Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Where do the cows go?

2

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,717 ✭✭✭YFlyer


    gozunda wrote: »
    Incorrect. Cows are not 'all' artificially disseminated by any means. A real live bull is used on many farms. Lots of things cant survive in the wild (such as pets) but no one is suggesting wiping them out.

    Dogs can survive in the wild.


  • Registered Users Posts: 293 ✭✭markjbloggs


    Why don't we just eat them all?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    YFlyer wrote: »
    Dogs can survive in the wild.

    Not all dog breeds.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 277 ✭✭Danthemanhere


    Pinics.

    :confused:

    Pinics: Of or pertaining to the pine; obtained from the pine; formerly, designating an acid which is the chief constituent of common resin,


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,717 ✭✭✭YFlyer


    Not all dog breeds.

    True.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    :confused:

    Pinics: Of or pertaining to the pine; obtained from the pine; formerly, designating an acid which is the chief constituent of common resin,

    No sandwiches and lashings of ginger ale.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 277 ✭✭Danthemanhere


    No sandwiches and lashings of ginger ale.

    :pac: Oh right.


  • Registered Users Posts: 380 ✭✭Iodine1


    Cows will probably end up in a cow museum.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 734 ✭✭✭Aceandstuff


    This thread looks like something straight out of the newest episode of South Park, "Let Them Eat Goo".
    Basically, most of South Park goes vegan because Tegridy Farms makes a new hemp burger and people get the munchies for more Tegridy burgers, etc, etc. Another vegan meat company arrives on the scene and isn't happy with this. Eventually, it leads to the local cattle farmer complaining to Randy and dumping his livestock on Tegridy farm. Randy and Towelie get stoned and go on a totally ethical and vegan cattle shooting spree.

    Feeling controversial, might set up a South Park discussion thread later, IDK.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,203 ✭✭✭emaherx


    Eathrin wrote: »
    No but they'd probably sell it back to the state or take a forestry grant if they had no better use for it. Animal agriculture is a horribly inefficient use of land.



    Ireland is just about the least forested country in Europe now. The extinction event already happened here and it's happening elsewhere in the world right now.

    Ireland has gone from 1% forestation a century ago to 11% today and is increasing. Also no hedge rows are included in these figures we have much more of those than most European countries.

    Animal agriculture is the most efficient way to produce food from land than is mostly only good at growing grass.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,996 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    Effects wrote: »
    Yeah, I'm going to take the word of a confirmed troll such as yourself :rolleyes:

    I'm sure you have loads of naturally inseminated, inbred cattle running around your farm. :rolleyes:

    Jesus christ. Reported.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,772 ✭✭✭Dakota Dan


    Effects wrote: »
    Most vegans keep unwanted cattle as pets, until they die of natural causes.
    All cows are artificially inseminated so they can't survive in the wild anyway.

    They can't survive in the wild because they are artificially inseminated? :D:D:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,996 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    YFlyer wrote: »
    Dogs can survive in the wild.

    So can wild bovines and even some domestic ones. But that's not the point is it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,772 ✭✭✭Dakota Dan


    gozunda wrote: »
    Yes - in many countries they are. There is just a fraction of the number of Donkeys now. In Africa and elsewhere the Chinese are buying them up to use in traditional medicine. Some countries indiginous populationsof donkies are being decimated. Not going to link to the story as per the charter here. But a google will bring up the details if you want to check it out ...

    Every Tom, Dick and Harry had a donkey in days gone by not as many around now.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,772 ✭✭✭Dakota Dan


    At the end of the day, it comes down to money. People will move away from traditional farming if that's where the larger profits are. Effects doesn't want to say much about it but does anyone have any information on whether plant based farming can be just as profitable for farmers?

    The thing is livestock are part of the farming package as all land is not suited for crops or crops for human consumption and livestock are needed to put organic matter back in the soil, compost simply won't work. There was an article on the internet explaining why the world can't go vegan.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,772 ✭✭✭Dakota Dan


    Eathrin wrote: »
    No but they'd probably sell it back to the state or take a forestry grant if they had no better use for it. Animal agriculture is a horribly inefficient use of land.



