Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

March Running Challenge

2

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,484 ✭✭✭✭Murph_D


    fletch wrote: »
    You sure you have lap pace on and not instantaneous pace? I turned on "Every Second Recording" (instead of Smart Recording) and GPS + Galileo to try improve accuracy.

    Yes, definitely looking at lap pace. :) Quite possible I am not using the most accurate settings alright, must check that. Thanks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭zico10


    1|3:59|
    2|3:55|-4
    3|3:51|-4
    4|3:48|-3
    5|3:45|-3
    6|3:44|-1
    7|3:40|-4
    8|3:39|-1
    9|3:34|-5
    10|3:31|-3

    The above table shows the times for laps 5-14 on my Strava activity.

    https://www.strava.com/activities/4919909993/laps

    This challenge suits my current training a little bit better than the February challenge did. I've no idea the total number of points I got. So shotgun you'll have to tot it uo.

    A progression run wasn't in my schedule (a 13km run was), but if I could increase my pace by only 1-2 seconds per kilometre, I'd still be able to stick with my original plan for the 13 kilometres and stay within my desired pace range. This wasn't as easy as I was hoping though, and a not insignificant wind made it even harder to meter out the effort. After a 1km warm up, I was hoping to get the challenge neatly wrapped up in the first 10km of the 13km run, but a 5 second difference between kilometres 2 and 3 scuppered those plans. I'd successfully increased the pace for those first 10km, but I thought I'd be able to nullify the 5 second gap if I kept going and submitted a 10km stint after that aberration. There was another 5 second drop thereafter though, and unfortunately there's no workaround.

    This will be my one and only effort for March, so no matter how many points it gets me, it can go into the table as my final tally.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 585 ✭✭✭axe2grind


    Unfortunately No. Fair play for having a go at all 3. 13 points still your top score.

    For medium risk the 3x 22 sec don't count unless you have the 5x 1 sec in the bag. You score 2x 1 sec for +2pts but missed 2 splits (-4pts). So score for that run was +6 for progression and +2 for bonus = 8 points.

    Also you need to score 10+5 on low and high risk, so 15pts total on each.
    Lol, I misunderstood completely :D

    So for the extra bonus one has to opt for the 10 second low risk option and do it perfectly.

    My terrain is undulating. The end of my 2nd km is on a small incline and I have problems keeping even pace there. Of the 3 runs, I have messed that split twice. The rest of the hills are in the first half of a km, so there is time to try get pace back to target.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,623 ✭✭✭dna_leri


    dna_leri wrote: »
    Made a first attempt at this tonight and almost ran into one of our medal hopes for Torun this weekend, also running in the woods after dark.

    Got the progression bit right but don't think I qualified for any bonus, though I still don't understand the medium bonus.
    The 1K progressions were -11,-3,-4,-7,-7,-8,-11,-10,-10.

    Started off nice and slow and increased the pace a little. Floundered a bit as I hit hills in the middle section. Came back on target towards the end and had to work on the 9th one and finished strong. I can probably make multiple attempts at this but if it's like previous challenges, my first attempt will be my best one.

    Had another go at this last night.
    Conditions were not great and did relatively better but still no bonus points.
    On my Polar watch my progressions were -9,-7,-10,-12,-9,-11,-10,-9,-12.
    Strava was a bit more generous with the roundings: -9,-8,-9,-12,-10,-10,-10,-10,-11 but still not enough.
    That's as good as my watch accuracy will allow but I might still roll the dice once more next week as it fits well with my training at the moment. Keeps those Tuesday runs from being boring and sets me up for a few short hill reps at the end.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,208 ✭✭✭shotgunmcos


    zico10 wrote: »
    1|3:59|
    2|3:55|-4
    3|3:51|-4
    4|3:48|-3
    5|3:45|-3
    6|3:44|-1
    7|3:40|-4
    8|3:39|-1
    9|3:34|-5
    10|3:31|-3

    The above table shows the times for laps 5-14 on my Strava activity.

    https://www.strava.com/activities/4919909993/laps

    This challenge suits my current training a little bit better than the February challenge did. I've no idea the total number of points I got. So shotgun you'll have to tot it uo.

