COD4 OR COD5

Lochy6767

Heres one for ye. Wats betta cod5 or cod4??

Dr.Millah

I have both and played both and i think i prefer WAW. Although alot of people seem to have a problem with it, i dont.

Carroller

COD 4

Although i do love shootin those dead nazi mo fo's

ToughyIRE

buy both

Nuri Sahin

COD4!

Captain-America

Both are absolutely fantastic.

Snake Plisken

I love both but WAW is my fav, even though its kicked me a couple of times like resetting my stats when I prestiged and the makin day patch that gave us the free content error, but still love the game for giving me The Dome & Asylum maps

TheGreatOne

Modern Warefare has a much better single player campaign imo, it's actually like playing through a blockbuster movie, its absolutely incredible.

With regards to the MP side of things they are both excellent shooters, two of the best around. It all depends whether your tired of the WWII setting or not, which I know a lot of people are by this stage. If you are then Modern Warefare is the way to go as an all round quality package.

Stuxnet

cod 4 hands down

Lab_Mouse

they are both excellent Online shooters.Cant beat the asylum map with your mates with just shotguns..Messy:D!

Dr.Millah

Lab_Mouse wrote: »

they are both excellent Online shooters.Cant beat the asylum map with your mates with just shotguns..Messy:D!

we had an 18 player private match on dome free for all and tdm. Great crack haha

KamiKazi

Cod5 is one of the worst FPS games I have ever played on PC.

That is all.

TheBigFella

KamiKazi wrote: »

Cod5 is one of the worst FPS games I have ever played on PC.

That is all.

Never got into the PC games so wont start the whole debate again but to see a comment like that about COD5 is unreal.

both COD4 & WAW are in a class of their own and long may the series continue.

ToughyIRE

TheBigFella wrote: »

Never got into the PC games so wont start the whole debate again but to see a comment like that about COD5 is unreal.

both COD4 & WAW are in a class of their own and long may the series continue.

clearly a console player

Epic Tissue

I'd also recommend both

KamiKazi

ToughyIRE wrote: »

clearly a console player

indeedy

dave-higgz

COD 4 for me. Not into the WW2 gameplay myself.

jonski

If you can afford it buy both . Couldn't pick one over the other .

CyanRain

They're both absolutely amazing games, but I'd pick WAW for the Multiplayer Maps like Station + Castle
Bouncing Betty's + Castle = Fun! Fun! Fun!

TheBigFella

ToughyIRE wrote: »

clearly a console player

100%

But I do wish I could Ctrl-Alt-Delete

John_Mc

Just bought WAW over the weekend and really enjoying it. The Maps are huge and I like that the guns arent as powerful or advanced as in COD4, adds a bit more skill to getting a kill

I like the addition of the dogs too

challengemaster

CoD4 without a doubt, I didn't even bother buying CoD5 after the beta...

Steffano2002

They're not even in the same league! CoD4 without breaking a sweat!

TheBigFella

TheBigFella wrote: »

both COD4 & WAW are in a class of their own and long may the series continue.

The new map pack for WAW has just nudged it ahead of COD4 for me. Especially Knee Deep.

Kirijoleth

I play both games on the PC and think CoD4 game play is a lot better than WaW. Here are my points for and against the games . . .


CoD4:

For:
Well balanced weapons
Great sound effects
A lot of highly skilled players *points at Toughy*
Great multiplayer maps

Against:
The graphics have a washed out look
Noob-tube



WaW:

For:
Zombie and co-op modes


Against:
Until this game arrived I didn’t think I’d ever see more shades of brown than Quake I.
There’s little difference between guns.
Poor sound effects
Not enough servers running co-op and zombie modes
Very few high skilled players
Higher spec PC needed with little to show for it

Steffano2002

Good analysis Kirijoleth! Except for pointing at Toughy and using the words "Highly Skilled"... LOL

Seems that if you play on the PC, you HAVE to prefer CoD4. Console players are quite happy with WaW though. Then again, that's not really surprising... Treyarch only really code for consoles (remember CoD3). In fact, Treyarch should ONLY code for consoles! That would be great!

jonski

Steffano2002 wrote: »

Seems that if you play on the PC, you HAVE to prefer CoD4.

Play on PC , much prefer COD WAW . For me COD 4 was just a spray fest .


Didn't you have a connection problem with COD WAW at the start ?

KamiKazi

Steffano2002 wrote: »

Good analysis Kirijoleth! Except for pointing at Toughy and using the words "Highly Skilled"... LOL

there is no such thing as skill in Cod4... it is all randomness to the power of <random_number>

Dinner

CoD5 by a country mile.

CoD 4 got boring very quickly with nearly every gun being identical, every map resorted to spraying (unsurprising since their was only a handful of guns that weren't full auto), and the maps were some of the worst that I've ever played. Far to small.
Single player was good but even in this respect CoD5 is better

smooch71

It's interesting that while there seems to be generally good views on both games, everybody is focusing on the multiplayer.

In terms of plot and storyline COD 4 wins hands down. WaW never really stood a chance because a lot of people wrote it off months before it came out for two reasons: World War II & Treyarch. Which wasn't really fair because it's really an excellent game.

If I had to stop playing one of them it would be WaW but I think they're both excellent games.

I suppose with Modern Warfare 2 on they way, we won't see any more map packs for COD 4?

smooch71

KamiKazi wrote: »

there is no such thing as skill in Cod4... it is all randomness to the power of <random_number>

Especially when using a mouse...