Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Decline of Respect/Morals in Society?

  • 04-08-2009 10:22pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,572 ✭✭✭✭


    Couldn't think of a better title.

    So me and my dad were talking today about this lad who threw bleach into the face of a woman who had told him and his fellow scum to be quiet during Harry Potter.. fair do's, it might have been a bit irritating, but what's wrong with just rolling your eyes at her.. but fúcking burning them?!

    Dad was saying 'back in the day' people sorted out their problems through a fight - just a normal fist fight, none of this knife shiit. A few punches, that was it. Now these morons make it a mission to 'slash' anyone who they don't like.
    Years ago so I'm told, a murder would be massive news - nowadays, at least one a day is almost expected.

    Why is it now that people are generally more violent, lacking in morals and so completed detached from normality? If it was upbringing, wouldn't their parents have recieved the same upbringing, and been just as bad... why has society been corrupted so much that death is nothing surprising to most people, and commonplace in cities?

    What's changed? :confused:


«13

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 15,238 ✭✭✭✭Diabhal Beag


    Must be the water


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,815 ✭✭✭✭galwayrush


    Nothing, same ****, just happening to new people.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    The birth of spider-babies.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,762 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Lack of empathy or lack of fear, take you pick. My money's on empathy.

    Personally, I put it down to media. Pressure to conform and to earn and to concume is more important than having respect for other people.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    Must be the water

    hahahahaha where you're from anyway!! :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭Loomis


    Television and computer games.
    They're terrible


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,962 ✭✭✭jumpguy


    It's the full moon (seriously, full moon tonight).

    Seriously, there's not been an increase in crime, just an increase in it's reporting (in concern to England now). Knife crime has increased dramatically, however (in England and Ireland)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 15,238 ✭✭✭✭Diabhal Beag


    hahahahaha where you're from anyway!! :D
    Not Limerick thank **** :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,231 ✭✭✭✭ejmaztec


    In the good old days stressed teachers used to go berserk and beat the little sh1ts to death, so that they didn't grow up to become psychotic arseholes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,850 ✭✭✭Cianos


    It's not that there's more stuff going on, it's just that we hear of more things happening because we are so surrounded by media. Back in the day, you would only hear about things happening in your town or village. So a serious crime would be massive news. But now if something bad happens, regardless of where it took place we will hear about it. This gives the illusion that there is more to fear, but really it's just the same amount. And in actual fact, the average person is safer now than they ever have been.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 61 ✭✭bean na gaeilge


    its money - people got too greedy family life went out the window wit manners and self respect - not many hav any respect anymore!! its getting worse!! Im only 4 yrs out of school - started teaching again this year - couldnt beliv the changes in 4 yrs!! Its scary!!!!!:confused:


  • Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 23,238 Mod ✭✭✭✭GLaDOS


    Television and computer games.
    They're terrible

    And Marylin Manson

    Cake, and grief counseling, will be available at the conclusion of the test



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,190 ✭✭✭✭IvySlayer


    Because people take the psycho-path.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    People have gone mental as they're scared ****less of the beast hiding where there would be moors.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,918 ✭✭✭✭orourkeda


    Drugs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,689 ✭✭✭Vain


    I blame Grand Theft Auto:pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,594 ✭✭✭Maddison


    We are not mental....we are emotionally unwell


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,190 ✭✭✭✭IvySlayer


    Oh and I forgot to add, we all don't live in Birmingham.

    Good Night!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 15,238 ✭✭✭✭Diabhal Beag


    People have gone mental as they're scared ****less of the beast hiding where there would be moors.
    Leave Waterford natives alone :P


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26 MsTempermental


    Who brings bleach to the cinema? Maybe they were drinking it?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 711 ✭✭✭Dr_Phil


    brummytom wrote: »
    What's changed? :confused:
    Stressless breeding takes it's toll.

    See all those kids on the streets at 11-12pm including 8-10 years old girls? They have no stress, they cannot be punished for anything they do, if they trow a stone at you, you can't say a word - because they are KIDS! You are the one who's gonna be in trouble, not them. Do you really think that when they grow up, they will act like a normal human being, a member of society that reckons whats good and whats bad?

    See all these teenagers? They don't give a s*it about Gards, they know that Gards won't touch them, as they're under 18 and they're laughing... They have no stress either, they know that whatever they do will have no repercussions at all.

    World is upside down, there is no respect, no rules, no honour anymore. Drugs and money are priorities. I'm afraid to think how it is gonna look like in about 20 years from now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    Dr_Phil wrote: »
    Stressless breeding takes it's toll.

    See all those kids on the streets at 11-12pm including 8-10 years old girls? They have no stress, they cannot be punished for anything they do, if they trow a stone at you, you can't say a word - because they are KIDS! You are the one who's gonna be in trouble, not them.

