and Privacy Policy - your feedback welcome

  • 16-12-2009 2:09pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,241 ✭✭✭


    Hi folks

    We are updating our Terms of Use and our site Privacy Policy. These will go live soon.

    We've put both pages up for your review:

    Terms of Use.

    Privacy Policy.


    EDIT: We have now put these live and you can see them here:

    Terms of Use

    Privacy Policy

    This is the first revision of both documents and are an important step for us. We welcome all questions, though if there is something you disagree with, please do let us know below with your reason.

    Your input will be most appreciated and valid points will be factored in to the next revision.

    Thanks for your time

    Darragh
    Post edited by Shield on


«13456

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    First things first: Journal.ie??


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,241 ✭✭✭Darragh


    Overheal wrote: »
    First things first: Journal.ie??

    Journals.ie ? Yes?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Thats the first time ive heard it mentioned. When did that happen?

    edit: T&C
    [you agree not to]

    # post Material that contains violence, or offensive subject matter or contains a link to an adult website
    # post Material that promotes or encourages illegal activity
    # post Material that infringes any patent, trademark, trade secret, copyright, rights of privacy or publicity, or other proprietary right of any party

    [you may not use a username which]

    # Contains any profanity, is vulgar or offensive, or promotes an illegal activity;
    # Misleadingly impersonates someone else.
    These Terms get abused quite a lot. When you quote a news article (a gun violence article perhaps) or register a username with Bertie's name just to make AH jokes, or if people discuss smoking weed, drinking underage, or pirating software or other digital material.
    You agree to waive any moral rights in your Material for the purposes of its posting on Boards.ie and the purposes specified above.
    :confused:
    8.1 Links to other websites

    This website contains links to other websites operated by third parties over whom we have no control. Such links are provided for your convenience only and we accept no responsibility or liability in respect of the content or use of other websites.

    Some of these sites may contain materials that are objectionable, unlawful, or inaccurate. The fact that these links appear does not mean that we endorse these third party sites or services.

    If you do decide to leave the Boards.ie site and access third party sites you do so at your own risk.
    This reads as a backdoor to allowing, for instance, links to torrents etc. doesnt it

    I dont see anything wrong with the Privacy Statement but can you expand on this point?
    The previous website address from which a visitor reached us, including any search terms used;
    Is that just when we follow a hyperlink to boards (like on google), or is it also when we navigate (type our url) into boards? eg. would you know if I switched over to boards immediately after coming off of youtube?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,452 ✭✭✭Time Magazine


    I had a quick read, Darragh.

    "We reserve the rights to change usernames at our discretion." Typo?

    "...the following will lead to a suspension of your privileges on Boards.ie: ... extended periods of inactivity." I don't think that will lead to anything. Pedantic, I know, but these things are pedantic documents.

    Introduction: "Adverts Marketplace Ltd"
    Section 9: "Adverts Marketplaceing Ltd"
    Section 11.4: "Adverts Marketing Marketplace Ltd"
    Section 11.5: "Adverts Marketplaceing Ltd"
    etc. Make your mind up! You have registered the first one.

    Then I gave up. Also I would suggest that you specify in the Privacy Statement that PMs are private unless (i) yer asked by the cops to show the goods or (ii) the PM is reported. I think that's something that should be adhered to but also specified.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,739 ✭✭✭✭minidazzler


    Regarding the Privacy Policy
    Information relating to your use of Boards.ie generally. This includes, for example, private messages, login and logout times, polls you’ve voted on, threads to which you have subscribed and posts you’ve thanked.

    Can you guys read any PM's sent? Or just the ones reported?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,311 ✭✭✭✭Quazzie


    I have to agree with TM here.

    Someone needs to read over this and fix a lot of grammar mistakes.
    Why is there so many capital letters sporadically placed around it?

    I'm no spell czech but if I notice it I'm pretty sure others will.
    post Material that promotes or encourages illegal activity
    As Overheal states this is broken all the time. Does discussing smoking weed count break this rule?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    I use Capitals a lot in my posts (not that anyone ever notices) when lightly emphasizing certain Terms or Phrases, especially Nouns.
    #Post material that promotes or encourages Illegal Activity
    fyp.

