Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

N22 - Macroom to Ballyvourney (Macroom Bypass) [open to traffic]

Options
18890929394

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 962 ✭✭✭James 007



    Only 5 days ago Leo was in South Korea at the border

    Taoiseach Leo Varadkar has today visited the demilitarised zone dividing the Korean Peninsula as part of the Team Ireland Trade Mission

    Taoiseach Leo Varadkar steps onto North Korean soil on ‘sobering’ historic visit to demilitarised zone | Independent.ie


    Today, I can't help but feel if he is thinking he is in North Korea to meet the Healy Raes 🤣



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,880 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    major cities like ... Limerick

    It's not often that you get to miss a major city while you blink.



  • Registered Users Posts: 795 ✭✭✭65535


    You mention 'LILO' ?

    Are these the junctions that are on the Macroom Bypass ?

    That's what I mean -

    When I said 'If only we could do the same between Cork and Limerick' - what I meant was - build a Dual Carrigeway



  • Registered Users Posts: 69 ✭✭confidentjosh


    Sorry to correct you but Limerick is a major city in Irish terms and a major population centre. Not in international terms obviously.



  • Registered Users Posts: 69 ✭✭confidentjosh


    Yep, LILOs and roundabouts are the junctions on it.

    Given the huge numbers using the existing N20, Cork - Limerick will require a motorway. Which is technically a higher spec dual carriageway but also a lot more expensive than the narrow 2+2 dual carriageway built for the N22.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 795 ✭✭✭65535


    Quote "and therefore high powered junctions with longer slip roads will be required." - I KNOW....

    Those 'right angle junctions' without merging are a disaster waiting to happen on the Macroom Bypass and on other roads.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,546 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    Would proper flood have cost much more to have built.

    Yes, I understand that 2+2 is a lesser standard compared to HQDC / Motorway. However, what’s the cost / benefit by going with no slips and stops signs at entrances over full slip roads?

    People are idiots and having driven on this road a total of twice, I’ve had 2 incidents where people have pulled out in front of me forcing me both times to go into the overtaking lane to avoid an accident.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,607 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    I treat it as I would someone on a slip road about to merge and move over in good time to allow them to merge/ enter safely.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,546 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus




  • Registered Users Posts: 581 ✭✭✭lordleitrim


    I always move to the outer lane even on higher spec motorways where there are LILOs (Roscrea Junction on M7 for example) as the lead time for being able to see merging cars at such junctions is minimal. In fact I generally do it at all merging junctions on motorways as there is inevitably some motorists who will only join a motorway at 30kph regardless of free flow conditions.

    Sounds like it's even more imperative to do so on this road...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,546 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    Given there is a stop sign on each entrance, assume that both lanes need to be empty before you can enter the road?



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,623 ✭✭✭creedp


    Its essential but what happens when it doesn't happen?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,676 ✭✭✭serfboard


    If you think that the Roscrea junction on the M7 is bad (and it's not great), you should check out the (IMO) dangerous junctions 13 and 14 on the M18:

    (Google Streetview)

    If you are already on the M18, you can only drive past these junctions on the outer lane because some idiot will come flying around the bend and straight onto the motorway.

    In general though, I've noticed a severe decline in driving standards in 2023 - worse I think then it was before the pandemic. On single-carriageway roads, people seem to emerge from side roads straight onto main roads either without looking, or doing this crack of pretending that the hard shoulder is a merge lane.

    So it's no surprise at all to me to read reports of what people are doing on the new N22.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 11,844 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    The N22 has no merge lane or hard shoulder, so it's straight onto the driving lane from a stopped position. Cars entering the M18 at least have time to get up some sort of speed before entering the driving lane.



  • Registered Users Posts: 112 ✭✭Baldilocks


    The 'lack of' and/or 'length of' the slips on and off ANY dual carriageway/motorway, is at best poor practice.

    where possible good engineering practice should be used to mitigate the likelihood of an accident.