    A progression run wasn't in my schedule (a 13km run was), but if I could increase my pace by only 1-2 seconds per kilometre, I'd still be able to stick with my original plan for the 13 kilometres and stay within my desired pace range. This wasn't as easy as I was hoping though, and a not insignificant wind made it even harder to meter out the effort. After a 1km warm up, I was hoping to get the challenge neatly wrapped up in the first 10km of the 13km run, but a 5 second difference between kilometres 2 and 3 scuppered those plans. I'd successfully increased the pace for those first 10km, but I thought I'd be able to nullify the 5 second gap if I kept going and submitted a 10km stint after that aberration. There was another 5 second drop thereafter though, and unfortunately there's no workaround.

    This will be my one and only effort for March, so no matter how many points it gets me, it can go into the table as my final tally.

    Thank for participating. Your total is as follows

    10 points for progression
    -5 points for not stopping on 10.00
    +2 for the 2x 1 sec drops
    Total 7 points


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭zico10


    Thank for participating. Your total is as follows

    10 points for progression
    -5 points for not stopping on 10.00
    +2 for the 2x 1 sec drops
    Total 7 points

    :confused: Don't worry I won't throw a strop over this, and I guess you made it clear in the OP, but I would have thought I was entitled to a warm up and cool down surely? The challenge wasn't the main goal of the run, so I wasn't going to save the 10km as one activity; no more than I needed to have a 35 minute run saved for February's Challenge, or how some people continued running after they thought an hour had gone by in January.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,208 ✭✭✭shotgunmcos


    zico10 wrote: »
    :confused: Don't worry I won't throw a strop over this, and I guess you made it clear in the OP, but I would have thought I was entitled to a warm up and cool down surely? The challenge wasn't the main goal of the run, so I wasn't going to save the 10km as one activity; no more than I needed to have a 35 minute run saved for February's Challenge, or how some people continued running after they thought an hour had gone by in January.

    You split out the 35 mins for Feb. Maybe in another run you can put in a 10k progression with warm up and cool down. Rule was 10.00 so a run or a split, don't mind. Understand that your run was priority and challenge as an accessory, so thank again for participating if its your only go, you get an extra point for that anyway. Just a bit of fun :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 438 ✭✭Omeceron


    Attempt 2. I think I have this calculated correctly. On the boards with 5 points.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,208 ✭✭✭shotgunmcos


    Omeceron wrote: »
    Attempt 2. I think I have this calculated correctly. On the boards with 5 points.

    Hmm
    10.00 progression = 10 points
    2 splits missed = -4 points
    3x 1 sec drops = +3 (high risk)

    Total = 9 points :)

    Note progression splits don't necessarily count by themselves (unless they are 1 sec).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 933 ✭✭✭jamule


    High risk mess. 5 outta 10 , I have no idea if i get more or less points! Had a GPS disaster at the end of the 8k, was at 4:18 at .98k, it jumped to 04:15 at .99k and then back to 4.20 at 1k, fook!


    1 00:04:23
    2 00:04:23
    3 00:04:23
    4 00:04:22
    5 00:04:21
    6 00:04:20
    7 00:04:19
    8 00:04:20
    9 00:04:18
    10 00:04:17


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,191 ✭✭✭healy1835


    jamule wrote: »
    High risk mess. 5 outta 10 , I have no idea if i get more or less points! Had a GPS disaster at the end of the 8k, was at 4:18 at .98k, it jumped to 04:15 at .99k and then back to 4.20 at 1k, fook!


    1 00:04:23
    2 00:04:23
    3 00:04:23
    4 00:04:22
    5 00:04:21
    6 00:04:20
    7 00:04:19
    8 00:04:20
    9 00:04:18
    10 00:04:17

    Go big or go home :cool: Nice effort


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,208 ✭✭✭shotgunmcos


    jamule wrote: »
    High risk mess. 5 outta 10 , I have no idea if i get more or less points! Had a GPS disaster at the end of the 8k, was at 4:18 at .98k, it jumped to 04:15 at .99k and then back to 4.20 at 1k, fook!


    1 00:04:23
    2 00:04:23
    3 00:04:23
    4 00:04:22
    5 00:04:21
    6 00:04:20
    7 00:04:19
    8 00:04:20
    9 00:04:18
    10 00:04:17

    Need the link dude, thanks :cool: But provisionally thats some effort at the high risk.