    But yeah we've got marijuana usernames and self proclaimed pirates and and and yeah. These points could do with some polishing. Speaking of misleading usernames (Bertie Ahern) perhaps some names should be protected until they are registered using an official email address.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,479 ✭✭✭Conor


    Can you guys read any PM's sent? Or just the ones reported?

    If a PM is reported, the Admins will see the contents of it.

    If a PM is not reported then the only people who can read it are those with direct database access. Currently, that's Ross and me. We're not permitted to read PMs unless explicitly instructed to and the only time that has happened during my time here was when a user was PM spamming and we needed to find out the extent of the spam run. Other than that, my only interaction with the private message portion of the database has been to collect anonymous, aggregated statistics.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,972 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    So Piss Flaps is no more?

    Shame :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    mike65 wrote: »
    So Piss Flaps is no more?

    Shame :(
    Id like to request a name change....


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 43,045 ✭✭✭✭Nevyn


    Overheal wrote: »
    Thats the first time ive heard it mentioned. When did that happen?

    Journals.ie has been running a long time, mines been active for the last 5 years.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37 iWillBeReborn


    What does all the following mean?

    The first bit I get.

    You are solely responsible for your conduct and any Material that you submit, post, and/or display on Boards.ie. You agree not to post Material contrary to these Terms of Use. We may, but are not obliged to, remove or limit access to Material from any user which breaches these Terms of Use.

    Then:
    By posting any Material on or through Boards.ie, you grant us a limited license to use, modify, publicly perform, publicly display, reproduce, and distribute such Materials in connection with Boards.ie or the promotion thereof.

    The license you grant to us is non-exclusive, royalty free and fully paid, sub licensable, and worldwide.

    You are responsible for making sure that you have all rights to what you post, including the rights necessary for you to grant the foregoing licenses to same.

    You represent and warrant that: (i) you own the Material posted by you or otherwise have the right to grant the license set forth in this section, and (ii) the posting of the Material does not violate the privacy rights, publicity rights, copyrights, contract rights or any other rights of any person

    You agree to waive any moral rights in your Material for the purposes of its posting on Boards.ie and the purposes specified above.


    What does all that mean for the poster? If someone wrote a short story on the writing forum do boards.ie now own that after the 21st?
    7.1 Submissions to Boards.ie

    You do not have to submit anything to us, but if you do you acknowledge and agree that any questions, comments, suggestions, ideas, feedback, or any other submissions to us which may improve our products, services, or offerings shall become our sole property unless otherwise agreed by us.
    By making a submission to us, you grant a nonexclusive, irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual, unlimited, assignable, sublicenseable, fully paid up and royalty free right to us to copy, prepare derivative works from, improve, distribute, publish, remove, retain, add, and use and commercialise, in any way now known or in the future discovered, anything that you submit to us, without any further consent, notice and/or compensation to you or to any third parties.
    If you do not want to grant us the rights set out above, please do not make submissions to us.


    What does that part mean? If I wrote you some fancy code to speed up the site, it becomes your sole property if you desire?:confused:


    Should this discussion itself not merit a site wide announcement?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,716 ✭✭✭✭Earthhorse


    I think that's exactly what both those passages mean, essentially. Though the likelihood of boards enforcing them in that manner is probably pretty slim. Still...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,441 ✭✭✭jhegarty


    You agree NOT to use Boards.ie to:
    * solicit personal information from anyone under 18

    How does one know someone is under 18 ?

    Wouldn't any public poll asking a personal question fall foul of this.
    modify, adapt, translate, or reverse engineer any portion of Boards.ie, or use any robot, spider, site search/retrieval application, or other device to retrieve or index any portion of Boards.ie, except as expressly authorised in writing by Boards.ie

    Shouldn't you updated the robots.txt as it allows most of those things ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,817 ✭✭✭ynotdu


    What is the reason that an account cannot be closed?
    I understand that to delete posts from threads would make any replys to a question etc seem ridiculous,so a persons posts would have to remain up to the date they wished to delete their account,but after that why not allow people to totally leave?{cynical thought would be that having x amount of subscribers is a good selling point for Ad's}

    Also why keep infractions on record well past the 'offense'especially for new users while they learn the ethos of the site and the diffrient rules across forums.?
    Surely keeping these infractions forever is bound to influence Admins/Mods decisions even when members have learned what is acceptable on boards and what is not{often a post is just borderline as to wether it is a rule-breaker or not}

    Often times new users have come to boards from more 'crude' sites and it takes time to adjust.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    What does all the following mean?

