Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Concerned about Emirates continuing to fly over Iraq. Is it risky?

Options
  • 18-01-2020 7:50pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 317 ✭✭


    I have a flight soon with Emirates to Dubai, which will fly over Iraq on the way. This concerns me in the current geopolitical situation, although I admit that it is personal anxiety at play more than an understanding of the actual risks.
    The latest advice to airlines and pilots about Iraq ( taken from Safe Airspace) reads as follows:

    "There was an Iranian missile strike on US military bases in Iraq on Jan 8, quickly followed by the shooting down of Ukraine Int Airlines flight 752 in Tehran by the Iranian Armed Forces, having mistaken the aircraft radar return for an inbound missile to Tehran.

    In the days following these events, many countries issued warnings to avoid the airspace of Iran and Iraq. We now classify both these countries as Level 1 - Do Not Fly airspace. Tehran and Baghdad FIRs are off-limits.

    Most airlines other than Middle Eastern carriers have now stopped overflying Iraq entirely. Traffic that normally operates through the Baghdad FIR now needs another route.

    The predominant choice for east-west flights into the Dubai area is a southerly routing via Saudi Arabia and Egypt. The aviation security picture in the Middle East, already fragile and unstable, is now unpredictable."

    My reason for posting this is to gauge the thoughts of a community that is probably more knowledgeable than me about this stuff. It appears that many aviation authorities consider Iraq to be high risk, but Emirates doesn't because it still overflies the country on pretty much every route between Dubai and the West.

    You could make the argument that hundreds of flights pass through the air corridors over Iraq every day en route to the Middle east or back West without incident. But then to counter that, you could say that hundreds of flights passed over Eastern Ukraine in the days before MH17 happened.

    Would people here feel comfortable flying over Iraq right now? Am I overblowing the risk? Thanks for any thoughts/opinions.


«13

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,033 ✭✭✭who_ru


    roro1990 wrote: »
    I have a flight soon with Emirates to Dubai, which will fly over Iraq on the way. This concerns me in the current geopolitical situation, although I admit that it is personal anxiety at play more than an understanding of the actual risks.
    The latest advice to airlines and pilots about Iraq ( taken from Safe Airspace) reads as follows:

    "There was an Iranian missile strike on US military bases in Iraq on Jan 8, quickly followed by the shooting down of Ukraine Int Airlines flight 752 in Tehran by the Iranian Armed Forces, having mistaken the aircraft radar return for an inbound missile to Tehran.

    In the days following these events, many countries issued warnings to avoid the airspace of Iran and Iraq. We now classify both these countries as Level 1 - Do Not Fly airspace. Tehran and Baghdad FIRs are off-limits.

    Most airlines other than Middle Eastern carriers have now stopped overflying Iraq entirely. Traffic that normally operates through the Baghdad FIR now needs another route.

    The predominant choice for east-west flights into the Dubai area is a southerly routing via Saudi Arabia and Egypt. The aviation security picture in the Middle East, already fragile and unstable, is now unpredictable."

    My reason for posting this is to gauge the thoughts of a community that is probably more knowledgeable than me about this stuff. It appears that many aviation authorities consider Iraq to be high risk, but Emirates doesn't because it still overflies the country on pretty much every route between Dubai and the West.

    You could make the argument that hundreds of flights pass through the air corridors over Iraq every day en route to the Middle east or back West without incident. But then to counter that, you could say that hundreds of flights passed over Eastern Ukraine in the days before MH17 happened.

    Would people here feel comfortable flying over Iraq right now? Am I overblowing the risk? Thanks for any thoughts/opinions.

    I think it's perfectly reasonable to concerned about such a flight and I personally would prefer to avoid that route. The likelihood is that all will be fine, recent tragic events not withstanding. Flying is statistically ultra safe although not an experience I enjoy myself. A distraction would help, a movie, a book or a conversation with someone else. I'm sure everything will be fine on the day.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 317 ✭✭roro1990


    who_ru wrote: »
    I think it's perfectly reasonable to concerned about such a flight and I personally would prefer to avoid that route. The likelihood is that all will be fine, recent tragic events not withstanding. Flying is statistically ultra safe although not an experience I enjoy myself. A distraction would help, a movie, a book or a conversation with someone else. I'm sure everything will be fine on the day.

    Thanks for your reply. Yeah, I have a few podcasts downloaded for distraction. My doctor can offer anxiety-reducing medication for flying, which I will probably accept.

