Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Higher Level Physics

Options
1456810

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,211 ✭✭✭celtic723


    smndly wrote: »
    Right heres some answers i got... Can anyone confirm them?:

    Q1. g=10.15

    Q2. f= 15. (something)

    Q3 mew= 6x10^-5

    Q5. (h) emf= 45V

    Q6. (i) a= 2.97
    (iii) friction = 26.2N

    Centripetal force = 771
    Height = 5.01

    Q9. (i) 0.16
    (iii) 16A
    (iv) 40000 W

    Q10. Max net mass of particles: 7.13x10^-27
    :pac::pac::pac:


    think your g is wrong coz i got 9.8 spot on
    0.16 is correct
    can't remember what else i got.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 67 ✭✭Dmullar


    smndly wrote: »
    Right heres some answers i got... Can anyone confirm them?:

    Q1. g=10.15

    Q2. f= 15. (something)

    Q3 mew= 6x10^-5

    Q5. (h) emf= 45V

    Q6. (i) a= 2.97
    (iii) friction = 26.2N

    Centripetal force = 771
    Height = 5.01

    Q9. (i) 0.16
    (iii) 16A
    (iv) 40000 W

    Q10. Max net mass of particles: 7.13x10^-27
    :pac::pac::pac:
    I got the same results for questions 2, 9 and 10, but I got 9.8 spot on for Q1. And i got something way different for question 2....:(


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 108 ✭✭Alexl


    will I lose much for forgetting a 2? cause I wrote out the formula and everything I just forgot to use the 2 when multiplying it out =(

    I doubt you'll lose too many marks. Maybe 3-6, they cant punish the same mistake twice so I wouldnt be too concerned.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11 Pixiesticks


    for the net mass of particles in Q10 did you have to multiply the energy by 2 cause there were 2 protons?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,082 ✭✭✭Fringe


    Hm.. I got 10.2 for g in Q1. Does anyone know what the range usually is? I was going to do it again but I wasted about 40 minutes doing that question so I moved on.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 4,630 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    for the net mass of particles in Q10 did you have to multiply the energy by 2 cause there were 2 protons?

    Yah, the total energy was 4 GeV.

    According to 2004's marking scheme (the last time g by free fall came up), as long as your answer is in the 9.8 - 10.2 range you're ok. I got 10m/s^2 for mine, anyway.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 48 CallMeDoctor


    smndly wrote: »
    Right heres some answers i got... Can anyone confirm them?:

    Q1. g=10.15

    Q2. f= 15. (something)

    Q3 mew= 6x10^-5

    Q5. (h) emf= 45V

    Q6. (i) a= 2.97
    (iii) friction = 26.2N

    Centripetal force = 771
    Height = 5.01

    Q9. (i) 0.16
    (iii) 16A
    (iv) 40000 W

    Q10. Max net mass of particles: 7.13x10^-27
    :pac::pac::pac:

    Hey i got 10.3 for gravity!

    For people who got 9.8 did ye calculate it from d graph?? Because no marks otherwise g= slope x 2

    Ya i got d same also for Q 9 and 10 :D
    Hopin for the A1


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,211 ✭✭✭celtic723


    Hey i got 10.3 for gravity!

    For people who got 9.8 did ye calculate it from d graph?? Because no marks otherwise g= slope x 2

    Ya i got d same also for Q 9 and 10 :D
    Hopin for the A1


    aye i done it both ways and got 9.8 both times.WOOO


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 48 CallMeDoctor


    celtic723 wrote: »
    aye i done it both ways and got 9.8 both times.WOOO

    Nicew one wel done how many marks wu i lose for bein out of the range?


  • Posts: 4,630 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Nicew one wel done how many marks wu i lose for bein out of the range?

    Again, according to 2004's marking scheme, you'd lose 3.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 48 CallMeDoctor


    Again, according to 2004's marking scheme, you'd lose 3.
    Thanks man did anyone get lyk 63 m/s^2
    for the max acceleration in d shm question!?:cool:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 108 ✭✭Alexl


    Thanks man did anyone get lyk 63 m/s^2
    for the max acceleration in d shm question!?:cool:

    Dont think so, me and my friends all got 6 point something, not quite sure......

    Did anyone get 22 for the maximum number of orders???


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 67 ✭✭Dmullar


    Thanks man did anyone get lyk 63 m/s^2
    for the max acceleration in d shm question!?:cool:
    I think i got 1.5

    63 would be very fast for a ball attached to a spring, thats about 220 km/h.
    Alexl wrote: »
    Dont think so, me and my friends all got 6 point something, not quite sure......