    Ireland is just about the least forested country in Europe now. The extinction event already happened here and it's happening elsewhere in the world right now.

    Whatever you do don't glue yourself to a London tube.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,996 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    Just for clarity - basic article here about the use of stock bulls.

    https://www.agriland.ie/farming-news/are-you-managing-your-stock-bull-correctly/

    Tbh the one thing I find extremly disingenuous is the amount of misinformation that is being put out about farming. It really doesn't help any discussion tbh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,760 ✭✭✭Effects


    No responsible animal owner, whether breeding dogs or farming cattle allows inbreeding and to suggest otherwise is idiotic.

    Yeah, that was my point. You missed that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,891 ✭✭✭Odelay


    Effects wrote: »
    Yeah, that was my point. You missed that.

    You should think about using “roll eyes” or something similar. Some people could take your posts as an example of what happens on the ground.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    Effects wrote: »
    Yeah, that was my point. You missed that.

    You were being serious?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,382 ✭✭✭topmanamillion


    gozunda wrote: »
    Just for clarity - basic article here about the use of stock bulls.

    https://www.agriland.ie/farming-news/are-you-managing-your-stock-bull-correctly/

    Tbh the one thing I find extremly disingenuous is the amount of misinformation that there is about farming. It really doesn't help any discussion tbh.

    A massive amount of misinformation out there.
    The difference between animal welfare levels in Ireland and places like the USA and South America is huge.
    It's why Irish farmers are so strongly against Mercosur.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,076 ✭✭✭Eathrin


    Dakota Dan wrote: »
    Whatever you do don't glue yourself to a London tube.

    And the same to you I suppose...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,767 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    I'm just wondering, if everyone becomes vegan, where do the cows go? What do we do with them? I'm not trying to be antagonistic, I'd be interested in becoming a vegan but I've just never figured out what happens to cattle if they're no longer needed for food?

    They'd still go to the factory to be turned into cuts for the British market.

    Maybe you mean if some miraculous mass world conversion took place.
    They'd still go the factory to be turned into lipstick, jet fuel, insulin, antifreeze, steroids, blood thinners, collegan, gellatin, leather and hundreds of other products.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,772 ✭✭✭Dakota Dan


    Eathrin wrote: »
    And the same to you I suppose...

    No fear as I'm not an XR nutter.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,007 ✭✭✭s7ryf3925pivug


    jet fuel? So an authentic vegan cannot fly in a plane?


  • Registered Users Posts: 5 Prisca


    Cows live on until they don’t anymore.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,203 ✭✭✭emaherx


    jet fuel? So an authentic vegan cannot fly in a plane?

    More likely lubricants used in jet engines than fuel but also brake fluids and antifreezes for cars. But then again anyone who seriously believes we shouldn't eat meat for environmental reasons shouldn't fly in planes anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,203 ✭✭✭emaherx


    Prisca wrote: »
    Cows live on until they don’t anymore.

    Just like now. Great first post welcome to Boards.ie


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,137 ✭✭✭endainoz


    Effects wrote:
    Most vegans keep unwanted cattle as pets, until they die of natural causes. All cows are artificially inseminated so they can't survive in the wild anyway.

    Effects wrote:
    I'm a vegan farmer, of course I believe that.

    Effects wrote:
    As a farmer myself, I've already given up land to return to nature. I get paid by the EU to do so.

    Effects wrote:
    Nuts, berries, fruits.

    Sounds like you have a few briars in your back garden. You have me a good laugh all the same.

    Let's keep it going for the craic, are you in the organic scheme seen as your a vegan farmer?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,421 ✭✭✭✭Rikand


    jet fuel? So an authentic vegan cannot fly in a plane?

    They also have to choose to die to diabetes too.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,007 ✭✭✭s7ryf3925pivug


    emaherx wrote: »
    More likely lubricants used in jet engines than fuel but also brake fluids and antifreezes for cars. But then again anyone who seriously believes we shouldn't eat meat for environmental reasons shouldn't fly in planes anyway.
    *except for mandatory pilgrimages to India and South America obviously.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 734 ✭✭✭Aceandstuff


    Rikand wrote: »
    They also have to choose to die to diabetes too.

    Diabetic here, and I'm not even remotely vegan BTW. My insulin is made by modified e.coli, not cows. I have heard of pork insulins still being used, but not beef. It has been a while since I read up on it, so I only know what's going on with my own medications right now.

    Anyway, does any vegan have a problem with e.coli and yeast being used to create hormones that save human beings from dying? I can't say I've heard about it, but I am sure I will. So far, zero of the vegans I know have taken issue with the way I don't "choose to die to diabetes".


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭nthclare


    Cow's are amazing animals, I love them.
    These big eye's, they're very curious and living in the Burren up near the winterage you can see how their coats get really furry in the winter.

    If you drive from Lisdoonvarna Around to Ballyvaughan from now on you'll see the wild cattle grazing away on the limestone plateau's.

    Around November they take on change and their hair grows very long, they're really fluffy looking.

    You can also see them along the commonage in the Burren...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,007 ✭✭✭s7ryf3925pivug


    They're in the field behind my house about half the time. When they are there my garden is full of flies. It's really gross.

    They fart methane. They take up land that could have trees planted in it instead. They are sometimes given feed imported from different countries. Therefore from an environmental point of view they should just be slaughtered and consumed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,137 ✭✭✭endainoz


    They're in the field behind my house about half the time. When they are there my garden is full of flies. It's really gross. They fart methane. They take up land that could have trees planted in it instead. They are sometimes given feed imported from different countries. Therefore from an environmental point of view they should just be slaughtered and consumed.


    Jesus your obsessed with your flies, you also have absolutely no idea or proof that their feed is imported. In fact it likely isn't at all, you forgot they fertilize the ground too. They could also co exist quite easily with a few trees in the field so they could compliment each other from a habitat point of view, dosent have to be one extreme or the other.

    Also the last line of your post makes zero sense and not worth responding to.

    It's actually difficult to decipher the people who post here sometimes, either they are expert trolls or completely uninformed idiots.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,708 ✭✭✭corks finest


    Only on boards FFS would you get quirky questions+ answers like these,,,,,put a smile on my face today- thank you,as it was badly needed


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,708 ✭✭✭corks finest


    BDI wrote:
    We would give them a small country to rule as they see fit. Somewhere with lots of grass.

    That's a cracker,v funny - witty answer,you must be from Cork kid


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,708 ✭✭✭corks finest


    We don't eat donkeys, are they endangered?


    Another good answer


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,996 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    ...
    They fart methane. They take up land that could have trees planted in it instead. They are sometimes given feed imported from different countries. Therefore from an environmental point of view they should just be slaughtered and consumed.

    Nope. Incorrect. It is cows burps not farts which are news regarding emissions. But if you are wondering about some of the most significant causes of methane emissions - a recent NASA study, has confirmed significant Methane spikes have been tied to Oil and Gas and rice production.
    Combining isotopic evidence from ground surface measurements with the newly calculated fire emissions, the team showed that about 17 teragrams per year of the increase is due to fossil fuels, another 12 is from wetlands or rice farming, while fires are decreasing by about 4 teragrams per year. The three numbers combine to 25 teragrams a year -- the same as the observed increase.

    https://www.ecowatch.com/nasa-study-methane-spike-2526089909.html?fbclid=IwAR1U87gLM7Mz9MyrYPPoBEfixyCldqpLIDUR0H0ijJFSgRl4lRqoUEw0uxE

    But yes cows produce milk - which is recognised as a valuable part of healthy balanced diet. From a purely environmental viewpoint - it would surely be much better to demolish the vast concrete urban wastelands to the plant forests. Oh and the feedstuffs which are sometimes fed to cattle and other animals are primarily the waste and by-products of the human food industry. It doesn't surprise me that some plant food advocates think cows should be eradicated. The same viewpoint apparently is held by a number of leading plant food advocates who also want all wild predators wiped off tte face off the planet. Nice ...