    The first bit I get


    ......



    What does that part me

    an? If I wrote you some fancy code to speed up the site, it becomes your sole property if you desire?:confused:


    Should this discussion itself not merit a site wide announcement?
    You know thats a good point. On one hand the T&C is claiming [Intellectual Property; Text; etc] is all surrendered to/owned by Boards, but the other half of the T&C conflicts with the first half, saying you're not responsible for all of the offensive and illegal stuff.... so tbh, which is it?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,241 ✭✭✭Darragh


    Hey all

    Thanks for the continued input. Please continue - we are reading it all, and I'll set aside time this afternoon to address all your points.

    Cheers and thank you

    Darragh


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,944 ✭✭✭Jay P


    From the terms of use:
    # post Material that infringes any patent, trademark, trade secret, copyright, rights of privacy or publicity, or other proprietary right of any party

    Surely that could include many videos on Youtube? Namely user uploaded content such as live shows and album rips. Or does this not count because it's a 3rd party site?

    About the user names:
    # Contains any profanity, is vulgar or offensive, or promotes an illegal activity;
    # Violates any trademark or other proprietary right; or
    # Misleadingly impersonates someone else.

    Is this rule going to be implemented across the board? Old users included? I can think of a good few examples of each.


    I'm sure these points have already been raised, this is just how I see things.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,263 ✭✭✭✭Eoin


    Overheal wrote: »
    Is that just when we follow a hyperlink to boards (like on google), or is it also when we navigate (type our url) into boards? eg. would you know if I switched over to boards immediately after coming off of youtube?

    A site can only tell what site you were on previously if the user clicked a link on the previous website to get to the new site.

    e.g. You're on youtube.com and type boards.ie in the address bar, there will be no record. If you're on youtube and click a link there that brings to you boards, then it can be recorded by boards.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,315 ✭✭✭Jazzy


    what a big fat load of bureaucratic sh1t. i suppose some ppl will love it though. they will learn it and wield it and impose it at every opportunity they deem necessary. with documents like these you really can get that authentic smell of importance and smug satisfaction right into your clothes at only 30 degrees. it all stinks of control and other agendas which dont really suit. and ppl wonder why there is so much red tape in the Dail and why they are so incompetent. it all begins at the lowest echelons in this country :)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,241 ✭✭✭Darragh


    Jazzy wrote: »
    what a big fat load of bureaucratic sh1t. i suppose some ppl will love it though. they will learn it and wield it and impose it at every opportunity they deem necessary. with documents like these you really can get that authentic smell of importance and smug satisfaction right into your clothes at only 30 degrees. it all stinks of control and other agendas which dont really suit. and ppl wonder why there is so much red tape in the Dail and why they are so incompetent. it all begins at the lowest echelons in this country :)

    Erm, Jazzy, what? Did you have anything constructive to offer at all? Your post is suspiciously troll-ish.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,452 ✭✭✭Time Magazine


    Darragh wrote: »
    Erm, Jazzy, what? Did you have anything constructive to offer at all?

    Darragh, he's Jazzy. He dislikes an awful lot about this site but, I presume, has nowhere else to go.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,311 ✭✭✭✭Quazzie


    Darragh wrote: »
    Erm, Jazzy, what? Did you have anything constructive to offer at all? Your post is suspiciously troll-ish.
    Why is it Troll-ish? Because it questions the need for this at all? Because he sees this as totally unnceccesary and unlikely to affect anybody with the exception of the a few mods and admins? Or maybe its trollish because he questioned why this looks like a legal document aimed at protecting BoardsCorp and screwing over the average user?