    10 pts for the progression (once 10.00 validated)
    5 pts for 5/9
    -6 pts for missing 3 splits (such is the high risk)
    Provisional Total 9 points

    Edit: No real need for validation as you have 10 point on the table already. Goes to show that a simple progression is 10 points but the high risk is high risk!
    I'd recommend folk try the -5 or so first and bank 10 points. The bonuses are not easy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,412 ✭✭✭fletch



    High Risk
    10x exact 1 sec consecutive drops = + 10pts
    +1 point for every 1 sec faster split achieved plus +1 for hitting all 9.
    Remember its -2 points for a same/slower lap
    Should this read "9x exact 1 sec consecutive drops = + 10pts"?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 933 ✭✭✭jamule


    Need the link dude, thanks :cool: But provisionally thats some effort at the high risk.

    10 pts for the progression (once 10.00 validated)
    5 pts for 5/9
    -6 pts for missing 3 splits (such is the high risk)
    Provisional Total 9 points

    Edit: No real need for validation as you have 10 point on the table already. Goes to show that a simple progression is 10 points but the high risk is high risk!
    I'd recommend folk try the -5 or so first and bank 10 points. The bonuses are not easy.

    https://www.strava.com/activities/4923546409/laps

    Am i on for the bonus bonus now?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,208 ✭✭✭shotgunmcos


    jamule wrote: »
    https://www.strava.com/activities/4923546409/laps

    Am i on for the bonus bonus now?

    Emmm yes you got 5, but lost all of your base progression score :eek:

    10 pts for the progression (once 10.00 validated)
    5 pts for 5/9
    -5 pts for missing 10.00 (10.01)
    -6 pts for missing 3 splits (such is the high risk)
    Actual Total 4 points

    @fletch - you are right.. Kurt_G pulled me up on that already :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,191 ✭✭✭healy1835


    10 Mile attempt in the bag. Wasn't feeling 100% today so skipped planned session and did this instead. Went for the 15 sec drop per mile, planning to start at 8:15 pace and work down to 6min miles and that actually felt like a bit of a stretch the way I was feeling.
    It sort of gradually occurred to me as the run went on that I'd really have to put it in coming home. At the same time my lunch choice of spicy cous cous was rearing it's head and I was feeling under pressure from about 5 miles on. Figured I'd come too far not to finish the thing so got it done in the end.

    Didn't get the 15 sec drops, was close on the majority. It's tough to get them bang on! If I had of tried for the last couple, it would have more than likely of been myself that would have been dropping into a ditch, so i backed off a little.

    I'll let Shotgun Vorderman work his computational magic :)

    My reading is the following;

    8:10
    7:54 (-16)
    7:38 (-16)
    7:23 (-15)
    7:07 (-16)
    6:51 (-16)
    6:35 (-16)
    6:18 (-17)
    6:07 (-11)
    5:56 (-11)

    Edit: Just looked at the OP by Shotgun. I actually stole the term 'Royal Flush' from Martin Yelling on Marathon Talk so I can't claim any credit for that :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,761 ✭✭✭ReeReeG


    Attempted the challenge this evening. My first mistake was forgetting to change my lap alerts to each km instead of each mile... and then many mathematical errors were made resulting in a pace much faster than intended for the final few kms! I think I only get a paltry 3 points thanks to my stoopid watch adding 0.01 at the end, and a failed progression in km 6 :-/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,208 ✭✭✭shotgunmcos


    Healy 10 points, nicely done and close!

    ReeReeG 3 points. In fairness you were 1 second and 0.01km off 10 points!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,412 ✭✭✭fletch


    High Risk
    10x exact 1 sec consecutive drops = + 10pts
    +1 point for every 1 sec faster split achieved plus +1 for hitting all 9.
    Remember its -2 points for a same/slower lap
    fletch wrote: »

    I make that 10 points for full progression (finished bang on 10:00 and didn't miss any splits) + 1 for 5/9 laps exactly 10secs faster giving a total of 11 points
    Had a go at the high risk. Splits were as follows, see activity here

    KM|Pace|Difference
    1|4:30|
    2|4:29|-1
    3|4:27|-2
    4|4:26|-1
    5|4:25|-1
    6|4:23|-2
    7|4:22|-1
    8|4:21|-1
    9|4:19|-2
    10|4:18|-1


    I think that's 6 points?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,208 ✭✭✭shotgunmcos


    fletch wrote: »
    Had a go at the high risk. Splits were as follows, see activity here

    KM|Pace|Difference
    1|4:30|
    2|4:29|-1
    3|4:27|-2
    4|4:26|-1
    5|4:25|-1
    6|4:23|-2
    7|4:22|-1
    8|4:21|-1
    9|4:19|-2
    10|4:18|-1


    I think that's 6 points?

