Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Aer Lingus Fleet/ Routes Discussion Pt 2 (ALL possible routes included)

13567141

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,756 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    Van.Bosch wrote: »
    Buy Irish is illegal under EU rules.

    Nobody tell the EU all the illegal rules been broken currently...

    Its more than possible to put out a tender and comply with rules and still get the operator of choice to win it.

    _____
    Its likely Aer Lingus only got PEK flights because of regulations, you couldn't for example see Finnair getting permission to run 50 non stop flights between DUB-PEK.

    Its good they got PEK and were prepared to do it.

    Delta will be S Korea-USA-Ireland? and combined with other destinations rather than expansive direct flights as demand has eased.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,270 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    Van.Bosch wrote: »
    Buy Irish is illegal under EU rules.

    True, but right now how about we protect our economy and fight the court case in the years to come.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,927 ✭✭✭Van.Bosch


    smurfjed wrote: »
    True, but right now how about we protect our economy and fight the court case in the years to come.

    I agree, was just pointing it out. I’m sure it could be “fixed” for EI but maybe EI got greedy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,206 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    At the time only EU carriers had the certification to carry cargo in the passenger cabin, EI had an advantage there.

    FAA has approved it now, so its a level playing field.

    That said the vast bulk of PPE is flying with EI


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,086 ✭✭✭Nijmegen


    smurfjed wrote: »
    True, but right now how about we protect our economy and fight the court case in the years to come.

    Aha. And during that court case many of the same "Buy Irish!" will be moaning if the costs of other lower bids emerge and the headlines will be "State Overspent by €xx Million During Pandemic Crisis", with posts like "Dey couldn't be givin de nurses a raise but had all dat cash for tha Spanish company!"

    Proper tender processes (a) provide value for money and (b) allow Irish companies to compete for and win business across our 450 million person EU market. It isn't in our 4.7 million person interest to suddenly become a standard bearer for deglobalisation.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,252 ✭✭✭joeysoap


    No mattered what they tendered, I couldn’t see AL getting a contract to carry PPE from say Korea to anywhere in the US.

    Might be using one of these

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SkyTeam_Cargo


  • Registered Users Posts: 142 ✭✭Lapmo_Dancer


    HTCOne wrote: »
    https://flyinginireland.com/2020/05/repatriation-flights-continue-as-restrictions-begin-to-lift/

    Just in case anyone thinks strokes are being pulled for EI in the PEK PPE transport flights, Finnair won the contract for the CAN flights, and Delta won the big one for ICN (120 million masks plus other PPE). These are put out for tender as per EU legislation, nobody is getting a free ride with tax payers €. EI got the PEK contract fair and square.

    The bit about Delta getting awarded the Korea contract has been removed from the article?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 893 ✭✭✭HTCOne


    The bit about Delta getting awarded the Korea contract has been removed from the article?

    Indeed it has, strange.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,931 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    The bit about Delta getting awarded the Korea contract has been removed from the article?

    Very odd. Maybe it was a mistake?


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,920 ✭✭✭billy few mates


    HTCOne wrote: »
    https://flyinginireland.com/2020/05/repatriation-flights-continue-as-restrictions-begin-to-lift/

    Just in case anyone thinks strokes are being pulled for EI in the PEK PPE transport flights, Finnair won the contract for the CAN flights, and Delta won the big one for ICN (120 million masks plus other PPE). These are put out for tender as per EU legislation....

    What "EU legislation" says you have to allow American companies an opportunity to compete against EU companies for contracts that have nothing to do with America...?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 893 ✭✭✭HTCOne


    What "EU legislation" says you have to allow American companies an opportunity to compete against EU companies for contracts that have nothing to do with America...?

    Nothing specific to America, merely that national contracts must go for public tender, like how Royal Jordanian and UTAIR got the contracts for transporting our troops to and from UN missions in recent years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,814 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    HTCOne wrote: »
    Nothing specific to America, merely that national contracts must go for public tender, like how Royal Jordanian and UTAIR got the contracts for transporting our troops to and from UN missions in recent years.