    Then again maybe it wasn't trollish at all.:rolleyes:


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,315 ✭✭✭Jazzy


    Darragh wrote: »
    Erm, Jazzy, what? Did you have anything constructive to offer at all? Your post is suspiciously troll-ish.

    well it isnt. its exactly how i feel. you asked for feedback and you got it, if you dont like it dont accuse it of being 'troll-ish' just for the sake of dismissing it.
    basically, things like these documents only serve to control. boards is already more of a personality cult instead of discussion board nowadays anyway and these documents will only enforce this. you are turning the site into a day-glo 50's american small town with the village elders and of course, the idiots to be looked down upon by all the normal, respectable folk. the site has become all about moderators and all about the different personalities. why is there "congrats to xxx for becoming a moderator" threads? i thought these were (best word usage here) 'volunteers' or some lark? surely they dont need to be tugged off by the populance to secure their position? from what i can see these documents will grant those that love authority and rules and that need to be important the flexibility to do so. and in true american 50's small town fashion, there is indeed witch hunts, or do i need to clarify my point with a jpg of a random girl from the background of a picture posted on the dating thread with a little mspaint moustache & beard? or perhaps a "profile infraction" for posting nothing offensive at all in the early hours of the morning but one of the golden gods has decided that it falls under the "don't be a d1ck" rule simply because he can? thats the reality and all these policies will only enforce it and that attitude
    Darragh, he's Jazzy. He dislikes an awful lot about this site but, I presume, has nowhere else to go.

    a lot of my friends post here and there are a lot of good aspects of this site. it has a nice soccer and games section even if the former is full of drooling 90's kids full of sugar and no sense. love the dismissive tone tho, really suits my arguement :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Jazzy wrote: »
    what a big fat load of bureaucratic sh1t. i suppose some ppl will love it though. they will learn it and wield it and impose it at every opportunity they deem necessary. with documents like these you really can get that authentic smell of importance and smug satisfaction right into your clothes at only 30 degrees. it all stinks of control and other agendas which dont really suit. and ppl wonder why there is so much red tape in the Dail and why they are so incompetent. it all begins at the lowest echelons in this country :)
    bobkelso.jpg "Damn Hippies!"

    I worry it will just act to Supersede the Charters and the Mods will just point at it to ban people with too. But then, Boards is a legal entity, and you do need a T&C. Theres not much way around that.

    I think Stan (Kyle?) Put it best in that Southpark episode with Mohammad and Family Guy - once you pull or censor one thing, you'll inevitably pull and censor more, until there is just so much red tape around that the place will choke itself into inactivity, and ultimately death.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,374 ✭✭✭Gone West


    What is the point of this?
    Was a real need identified or was it just a slow month in the boards.ie offices?

    Of course the lonely yet smug bureaucracy lovers & red tape fetishists will love this one.
    Boards is supposed to be fun, its not supposed to come with a contract.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,241 ✭✭✭Darragh


    Quazzie wrote: »
    Why is it Troll-ish?

    Because it's general statements aimed at eliciting a response rather than stating constructively why he feels that there's something amiss with it.

    Because he brings the Dáil into it for some reason?

    Because he talks of "control" and "agendas" yet fails to state where and what these are, perhaps?
    Because it questions the need for this at all? Because he sees this as totally unnceccesary and unlikely to affect anybody with the exception of the a few mods and admins?

    You don't think there's a need for this?
    Or maybe its trollish because he questioned why this looks like a legal document aimed at protecting BoardsCorp and screwing over the average user?

    This *is* a legal document. I'm not sure why you think it's out to protect the site and "screw over" the average user. Care to clarify on that point?
    Then again maybe it wasn't trollish at all.:rolleyes:

    Oh but it was. It was.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    And this discussion still isnt a sitewide announcement despite its own fine print saying users will be notified 7 days before changes are made. Whats up with that?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,241 ✭✭✭Darragh


    Jazzy wrote: »
    well it isnt. its exactly how i feel. you asked for feedback and you got it, if you dont like it dont accuse it of being 'troll-ish' just for the sake of dismissing it.
    basically, things like these documents only serve to control. boards is already more of a personality cult instead of discussion board nowadays anyway and these documents will only enforce this. you are turning the site into a day-glo 50's american small town with the village elders and of course, the idiots to be looked down upon by all the normal, respectable folk. the site has become all about moderators and all about the different personalities. why is there "congrats to xxx for becoming a moderator" threads? i thought these were (best word usage here) 'volunteers' or some lark? surely they dont need to be tugged off by the populance to secure their position? from what i can see these documents will grant those that love authority and rules and that need to be important the flexibility to do so. and in true american 50's small town fashion, there is indeed witch hunts, or do i need to clarify my point with a jpg of a random girl from the background of a picture posted on the dating thread with a little mspaint moustache & beard? or perhaps a "profile infraction" for posting nothing offensive at all in the early hours of the morning but one of the golden gods has decided that it falls under the "don't be a d1ck" rule simply because he can? thats the reality and all these policies will only enforce it and that attitude