    From Strava on the first split, I see 4:29, 4:29 for the overview or 4:30, 4:28 for the laps

    So I count 5x -1 which would give you 15 points for this, the top score so far for March and the overall lead :)

    Perhaps Garmin gives you that first split? Either way, hell of an effort!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,412 ✭✭✭fletch


    From Strava on the first split, I see 4:29, 4:29 for the overview or 4:30, 4:28 for the laps

    So I count 5x -1 which would give you 15 points for this, the top score so far for March and the overall lead :)

    Perhaps Garmin gives you that first split? Either way, hell of an effort!
    That is strange...I see 4:30 - 4:29 for the overview on Strava. I'm currently downloading the Connect IQ SDK to see if I can develop a data field with millisecond lap pace accuracy

    splits.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,208 ✭✭✭shotgunmcos


    fletch wrote: »
    That is strange...I see 4:30 - 4:29 for the overview on Strava. I'm currently downloading the Connect IQ SDK to see if I can develop a data field with millisecond lap pace accuracy

    splits.jpg

    :D Leaving no stone unturned :D Here's what I see. An the overview show 4:29, 4:29. I did say I wouldn't do decimal places for my sanity :rolleyes::(

    Apologies for being sticky about it, but if you show me the -1 for the first split, I'll pump it from 15 pts to 16 pts. Then I'll do a table update before I lose track

    Lap Distance Time Pace Elev HR
    1 1.00 km 4:30 4:30 /km 8 m 133 bpm
    2 1.00 km 4:28 4:28 /km -3 m 150 bpm
    3 1.00 km 4:27 4:27 /km -3 m 143 bpm
    4 1.00 km 4:26 4:26 /km 4 m 152 bpm
    5 1.00 km 4:24 4:24 /km 1 m 152 bpm
    6 1.00 km 4:23 4:23 /km -11 m 157 bpm
    7 1.00 km 4:22 4:22 /km 7 m 159 bpm
    8 1.00 km 4:21 4:21 /km 3 m 154 bpm
    9 1.00 km 4:19 4:19 /km 2 m 157 bpm
    10 1.00 km 4:17 4:17 /km -4 m 153 bpm


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,412 ✭✭✭fletch


    :D Leaving no stone unturned :D Here's what I see. An the overview show 4:29, 4:29. I did say I wouldn't do decimal places for my sanity :rolleyes::(

    Apologies for being sticky about it, but if you show me the -1 for the first split, I'll pump it from 15 pts to 16 pts. Then I'll do a table update before I lose track

    Lap Distance Time Pace Elev HR
    1 1.00 km 4:30 4:30 /km 8 m 133 bpm
    2 1.00 km 4:28 4:28 /km -3 m 150 bpm
    3 1.00 km 4:27 4:27 /km -3 m 143 bpm
    4 1.00 km 4:26 4:26 /km 4 m 152 bpm
    5 1.00 km 4:24 4:24 /km 1 m 152 bpm
    6 1.00 km 4:23 4:23 /km -11 m 157 bpm
    7 1.00 km 4:22 4:22 /km 7 m 159 bpm
    8 1.00 km 4:21 4:21 /km 3 m 154 bpm
    9 1.00 km 4:19 4:19 /km 2 m 157 bpm
    10 1.00 km 4:17 4:17 /km -4 m 153 bpm
    I won't split hairs over a point. :)

    I see the table you quoted above in the Laps of the activity alright (which would give me 15 points) but on the Overview, I see this (which would give me 16 points)

    splits.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,208 ✭✭✭shotgunmcos


    fletch wrote: »
    I won't split hairs over a point. :)

    I see the table you quoted above in the Laps of the activity alright (which would give me 15 points) but on the Overview, I see this (which would give me 16 points)

    splits.jpg

    Really odd :confused::confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,412 ✭✭✭fletch


