Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Paul Tibbits dies

  • 01-11-2007 11:28pm
    #1
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 400 ✭✭


    Paul Tibbits, the man who dropped the first a-bomb on Hiroshima in 1945, has died at the age of 92. Isnt it just wrong that that monster lived a long healthy life after what he took part in? He dropped a bomb that completly disintegrated human life, and caused countless cancers and suffering for years to come


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,681 ✭✭✭✭P_1


    Que 'he was just following orders ala the nazis' responses


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,563 ✭✭✭connundrum


    What would you have preferred happen to him?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,441 ✭✭✭jhegarty


    You do know more people would have died (on both sides) if the US had the invade japan ?


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 35,125 Mod ✭✭✭✭AlmightyCushion


    ruskin wrote: »
    Paul Tibbits, the man who dropped the first a-bomb on Hiroshima in 1945, has died at the age of 92. Isnt it just wrong that that monster lived a long healthy life after what he took part in? He dropped a bomb that completly disintegrated human life, and caused countless cancers and suffering for years to come

    In fairness if he didn't do it someone else would. Should the person who made the nuts and bolts for the bomb deserve to die at a young age too.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 28,128 ✭✭✭✭Mossy Monk


    ruskin wrote: »
    Isnt it just wrong that that monster lived a long healthy life after what he took part in?

    Shut up.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 310 ✭✭csm


    he was following orders. just like the nazis. what of it?

    people do crazy things when under situations like that (e.g. stanford prison experiment) and to be fair, the full extent of destruction wasn't fully known back then.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,549 ✭✭✭*Kol*


    ruskin wrote: »
    Paul Tibbits, the man who dropped the first a-bomb on Hiroshima in 1945, has died at the age of 92. Isnt it just wrong that that monster lived a long healthy life after what he took part in? He dropped a bomb that completly disintegrated human life, and caused countless cancers and suffering for years to come

    :rolleyes: Jeez.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,284 ✭✭✭wyndham


    That bomb saved millions of lives.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,972 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    Some peeps should not have teh interweb. Anyway if anyone is to blame its Oppenheimer of course! ;)

    Mike.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,290 ✭✭✭ircoha


    ruskin wrote: »
    Paul Tibbits, the man who dropped the first a-bomb on Hiroshima in 1945, has died at the age of 92. Isnt it just wrong that that monster lived a long healthy life after what he took part in? He dropped a bomb that completly disintegrated human life, and caused countless cancers and suffering for years to come

    He was the pilot.

    re
    disintegrated human life, and caused countless cancers and suffering for years to come

    The HSE is pretty much doing that now


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 400 ✭✭ruskin


    It is a useless argument to say that the bomb saved millions of lives. By the time it was dropped, the war was all but over in continental Europe and in the Pacific the Americans were obviously winning. There was no need for the bombs to be dropped on Japan, and those involved in their deployment made a serious mistake


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,441 ✭✭✭jhegarty


    ruskin wrote: »
    It is a useless argument to say that the bomb saved millions of lives. By the time it was dropped, the war was all but over in continental Europe and in the Pacific the Americans were obviously winning. There was no need for the bombs to be dropped on Japan, and those involved in their deployment made a serious mistake

    Except that Japan was going to fight until the last man , woman and child had died....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,854 ✭✭✭Sinfonia


    .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,220 ✭✭✭✭biko


    wyndham wrote: »
    That bomb saved millions of lives.
    Thanks for your input.

    Now from wiki:
    The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were nuclear attacks during World War II against the Empire of Japan by the United States of America under US President Harry S. Truman. After six months of intense firebombing of 67 other Japanese cities, on August 6, 1945, the nuclear weapon "Little Boy" was dropped on the city of Hiroshima, followed on August 9, 1945 by the detonation of the "Fat Man" nuclear bomb over Nagasaki. These are the only uses of nuclear weapons in warfare.

    As many as 140,000 people in Hiroshima and 80,000 in Nagasaki may have died from the bombings by the end of 1945, roughly half on the days of the bombings. Since then, thousands more have died from injuries or illness due to radiation. In both cities, the overwhelming majority of the dead were civilians.

    Couldn't have done more damage if they've flown the bomb planes into a building.

