Forum Feedback

randylonghorn

Yore a rabble rabble!!

unknown13

I have just posted my opinion accidentally on this matter in the new thread.

TBH; I was nearly going to ask for my thread to be locked last night after the Labour / FG decision.

Ginja Ninja

Insect Overlord wrote: »

Rabble rabble rabble!!! :mad:

This forum isn't cliquey enough!

Rabble rabble!

:pac:

Grindylow

Just a little feedback.

I don't think people should post others information on boards (ie: a screenshot of a person's social networking page). I know most people know eachother and all, but there should be some boundaries, that being one of them..

Colm!

Even if a link to said person's social networking page was posted by the user a few pages back in the same thread?

Insect Overlord

Maybe, Noel, if you and others kept your Twitter pages to yourselves instead of spamming the forum with them, then this wouldn't happen.

Grindylow

Colm! wrote: »

Even if a link to said person's social networking page was posted by the user a few pages back in the same thread?

Well I am entitled to post my own page aren't I? I don't go around posting other peoples pages on here.

Insect Overlord

If you put your page into this domain (i.e. the C&H forum) in the first place, then you can't really complain if others make reference to it here.

Grindylow

Insect Overlord wrote: »

If you put your page into this domain (i.e. the C&H forum) in the first place, then you can't really complain if others make reference to it here.

Clearly I can when not everyone can see my tweets.. I've a request to view profile.

unknown13

Noel2k9 wrote: »

I don't think people should post others information on boards (ie: a screenshot of a person's social networking page). I know most people know eachother and all, but there should be some boundaries, that being one of them..

Everyone has the right to anonymity here. I chose to respect my right by not posting a picture of myself in the Know your fellow *insert description thingy* thread etc.

I have twitter but I don't make it known here I have twitter. The problem Noel is that you and a few others keep posting and going about each others twitter and in turn you are basically waving your right to anonymity away.

Grindylow

unknown13 wrote: »

Everyone has the right to anonymity here. I chose to respect my right by not posting a picture of myself in the Know your fellow *insert description thingy* thread etc.

I have twitter but I don't make it known here I have twitter. The problem Noel is that you and a few others keep posting and going about each others twitter and in turn you are basically waving your right to anonymity away.

So if I add someone from here on Facebook, I've given my anonymity away. Therefore, they now have the right to print screen my page and show it here to everyone else?

Confused, I am.

unknown13

Adding someone from here is not giving your anonymity away. The fact with twitter is you always keep talking about it.

If you don't want this stuff to happen again. Then DON'T consistently mention Twitter, Facebook or other social media.

Grindylow

unknown13 wrote: »

Adding someone from here is not giving your anonymity away. The fact with twitter is you always keep talking about it.

If you don't want this stuff to happen again. Then DON'T consistently mention Twitter, Facebook or other social media.

I've mentioned it once. Unless the definition of consistently has been changed in the dictionary, then it appears your theory is flawed.

Insect Overlord

I don't think an isolated incident even warrants forum-wide feedback anyway. Stop being such a drama llama.

unknown13

Noel2k9 wrote: »

I've mentioned it once. Unless the definition of consistently has been changed in the dictionary, then it appears your theory is flawed.

I am not going to get into an agrument about this but most of the posters know that first sentence is untrue.

I am going refrain from posting in this thread for the time being until one of the mods of here have given feedback on this issue.

Grindylow

Insect Overlord wrote: »

I don't think an isolated incident even warrants forum-wide feedback anyway. Stop being such a drama llama.

Says the one who started the drama after the Jizzlers..

Insect Overlord

*round of applause*

Grindylow

Insect Overlord

Oh dear, Noel, you really don't get it. The Jizzlers thing should never have been a problem. I posted my dissatisfaction in the appropriate place. You know, the Jizzlers DISCUSSION Thread. Someone reported my post. I still don't know why they thought they needed to do that. Ginja Ninja moved the discussion here. He was a very new mod at the time, so you can't really blame him for mistakes like that. And once the posts were moved over here, you used the chance to stick up for your buddies. They had done a great job on the Jizzlers, don't get me wrong. But, for whatever reason, you turned my mole-hill piece of criticism into a mountain.

Calling me a hypocrite because you don't know how to deal with irony is just childish.