    Really odd :confused::confused:
    That is very strange...I didn't photoshop...I swear :D...go with the 15 points and I guess I'll go out and give it another shot...although I think I've got 5 points then in both the low and high risks so I'll have to give the medium a go for the brucey bonus :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,208 ✭✭✭shotgunmcos


    fletch wrote: »
    That is very strange...I didn't photoshop...I swear :D...go with the 15 points and I guess I'll go out and give it another shot...although I think I've got 5 points then in both the low and high risks so I'll have to give the medium a go for the brucey bonus :)

    You have the +5pts in high but not low. You got 5/9 for +1. You need +5 bonus for each challenge to get the last bonus...

    Med bonus you basically need to hit 5/5 -1s.

    Each risk is challenging and the last bonus is super challenging :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,208 ✭✭✭shotgunmcos


    March Table Update #2 :)

    A few more scores on the doors

    Pos|Runner|Jan|Feb|March pts|Total

    1|fletch*|19|18|15|54
    2|crisco10*|18|17|11|48
    3|jamule*|15|19|10|46
    4|Omeceron*|20|13|9|44
    5|mister paul*|12|16|10|40
    6|Comic Book Guy*|11|14|11|38
    6|Murph_D|18|8|11|38
    8|Lambay Island|14|18||33
    9|axe2grind*||18|13|32
    10|dna_leri*|4|13|10|29
    10|healy1835*|18||10|29
    12|Kander*|10|17||28
    13|Antrim Glens*||20|5|26
    14|Annie get your Run*|9|15||25
    15|Swashbuckler*|18|5||24
    16|eyrie*|18|4||23
    17|ReeReeG*|5|11|3|21
    18|Zico10*|1|11|7|20
    18|BeginnerRunner|20|||20
    18|Conor74*||20||20
    21|py*||19||19
    22|eposhea*||17||18
    22|Shotgunmcos*|16|2||18
    24|Unknown Unthought|17|||17
    25|Kurt_Godel*|1|15||16
    25|TFBubendorfer*||16||16
    27|edinrunna*||14||15
    28|Dudda|13|||13
    29|Dubh Geannain*|2|9||12
    29|racersedge||12||12
    29|Strawberry Swan*||12||12
    32|En Passant*|7|3||11
    33|Wubble Wubble*|10|||10
    33|jackc101*||10||10
    35|Laineyfrecks|1|7||9
    36|skyblue46|8|||8
    36|Pherekydes*|1|6||8
    38|omicron*|6|||6
    39|Huzzah|3|||3
    40|Tummer||||
    40|OOnegative||||


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,221 ✭✭✭crisco10


    In the spirit of posting poor efforts too... went for the high risk option this morning.

    Didn’t go so well, lol.

    Drops were (-1.6, -0.7, -1.8, -0.9, +1.1, +1.2, -1.0, -1.1, -1.4, -0.8). Also forgot to stop the watch at end and ran 10.06.

    So ended up with about -5 for the run. No need to check shotgun!

    What’s interesting is those times above are from garmin. But Strava shows a bonkers 5th km split for me. It’s about 6 seconds quicker than any of my other splits.

    Think that was my last effort with this challenge. My running pace is just not smooth enough to hit splits to 1 second resolution. And I need to see a physio about my left shoulder now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 933 ✭✭✭jamule


    I'm giving up on the high risk. going by watch I had 6 from 9, when it uploads its 4 , Strava has it at 3. At least i stopped the watch at exactly 10K this time

    https://connect.garmin.com/modern/activity/6433612640


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,476 ✭✭✭Comic Book Guy


    Must be the day that's in it but i went for the high risk one today too.
    Mile 1- 7:49
    Mile 2- 7:49, ah flip
    Mile 3- 7:47, ah here
    Mile 4- 7:46
    Mile 5- 7:45
    Mile 6- 7:44
    Mile 7- 7:43
    Mile 8- 7:42
    Mile 9- 7:41 I'm thinking this is a pure doddle!
    Mile10- 7:42 FFS!

    I was slightly too fast towards the end of the last mile so slowed way down and then forgot that my Garmin doesn't beep for a full 2 seconds after the lap goes from 0.99 to 1.00 and a mad 10 metre sprint couldn't save me!
    Amd then to cap it all my car was just up the road a small bit so never thought of stopping tye watch and ended up doing 10.05 miles.