    Not necessarily, EU legislation allows for restricted procedures to be put in place which makes it possible to only invite certain entities to submit tenders.

    The Irish government choose to have tenders of this nature open to anyone but there is certainly no obligation for them to do so.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,920 ✭✭✭billy few mates


    I would imagine that the wider you cast your net the better your chances of success but I doubt there's an EU regulation that says you have to give the Americans an opportunity to tender and then have to go with them if they come in with the best bid.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 893 ✭✭✭HTCOne


    https://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/public-procurement/rules-implementation_en

    It's all covered here, basically transparency, competitiveness etc. I see lots of mentions of "ensures equal competition across the EU", which implies they only apply to EU companies, but downloading and reading the entire document on a phone is less than appealing! I did come across an article stating these rules did not apply to emergency COVID supplies.

    If DL did win the ICN contract, it is worth remembering they have a big hub operation in ICN, and A359s and B77Ls, which have advantages in cargo capacity vs the A330. Sure we'll have to wait and see what comes out in the wash officially.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,548 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    A "DL" contract win could have actually been AFKL tendering.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 643 ✭✭✭duskyjoe


    Would Donald have let a european company get a contract ahead of an American company in the USA in these uncertain times to shift PPE?

    NO


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,548 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    duskyjoe wrote: »
    Would Donald have let a european company get a contract ahead of an American company in the USA in these uncertain times to shift PPE?

    NO


    Is Trump someone to look at as a positive example, ever?

    No.

    But realistically, if the airline was owned by the landlord of one of his towers or golf courses, he'd be chomping at the bit.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 643 ✭✭✭duskyjoe


    L1011 wrote: »
    Is Trump someone to look at as a positive example, ever?

    No.

    But realistically, if the airline was owned by the landlord of one of his towers or golf courses, he'd be chomping at the bit.

    Replace Trump with American government policy so .....you’ll get the same answer. No need to get personal


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,609 ✭✭✭California Dreamer


    duskyjoe wrote: »
    Replace Trump with American government policy so .....you’ll get the same answer. No need to get personal

    Hear Hear!!! No need to get personal against the president of the united states!

    Poor fella wouldn't be able to take it! :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,548 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    duskyjoe wrote: »
    Replace Trump with American government policy so .....you’ll get the same answer. No need to get personal

    But you were the one that personalised it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,251 ✭✭✭kevinandrew


    EI-DUO operating the 105 to JFK this afternoon, looks to be the only A330-200 still flying?

    Any news on EI-EIK? Seems to have had its Qatar reg removed now.


  • Registered Users Posts: 70 ✭✭eam77


    When do these new covid routes start


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,931 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    eam77 wrote: »
    When do these new covid routes start

    "Covid routes"?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,504 ✭✭✭Jack1985


    It seems more cuts are imminent. Has to be said this is a very challenging time mentally for EI employees, as well as all of those in the aviation. It's jaw dropping to see whats happening to the sector.

    Look after yourselves number one, both your mental and phsyical health.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,015 ✭✭✭✭Mc Love


    Jack1985 wrote: »
    It seems more cuts are imminent. Has to be said this is a very challenging time mentally for EI employees, as well as all of those in the aviation. It's jaw dropping to see whats happening to the sector.

    Look after yourselves number one, both your mental and phsyical health.

    What's your source or just stating opinion on the matter?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 404 ✭✭NH2013


    Mc Love wrote: »
    What's your source or just stating opinion on the matter?

    I believe staff were informed today that with effect from mid June layoffs would commence and that not all staff could be maintained on their current 50% pay levels either with further pay cuts beyond 50% for those that remain.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,251 ✭✭✭kevinandrew


    The airline must feel they are still a long way off getting their operations going again, the arrival quarantine announced today will be seen as another setback but not exactly an unexpected one.

    Aer Lingus must still feel somewhat at sea with regards to rebuilding its schedule, there's very little evidence to suggest Europe is ready to start flying again and the US will be no go area for quite a while. With the UK and Ireland common travel area remaining unaffected by the 14 day arrival quarantine announced by the two nations today, maybe there's scope for UK operations to begin next month?

    However, Aer Lingus will no doubt be planning for a phased restart of their wider operations but they remain incredibly quiet on the details whereas Ryanair has been boasting of a 40% schedule by July and other European carriers like Lufthansa have spoken about restarting Asian and Middle Eastern markets. While Aer Lingus, like all other airlines, will have to be mindful of government travel restrictions and imposed quarantines, they also need to ensure they aren't too slow or cautious in reopening and missing out on that first mover advantage which is definitely why Ryanair's motivation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,181 ✭✭✭PukkaStukka


    Mc Love wrote: »
    What's your source or just stating opinion on the matter?

    There is truth in this I'm afraid.

    I've been forwarded a message which seems to be a multi union communique. It states the current pay arrangements will continue for another 4 weeks, after which It warms of the threat of "unilateral measures including layoffs and further reductions in hours and pay" being taken. It resolved to protect members interests and called on the company to abide by existing agreements.

    To me this is usual pre-dispute posturing but in this circumstance, it's entirely down to factors outside both sides control. A strike is pointless, so where can this go?

    It's an apalling situation for everyone involved. Fingers crossed for the best.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 957 ✭✭✭Qprmeath


    There is truth in this I'm afraid.

    I've been forwarded a message which seems to be a multi union communique. It states the current pay arrangements will continue for another 4 weeks, after which It warms of the threat of "unilateral measures including layoffs and further reductions in hours and pay" being taken. It resolved to protect members interests and called on the company to abide by existing agreements.

    To me this is usual pre-dispute posturing but in this circumstance, it's entirely down to factors outside both sides control. A strike is pointless, so where can this go?

    It's an apalling situation for everyone involved. Fingers crossed for the best.

    Very accurate summing up of the current situation. Would hope the unions have some sort of plan for the next move.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,525 ✭✭✭kona


    Qprmeath wrote: »
    Very accurate summing up of the current situation. Would hope the unions have some sort of plan for the next move.

    The unions are the equivalent of a ash tray on a motorbike.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,060 ✭✭✭Sexual Chocolate


    EI-DUO operating the 105 to JFK this afternoon, looks to be the only A330-200 still flying?

    Any news on EI-EIK? Seems to have had its Qatar reg removed now.

    It's the only 200 I've noticed flying the past number of weeks. LAX is stored in Shannon I believe, not sure about the rest.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,478 ✭✭✭✭cson


    NH2013 wrote: »
    I believe staff were informed today that with effect from mid June layoffs would commence and that not all staff could be maintained on their current 50% pay levels either with further pay cuts beyond 50% for those that remain.

    Jaysus at < 50% most cabin crew would be better off on welfare or working a minimum wage job. I get it from the pilots perspective in terms of keeping your hours ticking over, but **** that's still very very rough.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,252 ✭✭✭joeysoap


    I was shown an AL Payslip last week. The majority of the pay was the €700. I’d say the AL portion was no more than 30% and there was a tax refund too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,525 ✭✭✭kona


    joeysoap wrote: »
    I was shown an AL Payslip last week. The majority of the pay was the €700. I’d say the AL portion was no more than 30% and there was a tax refund too.

    They are taking the piss. Government funding most of that show.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,251 ✭✭✭kevinandrew


    kona wrote: »
    They are taking the piss. Government funding most of that show.

    As they are with various other businesses, including airlines. That's the name of the game at the moment unfortunately.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,548 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    When it comes to the subsidy scheme from an employers perspective, once the assurances about it not being considered to be trading insolvent came in you'd be mad not to take it if you could. Free money.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,525 ✭✭✭kona


    L1011 wrote: »
    When it comes to the subsidy scheme from an employers perspective, once the assurances about it not being considered to be trading insolvent came in you'd be mad not to take it if you could. Free money.

    Doesnt make it right. Some employers will be using it fairly, others however are using it to make up 50% of peoples wages the employees will be on the hook for the tax. Its pathetic and something that many people are familiar with from this government.

    The fact of the matter is that since it kicked in, some people are enjoying 2 months off on it. Others are working away keeping the show running for the same terms.


  • Registered Users Posts: 351 ✭✭Shamrockj


    EI-DUO operating the 105 to JFK this afternoon, looks to be the only A330-200 still flying?

    Any news on EI-EIK? Seems to have had its Qatar reg removed now.

    -LAX , -DAA and -GEY are all stored in shannon at the moment. Not sure why -DUO is still flying


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,206 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Believe it or not the current operations can require all the A330-300

    There can be up to 7 tied up on the PEK operations

    1 JFK, 1 ORD
    =9
    +1 Spare

    And since PEK is only -300 to maximise volume of cargo, if there is a need for a further aircraft if it will be a -200 and flown to JFK or ORD. You most certainly don't want to cancel in the current circumstances, how and where to accommodate people might be tricky


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,181 ✭✭✭PukkaStukka




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 351 ✭✭Shamrockj


    -EIK is now parked over next to the Aer Lingus hangar anyone know what will happen to this frame surely it's not going to be needed any time soon.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,931 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    Shamrockj wrote: »
    -EIK is now parked over next to the Aer Lingus hangar anyone know what will happen to this frame surely it's not going to be needed any time soon.

    There was a pic on the DUB spotters page on Facebook about 5-6 days ago. Showed it in that location with A7 decals over fuselage reg removed.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Tenger wrote: »
    There was a pic on the DUB spotters page on Facebook about 5-6 days ago. Showed it in that location with A7 decals over fuselage reg removed.

    Now reg’d EI-EIK.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,756 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    NH2013 wrote: »
    I believe staff were informed today that with effect from mid June layoffs would commence and that not all staff could be maintained on their current 50% pay levels either with further pay cuts beyond 50% for those that remain.

    Staff pay cut of 50%, surly some confusion here?

    My take:
    If the Government scheme stays for a few extra months (IMO it will) and they are return a solid flying schedule then pay cuts will be more moderate but if it ends cuts will likely be more and less staff if they can't resume operations fully but 50% is mad and I don't think they would ever get such cuts passed nor should they try.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,144 ✭✭✭pm.


    Looking at flight radar it looks like the US has not been effected by covid. When do you think we will see passanger flights return to the US?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 893 ✭✭✭HTCOne


    pm. wrote: »
    Looking at flight radar it looks like the US has not been effected by covid. When do you think we will see passanger flights return to the US?

    A condition of the bailout the airlines received in the US was that they maintain a certain level of frequencies and not lay anyone off until October, just because they’re flying doesn’t mean they’re full.

    Also, having that particular administration doesn’t help. The disease will be running around in rural and red states for months yet sadly. Other nations may want to restrict access for US citizens for a long time yet, although Trump may enact petulant retaliations.

    Bear in mind passenger flights to the US never stopped though, EI are still flying DUB - JFK/ORD/BOS


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,252 ✭✭✭joeysoap


    With US citizens only allowed to enter the US?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,206 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    The list is quite a bit more than US citizens, if the US government wants you to travel to the US you will travel. As always if it suits the US there is a way within its complex immigration process to make exceptions.

    EI ops are mainly for freight and mail but there is some passenger traffic, not much but there is some movement.

    With the 14 day rule coming in that will probably cut back


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,478 ✭✭✭✭cson


    Right now I believe the only people who can fly to the US from Ireland (and vice versa) would be (i) US (or Irish) National repatriating, (ii) Irish Green Card holders and (iii) Dual US/Irish passport holders.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 893 ✭✭✭HTCOne


    cson wrote: »
    Right now I believe the only people who can fly to the US from Ireland (and vice versa) would be (i) US (or Irish) National repatriating, (ii) Irish Green Card holders and (iii) Dual US/Irish passport holders.

    I think any EU citizen or person permitted to work in the EU is allowed on the eastbound flights.


Advertisement