    My increased concern is mostly in light of the fact that so many aviation authorities and advisory bodies are advising against flying over Iraq or even outright prohibiting it. For example, EASA (European Aviation Safety Agency) has advised that, "In the light of recent events in the Middle East, EASA has contacted European Union National Aviation Authorities to recommend that commercial flight operations over Iraqi airspace be avoided, as a precautionary measure."

    It is difficult not to think that Emirates continues to fly over Iraq because of the major disruption that avoiding Iraq's airspace would cause to their schedules, particularly in relation to passengers missing connections and having to be rebooked/provided with accommodation.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,849 ✭✭✭Van.Bosch


    roro1990 wrote: »
    Thanks for your reply. Yeah, I have a few podcasts downloaded for distraction. My doctor can offer anxiety-reducing medication for flying, which I will probably accept.

    My increased concern is mostly in light of the fact that so many aviation authorities and advisory bodies are advising against flying over Iraq or even outright prohibiting it. For example, EASA (European Aviation Safety Agency) has advised that, "In the light of recent events in the Middle East, EASA has contacted European Union National Aviation Authorities to recommend that commercial flight operations over Iraqi airspace be avoided, as a precautionary measure."

    It is difficult not to think that Emirates continues to fly over Iraq because of the major disruption that avoiding Iraq's airspace would cause to their schedules, particularly in relation to passengers missing connections and having to be rebooked/provided with accommodation.

    While rebooking / providing accommodation would be an issue if they avoided it, the flip side is that losing an aircraft with passengers would be much worse obviously. I would think Emirates fly over Iraq because their aviation authority allows them to and they believe it’s safe. It’s also not that huge a diversion for them.

    Saying that, I would wonder why they believe so given the other agencies are recommending against it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 317 ✭✭roro1990


    Van.Bosch wrote: »

    I would think Emirates fly over Iraq because their aviation authority allows them to and they believe it’s safe. It’s also not that huge a diversion for them.

    Saying that, I would wonder why they believe so given the other agencies are recommending against it.

    Yeah, that's what has me a bit perplexed. The fact that Emirates is deeming the airspace as safe but many other leading airlines are actively avoiding it in light of either outright bans or recommendations from agencies and aviation authorities. I don't really know what to do because cancelling and booking with a different airline would incur a huge personal expense for something that is probably still a very low likelihood of risk.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,849 ✭✭✭Van.Bosch


    roro1990 wrote: »
    Yeah, that's what has me a bit perplexed. The fact that Emirates is deeming the airspace as safe but many other leading airlines are actively avoiding it in light of either outright bans or recommendations from agencies and aviation authorities. I don't really know what to do because cancelling and booking with a different airline would incur a huge personal expense for something that is probably still a very low likelihood of risk.

    It’s a tough call for you, personally I would fly it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 19,018 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    It is a tough call. I don't think I'd put my family on a flight over Iraq at the moment. Statistically unlikely but surely it's tempting fate to fly through airspace through which missiles are being fired, though since Iran accidentally killed all those people the rhetoric is notably reduced. Ironically the deaths of these passengers in Iran probably makes air travel over Iraq safer than it was in the immediate aftermath of the US assassination of those people in Baghdad.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 317 ✭✭roro1990


    murphaph wrote: »
    It is a tough call. I don't think I'd put my family on a flight over Iraq at the moment. Statistically unlikely but surely it's tempting fate to fly through airspace through which missiles are being fired, though since Iran accidentally killed all those people the rhetoric is notably reduced.

    Yeah, to me it seems an unnecessary risk and I can't think of any good reason Emirates continues to fly over Iraq other than the fact that choosing alternative routes would impact their bottom line. I'd like to think they have more info than me about the actual risks but I dunno.

    I'll be flying alone so it will be a personal safety risk that I'm taking, but it still is causing much more angst for me than a normal flight would. It's not just my personal safety I need to account for though; there's the impact that something happening to me would have on my family aswell. The only helpful thing I've found is to look at FlightRadar and see how many flights pass over Iraq each day without incident (lots).


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,872 ✭✭✭✭Del2005


    Flying over Saudi Arabia isn't safe either as they have been attacked before and their military is incompetent, so like the 100ml fluid limit its just optics to fool people.


  • Registered Users Posts: 270 ✭✭newirishman


    I just flew that route from Dubai to Dublin last Sunday (with family for a change), and will go to Asia via Dubai again in March.
    To be honest, I had and have no concerns whatsoever, especially after Iran admitted to shooting that Ukraine aircraft.

    In case the situation escalates (again), I would reassess, but at this point I don’t see it.