    That's a lot of words right there Jazzy, but would you like to show where you see these documents affecting the site and how it's " turning the site into a day-glo 50's american small town with the village elders"

    I mean, specifically, here, please.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,241 ✭✭✭Darragh


    Overheal wrote: »
    And this discussion still isnt a sitewide announcement despite its own fine print saying users will be notified 7 days before changes are made. Whats up with that?

    Because they're not going live yet, are they? They're here for the discussion of people who read this thread.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,241 ✭✭✭Darragh


    el judìo wrote: »
    What is the point of this?
    Was a real need identified or was it just a slow month in the boards.ie offices?

    Ha, I wish it was a slow month! The point of this is just like every other site out there, to have Terms of use that protect users and clarify the rules and guidelines of this site.

    The amount of legal threats and queries we get on a weekly basis would surprise you.
    Boards is supposed to be fun, its not supposed to come with a contract.

    Can you point me to just one thing in the Terms of Use that prevents you from doing something you're allowed to do today, that changes the site or that would stop you from using the site?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,241 ✭✭✭Darragh


    Overheal wrote: »
    I worry it will just act to Supersede the Charters and the Mods will just point at it to ban people with too. But then, Boards is a legal entity, and you do need a T&C. There's not much way around that.

    This is an accompanying document to the charters.

    Once again, where in the TOU is there a ban on doing anything that you are currently allowed to do?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,374 ✭✭✭Gone West


    Darragh, I mean no offense to you personally but as a "communications manager" I think you need to work on the tone of your communications in this thread. You are coming across (IMO) as obnoxious and passive-aggressive.
    Darragh wrote: »
    Ha, I wish it was a slow month! The point of this is just like every other site out there, to have Terms of use that protect users and clarify the rules and guidelines of this site.

    The amount of legal threats and queries we get on a weekly basis would surprise you.

    Can you point me to just one thing in the Terms of Use that prevents you from doing something you're allowed to do today, that changes the site or that would stop you from using the site?
    Unsure what this is supposed to mean. Its clear that I did not suggest that this will limit my ability to do specific things. Just that its a shame that the site has to go this way with so much red-tape.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,315 ✭✭✭Jazzy


    Darragh wrote: »
    That's a lot of words right there Jazzy, but would you like to show where you see these documents affecting the site and how it's " turning the site into a day-glo 50's american small town with the village elders"

    I mean, specifically, here, please.

    i dont think you get it.

    el Judio wrote:
    What is the point of this?
    Was a real need identified or was it just a slow month in the boards.ie offices?

    Of course the lonely yet smug bureaucracy lovers & red tape fetishists will love this one.
    Boards is supposed to be fun, its not supposed to come with a contract.

    pretty much that.
    Overheal wrote:
    I worry it will just act to Supersede the Charters and the Mods will just point at it to ban people with too.

    and that.

    its the idea. the constitution. you are granting a license to those who love to express their authority to do so candidly. another site i was on tried to do the same and they came up with all these rules and charters and authority figures and stretched the red tape right around and guess what, it died. these documents are very patronising and only really seem to elevate those with power higher and those without, lower. as i said, boards is already a personality cult and all you are going to do is put that underlined and in bold. i dont want to feel like im under a magnifying glass because some mods have issues as to who and where they are and then make up for that here, because that is what happens (with the minority, not the majority. most mods are good).
    i dunno, if you cant understand the depth of the point im trying to make or are going to continue calling it trolling then i personally don't feel you are qualified to be doing the job you are doing


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,241 ✭✭✭Darragh


    el judìo wrote: »
    Darragh, I mean no offense to you personally ... I think you need to work on the tone of your communications in this thread. You are coming across (IMO) as obnoxious and passive-aggressive.