    I won't even bother uploading a screenshot this time round, will have another go next Monday!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,208 ✭✭✭shotgunmcos


    Had a go. Stopped on 10.00km

    Km1 5:12
    Km2 5:10 (-2)
    Km3 5:09 (-1)
    Km4 5:08 (-1)
    Km5 5:07 (-1)
    Km6 5:06 (-1)
    Km7 5:05 (-1)
    Km8 5:02 (-3)
    Km9 5:00 (-2)
    Km10 4:07 (-53)

    Full progression (10pts) +5 bonus pts = 15pts total


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,412 ✭✭✭fletch


    Had a go. Stopped on 10.00km

    Km1 5:12
    Km2 5:10 (-2)
    Km3 5:09 (-1)
    Km4 5:08 (-1)
    Km5 5:07 (-1)
    Km6 5:06 (-1)
    Km7 5:05 (-1)
    Km8 5:02 (-3)
    Km9 5:00 (-2)
    Km10 4:07 (-53)

    Full progression (10pts) +5 bonus pts = 15pts total
    What was the last km all about? :confused::D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,208 ✭✭✭shotgunmcos


    fletch wrote: »
    What was the last km all about? :confused::D

    Strides :) It wasn't necessarily planned as a go at the challenge but I had 10k easy to do so why not. The strides at the end were a planned part of the run. I might have abandoned strides if I was on for a full high risk bonus.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,513 ✭✭✭Dubh Geannain


    Points on the board. Nice hilly route I wasn't within an asses roar of getting any bonus. I've done better progressions with less mental strain in the past. I was only going for the 10 second increments too.

    https://www.strava.com/activities/4956321827

    1. 5:43 - missed my 5:40 planned start
    2. 5:30 (-13) - okay I'll get into the swing of this. Steady now.
    3. 5:13 (-17) - NOOOOO! Need to reign in or I'll be into 10 k pace by the end.
    4. 5:02 (-11) - So close
    5. 4:53 (-9) - So close again
    6. 4:43 (-10) - Finally
    7. 4:29 (-14) - Useless. you got cocky kid.
    8. 4:23 (-6) - YES 10 seconds I thought. NO when I realised I was working off the wrong number when I got home.
    9: 4:09 (-14) - It really is a nice day to be out
    10. 4:00 (-9) - Just make sure it's a progression at least.

    PS - I now hate my watch. The lying b*****d.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,761 ✭✭✭ReeReeG


    1. 5:43 - missed my 5:40 planned start 2. 5:30 (-13) - okay I'll get into the swing of this. Steady now. 3. 5:13 (-17) - NOOOOO! Need to reign in or I'll be into 10 k pace by the end. 4. 5:02 (-11) - So close 5. 4:53 (-9) - So close again 6. 4:43 (-10) - Finally 7. 4:29 (-14) - Useless. you got cocky kid. 8. 4:23 (-6) - YES 10 seconds I thought. NO when I realised I was working off the wrong number when I got home. 9: 4:09 (-14) - It really is a nice day to be out 10. 4:00 (-9) - Just make sure it's a progression at least.


    I thoroughly enjoyed this commentary


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,623 ✭✭✭dna_leri


    dna_leri wrote: »
    Had another go at this last night.
    Conditions were not great and did relatively better but still no bonus points.
    On my Polar watch my progressions were -9,-7,-10,-12,-9,-11,-10,-9,-12.
    Strava was a bit more generous with the roundings: -9,-8,-9,-12,-10,-10,-10,-10,-11 but still not enough.
    That's as good as my watch accuracy will allow but I might still roll the dice once more next week as it fits well with my training at the moment. Keeps those Tuesday runs from being boring and sets me up for a few short hill reps at the end.

    Attempt #3 on Progression Tuesday.
    Can't complain about the conditions this time.
    Started out at recovery pace 5:23 /km and ended at tempo pace 3:50.
    In between the increments were: -8,-9,-10,-10,-12,-12,-11,-11,-10 - only 3 on target so no bonus. Strava was no better. Did 12x hill sprints after again.
    There are 2 more Tuesdays left in the month :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 585 ✭✭✭axe2grind


    Since I was last here, I moved my attempts to flat location with no trees, put on my glasses so I can read my watch...and switched to manual lap rather than auto. First 2 attempts with this approach failed as some laps ended up at 1.01 (and the following 0.99)and the odd time the watch skips a beat when I press the lap button.