    Why did the yanks drop the second bomb? They've already killed more than 100.000 people. It seems survivors from the Hiroshima bombing made their way to Nagasaki and were actually bombed again.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,290 ✭✭✭ircoha


    ruskin wrote: »
    It is a useless argument to say that the bomb saved millions of lives. By the time it was dropped, the war was all but over in continental Europe and in the Pacific the Americans were obviously winning. There was no need for the bombs to be dropped on Japan, and those involved in their deployment made a serious mistake

    History is a person's opinion of what happened.:)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 595 ✭✭✭speaktofrank


    exactly. If i had been president I would have dropped a third just to spite them.
    I know a lot of veterans feel the same. remember the death march, the horrors of Japanese prisoner of war camps? The Japanese invasion of modern day China etc Pearl Harbor. The list goes on. They got what was coming to them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,336 ✭✭✭Mr.Micro


    Only the good die young .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,441 ✭✭✭jhegarty


    So ruskin, what would you have done ? if you were the US President...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,220 ✭✭✭✭biko


    exactly. If i had been president I would have dropped a third just to spite them.
    I know a lot of veterans feel the same. remember the death march, the horrors of Japanese prisoner of war camps? The Japanese invasion of modern day China etc Pearl Harbor. The list goes on. They got what was coming to them.
    I can't believe how aggressive Americans are.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,139 ✭✭✭Orange69


    This thread is teh ghey!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,983 ✭✭✭leninbenjamin


    jhegarty wrote: »
    Except that Japan was going to fight until the last man , woman and child had died....

    were they? i read somewhere recently that they were already going to surrender by the time the bombs dropped.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,230 ✭✭✭✭ejmaztec


    I understood that the nuclear attacks weren't that necessary, but the Americans wanted to send a signal to the Russians to show them what they had to offer. The Russian army was getting close to Japan and the Americans didn't like the idea of them moving in.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,883 ✭✭✭Poxyshamrock


    Mr.Micro wrote: »
    Only the good die young .

    but that doesn't mean only the evil die old! :mad:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,783 ✭✭✭Binomate


    jhegarty wrote: »
    You do know more people would have died (on both sides) if the US had the invade japan ?
    This is not true. The Japs days were numbered when the bomb was dropped. Japan had very little fight left in her. The decision to drop the bomb was completely wrong. In fact, it was more of an experiment than it was a quick end to the war.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,216 ✭✭✭✭monkeyfudge


    In fairness if he didn't do it someone else would. Should the person who made the nuts and bolts for the bomb deserve to die at a young age too.

    Believe it or not one of the Marx brothers designed the clamps for the bomb release mechanism.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 720 ✭✭✭justfortherecor


    Binomate wrote: »
    This is not true. The Japs days were numbered when the bomb was dropped. Japan had very little fight left in her. The decision to drop the bomb was completely wrong. In fact, it was more of an experiment than it was a quick end to the war.

    The Japanese (not "Japs") days had been numbered since the Battle of Midway. It didn't stop their manic fighting at Iwo Jima (216 surrendered, other 20,700 perished or commited suicide) and in Okinawa where over 200,000 died and many again commited seppaku. Invading Honshu would have been an absolute bloodbath for both sides.

    Remember, it didnt matter a damn about military capabilities and strength to the ordinary Japanese at that time. As long as they still thought they were fighting a religious war, they would have fought to the very end.

    It was only after Hiroshima and Nagasaki that Emperor Hirohito saw what awaited his country and ordered the surrender (first time he was ever heard by the Japanese people btw); they quickly laid down their arms after that and one of the most successful occupations of a defeated state ensued. Hiroshima was a tragic event but it was, unfortunately, necessary. It changed the course of Japanese history and without doubt a better Japan emerged from the whole experience.

    Look where Japan is today.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,467 ✭✭✭bushy...



    Look where Japan is today.

    Compared to where they were
    (Note date is 1933-45)
    If it helped end that .....





    don't click link if delicate etc.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,783 ✭✭✭Binomate


    The Japanese (not "Japs") days had been numbered since the Battle of Midway. It didn't stop their manic fighting at Iwo Jima (216 surrendered, other 20,700 perished or commited suicide) and in Okinawa where over 200,000 died and many again commited seppaku. Invading Honshu would have been an absolute bloodbath for both sides.