    Erm, thanks for the feedback. Tone is quite difficult to convey in text. Apologies for how I appeared to be interacting with you - no offense - or defence - was intended.

    I know what you mean about " its a shame that the site has to go this way with so much red-tape" but we really have no choice here. Not only is the legal situation one that we have to deal with daily, but with the continued success of Google and growth of the internet, more and more people are taking things written on the internet seriously and personally. Never a good thing.

    It was suggested that we summarise the entire document into our first Guideline - "Don't be a dick". Not a bad suggestion, I think.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,241 ✭✭✭Darragh


    Jazzy wrote: »
    i dont think you get it.




    pretty much that.



    and that.

    its the idea. the constitution. you are granting a license to those who love to express their authority to do so candidly. another site i was on tried to do the same and they came up with all these rules and charters and authority figures and stretched the red tape right around and guess what, it died. these documents are very patronising and only really seem to elevate those with power higher and those without, lower. as i said, boards is already a personality cult and all you are going to do is put that underlined and in bold. i dont want to feel like im under a magnifying glass because some mods have issues as to who and where they are and then make up for that here, because that is what happens (with the minority, not the majority. most mods are good).
    i dunno, if you cant understand the depth of the point im trying to make or are going to continue calling it trolling then i personally don't feel you are qualified to be doing the job you are doing

    But you see, you're still not giving me specific examples here.
    these documents are very patronising

    Can you show me where, please?
    only really seem to elevate those with power higher and those without, lower

    And can you show me where they do this, as well please?

    Moderators will be subject to these rules the same as everyone else.
    boards is already a personality cult

    Can you elaborate on this?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 600 ✭✭✭Rev. BlueJeans


    Maybe I'm being simplistic, I dunno.

    I have no doubt that there needs to be a usage policy of sorts on this site, but didn't we always have something along a similiar line in terms of sitewide rules and policies anyway? Wouldn't it be in order to duplicate these, in a TOU format, and pad out as appropriate?

    I assume the ultimate driver of this is to keep guys like this happy:
    31NM76DSRQL._SL500_AA280_.jpg

    On another note, how can it be that posts can be both the property of boards.ie (in that they can use them as they see fit), and yet the responsibility of the user?

    I can understand the latter totally, but we were always told that our posts were our own, and if someone submits a short story, or as someone else exemplified, a vB hack or piece of code, as many do, they now give up any and all rights for doing so?

    This is a community, as I'm sure everyone is aware, and as such there is something of a symbiosis between the critical mass of users and the hosting costs involved, due to the happy fact of advertising, and latterly customer interaction as well. Most people don't post here for the love of boards as a uniform and legal entity; they do so for the friends they have here, the problems they seek help with, the solutions they offer, in short, the whole ball of wax.

    The language here (which I know isn't unique) seems to indicate that every post is submitted to the altar of boards itself, rather than the congregation. I'd hope that isn't the intention, as it makes those running the site appear to have a grandiose view of what it is, what its function is, and the role it plays to many people, which, and I hope I don't cause offence, is in the majority of cases, a trivial one, occupying a place somewhere within playing tetris and watching Corrie, in terms of daily activity.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,241 ✭✭✭Darragh


    Maybe I'm being simplistic, I dunno.

    I have no doubt that there needs to be a usage policy of sorts on this site, but didn't we always have something along a similiar line in terms of sitewide rules and policies anyway? Wouldn't it be in order to duplicate these, in a TOU format, and pad out as appropriate?

    To be honest, I think that's what we've done to the best of our ability.

    On another note, how can it be that posts can be both the property of boards.ie (in that they can use them as they see fit), and yet the responsibility of the user?

    I can understand the latter totally, but we were always told that our posts were our own, and if someone submits a short story, as many do, they now give up any and all rights for doing so?

    That is a point that needs to be clarified.

    Anything you submit to Boards.ie is your responsibility and you retain full copyright on all posts.

    However, we may use a post, or a thread, or screenshot a page of the site for something like a presentation.

    In every instance where possible we will make contact with the poster and ask permission. If permission isn't granted, we won't use it.

