Lady can't have her hairy balls waxed [mod notes/warnings in post #1]

All he has to do is buy some shaving cream and a razor and shave his own balls, it's not that difficult to do.

What a stupid world we live in entertaining people like this guy complaing that women won't wax his sack.

Franz Von Peppercorn II wrote: »

seamus wrote: »

If the media weren't publicising the actions of this idiot, it would be some unknown random failed frivolous lawsuits on the other side of the planet, just like the thousands of others every day.

The media isn’t publicising the case at all. Until a few days ago it wasn’t a public hearing. There’s one or two independent bloggers. And the case hasn’t failed yet.

Small correction it was open to the public.
With a public gallery.
So the media could have attended and reported on the facts of the case

The only restriction was on IDing the person

This restriction is used is applied to the media in rape cases and in the recent muder case

The media did not turn up even though they had access

That Twitter account that started all this is satire....

Dante7 wrote: »

It has nothing to do with nice or not nice. It is biological and scientific fact. Also remember that biological males will always be biological males, regardless of whatever gender they identify as. And with that biological maleness, trans women will continue to exhibit the same levels of male pattern violence and sexual assault and women are completely correct in wanting to keep them out of their spaces.

Pull the other one.

drunkmonkey wrote: »

The UK times back in march it was over a feminist suing twitter, it's a paid for article I can't link to it. It's been going on for a while.
It's transphobic not to be supporting her so I'm not surprised the papers have kept away from it especially here as we're one of the only countries in the world to give special rights to gender identity.

https://lawandcrime.com/lawsuit/feminist-writer-sues-twitter-after-she-tweets-men-arent-woman-and-gets-banned/

It was for hate speech. Misgendering the woman who filed the cases and saying a man can't be a woman

She claims that she is a bestie with one of the founders of Twitter and that this is why posts about her get monitored and posting bans handed out

Dante7 wrote: »

So you have nothing to add to the substantive issues of the debate, you just have a vague hurty feeling. Sounds familiar.

No, I just know one when I see one and you're certainly fitting the profile.

Dante7 wrote: »

Again, nothing to add. Just another man pretending to be all inclusive and woke, while happily standing by as women and their hard fought sex based rights are thrown under the bus.

If that's the therapy you need to get out there.....

Gatling wrote: »

So can a man sue a doctor or hospital or health service for not providing him cervical smears and other female specific examinations and treatments even though they don't actually have a cervix or female reproductive systems

The BBC did 2 articles on cancer
Men got prostate cancer
People with a vagina got cervical cancer. the video had a actress doing a monolog of her discovering she had cancer. She did not use the word woman once.


The recording of gender is an actual problem for medical services
If the doctors here list a female as male
She will not get offered cervical tests or mammograms etc
I don't think there is a test for prostate cancer yet? [but any males want to chip in on male only medical services?]


If she is listed in a&e as trans male on a medical chart and has bad cramping and involuntary liquid discharge (wet themselves) and no periods is the doctor going to think miscarriage?
>> This was recorded in the US the baby was reported to have died and the parent was a 'near miss'.

The other issue is we don't present the same biological indicators for illness eg
female heart attack symptoms are different from male heart attack symptoms. Womens being classes as atypical ie less chest pain and more subtle symptoms


And that's not taking account of the changes that puberty blockers and hormones may have on the body ( brest cancer, bone density, depression, mood swings)
or the medical issues which may arrise from surgical intervention

Odhinn wrote: »

..turned into the appropriate organs, and they refused to wax them, she'd have a case.

Both women have stated that their personal belief and their religious belief would result in the same outcome for a post op trans woman
That they would view handling a bio-male body as cheating on their husbands
The second lady (who has learning difficulties) left a care job before marrying so as not to have to provide care to male bodies. The waxing allowed her an opportunity to earn an income while only having a female client base.

So both ladies would never consent to the waxing irrespective of gender they would still see a male body.

Should the State remove their ability to refuse wax a body and force them out of business?

drunkmonkey wrote: »

In British Columbia, there is at the present moment 16 “human rights” complaints, launched by a single person who asserts the status of “trans woman” against (mainly immigrant) female cosmeticians who — from religious sensibilities, reasons of safety, or simple personal preference — refused that person’s demand for a Brazilian waxing of their male genitals.

Ricky Gervais has jumped in to help..



We can't be far off one of these cases here.

Full story https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.spiked-online.com/2019/07/19/canadas-bizarre-trans-waxing-controversy/amp/

Whats even worse about this person, which was linked in another thread was that they have been up to some questionable things with kids around the age of 12-13 saying that they will help them put in their tampons.

It would be in the best interest for the trans community that people like this do not come to prominence here.