    The same happened today with the watch sluggish when I press lap button. Some of the times were very tight, but it all worked out today :) for 20pts?

    547295.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 933 ✭✭✭jamule


    Mid Risk attempt, 7 points, I think. Should have a bonus bonus point by now.

    1 00:05:16 10
    2 00:05:14 -2
    3 00:04:51 -23
    4 00:04:50 -1 1
    5 00:04:27 -23
    6 00:04:26 -1 1
    7 00:04:04 -22 1
    8 00:04:03 -1 1
    9 00:03:42 -21
    10 00:03:43 1 -2
    10.01 00:00:09 -5

    Total 7


    https://www.strava.com/activities/4967322782/laps


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,208 ✭✭✭shotgunmcos


    March Table Update #3 :)

    Congrats axe2grind for hitting a perfect 20 points on the high risk :eek::)
    jamule I think you may be on 14 points but couldn't access your garmin link from 15 March :confused:

    Pos|Runner|Jan|Feb|March pts|Total

    1|fletch*|19|18|15|54
    2|crisco10*|18|17|11|48
    3|jamule*|15|19|10|46
    4|Omeceron*|20|13|9|44
    5|mister paul*|12|16|10|40
    6|axe2grind*||18|20|39
    7|Comic Book Guy*|11|14|11|38
    7|Murph_D|18|8|11|38
    9|Shotgunmcos*|16|2|15|34
    10|Lambay Island|14|18||33
    11|dna_leri*|4|13|10|29
    11|healy1835*|18||10|29
    13|Kander*|10|17||28
    14|Antrim Glens*||20|5|26
    15|Annie get your Run*|9|15||25
    16|Swashbuckler*|18|5||24
    17|Dubh Geannain*|2|9|10|23
    17|eyrie*|18|4||23
    19|ReeReeG*|5|11|3|21
    20|Zico10*|1|11|7|20
    20|BeginnerRunner|20|||20
    20|Conor74*||20||20
    23|py*||19||19
    24|eposhea*||17||18
    25|Unknown Unthought|17|||17
    26|Kurt_Godel*|1|15||16
    26|TFBubendorfer*||16||16
    28|edinrunna*||14||15
    29|Dudda|13|||13
    30|racersedge||12||12
    30|Strawberry Swan*||12||12
    32|En Passant*|7|3||11
    33|Wubble Wubble*|10|||10
    33|jackc101*||10||10
    35|Laineyfrecks|1|7||9
    36|skyblue46|8|||8
    36|Pherekydes*|1|6||8
    38|omicron*|6|||6
    39|Huzzah|3|||3
    40|Tummer||||
    40|OOnegative||||


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,221 ✭✭✭crisco10


    axe2grind wrote: »
    Since I was last here, I moved my attempts to flat location with no trees, put on my glasses so I can read my watch...and switched to manual lap rather than auto. First 2 attempts with this approach failed as some laps ended up at 1.01 (and the following 0.99)and the odd time the watch skips a beat when I press the lap button.

    The same happened today with the watch sluggish when I press lap button. Some of the times were very tight, but it all worked out today :) for 20pts?

    547295.png

    This confuses me, I thought it was the rounded times? not the decimals...not that it made a difference to me, but I was rounding to nearest second on each split. :confused::confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 585 ✭✭✭axe2grind


    crisco10 wrote: »
    This confuses me, I thought it was the rounded times? not the decimals...not that it made a difference to me, but I was rounding to nearest second on each split. :confused::confused:
    I was going by the following

    ... Let's say 6.1 to 5.8 classifies as a 1 sec split drop. Happy for everyone to show avg pace, actual pace, garmin, polar or strava whatever gives you the best score.

    so either way works...whichever works best.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,221 ✭✭✭crisco10


    axe2grind wrote: »
    I was going by the following


    so either way works...whichever works best.

    That made a big difference to my terrible effort of last week, it went from -5 to 7 points. So if I had actually stopped on 10km, I'd have improved my score by a whole point. hahaha


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,476 ✭✭✭Comic Book Guy


    Had a go at the medium risk version this afternoon.
    My splits are a lot better on Garmin but despite hitting the stop button bang on the last mile beep it says I did 10.01 miles so will go with Strava instead.