    See all these teenagers? They don't give a s*it about Gards, they know that Gards won't touch them, as they're under 18 and they're laughing... They have no stress either, they know that whatever they do will have no repercussions at all.

    World is upside down, there is no respect, no rules, no honour anymore. Drugs and money are priorities. I'm afraid to think how it is gonna look like in about 20 years from now.

    You're spot on mate.










    psst I'm one of those teenagers


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,892 ✭✭✭ChocolateSauce


    Drugs are tearing apart the fabric of our society. Sex too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,735 ✭✭✭Rougies


    its money - people got too greedy family life went out the window wit manners and self respect - not many hav any respect anymore!! its getting worse!! Im only 4 yrs out of school - started teaching again this year - couldnt beliv the changes in 4 yrs!! Its scary!!!!!:confused:

    I find your grammer and spelling quite scary if you're a teacher! :eek:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,572 ✭✭✭✭brummytom


    Rougies wrote: »
    I find your grammer and spelling quite scary if you're a teacher! :eek:

    P.E teacher?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 711 ✭✭✭Dr_Phil


    Drugs are tearing apart the fabric of our society. Sex too.
    We are failing. We are failing as a society, as parents, teachers, priests... We are unable to show the way, we are too busy making money, taking drugs, having fun, so that childern have no example to follow. The laws that we had initially to protect children are failing, they turn up against us. We are going to raise a beast, but when we realise that it'l be too late.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,479 ✭✭✭✭philologos


    brummytom wrote: »
    Why is it now that people are generally more violent, lacking in morals and so completed detached from normality? If it was upbringing, wouldn't their parents have recieved the same upbringing, and been just as bad... why has society been corrupted so much that death is nothing surprising to most people, and commonplace in cities?

    If I may open a big can of worms with this one :)

    I think this is going to be an issue with many societies where faith has been rejected by a lot of people. Countries which have formerly based their values on religious tenets, when those religious tenets are rejected are going to have a void in morality and ethics while they seek for a coherent replacement.

    The problem is if we take the postmodern view that there are no absolutes, it will be incredibly difficult for people to find this coherent secular replacement for former values that people held, leading to a lack of clarity in how to pass on values and morals to people. If everything is subjective, people can make up their own minds for themselves on what morals they hold, which ultimately is far from consistent.

    Edit: It could also be something to do with the deterioration of the value of life and people regarding it as more dispensible.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,654 ✭✭✭cruiser178


    Not Limerick thank **** :pac:
    Nah...sick to death of been banned


  • Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 23,238 Mod ✭✭✭✭GLaDOS


    Dr_Phil wrote: »
    We are failing. We are failing as a society, as parents, teachers, priests... We are unable to show the way, we are too busy making money, taking drugs, having fun, so that childern have no example to follow. The laws that we had initially to protect children are failing, they turn up against us. We are going to raise a beast, but when we realise that it'l be too late.
    Us.

    Cake, and grief counseling, will be available at the conclusion of the test



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,032 ✭✭✭DWCommuter


    Maybe the Ryan report got it all wrong.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 711 ✭✭✭Dr_Phil


    Jakkass wrote: »
    I think this is going to be an issue with many societies where faith has been rejected by a lot of people.
    Yeah, and as example: atheist Sweden, Holland, Denmark, Norway....

    vs catholic:

    Mexico
    Italy (Cosa Nostra)
    vast majority of South America...

    ... ultra-safe, polite societies, no doubts.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,479 ✭✭✭✭philologos


    Dr_Phil wrote: »
    Yeah, and as example: Sweden, Holland, Denmark, Norway....

    vs catholic:

    Mexico
    Italy (Cosa Nostra)
    vast majority of South America...

    How about Germany, the UK, Finland, amongst others? As countries have seemed to become more irreligious the rate of violent crime seems to have increased. Perhaps as they become more established people will find some form of ethics again.

    Also note, I never said it was not possible for a consistent secular morality system to be formed, I just said it was very difficult. I also said that this period of lawlessness if you will would take place in the interim period while people tried to come up with this consistent secular morality system.

    Edit: Sweden has the 2nd highest violent crime rate in Europe after the UK. http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23714675-details/UK+%27has+worst+violent+crime+rate+in+Europe%27/article.do


  • Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 23,238 Mod ✭✭✭✭GLaDOS


    Dr_Phil wrote: »
    Yeah, and as example: atheist Sweden, Holland, Denmark, Norway....

    vs catholic:

    Mexico
    Italy (Cosa Nostra)
    vast majority of South America...

    ... ultra-safe, polite societies, no doubts.
    And the complete lack of violence in the Muslim dominated Middle East

    Cake, and grief counseling, will be available at the conclusion of the test



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 711 ✭✭✭Dr_Phil


    Jakkass wrote: »
    How about Germany, the UK, Finland, amongst others? As countries have seemed to become more irreligious the rate of violent crime seems to have increased.
    What's wrong with Germany or Finland? IMO it's very unlikely to get assaulted in both comparing to IE or UK. I've been, I've seen.

    EDIT:
    Jakkass wrote: »
    Like messing with stats?



    Assaults per capita:

    catholic

    Portugal: 3.59445 per 1,000 people
    Mexico: 2.40275 per 1,000 people
    Spain: 2.24221 per 1,000 people

    vs atheist

    Denmark: 1.80339 per 1,000 people
    France: 1.75554 per 1,000 people
    Germany: 1.4183 per 1,000 people

    or maybe we should look at extremely safe

    Azerbaijan: 0.0252781 per 1,000 people
    Georgia: 0.10434 per 1,000 people

    http://www.nationmaster.com


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 61 ✭✭bean na gaeilge


    Rougies wrote: »
    I find your grammer and spelling quite scary if you're a teacher! :eek:

    An Irish one.... on holidays... not very computer literate! Still learning!!!
    Apologies.....


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,972 ✭✭✭orestes


    Jakkass wrote: »

    That study makes no correllation between rates of crime in a country and religious belief amongst the population from what I can see.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 529 ✭✭✭rhapsody!


    brummytom wrote: »
    Couldn't think of a better title.

    So me and my dad were talking today about this lad who threw bleach into the face of a woman who had told him and his fellow scum to be quiet during Harry Potter.. fair do's, it might have been a bit irritating, but what's wrong with just rolling your eyes at her.. but fúcking burning them?!

    Dad was saying 'back in the day' people sorted out their problems through a fight - just a normal fist fight, none of this knife shiit. A few punches, that was it. Now these morons make it a mission to 'slash' anyone who they don't like.
    Years ago so I'm told, a murder would be massive news - nowadays, at least one a day is almost expected.

    Why is it now that people are generally more violent, lacking in morals and so completed detached from normality? If it was upbringing, wouldn't their parents have recieved the same upbringing, and been just as bad... why has society been corrupted so much that death is nothing surprising to most people, and commonplace in cities?

    What's changed? :confused:

    Americans are pretty much in charge.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,918 ✭✭✭✭orourkeda


    Rougies wrote: »
    I find your grammer and spelling quite scary if you're a teacher! :eek:

    It's grammar


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,918 ✭✭✭✭orourkeda


    And the complete lack of violence in the Muslim dominated Middle East

    You have got to be joking


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,479 ✭✭✭✭philologos


    orestes wrote: »
    That study makes no correllation between rates of crime in a country and religious belief amongst the population from what I can see.

    I never said it did, I'm refuting the notion that Sweden has a low violent crime rate which another user posted. Keep up :)

    My opinion on why violent crime has increased in the UK is merely a theory which has been discussed by conservative commentators (such as Peter Hitchens) there as well.

    The OP asked, why are people generally more violent, and lacking in morality. He also wondered what has changed.

    My take is that Britain itself has changed:
    They are more violent because life isn't valued as much as it used to be in Britain, which is true.

    They are lacking in morals due to the rejection of the former system of morality in favour of a subjective means of personal morality influenced by the postmodern idea that there are no absolutes leading to a lack of clarity.

    I said clearly that it was opening a can of worms, and indeed it did as I expected :)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,972 ✭✭✭orestes


    orourkeda wrote: »
    You have got to be joking

    Erm, I think they were being a wee bit sarcastic


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    orourkeda wrote: »
    You have got to be joking

    Ah, he was being sarcastic..... :pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,972 ✭✭✭orestes


    Jakkass wrote: »
    I never said it did, I'm refuting the notion that Sweden has a low violent crime rate which another user posted. Keep up :)

    My opinion on why violent crime has increased in the UK is merely a theory which has been discussed by conservative commentators there as well.

    The OP asked, why are people generally more violent, and lacking in morality. My take is:
    They are more violent because life isn't valued as much as it used to be in Britain, which is true.

    They are lacking in morals due to the rejection of the former system of morality in favour of a subjective means of personal morality influenced by the postmodern idea that there are no absolutes leading to a lack of clarity.

    I said clearly that it was opening a can of worms, and indeed it did as I expected :)

    Your original posts put forward the position that cultures/countries become more violent as the culture/members of the population become less religious. To support this position you put forward the names of a few countries which are generally thought of to be athiest countries and stated they have violent crime rates, citing the study I quoted as an example. I don't debate the figures of the study (although I do find them dubious personally), what I don't understand is the jump from a rejection of a former system of morals necessarily being a rejection of religion, as religion is not the only source or inspiration of morality in a culture.

    Arguing that the rejection of a former moral system and life isn't as valued as it formerly was is an interesting position, but I think it is jumping the gun a bit and putting the cart before the horse to say it all boils down to the decline of religion.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 515 ✭✭✭In All Fairness


    An Irish one.... on holidays... not very computer literate! Still learning!!!
    Apologies.....

    You should have apologised for the spelling but asked him why he found your grandmother scary (people in glass houses).;)

    Sorry just read Ourokeda's post. Too late:o


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,918 ✭✭✭✭orourkeda


    orestes wrote: »
    Erm, I think they were being a wee bit sarcastic

    Its still the lowest form of wit I see.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,479 ✭✭✭✭philologos


    orestes wrote: »
    Your original posts put forward the position that cultures/countries become me violent as the culture/members of the population become less religious.

    It's not even that. It's more based on a buffer period where one morality has been rejected and people are trying to find a non-religious set of morals that are as effective as the former religious ones.
    orestes wrote: »
    To support this position you put forward the names of a few countries which are generally thought of to be athiest countries and stated they have violent crime rates, citing the study I quoted as an example.

    I don't consider them "atheist" countries. Rather countries that have gotten more violent as more people have rejected the former Christianity of their respective nations. I personally wouldn't consider Britain an atheist nation, but a nation that is forgetting it's former Christian values.
    orestes wrote: »
    I don't debate the figures of the study (although I do find them dubious personally), what I don't understand is the jump from a rejection of a former system of morals necessarily being a rejection of religion, as religion is not the only source or inspiration of morality in a culture.

    A rejection of a system of ethics is surely going to lead to confusion? At least I would have thought that it is somewhat reasonable.

    I never said that religion was the only source of morality, but that it is generally more coherent than values based on subjectivism and postmodernism.

    I find it funny because atheists usually argue that Christianity was merely contrived as a means of controlling people and keeping them good (which isn't really accurate), and yet when I argue this it's straight on the defence for many :pac:
    orestes wrote: »
    Arguing that the rejection of a former moral system and life isn't as valued as it formerly was is an interesting position, but I think it is jumping the gun a bit and putting the cart before the horse to say it all boils down to the decline of religion.

    I don't claim my position as fact, but as a theory of mine. It also served the purpose of sparking discussion :)


  • Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 23,238 Mod ✭✭✭✭GLaDOS


    orourkeda wrote: »
    Its still the lowest form of wit I see.
    I'll go with a pun next time so

    Cake, and grief counseling, will be available at the conclusion of the test



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,750 ✭✭✭liah


    FFS, do you really need to drag more Christian propaganda into literally every single thread you come across?

    Can't there just be one without all this BS?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,972 ✭✭✭orestes


    Jakkass wrote: »
    It's not even that. It's more based on a buffer period where one morality has been rejected and people are trying to find a non-religious set of morals that are as effective as the former religious ones.

    I don't consider them "atheist" countries. Rather countries that have gotten more violent as more people have rejected the former Christianity of their respective nations. I personally wouldn't consider Britain an atheist nation, but a nation that is forgetting it's former Christian values.

    A rejection of a system of ethics is surely going to lead to confusion? At least I would have thought that it is somewhat reasonable.

    I never said that religion was the only source of morality, but that it is generally more coherent than values based on subjectivism and postmodernism.

    I find it funny because atheists usually argue that Christianity was merely contrived as a means of controlling people and keeping them good (which isn't really accurate), and yet when I argue this it's straight on the defence for many :pac:

    I don't claim my position as fact, but as a theory of mine. It also served the purpose of sparking discussion :)

    No problem at all, I agree that your theory is interesting and might hold some merit as the change of the moral standpoint of a culture and the rejection of formerly accepted social norms could lead to a backlash as people rebel against the old morality.

    I don't agree about singling out the decline of christianity as the main reason for the rise in violent crime however. What about countries with little or no Christian influence which have a prevailing anti-humanist culture, China for example, or countries like the United States or Brazil which still have a massive christian presence in their culture and influence in terms of morality but is renowned for violent crime/murder?

    I'm open to the idea of a change in moral values leading to a rise in crime, but I think that putting it down to the decline in christian belief is a bit far fetched and seems to be getting the issue backwards and looking for reasons why rejecting christianity is bad rather than looking for causes of vthe increase in violent crime. It just seems to me that the position seems to have started with the answer and then looking for the question I'm afraid rather than the other way around


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,572 ✭✭✭✭brummytom


    liah wrote: »
    FFS, do you really need to drag more Christian propaganda into literally every single thread you come across?

    Can't there just be one without all this BS?

    I asked for opinions on causes for the apparent decline of morals in society.
    Jackass is offering his opinion (which I would be inclined to agree with, along with other factors).

    What's the problem?


  • Advertisement
Advertisement