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    I've read some of PETA's ideology, how you can have the word 'Ethical' in your acronym , yet want predatory animals wiped out. Wonder have they studied the effects that would have on the ecosystem?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,007 ✭✭✭s7ryf3925pivug


    There are about a billion cows, and they each produce about 100kg of methane a year from farts and burps. That is a total of 100,000,000,000kg of methane or 100 teragrams of it. Which is lots.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,007 ✭✭✭s7ryf3925pivug




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,203 ✭✭✭emaherx


    There are about a billion cows, and they each produce about 100kg of methane a year from farts and burps. That is a total of 100,000,000,000kg of methane or 100 teragrams of it. Which is lots.

    If humans didn't exist how many wild ruminants would there be? What would their methane impact be?

    I've seen estimates that there were between 50 and 100 million buffalo in America compared to the modern 100 million cattle.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/22178852/

    According to this link 50 million Buffalo would produce 86% of the modern 100 million cattle in America's methane. Which is interesting because every continent except Antarctica should have large numbers of Bison and many other wild ruminants like aurochs, elk, deer etc.

    The NASA study refered to earlier can directly link the recent spike in methane to Oil/gas production and increases in rice production
    https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2668/nasa-led-study-solves-a-methane-puzzle/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,305 ✭✭✭✭the_syco


    I'm just wondering, if everyone becomes vegan, where do the cows go?
    They'd be killed off to make room for crops.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,996 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    the_syco wrote: »
    They'd be killed off to make room for crops.

    Areas which grow grass well are not necessarily suitable for arable or horticultural production. In many parts of Ireland a combination of soil type, topography and climate means that commercial crop production for human grade crops is a no go. We can't eat grass that grows well but animals can.

    The other issue is that soil cultivation and harvesting cause significant loss of carbon to the atmosphere. Where crops can be grown successfully, the removal of livestock will mean increased use of fossil fuel to manufacture even more artificial fertilisers in order to maintain some semblance of soil fertility. The pipe dream of eradicating livestock does not make a particularly good reality...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 755 ✭✭✭davidjtaylor


    Effects wrote: »
    As a farmer myself, I've already given up land to return to nature. I get paid by the EU to do so.

    Yes, I've heard of this. Fair play to ya. Also, I know dairy farmers' vegan sons who have inherited the farm and either forested it (again, subsidised but a much more acceptable use of subsidies) or opened an animal sanctuary.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,203 ✭✭✭emaherx


    Yes, I've heard of this. Fair play to ya. Also, I know dairy farmers' vegan sons who have inherited the farm and either forested it (again, subsidised but a much more acceptable use of subsidies) or opened an animal sanctuary.

    Yes a much better use than feeding people ;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 52 ✭✭The11Duff


    Yes, I've heard of this. Fair play to ya. Also, I know dairy farmers' vegan sons who have inherited the farm and either forested it (again, subsidised but a much more acceptable use of subsidies) or opened an animal sanctuary.

    More than one?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,618 ✭✭✭✭_Brian


    Effects wrote: »
    As a farmer myself, I've already given up land to return to nature. I get paid by the EU to do so.

    Can you please say which payment you get that allows land return to nature, genuinely I’d like to know.
    We allow small corners return wild but fear of being disallowed on larger areas stops us.

    I’m genuinely not aware of any scheme that pays a subsidy for wilding land.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,620 ✭✭✭El Tarangu


    Do you think farmers will give up their land to be returned to nature?

    Probably not.

    Do you think farmers would continue raising cattle at current levels if either:
    (i) increasing numbers of people stopped eating beef for whatever reason, or;
    (ii) they no longer received subsidies at current levels?


  • Advertisement
Advertisement