    Mile 1- 8:46
    Mile 2- 8:44
    Mile 3- 8:11
    Mile 4- 8:11
    Mile 5- 7:37
    Mile 6- 7:37
    Mile 7- 7:04
    Mile 8- 7:02
    Mile 9- 6:28
    Mile 10- 6:25

    Think I'm ok for 5+ points with that as part of getting the bonus points for completing the 3 different risk category runs?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 277 ✭✭EnPassant


    I tried this today - it didn't quite go according to plan.

    I was planning to start at 6.10, increasing by 10-seconds and finishing at 4:40. The actual times were:-
    6.07
    6.01
    6.00
    5.36
    5.33
    5.19
    5.06
    5.00 <== The only km on schedule!
    4.55
    4.52

    It was a full progression run according to Strava ... but Strava also has the distance as 9.98 as against 10.02 on Garmin :(

    https://www.strava.com/activities/4984458063


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,340 ✭✭✭TFBubendorfer


    547952.jpg

    Here's mine from this morning. Any ideas of anything fancy went right out of the window at the start when I noticed that lap pace was still set on miles, even though pace was on km and lap distance was km! :confused:

    Strava link is https://www.strava.com/activities/5000604911


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 933 ✭✭✭jamule


    I think i'm missing a midlife risk attempt from earlier but i done it again for the craic

    I think i managed 11 points with 1 1sec (2 *22 is not good enough!)

    Laps Avg Pace
    1 05:31
    2 05:29
    3 05:07
    4 05:07
    5 04:46
    6 04:46
    7 04:24
    8 04:22
    9 04:01
    10 04:00


    https://connect.garmin.com/modern/activity/6477856970


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,761 ✭✭✭ReeReeG


    Should be OK for 10 points this time around. Strava changed it to 9.99km but thankfully Garmin is a good friend!
    No bonus points although I'd happily take one for managing to close a clip on my sports bra that opened in km 7 while still running!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,513 ✭✭✭Dubh Geannain


    It was too nice a day. I had to ruin it with another bash at this. I'd no plan but to try and run as narrow increments as possible without going the wrong side of the split. I'll need to speak to the judge on this one.

    https://www.strava.com/activities/5039259470/overview

    1 - 4:53
    2 - 4:51 -2
    3 - 4:50 -1
    4 - 4:46 -4
    5 - 4:46 -0.3 according to Garmin
    6 - 4:45 -1
    7 - 4:39 -6
    8 - 4:33 -3
    9 - 4:29 -4
    10 - 4:21 -8

    I kind of lost my bottle after the apparent even split on the 5th km but Garmin gave says it was 0.3 seconds quicker (attached). Is it 0 points or is it 10 plus some bonuses? Or worse a -2 for an even split? :confused:

    Also, were some folk using manual laps as opposed to autolaps?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,208 ✭✭✭shotgunmcos


    It was too nice a day. I had to ruin it with another bash at this. I'd no plan but to try and run as narrow increments as possible without going the wrong side of the split. I'll need to speak to the judge on this one.

    https://www.strava.com/activities/5039259470/overview

    1 - 4:53
    2 - 4:51 -2
    3 - 4:50 -1
    4 - 4:46 -4
    5 - 4:46 -0.3 according to Garmin
    6 - 4:45 -1
    7 - 4:39 -6
    8 - 4:33 -3
    9 - 4:29 -4
    10 - 4:21 -8

    I kind of lost my bottle after the apparent even split on the 5th km but Garmin gave says it was 0.3 seconds quicker (attached). Is it 0 points or is it 10 plus some bonuses? Or worse a -2 for an even split? :confused:

    Also, were some folk using manual laps as opposed to autolaps?

    10 points
    -2 for the missed split
    +2 for the 2x 1sec drops
    10 points total

    I'll update final table tomorrow. Been swamped the last 2 weeks. 1 idea for April and might suit 20k radius and better weather. Open to any ideas people have, thanks.

    Or if the series has run its course, so be it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,513 ✭✭✭Dubh Geannain


    Fair play for taking it this far. Gave me a bit of a laugh anyway.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement