Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Tour of Afghanistan in India 2019

12345679»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,578 ✭✭✭✭KevIRL


    Balbirnie (82) and McCollum (39) both out shortly after lunch. Ireland now ahead on runs but four wickets down. Need a KOB sized miracle


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,578 ✭✭✭✭KevIRL


    5 down. Poynter gone


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,578 ✭✭✭✭KevIRL


    Thompson gone


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,578 ✭✭✭✭KevIRL


    50 partnership up for KOB and Dockrell. Can these two make to stumps and beyond though?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,841 ✭✭✭Squatter


    And now a 50 for Big Kev. Well played sir!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,732 ✭✭✭BarryD2


    KevIRL wrote: »
    50 partnership up for KOB and Dockrell. Can these two make to stumps and beyond though?

    Be great if they could, give us a bit of hope. Looked like an innings defeat after first day but we’ve come back well to avoid that ignominy. Nice to see Kev getting dropped, that’d be a sickener for the Afgs out there in the sun all day. Stirling seems to have victim of poor low decisions twice in this match. Not good enough. Dockrell has shown good approach in circumstances.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,861 ✭✭✭Mysterypunter


    220-6 at tea. Lead by 78, despite a collapse of 4-20 after the 3rd wicket stand. Still playing catch up, another 100 needed at least


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,732 ✭✭✭BarryD2


    220-6 at tea. Lead by 78, despite a collapse of 4-20 after the 3rd wicket stand. Still playing catch up, another 100 needed at least

    Yeah, still very much adv for Afg. We’ be wanting to set a target of 200+ to be in with any half chance. And that’s a bit of an ask from here. Even then, Afg will likely have plenty of time to knock it off. Never was just occupying the crease and soaking up time more important. No sign of the weather intervening anyway :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,861 ✭✭✭Mysterypunter


    BarryD2 wrote: »
    No sign of the weather intervening anyway :)
    The only way it could is to heat up, and keep Afghanistan in the field for 2 more sessions.
    This is a good fight from 85-9 in the first innings


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,861 ✭✭✭Mysterypunter


    Dockrell out, didn't look out, dodgy LBW


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,861 ✭✭✭Mysterypunter


    Kevin O'Brien out now, 8 down


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,421 ✭✭✭✭Rikand


    KOB out lbw

    Pitched in line, hit just about in line. Probably would have missed leg stump though. Even the commentator didn't feel great about saying it was good


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,861 ✭✭✭Mysterypunter


    Rikand wrote: »
    KOB out lbw

    Pitched in line, hit just about in line. Probably would have missed leg stump though. Even the commentator didn't feel great about saying it was good

    The leg spinner Salamkhiel is supposed to be 17, who are they kidding?, KOB played it off the back foot, did look like it was missing though. The Afghans are appealing 3 or 4 times every over


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,578 ✭✭✭✭KevIRL


    Useful runs for the last stand


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,578 ✭✭✭✭KevIRL


    50 partnership


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,578 ✭✭✭✭KevIRL


    First time since 1895 that a team has had 50 partnerships for the last wicket in both innings


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,732 ✭✭✭BarryD2


    KevIRL wrote: »
    50 partnership

    Had to go out for a bit to return & find the wheels coming off our wagon, helped by one of the umpires loosening the wheel nuts :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,861 ✭✭✭Mysterypunter


    288 all out after an entertaining last wicket stand. 147 to win for Afghanistan


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,578 ✭✭✭✭KevIRL


    288 all out.

    147 the target then. Three wickets before close?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,732 ✭✭✭BarryD2


    KevIRL wrote: »
    288 all out.

    147 the target then. Three wickets before close?

    Hope springs eternal in the Irishman’s breast, particularly on Paddy’s Day!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,578 ✭✭✭✭KevIRL


    Wicket. Shazad out


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,861 ✭✭✭Mysterypunter


    29-1 at the close, Afghanistan looking comfortable


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,732 ✭✭✭BarryD2


    29-1 at the close, Afghanistan looking comfortable

    Very comfortable. Be all done & dusted tomorrow morning. That Rahmat Shah is a stylish batsman, uses the feet well and looks fairly unflappable. Could do very well for them you’d think in future matches.

    We just got off to a very bad start and not helped by some questionable umpiring for important wickets.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    Hopefully the wicked goes off tomorrow and if we can't win, we can at least make the scores look respectable


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,861 ✭✭✭Mysterypunter


    BarryD2 wrote: »
    Very comfortable. Be all done & dusted tomorrow morning. That Rahmat Shah is a stylish batsman, uses the feet well and looks fairly unflappable. Could do very well for them you’d think in future matches

    He has 50* now 82-1


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,861 ✭✭✭Mysterypunter


    Afghanistan 149-3, won by 7 wickets. Was a bit of a farcical end, lost a wicket to a stumping and a run out near the end, but a very easy win


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,578 ✭✭✭✭KevIRL


    All done. Match won with a four.149/3, the two wickets coming very late on when the result was a formality


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,812 Mod ✭✭✭✭riffmongous


    Why was it just a one off test?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,861 ✭✭✭Mysterypunter


    Why was it just a one off test?

    Because the ICC only pretend to give a fcuk


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,288 ✭✭✭HonalD


    Why was it just a one off test?

    A number of reasons probably.

    There was 3 T20s and 5 ODIs already in the Tour, so having more than 1 Test would have extended it longer - Afghanistan are now concentrating on the World Cup I presume.

    ICC also want to get sides a few 1 Test series to show them the ropes. Given that there was virtually no income from the Test Match, someone has to pick up the tab too.

    Overall, cannot read too much into a one match series but the fact that the team did not roll over is a positive. Areas to work on are - batting in the first innings and bowling wicket taking deliveries.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,732 ✭✭✭BarryD2


    HonalD wrote: »
    Overall, cannot read too much into a one match series but the fact that the team did not roll over is a positive. Areas to work on are - batting in the first innings and bowling wicket taking deliveries.

    It was a pretty comprehensive win for Afg! Should have been a 9 wicket victory and could easily have been an innings win. They won with a day plus to spare.

    Bad start on Day1, failure to build partnerships higher up the order, some questionable umpiring decisions going against us, no real penetration in the bowling - waiting for batsmen to make mistakes.

    I think our fielding was generally sharp from what I saw and we can bat down the order - probably a function of our more extensive experience of the limited overs game.

    Series averages make for a bit of reading:
    http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/records/averages/batting_bowling_by_team.html?id=12786;team=29;type=series
    http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/records/averages/batting_bowling_by_team.html?id=12785;team=29;type=series

    When one of your opening batsman is consistently scoring less than tail end bowlers, there's something seriously amiss. No room for sentimentality - William Porterfield shouldn't be picked. Nothing greatly new in this, from following the team fortunes over the past 10 years, he's been more likely to fail in the matches where we need him the most, scoring more freely against lesser opposition. That's just my two cents from a follower.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,861 ✭✭✭Mysterypunter


    When one of your opening batsman is consistently scoring less than tail end bowlers, there's something seriously amiss. No room for sentimentality - William Porterfield shouldn't be picked. Nothing greatly new in this, from following the team fortunes over the past 10 years, he's been more likely to fail in the matches where we need him the most, scoring more freely against lesser opposition. That's just my two cents from a follower.[/QUOTE]

    I agree, he fails a lot, and is always picked, but are there any strong alternatives?


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,812 Mod ✭✭✭✭riffmongous


    Checking back through my posting history here I saw that 2 and a half years ago I was complaining about his uninspired captaincy and how it was time for someone else to take over, little seems to change with our team


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    Exactly. It's not like he's a Mike Brearly type where you could overlook his lack of runs for his on field leadership. He's a terrible captain. And I'm not being overly dramatic in using the word terrible. He really is terrible.

    This team needs to go to Lords in 4 months. Lords is a predictable as the clock. It will swing like mad until lunch on the first day, then you'll get a batting track for 3 days. We lose the toss and get put into bat, we're in big big trouble. All out at lunch and then watch England bump their batting averages for 2 days. It's going to get very ugly and a step too far, too soon for this team. Something has to change quickly.

    Porterfield would probably end up batting if he won the toss.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,732 ✭✭✭BarryD2


    I agree, he fails a lot, and is always picked, but are there any strong alternatives?

    George Dockrell has good experience, few years both behind and in front of him. Generally puts in a solid contribution. He'd be as good a captain as any I'd have thought, but knowing little of the internal politics of Cricket Ireland.

    Batting? Stirling and Balbirnie to open, bring on some of the younger players like McCollum - we'll need them for the future anyway.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,288 ✭✭✭HonalD


    I heard Balbirnie might be a good shout for captain. Problem is Porterfield has tons of experience and although Dockroll has too, he's been in and out of the team and hasn't a place nailed down.
    Young wicket taking fast bowlers are a big problem area.


Advertisement