    However, if we use something - for example to sell advertising over a forum - all we're saying here is that any indirect revenue that comes of that (so the advertiser buys advertising) goes to Boards.ie and not to the poster, unless there's a need for that to happen.

    Clearer?
    This is a community, as I'm sure everyone is aware, and as such there is something of a symbiosis between the critical mass of users and the hosting costs involved, due to the happy fact of advertising, and latterly customer interaction as well. Most people don't post here for the love of boards as a uniform and legal entity; they do so for the friends they have here, the problems they seek help with, the solutions they offer, in short, the whole ball of wax.

    The language here (which I know isn't unique) seems to indicate that every post is submitted to the altar of boards itself, rather than the congregation...

    That's a fair point and I'm happy to take any suggestions on how we can improve that to make it clearer on board.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,944 ✭✭✭Jay P


    Overheal wrote: »
    I worry it will just act to Supersede the Charters and the Mods will just point at it to ban people with too. But then, Boards is a legal entity, and you do need a T&C. Theres not much way around that.

    That could be a good thing though. It gives a more site-wide "rule book". I think it may lead to a more well maintained discussion board, as the rules will be officially written down. I think that's what I meant to say.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 600 ✭✭✭Rev. BlueJeans


    Sorry Darragh, I edited during your reply.
    Darragh wrote: »
    Anything you submit to Boards.ie is your responsibility and you retain full copyright on all posts.

    However, we may use a post, or a thread, or screenshot a page of the site for something like a presentation.

    In every instance where possible we will make contact with the poster and ask permission. If permission isn't granted, we won't use it.

    However, if we use something - for example to sell advertising over a forum - all we're saying here is that any indirect revenue that comes of that (so the advertiser buys advertising) goes to Boards.ie and not to the poster, unless there's a need for that to happen.

    I wouldn't have a problem with the latter myself, and the bolded points above, are to me the salient ones. The original draft above seems to suggest differently, though I accept my reading of legalese was never the best.

    If the above ethos was clarified in a redraft, I certainly, as one user wouldn't have an issue with any of the rest of it.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,315 ✭✭✭Jazzy


    boards is a personality cult due to the fact that everything has become about the different tiers. lets take an active example.

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055773205
    useless thread posted by a moderator that everyone will come into and go "oh you :D" and the generic circle jerk will go on.

    if I posted that or any regular user did it would be locked and you may get a warning depending on the mod in question and how anal they are.
    that, at a basic level, is how this site has become a personality cult. its all about who you are as to whether you are actually worth listening to or replying to. devore could probably just randomly say "fart" in some thread somewhere and he'd get a load of 'thanks' for it and a good few comments simply because he is devore. it works from the top down and as said, this will only put the top higher.

    you asked how that is sooooo:
    basically what you have written here is a contract that we have to abide to as long as we post here. im sure its lovely and makes sense and all but what you are missing is the idea and how that will effect ppl. it will give those with power a double backing. they already have the charter (and the circled wagons lest we forget) and now they are going to have a full blown legal contract. mods won't be interacted with as much, instead they will be feared. you either lick their butts or just don't talk or question them, ever. their opinion will have more weight behind it then any others and hence, its no longer a discussion site but rather a personality cult.

    the documents are patronising because, sure they apparently need to exist or some such but im not sure of that one because how long have you guys been a private company and you are only getting round to this super important issue now? i don't buy that. i deviate, they are patronising as its very much a "oh yeah, in case you forgot who your daddy is, we are your collective daddys". what of the private forums? what of all the little cliques and such? is this going to be imposed on them just as much as everyone else? and you are controlling what ppl call themselves online now too or am i making that up? who decides that? are you qualified to know what is and isnt offensive or do we just have to trust your opinion? ill let you in on a little secret, opinions dont actually exist :) they are made up, they only exist in the fabric of thought. on this world there is right & wrong, true & false. shades of grey are just there to make ppl comfortable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,584 ✭✭✭✭Steve


    In the hope that this may dispel some of the 'ownership of content' stuff being debated (this was explained rather well imo by Conor on the mod forum in a similar thread to this where we pretty much asked the same thing).