    I am going that route several times a year for work, usually with Emirates, and in my experience most Airlines are targeting to not taking any risks and would reroute more drastically if there’s significant danger.

    There’s no missiles flying over Iraq / the region at this point in any case.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 317 ✭✭roro1990


    I just flew that route from Dubai to Dublin last Sunday (with family for a change), and will go to Asia via Dubai again in March.
    To be honest, I had and have no concerns whatsoever, especially after Iran admitted to shooting that Ukraine aircraft.

    In case the situation escalates (again), I would reassess, but at this point I don’t see it.

    I am going that route several times a year for work, usually with Emirates, and in my experience most Airlines are targeting to not taking any risks and would reroute more drastically if there’s significant danger.

    There’s no missiles flying over Iraq / the region at this point in any case.

    Thanks for your reply. I think reassessing in case of an escalation is the best advice. At the moment the risk is hopefully quite low, but I'll keep an eye on the news over the next day or two before my flight.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,502 ✭✭✭Noxegon


    For what it’s worth, I was supposed to be attending something in the Middle East that was cancelled in the immediate aftermath of the shoot down. I’d have gone regardless, but a sizeable percentage of those involved said no.

    The decision to travel is a personal one. Only you can make it.

    I develop Superior Solitaire when I'm not procrastinating on boards.ie.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 317 ✭✭roro1990


    Noxegon wrote: »
    For what it’s worth, I was supposed to be attending something in the Middle East that was cancelled in the immediate aftermath of the shoot down. I’d have gone regardless, but a sizeable percentage of those involved said no.

    The decision to travel is a personal one. Only you can make it.

    That's interesting that a sizeable percentage said no. It shows that it's not just me who automatically assumes the worst will happen! True that the decision is ultimately only one I can make, I guess I was posting to gauge the consensus from people who are interested in aviation to see if they'd be comfortable making the same journey.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,730 ✭✭✭✭Inquitus


    You'll be flying over Iraq at 39000-41000 feet, personally I wouldn't give it a 2nd thought, but as mentioned above, it is your own choice of what risk is acceptable to you, and if you are a nervous flyer this may ruin the experience for you.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,780 ✭✭✭jamo2oo9


    AFAIK, FAA is the only aviation agency to ban aircraft from Iraq/Iran airspace. No other agencies have done so. It's ultimately down to the airlines to decide if it's safe to fly through their airspace or not. A few airlines did reroute their aircraft around the Iran/Iraq airspace for a few days but resume normal routes afterwards when the situation de-escalated.

    Personally, you would be fine. The odds of you being shot down at 30,000+ feet is astronomically low. In the last 100 years, there has been 31 airplanes shot down (civilian). Only 3 of these were shot down whilst at cruising altitude with S2A missiles. Rest were all shot down by missiles but during take-off or landing or by military aircraft.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,178 ✭✭✭killbillvol2


    roro1990 wrote: »
    Yeah, to me it seems an unnecessary risk and I can't think of any good reason Emirates continues to fly over Iraq other than the fact that choosing alternative routes would impact their bottom line. I'd like to think they have more info than me about the actual risks but I dunno.

    This is nonsense tbh. You think maybe Emirates haven't assessed the risks and you're better informed than them?

    As to the bottom line, taking the most cynical view, having a 777 and 300+ passengers shot down would have far more impact on their bottom line than changing the routing.

    And which alternative route would you be happier with? Flying over Iran? Or Israel/Egypt /Saudi Arabia?


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,856 ✭✭✭trellheim


    You think maybe Emirates haven't assessed the risks and you're better informed than them?
    Ukraine Airlines had a perfect safety record until PS752 was shot down.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 317 ✭✭roro1990


    This is nonsense tbh. You think maybe Emirates haven't assessed the risks and you're better informed than them?

    As to the bottom line, taking the most cynical view, having a 777 and 300+ passengers shot down would have far more impact on their bottom line than changing the routing.

    And which alternative route would you be happier with? Flying over Iran? Or Israel/Egypt /Saudi Arabia?

    I don't think I'm better informed, I literally wrote in my comment that I'd like to think they have more info than me, but I don't know...because I don't actually know.

    I'd prefer they flew over Egypt and Saudi Arabia. I'm pretty sure they wouldn't be allowed in Israel's airspace.


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,261 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    If 1 in 10 of all shot down aircraft have been above 30000 ft,
    I think it's risky to over fly those areas.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 317 ✭✭roro1990


    mickdw wrote: »
    If 1 in 10 of all shot down aircraft have been above 30000 ft,
    I think it's risky to over fly those areas.