    Did anyone get 22 for the maximum number of orders???
    I got 14


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 399 ✭✭lou91


    Yeah I got 22 for that.
    Then you multiply it by two for images on each side.
    I forgot the central image though, so left it as 44 when it should have been 45. :(


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 185 ✭✭Mallox


    oh that exam was a disaster .. tink i passed it tho ... hey why was amreicium not found in nature .. is it an isotope or sometin???


  • Registered Users Posts: 234 ✭✭Heggy


    Yeah, I got 45 for the no. of images.
    Annoyed I forgot to double the energy in the particle physics.
    I was pleasantly surprised by the paper though.
    Of the ones I did, I'd say the heat pump one was the most awkward.
    Anyone else do that?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 48 CallMeDoctor


    ya i know wer i went wrong now i forgot a decimal! from the start how many marks wu i lose for that is it lyk maths !!!>??:mad::mad::mad::mad:


  • Registered Users Posts: 234 ✭✭Heggy


    I couldn't see them taking away much more than a couple of marks for arithmetic errors.


  • Registered Users Posts: 234 ✭✭Heggy


    Quote:
    Originally Posted by CallMeDoctor viewpost.gif
    Thanks man did anyone get lyk 63 m/s^2
    for the max acceleration in d shm question!?cool.gif


    I think i got 1.5

    63 would be very fast for a ball attached to a spring, thats about 220 km/h.
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Alexl viewpost.gif
    Dont think so, me and my friends all got 6 point something, not quite sure......

    Did anyone get 22 for the maximum number of orders???


    I got 14

    63 was the elastic constant was it not?


  • Registered Users Posts: 11 Pixiesticks


    Mallox wrote: »
    oh that exam was a disaster .. tink i passed it tho ... hey why was amreicium not found in nature .. is it an isotope or sometin???

    I dno...I said it was unstable o.O


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,693 ✭✭✭Jack Sheehan


    Eh, it was alright. Didnt make a balls of the whole paper, even though I expected to. The experiments were ****e though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,082 ✭✭✭Pygmalion


    Oh wow I only answered like half of at least one question I took a shot at... ****


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,586 ✭✭✭sock puppet


    That went really well. Did an extra question. Did Q 5 and then 8-12.

    Think I got the calculations for Q9 wrong. I ended up with the defilibrator having a current of 16mA or something. Seems a bit low but I'm not sure how big it would have to be in reality.

    The Question 5 and 12 were easy. But I didn't know why Americium doesn't occur naturally.

    Q8 was okay. It was an extra question for me. I knew the first part mostly but I didn't get the last part about the nature of light. And did anyone get the maximum velocity of an electron? I just wrote out the figures for hf= phi + 1/2(mv^2) and solved for v.

    Q10b. Probably the easiest applied electricity question ever. You didn't have to know anything from the chapter except the induction coil and loudspeaker.

    Q11 was good too. Knew heat alright so I did well.

    Also can someone tell me which electromagnetic waves have less energy than white light? I said microwaves and infrared but I wasn't sure about infrared.


  • Registered Users Posts: 234 ✭✭Heggy


    Also can someone tell me which electromagnetic waves have less energy than white light? I said microwaves and infrared but I wasn't sure about infrared.
    Well, I didn't do that question but the higher the frequency the higher the energy.
    So, Infra red, Microwave and Radio will all have less energy.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 47 Richyj_0


    Hopefully a C...:)


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,586 ✭✭✭sock puppet


    Heggy wrote: »
    Well, I didn't do that question but the higher the frequency the higher the energy.
    So, Infra red, Microwave and Radio will all have less energy.

    Thanks. Yeah it was apart from radio waves. I always get ultraviolet and infra-red mixed up. Not that it matters anymore:D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5 ciaran brady


    i got 22.9 for the order images so i put down 23. r u supost to use pythagorous' theorem and get sin value dat way?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,082 ✭✭✭Pygmalion


    What did everyone get for half life of Americium-241?

    I got like 23 seconds doing it two different ways, then converted it to years and got something very small... I'm assuming since it asks in terms of years I should have gotten a much bigger answer.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,586 ✭✭✭sock puppet


    Pygmalion wrote: »
    What did everyone get for half life of Americium-241?

    I got like 23 seconds doing it two different ways, then converted it to years and got something very small... I'm assuming since it asks in terms of years I should have gotten a much bigger answer.

    I got around 420 years iirc.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5 ciaran brady


    americium isnt in the periodic table is dat a valid answer?


Advertisement