Grindylow

Insect Overlord wrote: »

Oh dear, Noel, you really don't get it. The Jizzlers thing should never have been a problem. I posted my dissatisfaction in the appropriate place. You know, the Jizzlers DISCUSSION Thread. <username> reported my post. I still don't know why he thought he needed to do that. Ginja Ninja moved the discussion here. He was a very new mod at the time, so you can't really blame him for mistakes like that. And once the posts were moved over here, you used the chance to stick up for your buddies. They had done a great job on the Jizzlers, don't get me wrong. But, for whatever reason, you turned my mole-hill piece of criticism into a mountain.

Calling me a hypocrite because you don't know how to deal with irony is just childish.

I'm pretty sure it's not part of your mod duties of Midwest to look at reported posts in C&H and to post about who reported them. As far as I know, that's something for the mods of this forum to deal with, and I'm also pretty certain that they're not supposed to disclose who reported the post.

randylonghorn

Oh STFU the lot of ye!!

The point is valid: if the facebook / twitter / whatever is on private, the fact that the thing has been mentioned or linked isn't the same as giving permission for a screenshot to be posted publicly.

That said, I doubt if any harm was intended, nor can I see how much real harm was done.

I know the forum name mentions hormones, but does every little thing have to become a dick-measuring contest?! :pac:



(Coz I'll always win, anyway! :cool:)

Insect Overlord

All reported posts go to one forum, and all mods can read them. Stop moving the goalposts. You were wrong to label me a hypocrite. At least admit to that instead of trying to change the focus of the discussion.

Grindylow

randylonghorn wrote: »

Oh STFU the lot of ye!!

The point is valid: if the facebook / twitter / whatever is on private, the fact that the thing has been mentioned or linked isn't the same as giving permission for a screenshot to be posted publicly.

That said, I doubt if any harm was intended, nor can I see how much real harm was done.

I know the forum name mentions hormones, but does every little thing have to become a dick-measuring contest?! :pac:



(Coz I'll always win, anyway! :cool:)

Oh Randy, your wisdom is greater than anyone's I have ever come across! :P

I only intended to get it out there like that, it's not really fair to post my stuff on the page, you know?

Lawliet

Insect Overlord wrote: »

All reported posts go to one forum, and all mods can read them. Stop moving the goalposts. You were wrong to label me a hypocrite. At least admit to that instead of trying to change the focus of the discussion.

I don't want to add more fuel to this drama, but really naming and shaming someone for reporting a post is not good form. Especially when it's isn't even relevant to the current argument.

Insect Overlord

Lawliet wrote: »

I don't want to add more fuel to this drama, but really naming and shaming someone for reporting a post is not good form. Especially when it's isn't even relevant to the current argument.

Noel brought it up. I've edited my post. Noel will have to edit the quote to keep ye all happy.

**Timbuk2**

While it's true that Noel had posted up his twitter page only a few days prior, I really think permission should be gotten if you're posting up something that may lean towards identifying a person, especially as it contained his full name!

You'd be surprised how easy it is to find things out about people from what they post on boards, though!

(/stalker)

Edit: Sorry I had this tab open and left the computer over an hour ago. There has been about 10 new posts about this since I posted this :eek:
Edit 2: No wait, I figured out why. I didn't realise there was a 17th page to this thread! Sorry

Colm!

Noel2k9 wrote: »

Well I am entitled to post my own page aren't I? I don't go around posting other peoples pages on here.

Yeah, but the fact that you did post your twitter page, which is public (I sign out from twitter and all of your posts including your full name are still visible), on the previous page of the thread clearly shows that it isn't some invasion of privacy when I post what was basically my twitter homepage this morning.


If you didn't want your twitter page to be visible, then why did you post it?

Grindylow

Colm! wrote: »

Yeah, but the fact that you did post your twitter page, which is public (I sign out from twitter and all of your posts including your full name are still visible), on the previous page of the thread clearly shows that it isn't some invasion of privacy when I post what was basically my twitter homepage this morning.


If you didn't want your twitter page to be visible, then why did you post it?

What's the difference? It's obviously ok for me to post my stuff, but it's also clearly not ok for you to post it.

unknown13

Noel: Will you stop trying to think you are in the right here. You are wrong, your right to anonymity wasn't breached because you gave a direct link to your own twitter page.

If you didn't, you right would have been breached.

Grindylow

unknown13 wrote: »

Noel: Will you stop trying to think you are in the right here. You are wrong, your right to anonymity wasn't breached because you gave a direct link to your own twitter page.

If you didn't, you right would have been breached.

Will you ever just be quiet? You'd swear you were the mod of C&H or something. Jesus like you never even post here but the minute feedback opens your in here saying something. .