    I think it's risky too but I only think so because several aviation authorities and agencies have banned carriers from overflying Iraq. Carriers from the UK, Holland, Germany, USA are all avoiding Iraq, and one would think they are a good barometer of deciding what is safe.

    I think that statistic about shootdowns leaves out the context of there only being 31 shootdowns in 100 years out of I'm guessing X hundred million flights.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,780 ✭✭✭jamo2oo9


    mickdw wrote: »
    If 1 in 10 of all shot down aircraft have been above 30000 ft,
    I think it's risky to over fly those areas.

    Two civilian aircrafts have been shot down in the last 15 years. In that time period, over 561,000,000 flights have taken place. The odds of being shot down is 0.00000000035%.

    You have a better chance of being hit by a lightning, bitten by a shark, dying from fireworks or even winning the lotto...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 23,450 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    jamo2oo9 wrote: »
    The odds of being shot down is 0.00000000035%.

    Statistics like that are meaningless though if you just happened to be on PS752.

    It wasn't a 0.00000000035% chance for them.

    Accidents (or "accidents" in this case) happen.

    It's not a lottery.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 317 ✭✭roro1990


    Statistics like that are meaningless though if you just happened to be on PS752.

    It wasn't a 0.00000000035% chance for them.

    Accidents (or "accidents" in this case) happen.

    It's not a lottery.

    So what are you saying then? You wouldn't fly with Emirates at cruising altitude because a plane got downed on take off over Iran? Just curious.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,382 ✭✭✭FFVII


    jamo2oo9 wrote: »
    Two civilian aircrafts have been shot down in the last 15 years. In that time period, over 561,000,000 flights have taken place. The odds of being shot down is 0.00000000035%.

    You have a better chance of being hit by a lightning, bitten by a shark, dying from fireworks or even winning the lotto...

    Statistics don't apply to the individual.

    OP will fairly kick himself on the long fall down from 41000 feet for the sake of €€€.

    Emirates are taking an extra risk here for their bottom line, simple as.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,248 ✭✭✭✭BoJack Horseman


    Why would the Iraqi army shoot down an airliner?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,258 ✭✭✭bikeman1


    I would be more concerned with the drive to and from the airport at either end. That is a much riskier activity than the flight over Iran.

    Emirates management will have taken a risk assessment on matters and have acted accordingly. There is any increased risk, but not enough to warrant re routing of a fellow Middle Eastern countries airline at 40,000 ft.

    Enjoy your flight on the massive 77W and your trip on the other end.


  • Registered Users Posts: 270 ✭✭newirishman


    FFVII wrote: »
    Statistics don't apply to the individual.

    OP will fairly kick himself on the long fall down from 41000 feet for the sake of €€€.

    Emirates are taking an extra risk here for their bottom line, simple as.

    "Statistics don't apply to the individual"? Not sure what that's supposed to mean to be honest.

    People are notoriously bad at assessing risk, and this post is a good example of it.

    Accusing Emirates of putting people's lifes at risk for some money is frankly ludicrous. This is one of the most regulated and security aware industries, with a safety record that is second to none.

    But as someone else pointed out, it is everyone's personal decision.


  • Registered Users Posts: 78,247 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    Why would the Iraqi army shoot down an airliner?
    Why would Iran shoot down an airliner?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 317 ✭✭roro1990


    Victor wrote: »
    Why would Iran shoot down an airliner?

    Not to justify it but they were on high alert in the immediate aftermath of launching missiles at US military bases in Iraq. The Iraq defense forces hopefully don't just randomly aim missiles at their own airspace that can wipe out a civilian aircraft at cruising altitude. My reason for being worried is that several Western aviation authorities consider it high risk but Emirates apparently don't.


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,872 ✭✭✭✭Del2005


    roro1990 wrote: »
    I think it's risky too but I only think so because several aviation authorities and agencies have banned carriers from overflying Iraq. Carriers from the UK, Holland, Germany, USA are all avoiding Iraq, and one would think they are a good barometer of deciding what is safe.

    I think that statistic about shootdowns leaves out the context of there only being 31 shootdowns in 100 years out of I'm guessing X hundred million flights.

    The country's that are avoiding the airspace are the ones who killed thousands of people in the region so they have a good reason to


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,537 ✭✭✭Dr. Bre


    I recently flew from Doha to Dublin. Flew over Iran and close to Baghdad. I was very nervous


Advertisement