    Remember, it didnt matter a damn about military capabilities and strength to the ordinary Japanese at that time. As long as they still thought they were fighting a religious war, they would have fought to the very end.

    It was only after Hiroshima and Nagasaki that Emperor Hirohito saw what awaited his country and ordered the surrender (first time he was ever heard by the Japanese people btw); they quickly laid down their arms after that and one of the most successful occupations of a defeated state ensued. Hiroshima was a tragic event but it was, unfortunately, necessary. It changed the course of Japanese history and without doubt a better Japan emerged from the whole experience.

    Look where Japan is today.
    Yes, clearly by the way they gave up once the bombs had been dropped, they would not go out with out a fight...

    bushy... wrote: »
    Compared to where they were

    Note date is 1933-45





    don't click link if delicate etc.
    Bah ha ha. I hope you're not trying to use the fact that they carried out inhumane tests on human subjects as a justification for dropping a nuclear weapon on a city full of civilians. If you want to use that method of justification, I can retort with the fact that America was segregated at that time. Maybe if the Russians had dropped a Nuke in Manhattan the deep south would have suddenly cleaned up their act.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,441 ✭✭✭jhegarty


    Binomate wrote: »
    Yes, clearly by the way they gave up once the bombs had been dropped, they would not go out with out a fight...

    They didn't give up when the bomb was dropped , they waited until the second was ....

    they had flight left in them , but was something they couldn't fight...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 720 ✭✭✭justfortherecor


    They had fight left in them as long as the Emperor still wished them to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,182 ✭✭✭Genghiz Cohen


    but that doesn't mean only the evil die old! :mad:

    You have completely missed the meaning of that quote, and I'm not going to explain it to you.

    To the OP, do you actually think there was a day in that mans life that he didn't look back and think about all the people he killed, and then you come along and say something so unbelievably ignorant that the bile is touching the top of my throat. The people that dropped the bombs can actually be quoted as saying "Oh my God, what have we done." It wasn't their decision, and it wasn't their fault, show some God dammed respect to the man and his family.
    Now I have no love for such a vulgar display of power, but when someone comes along and says crap like this is make me sick, to my stomach. Maybe you should try living with something of that magnitude on your mind, every day for 40 odd years, gimp.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,182 ✭✭✭nyarlothothep


    best described as a fcked up course of action in a fcked up situation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 256 ✭✭patto_chan


    The tired old 'Americans = bad' argument again. Yawn.
    It is easy to make flippant comments from a safe vantage point 60 years later. The Pacific war end game was complex.
    Richards Rhodes wrote an excellent book on the development and use of the atomic bombs at the end of WW2. Check it out.

    It is argued that more people died in a firebombing raid in Tokyo in March 1945 than in the immediate aftermath of both A-bomb attacks. Yet very few people have heard of that raid.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,592 ✭✭✭✭Dont be at yourself


    Whatever about the need to drop the bomb, there was certainly no need to drop the bomb on a populated city, and certainly no need to drop two bombs. And for Tibbits, considering he not once expressed remorse - and indeed re-inacted the bombing, complete with mushroom cloud, at an airshow in Texas - he'll go down as ignorant and inhumane in my book.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,266 ✭✭✭Steyr


    OP you are an Idiot, if it wasnt for the likes of The Americans and The British Operation Grun could well and truly happened on Irish soil and we could have been speaking Deutsch now or Russian, get a grip the world was at War and the Japanese were just as blood thirsty as the rest, Pearl Harbour anybody?

    If you were there then would you have let the bomb go and end a World war or would you just let it continue? Show some respect for the many who made the ultimate sacrifice for the few.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,783 ✭✭✭Binomate


    I heard the Emperor tried to phone the president of America to tell him that he was giving up, but the line was engaged because the president was on the phone to the bomber pilots telling them to nuke Japan.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,266 ✭✭✭Steyr


    May I recommend the book

    Ruin from the Air - Gordon Thomas and Max Morgan Witts
    ISBN-10: 0812885090
    ISBN-13: 978-0812885095

    Very readable account of the politics, operation and personalities.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,266 ✭✭✭Steyr


    Binomate wrote: »
    I heard the Emperor tried to phone the president of America to tell him that he was giving up, but the line was engaged because the president was on the phone to the bomber pilots telling them to nuke Japan.

    You mean a RADIO.......... First ive heard of that or of Mobile Phones on WW2 Aircraft.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,266 ✭✭✭Steyr


    This man was a true aviation professional.

    He did something for the first time, something incredibly risky, with an awesome bottom line, without question, and brought the crew and the aeroplane home.

    And changed the course of history.

    The argument will never be won, because there are as many bleeding heart liberals as there are pragmatists in this world. There can be little doubt that the taking of the Home Islands and the ultimate invasion of Japan would have slaughtered perhaps millions of souls for the same outcome.


    ALSO

    I remember seeing him on the 'The World About Us - Colonel Culpeppers Flying Circus' documentary - he was still flying FIFI (the CAF B-29) aged 65 !!! - and when questioned about his thoughts he was adamant that given the same set of circumstances he would do the same thing again.


    Tibbets had requested no funeral and no headstone, fearing it would provide his detractors with a place to protest.

    Gen Tibbets did his duty. RIP Sir.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,467 ✭✭✭bushy...


    I wouldn't be sure about the phone , how long would it take & they would have had more than one surely ?
    Binomate wrote: »
    The Japs days were numbered when the bomb was dropped. Japan had very little fight left in her.The decision to drop the bomb was completely wrong. In fact, it was more of an experiment than it was a quick end to the war.
    For sure it was part-experiment , wasn't the original worry that Germany was developing a nuke too when they stopped selling uranium from Czech ?


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,644 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    To give an idea as to just how many casualties the US was expecting in a conventional attack on Japan, no Purple Hearts have been minted since 1945. Okinawa made it plain that an assault would have been a huge bloodletting: Troops who wouldn't surrender, or who would routinely kill themselves in order to kill the Americans, and civilians who would prefer to kill themselves rather than surrender to Americans.

    NTM


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11 deadprez


    jesus i wouldn't call him a monster,what I would call him was a pilot. they didn't really know what they were dealing with in them days. Times have changed and it wont happen again. Human history isn't all sweetness and pie ya know.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,892 ✭✭✭bizmark


    ruskin wrote: »
    Paul Tibbits, the man who dropped the first a-bomb on Hiroshima in 1945, has died at the age of 92. Isnt it just wrong that that monster lived a long healthy life after what he took part in? He dropped a bomb that completly disintegrated human life, and caused countless cancers and suffering for years to come

    Asshole :rolleyes:

    R.I.P paul tibbit your actions that no doubt haunted your long life saved possible millions of people and helped keep the peace for many year's


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,418 ✭✭✭BIG-SLICK-POKER


    If i was following orders i drop it . Part of War and direct orders . No questiosn asked . Blame the goverment not the Pilot

    R.I.P


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,972 ✭✭✭orestes


    He was a pilot following orders while his country was at war. Nasty sh1t is gonna happen when the world is split in half and each half is trying to conquer the other, and the atom bomb wasn't necessarily the worst of them. Should we be happy about the death of every pilot who took part in leveling Dresden? It was war, Queensbury rules don't exactly apply


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,592 ✭✭✭✭Dont be at yourself


    And what of his attitude and actions after the war? After it was known to everyone the absolute horror that dropping the bomb led to? It seems he was completely without remorse, and even re-enacted the bombing run at an American airshow, complete with a staged mushroom cloud? How utterly crass and disgusting is that?

    It's one thing to push the button under orders, not knowing the extent of the consequences or believing there are no alternatives. That's understandable, if not entirely forgivable. But, knowing what we know now, his actions after the event were just as repulsive.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,322 ✭✭✭ian_m


    There are bad crimes going on right now under our noses but its called democracy by some leaders.

    I guess he wasn't fully aware of the consequences of his actions. I doubt a day went by when he didn't think about it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,997 ✭✭✭Adyx


    Maybe I'm wrong but isn't the title of this thread "Paul Tibbits dies". Not "was what he did right or wrong"? At the end of the day none of us knows what he was really like or how he lived his life. I find the idea of any nuclear weapons abhorrent. But I wasn't there and neither were any of you so who are ye to judge.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,202 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    Will someone tell me, who the fcuk is Paul Tibbits?

    OP? Anyone?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,139 ✭✭✭Orange69


    Slow coach wrote: »
    Will someone tell me, who the fcuk is Paul Tibbits?

    OP? Anyone?

    http://www.google.com:rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
Advertisement