    Basically it boils down to 'boards' as an entity retaining the right to reproduce what you posted to in order to serve it to others - for example, when you read this comment, boards has effectively re-produced and re-used my words in order to serve the page that you are now reading. Without that clause, boards would effectively have to ask my permission every time someone viewed this thread.

    That's my take on it anyways.. I don't think there's anything sinister behind it, besides anything you post should be considered public domain as it can be viewed and used by anyone that has access to the internet (unless you're in China :D)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 600 ✭✭✭Rev. BlueJeans


    Jazzy: While you're not wrong in my view about an over emphasis on moderation here, it's as much by users as mods (more so when you look at the responses to that inconsequential thread, which is basically hot air from one or two people-not mods), and as such there's little DeV or the CMs can do about it.

    In any case, I don't see how a TOU policy is going to make or break that-or how it could be relevant to same in any event. Maybe I'm missing something?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,111 ✭✭✭MooseJam


    "defame, abuse, harass, stalk, threaten or otherwise violate the rights (such as rights of privacy and publicity) of others"

    I used to post on boards under a different account - it got deleted actually lot's of them got deleted, I was being a general ass - spamming crap, pretty harmless stuff like cats go meow, dogs go bow bow, actually don't remember much as I was in a permanent alcoholic haze - yah for drink - well been off it for a few years.

    Anyway a user name Devore took the information garnered from a very generous 50 euro paypal gift I made to boards to acertain my place of work - he then phoned my boss and lie'd to him - stating I had been abusive during work hours on boards and threatened legal action if it didn't stop.

    Of course it came to nothing after logs or it didn't happen.

    Anyway I believe he's like the head honcho, I also believe that his actions did all of the following

    defame, abuse, harass, stalk, threaten.

    now I was being a tit so fair play to him really, I just find it funny now.

    But the owner ? uses boards to do all of the above well then stating blah blah you get the drift.

    It's a bit pants isn't it.

    I'll probably get banned for this lulz


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,315 ✭✭✭Jazzy


    MooseJam wrote: »

    Anyway a user name Devore took the information garnered from a very generous 50 euro paypal gift I made to boards to acertain my place of work - he then phoned my boss and lie'd to him - stating I had been abusive during work hours on boards and threatened legal action if it didn't stop.


    f**king lol


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,817 ✭✭✭ynotdu


    Hi Darragh,I read both links You provided and found nothing from a Legal point of view that was not understandable.

    I would have appreciated some response to My post #16.
    There is something very disconcerting about a site that refuses to let a member leave if they want to?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,070 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    ynotdu wrote: »
    Hi Darragh,I read both links You provided and found nothing from a Legal point of view that was not understandable.

    I would have appreciated some response to My post #16.
    There is something very disconcerting about a site that refuses to let a member leave if they want to?

    It doesn't mention that you can't leave, it only states that accounts will not be deleted

    I agree with you're point though.. there should be a new user-group set up which states clearly that the member has asked to cease using the site ie "Former Poster", and those accounts should be locked down


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,241 ✭✭✭Darragh


    Yep, agreed - it's something we're looking at. Number of steps to complete.

    Not ignoring anyone's posts, just logging off for the night - back tomorrow am.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,258 ✭✭✭✭Rabies


    Am i right in thinking that there was always a Terms of Use and Privacy Policy for Boards and visible when signing up?

    But must of us skip to the bottom and hit accept :)

    Nothing major really is it.

    I see this a Boards securing itself from outside attacks. As it gets bigger, legal letters arriving in the front door will get more frequent (and some for stupid reasons)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,817 ✭✭✭ynotdu


    It doesn't mention that you can't leave, it only states that accounts will not be deleted

    I agree with you're point though.. there should be a new user-group set up which states clearly that the member has asked to cease using the site ie "Former Poster", and those accounts should be locked down

    Hi URL,thanks for the reply,I am not going to read both links again but it states that that you cannot leave as such but instead just dont log in or post again!

    That makes no sense to me except to hold onto member numbers that are not really members even Years&years after a last post,even isp.s and phone companies are only obliged to keep records after three years.It does state that an account can be suspended after a long period of non use,but that still leaves boards being able to include dead,banned or people who dont wish to be counted as members still being so.Only thing i can figure is this must be for commercial reasons.

    I may well be wrong but some answer to this would have been nice.


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement