Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Claims Crisis - Major Insurer pulls out saying claims culture and awards a joke

1235»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,518 ✭✭✭✭dudara


    New thread merged into pre-existing thread.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,220 ✭✭✭Jurgen The German


    Boggles wrote: »
    In the Circuit Court for a whip lash case that lasted what an hour or 2?

    BS.

    There you go again, talking about things you are clearly clueless about. The claimant had medical reports for over a two year period, the claim was obviously outstanding for over two years so the legal fees detailed are not at all outlandish.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,568 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    The current state of the insurance industry cannot be blamed on one root cause, it's a massively complex issue.

    We have reached this point due to a couple of major issues.

    1) Pricing : about 10 years ago the likes of 123 and Setanta entered the market with unsustainable pricing levels in an effort to win market share. To combat this, the established insurers like Aviva, Allianz, Axa etc began to dramatically cut their rates in an effort to retain their customers and thus a race to the bottom in terms of price point began. The issue was that on average the same level of claims were coming through however the amount of money there to cover the claims was significantly reduced due to the lower pricing.

    2) The global financial crash : Up to the GFC, insurers had been able to make decent returns on their investments which resulted in them being able to absorb the claims costs that should have been covered by the premium income from policies sold. Following the GFC, interest rates were basically wiped out, property investments became worthless so that meant their claims reserves were being depleted faster than they were being recouped.

    3) Legislative Change : a couple of years ago Solvency II was introduced by the ECB. In simple terms it related to legal requirements on insurers to have a minimum amount of cash available to cover the cost of claims. Iirc it's a minimum of 200% of the claim reserves which means if an insurer has €100m outstanding claims they have to have at last €200m cash in hand available to cover these. This was partly introduced to avoid another Quinn / Setanta style collapse. Massive fines can be given to insurers that fall below the minimum requirements. A couple of years ago the rules were also changed and the department of social welfare are now entitled to claim back any payments made to successful claimants that received sickness benefit while out of work, from insurers. Its another hidden cost people aren't aware of.

    4) Claims : historically in recessionary times, the number of claims increase. People are out of work and making a claim is still seen by a huge amount of people as being a victimless crime. Insurers are in the business of risk and are aware claims will occur, it's the nature of the business and these are accepted as "attritional" claims however with lower income and increased claims, both genuine and fraudulent, that puts additional pressure on their finances.

    5) Claims awards - Ireland is massively out of whack with the UK and Eueope in terms of awards for claims. "Soft tissue" awards here are 4 or 5 times higher on average than our European neighbor's. Our laws allow people to not only make claims for virtually anything but often times get paid out for even the most frivolous of incidents. Up til now the courts would usually side with the claimant. The book of quantum really screwed the pooch as it gave judges with zero knowledge of injuries a template to award tens of thousands of euro for the most minor of injuries.

    6) the legal system : the injuries board was introduced specifically to remove solicitors from the claims process due to the length of time claims were taking to settle (more money to be paid in legal fees) and the associated but today, something in the region of 90% of injuries board cases are represented by solicitors so all it is is more red tape.


    They are imo some of the major reasons for the current mire, there are others of course but as I said in my opening, it's a massively complex issue.

    So basically the insurance industry fúcked the market through bad management and gambling.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,568 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    There you go again, talking about things you are clearly clueless about. The claimant had medical reports for over a two year period, the claim was obviously outstanding for over two years so the legal fees detailed are not at all outlandish.

    That's not clear.

    Anyway solicitors don't issue medical reports.

    20k for legal fees for a case of this nature is bullshít.

    The entire thing has been fabricated IMO.


  • Subscribers Posts: 41,830 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Boggles wrote: »
    So basically the insurance industry fúcked the market through bad management and gambling.

    Yep in a nut shell.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,940 ✭✭✭Sweet.Science


    Boggles wrote: »
    In the Circuit Court for a whip lash case that lasted what an hour or 2?

    BS.

    What on Earth are you talking about


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,205 ✭✭✭cruizer101


    Boggles wrote: »
    So basically the insurance industry fúcked the market through bad management and gambling.

    Yes, and you can ascribe a certain amount of blame onto them, but at the end of the day they are private companies, their main purpose is to maximise profits anything else is secondary to that goal.

    The main fault is that of the government in sitting by idly, they should be regulating the industry, they should be controlling the levels of payout (book of quantum needs massive review and claims should be paid out as expenses direct to hospital/physio etc), they should be legislating to ensure fraudulent claims are dealt with appropriately and assigning the appropriate resources to deal with it effectively.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,862 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Boggles wrote: »
    So basically the insurance industry fúcked the market through bad management and gambling.

    Ah come on. The poster went to the effort to detail 6 reasons as to why were are where we are today. Simple, cheap oneliners from yourself notwithstanding add nothing to the debate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,862 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Boggles wrote: »
    That's not clear.

    Anyway solicitors don't issue medical reports.

    20k for legal fees for a case of this nature is bullshít.

    The entire thing has been fabricated IMO.

    Have you ever been to court? Do you know how much it costs to bring a case to the circuit court?

    Because if you did, you wouldn't be saying the above.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,568 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    cruizer101 wrote: »
    Yes, and you can ascribe a certain amount of blame onto them, but at the end of the day they are private companies, their main purpose is to maximise profits anything else is secondary to that goal.
    .

    Yes, the best way to achieve that is by good management and not reckless gambling.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,940 ✭✭✭Sweet.Science


    markodaly wrote: »
    Have you ever been to court? Do you know how much it costs to bring a case to the circuit court?

    Because if you did, you wouldn't be saying the above.


    Hence why some claims are bought off. Pay 10k now . Or let it drag on for years with the chance you may have to pay out 50k . Even if you are successful your costs will still be around the original 10k that would have bought the claim off

    Crazy system


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,568 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    markodaly wrote: »
    Have you ever been to court? Do you know how much it costs to bring a case to the circuit court?

    Because if you did, you wouldn't be saying the above.

    Break down the 20k so.

    Go.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,862 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Boggles wrote: »
    Break down the 20k so.

    Go.

    The way you carry yourself on this forum with your constant passive-aggressiveness will win you no arguments or debates.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,862 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Hence why some claims are bought off. Pay 10k now . Or let it drag on for years with the chance you may have to pay out 50k . Even if you are successful your costs will still be around the original 10k that would have bought the claim off

    Crazy system

    Many of the issues in the country can be attributed to the legal system and the way its set up to extract as much money as possible from the Irish 'system'.

    Things like Direct Provision, the revolving door of people being convicted of dozens of crimes, the insurance and claims industry, all point to a legal system that is taking the country for a ride.

    It's not surprising that its one of the few sectors that have not been reformed in decades as the EU has very little say on how a country organises its legal system.

    Alan Shatter tried to introduce some reforms but he got shown the door.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,568 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    markodaly wrote: »
    The way you carry yourself on this forum with your constant passive-aggressiveness will win you no arguments or debates.

    Like procrastination?

    If you don't want to answer the question, just say you don't want, no need to be so passive aggressive about it.

    :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,862 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Boggles wrote: »
    Like procrastination?

    If you don't want to answer the question, just say you don't want, no need to be so passive aggressive about it.

    :)

    Why would I bother, even if I do spend time breaking it down for you, id get s a snarky one-liner back.

    You are a time sink, that's all.

    Go beat a bag of coal or something.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,220 ✭✭✭Jurgen The German


    Boggles wrote: »
    So basically the insurance industry fúcked the market through bad management and gambling.

    Partly, yes, that's never been up for debate however you and others seem wholly incapable of seeing anything else as being a problem and are laying the blame solely at the feet of insurers.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,220 ✭✭✭Jurgen The German


    markodaly wrote: »
    Why would I bother, even if I do spend time breaking it down for you, id get s a snarky one-liner back.

    You are a time sink, that's all.

    Go beat a bag of coal or something.

    Poor oul Boggles is a flat earther when it comes to insurers. There are countless reasons and details in the public domain about the industry and its current problems but he cannot absorb any of it, I'm beginning to think his wife ran away with an insurance sales man or something.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,568 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Partly, yes, that's never been up for debate however you and others seem wholly incapable of seeing anything else as being a problem and are laying the blame solely at the feet of insurers.

    I'm not.

    But the Insurance Industry is blaming everyone else bar the main reason for rising premiums (themselves).

    It's not really sophisticated or new, it's plain old misdirection, point the fingers all over the place while you rapidly rise premiums by 70%+.

    Do you know what isn't up 70%?
    The number of personal injury cases taken in the State was down slightly last year while the average award made at High Court level dropped by 29 per cent, according to figures in the latest annual report from the Courts Service.
    PIAB awards down in value for third consecutive year....This is the third consecutive year that claim values have fallen, from €315.13 million in 2016, to €315.04 million in 2017, and €298.55 million last year


  • Posts: 3,689 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Am I any warmer in that you always wear your tinfoil hat boggles?

    Hope its not too much a personal question


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,568 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Am I any warmer in that you always wear your tinfoil hat boggles?

    Hope its not too much a personal question

    Do you struggle with basic maths?

    Too personal?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,624 ✭✭✭✭meeeeh


    Boggles wrote: »
    Do you struggle with basic maths?

    Too personal?

    This thread was of high quality and interesting until you showed up.

    And btw you forgot the numbers for district and circuit court. Also high court dmnumbers include medical negligence claims.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,220 ✭✭✭Jurgen The German


    Boggles wrote: »
    I'm not.

    But the Insurance Industry is blaming everyone else bar the main reason for rising premiums (themselves).

    It's not really sophisticated or new, it's plain old misdirection, point the fingers all over the place while you rapidly rise premiums by 70%+.

    Do you know what isn't up 70%?

    Yet again, you are taking just a snapshot of the entire picture and pinning your hat on it.

    Motor premiums have been reducing since 2018 for average drivers and continue to reduce which would correlate with a reduction in reported claims.

    I find your flip flopping amusing. On one hand you are lambasting insurers for settling out of court then above, you use the reduction in court settlements as a stick to try and beat them with.

    As for the 70% increase.

    A 70% increase on a premium that is way way under priced is not an increase in real terms, it is simply the premium returning to its correct base level.

    So one more time, for your benefit and because after this post I will not be addressing you again, if claims awards come down, prices will come down. They are already reducing for motor and will continue to reduce. For liability, if proper legislation is implemented and the book of quantum is scrapped, along with real deterrents and penalties for those that make fraudulent or false claims, prices will reduce and businesses like play centres will be able to get insurance.

    So thats some free education, from me to you, take it or leave it, I dont care, but I'm not going to waste any further time with you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,568 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    meeeeh wrote: »
    This thread was of high quality and interesting until you showed up.

    Threads were merged.

    Also High Quality? It was basically an extension of the Bailey thread, FG Bashing.

    Which I'm okay with. :)
    meeeeh wrote: »
    And btw you forgot the numbers for district and circuit court. Also high court dmnumbers include medical negligence claims.
    The total amount of awards across the three courts fell from €206,509,442 in 2017 to €177,068,972 in 2018 (down €29.4m)
    Some of this was driven by a reduction in medical negligence awards, which fell by over €7m or by 7.5%.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,568 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Motor premiums have been reducing since 2018 for average drivers and continue to reduce which would correlate with a reduction in reported claims.

    What's an average driver?

    I guess that would be me.

    Mine went up again in April of this year.
    A 70% increase on a premium that is way way under priced is not an increase in real terms, it is simply the premium returning to its correct base level.

    None of my premiums ever went down next to near 70%.

    Maybe I'm just unlucky, wonder what other people have experienced.

    Guess I am not alone.

    April 2018
    Despite recent research from the CSO indicating that the cost of motor insurance has dropped by 12.8% in the past year, many motorists are seeing premiums rise at the time of renewal, according to AA Ireland.

    In a survey of more than 4,000 Irish motorists, more than half (54.06%) said they saw a significant increase in their insurance costs at the time of their last renewal. A further 23.35% said they had seen their insurance costs continue to rise year on year.

    * CSO got their information from Insurance Ireland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,542 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    NIMAN wrote: »
    The new attitude now is to blame the industry! That's typical of us Irish. Always someone else's fault.
    NIMAN wrote: »
    I'd disagree.

    Did you watch the clip of Pearse Doherty grilling the insurance CEOs in committee a few weeks back.

    They investigate a miniscule amount of claims.

    This is why the industry gets a portion of the blame. They don't even bother fighting bogus claims, they just recoup the hit from the punters by upping insurance costs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,568 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Tony EH wrote: »
    This is why the industry gets a portion of the blame. They don't even bother fighting bogus claims, they just recoup the hit from the punters by upping insurance costs.

    How to get €16K compo from this insurance company without really trying

    Written by a solicitor so not exactly neutral.

    But I think it gives us a glimpse into an industry the vast majority of which is shrouded in secrecy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,891 ✭✭✭SlowBlowin


    When you sign up to an insurance policy you sign a subrogation waiver which means you agree to allow insurers assume the control of any claims. Knowing something is one thing, proving it beyond reasonable doubt and thus negating the claim is something else entirely. Now maybe you and your colleagues know more about claims and the likelihood of going to court and being successful than the insurers and their expert claims and legal departments, who knows, but if you did and do, why didn't ye agree to let them refuse indemnity and take on the time and expense of defending the claim yourselves?

    Or why bother buying insurance in the first place if ye know better?

    Its not about the individual claim, its the health of the whole industry, thats what I was explaining at the start, but you went all aggressive.

    If the insurance companies had a few morals, they would not be in this mess, and if the insurance companies don't have any morals then it should be legislated and enforced.

    The whole "its cheaper" argument you have is immature, lacks morals and shortsighted. Its cheaper to let cancer patients die, but we dont, why not ? Its cheaper to shoplift, but we don't, why not ?


Advertisement