    I doubt that providing decent on/off slips would have had a significant impact on the overall cost, perhaps 2%? Money well spent IMO



  • Registered Users, Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,316 Mod ✭✭✭✭yerwanthere123


    The view of oncoming traffic at the Toonlane slip road heading westbound is slightly obscured by two signs on the right hand side, seems a bit dodgy to me. Can see it catching some people out.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,731 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    I wouldn't consider having merging lanes for joining DC that much safer, I've seen plenty of drivers who think they are entitled to pull over into the driving lane once they reach the end of the merging lane, regardless what speed they are doing or what other traffic is in the driving lane. At least with the stop signs for those joining, it is clear who is at fault for any accidents.

    I'd say decelerating lanes are more important for exits, without them you have people breaking hard in the driving lane.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,499 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    The point is that the N22 has a low volume of traffic. You are expected to wait until there is a gap in the traffic and you can move out and accelerate without disrupting other traffic, this is not a long wait given the traffic volume.

    Dodgy LILOS don't envisage waiting and IMHO should have a proper long acceleration lane.



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,143 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Travelled Limerick - Mallow yesterday and today. That is the next section that needs to be done.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,546 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    You’d imagine having merging lanes should be much safer as the relative velocities between cars in the event of an accident should be much lower.

    In the case of the N22 there’s a possibility of a 100kph car impacting a near stationery car.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,731 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    There must be thousands of locations around the country where there’s a possibility of a 100kph car impacting a near stationery car turning onto the road. Basically every junction on every 100kph road in the country, plus the vast majority come with the added danger of traffic coming from both sides. It is clearly not practical/possible to provide merging lanes everywhere, that's why we have stop signs.

    Drivers are required to obey signs and use there judgement on when is a suitable opportunity to join the road. The new DC N22 is obviously much safer than most other similar speed junctions as there is a second lane where vehicles already on the road can move into and right turns are not possible.



  • Registered Users Posts: 138 ✭✭Mr.CoolGuy


    So has anyone on this thread driven between Killarney and Cork at peak or non-peak times since Monday? How long did the drive take and how does it compare to 3.5 years ago?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,546 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    Everything is relative. The Ballybeg Bends on the N20 are safe if drivers stick to the limit. I don’t think anyone in here will say that the Ballybeg Bends are acceptable however.

    Ultimately the junctions on the N22 were a design choice. It was safety with traffic levels in mind vs budget. They were deemed not worth it. Only time will tell if they weren’t.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,731 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    I'm not sure what you are trying to say here, are you advocating for a programme of works to add long merging lanes for every side road joining a 100kph road? Ultimately, there are countless locations where traffic has to join a 100kph road from a standing start. If it is deemed unsafe on the new N22 where good sightlines are provided, traffic only comes from one side and a second lane is available to traffic already on the road, then it must be far more dangerous at those other locations.

    The safety of every inch of road relies on drivers following the rules of the road, obeying signage/road markings and using good judgment. If a driver decides to ignore a stop sign and plough out onto a main road without consideration for traffic already on the road, that is not a failure of road design.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,546 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    Of course not. I’m questioning whether current 2+2 design specifications make sense from a cost / benefit analysis.

    What for instance is the saving money wise on a project like this by not having slips on each junction?

    I agree that ultimately, the problem is drivers who will miss the stop sign and just blindly pull onto the road. Road design has to take these kind of drivers into account too though in order to try to minimise crashes as much as reasonably possible.



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,143 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Used the slip No 2 at Ballincollig onto the N22 heading into the city today. Driver ahead of me did not use the slip to accelerate, so three of us were emerging slowly onto the main road and running out of space. Emerging from a stopped position would have been safer, oddly enough.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,450 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    yes, there's a safety benefit in making drivers stop and check their surroundings before joining the road.

    Short slips are known to be more dangerous than having no slip lane at all, as the presence of a merging lane encourages drivers to join without thinking. That's fine if the lane is long enough for them to get to to speed, but very bad if they then get forced into the main lane before they've found a safe gap.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,607 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    I've never had to use it, but it looks like you have about 50 mtrs to merge onto a 120km DC. Luckily the slip road is downhill and traffic on the DC have a good view of the slip road and could move over for you (if they chose to do so). But you could be behind a tractor or a jeep pulling a trailer on the slip road.




  • Registered Users Posts: 21,143 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    You can accelerate quickly quite easily, as you say it's downhill, but this guy didn't and we were all, almost in slow motion being squeezed. Slow drivers can be a danger.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement