Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

What have we come to

1356763

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 774 ✭✭✭RonanG86


    Strumms wrote: »
    FG are very right wing, this lot particularly so.

    I don’t think we’ll see FF roll into bed with SF, too big a risk, SF have fûck all to loose, FF have everything to loose, it would just take one scandal involving SF, and FF will be finished with them...

    It depends on the numbers. SF have by a mile the highest 1st pref vote, but their low number of candidates means that they may not actually be the largest party when it comes to seats. Given how close it is, it's theoretically possible that FF (or FG) might have a few seats more than SF. I think Martin would suddenly become very interested in talking them then, but I doubt they'd reciprocate.

    The best thing for SF is that no government can be formed and we run the election again, but this time they put up 60-70 candidates and become large enough to form a government with Green & smaller left wing parties. Wouldn't be surprised if they aimed for that situation.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    endacl wrote: »
    Short memories + shorter consciences

    bomb_2223487b.jpg

    Much shorter memories if you consider the FF bank bailout and disastrous debt passed from the private sector to the taxpayers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,017 ✭✭✭boetstark


    Cupatae wrote: »
    Could they be any worse than FF and FG who have held power since the dawn of time, personally im glad to see the D4 and upper classes being rooted out, the upper class will get it and rightfully so! and if they want to go the **** em! they only stay around cause they have it cushy and pay **** all so they ll be no loss.

    As I pointed out yes they can be worse. And as you suggested anybody that has bettered themselves in life can root up and leave???
    I earn 105k per year and half of that goes on tax to fund people who want everything free.....


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭Scoundrel


    This thread is great the tears of the FF FG arseholes are just so beautiful suck it up lads


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,473 ✭✭✭pgj2015


    Penn wrote: »
    I don't think people should believe SF bullsh*t. Hell, I don't believe SF bullsh*t. Their policies are unrealistic, unworkable and most of it will be severely pared down or abandoned.

    But SF won't have enough seats to be such the majority party that they'll be able to run rampant. Which means for them to be in power, either FG or FF will have to relent and have them as a minority party in their government, or we might get SF propped up with several of the other smaller parties as a large coalition. And after years of the FF/FG back and forth, I think we need to see something else, if for no other reason than to give FF and FG a kick up the bollox so they get their act together.





    You would think we were a third world country or something, do ye not realize you are living in one of richest countries in the world? the standard of living here is up there with the best countries in the world.

    all this nonsense you hear about all the homeless people in Ireland, a lot of them have mental problems and choose to live on the streets, the others who live in hotels yet keep having kids even though they have no jobs, well thats their own fault for being so stupid.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,915 ✭✭✭Cupatae


    boetstark wrote: »
    As I pointed out yes they can be worse. And as you suggested anybody that has bettered themselves in life can root up and leave???
    I earn 105k per year and half of that goes on tax to fund people who want everything free.....

    Best of luck to them then, we arent benifiting by having them here and we shouldnt be held hostage to keep em here by voting a certain way either, economies go up and down but always rise for the most part,

    My heart bleeds for people earning 105k per year and crying about of bit of extra tax, how would you survive on 90 k a year ohhh the humanity! hang on there till i change my vote.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 667 ✭✭✭Balf


    Ya, a party with a mixed race gay leader and who brought in abortion legislation, the biggest social housing programme in 40 years, and implemented the Slainte care health programme are rabidly right wing.
    That's worth thinking about.


    We might label it the Margaret Cash factor. You can give her a house and supports worth literally hundreds of thousands, but she'll still probably have the hump and, if she votes at all, will vote for SF.


    Yet, she's a product of our society not producing an answer to what's admittedly a very difficult question. What could we colletively do, what policies could our State adopt, that would make Margaret Cash turn out more like, I dunno, Michelle Obama (just picking a reasonably competent human at random)?


    Michelle seems to have gotten through life without ever feeling the need to turn up in a police station with a half-a-dozen kids in tow looking for a house. (And then getting one, in case we forget.)


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,166 ✭✭✭Still waters


    Cupatae wrote: »
    If its in such amazing shape why are FF and FG losing?

    Because people are never happy, we live in a buoyant economy, near full employment, a high quality of living, a high life expectancy but parties like sinn fein appeal to the lowest common denominator, people only think we have it bad, while it's no utopia we rank as one of the happiest/successful/wealthiest countries in the world, just because cynthia and her childers can't get a house near her mammy and oisin has to work in spar because he went to college and did an arts degree doesn't mean everyone else has to suffer through a few years of lunatics like sinn fein in power


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,564 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Cupatae wrote: »
    Best of luck to them then, we arent benifiting by having them here and we shouldnt be held hostage to keep em here by voting a certain way either, economies go up and down but always rise for the most part,

    My heart bleeds for people earning 105k per year and crying about of bit of extra tax, how would you survive on 90 k a year ohhh the humanity! hang on there till i change my vote.

    The fact you think someone earning 100k a year comes out with 90k tells me all I need to know.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 774 ✭✭✭RonanG86


    pgj2015 wrote: »
    You would think we were a third world country or something, do ye not realize you are living in one of richest countries in the world? the standard of living here is up there with the best countries in the world.

    The standard of living is up there with the best countries in the world if you have money. And even if you are well off, you might be living in the Dublin commuter belt and thus spend half your working day in your car, never see your kids between Monday to Friday and pay extortionate fees for childcare.

    Might surprise you, but not everyone who has a problem with their living arrangements is a layabout alcoholic drug-addled scab with schizophrenia.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,660 ✭✭✭armaghlad


    billyhead wrote: »
    Sinn Fein topping the polls in many constituencies. I believe in democracy but too vote this crowd in as your number 1
    Lol. I love the taste of west Brit tears


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,027 ✭✭✭willowthewisp


    The problem with democracy is that every idiot gets a vote. See Brexit.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,915 ✭✭✭Cupatae


    Because people are never happy, we live in a buoyant economy, near full employment, a high quality of living, a high life expectancy but parties like sinn fein appeal to the lowest common denominator, people only think we have it bad, while it's no utopia we rank as one of the happiest/successful/wealthiest countries in the world, just because cynthia and her childers can't get a house near her mammy and oisin has to work in spar because he went to college and did an arts degree doesn't mean everyone else has to suffer through a few years of lunatics like sinn fein in power

    Are we living in the same country? we are still on about ireland right? Have you ever been to a mythical place called Limerick hospital?


  • Registered Users Posts: 219 ✭✭DM1983


    I'm scared by this. Genuinely. I don't care about their connection to the troubles, it's in the past, but SF policies will ruin the economy. They will without doubt drive investment out of the country.

    In all likelihood, FFG will have one more electoral term to address the issues that decided this election. These issues ultimately are based on inequality. I am a strong FG supporter but I would support major, major increases in inheritance tax. This is how you tackle inequality in the long term. Generational wealth has to be redistributed in society. The typical FFG base won't like it but that's the answer to protect the country for the future.

    Can't blame populism if you choose to ignore root cause.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,564 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Because people are never happy, we live in a buoyant economy, near full employment, a high quality of living, a high life expectancy but parties like sinn fein appeal to the lowest common denominator, people only think we have it bad, while it's no utopia we rank as one of the happiest/successful/wealthiest countries in the world, just because cynthia and her childers can't get a house near her mammy and oisin has to work in spar because he went to college and did an arts degree doesn't mean everyone else has to suffer through a few years of lunatics like sinn fein in power

    Massive sense of entitlement in this country.

    Want all the reward without hard work.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Cupatae wrote: »
    Best of luck to them then, we arent benifiting by having them here and we shouldnt be held hostage to keep em here by voting a certain way either, economies go up and down but always rise for the most part,

    With that kind of logic, you must be a SF supporter... hilarious (in a frightening kind of way).


  • Registered Users Posts: 990 ✭✭✭Fred Cryton


    A vote for SF is a vote for the grey tracksuit brigade. They're poison.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,128 ✭✭✭✭Oranage2


    Much shorter memories if you consider the FF bank bailout and disastrous debt passed from the private sector to the taxpayers.

    Exactly, how many people committed suicide because of the actions of the previous two governments, how many for the cancer scan and were giving wrong results. How many of their mate's pockets have they lined. They're also guilty of recent crimes


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,912 ✭✭✭omega man


    Because people are never happy, we live in a buoyant economy, near full employment, a high quality of living, a high life expectancy but parties like sinn fein appeal to the lowest common denominator, people only think we have it bad, while it's no utopia we rank as one of the happiest/successful/wealthiest countries in the world, just because cynthia and her childers can't get a house near her mammy and oisin has to work in spar because he went to college and did an arts degree doesn't mean everyone else has to suffer through a few years of lunatics like sinn fein in power

    Some people just don’t want to work hard anymore to achieve a better standard of living. Some want the state to provide this for them. They rightly or wrongly believe SF will deliver this.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,819 ✭✭✭Fann Linn


    Criticising people for voting SF when for the last 100 + years gob****es have been continually returning FF/FG?

    The tipping point is now and I applaud it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,819 ✭✭✭✭freshpopcorn


    I don't think there is party loyalty there anymore compared to the past. If we have a Sinn Fein lead government and they don't deliver on their promises I doubt they'd be voted in again after an Election or two.
    The past referendums also have engaged more people in politics.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,331 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    Cupatae wrote: »

    My heart bleeds for people earning 105k per year and crying about of bit of extra tax, how would you survive on 90 k a year ohhh the humanity! hang on there till i change my vote.

    Those people earning 105k are paying another 105k in tax. You want to tax them even more to give out more welfare payments to the do nothings. Best of luck with that strategy. I won't be hanging around.
    Your basically trying to kill ambition via tax, welcome to a Socialist Shangri la, you'd be better off in Cuba at least they have decent healthcare and a free ice cream every afternoon.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,915 ✭✭✭Cupatae


    With that kind of logic, you must be a SF supporter... hilarious (in a frightening kind of way).

    You re right we should keep voting the same way and hope for different results. You must be FF& FG completely out of touch with reality.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,787 ✭✭✭I see sheep


    A great day for Ireland, my Mam voted not FF for the first time in her life in her 60s.
    All over for FF dominance , they're never coming back that strong again thank god!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,555 ✭✭✭wexfordman2


    El Tarangu wrote: »
    There are plenty of other parties that espouse very similar leftish-populist policies to Sinn Féin, but who haven't been complicit in murdering Gardaí, members of the Defence Forces, members of the Oireachtas, children, census-takers, the Collie Club... I could go on.

    Did you vote for the gfa ?

    I did, and knowing that this would and had the aim of bringing sf and other parties with similar links to paramilitary organisations, in from the cold, in to government and in to the Democratic process fully .

    I voted for the gfa, knowing that it would introduce power sharing in the north, knowing that it would bring the likes of SF into normal politics, and expecting the north to live with this.

    Now, can someone explain to me

    1) Why did we "impose" SF as a political party in the northern power sharing executive, and why is it good for them, but not something that we should tollerate?
    2) Considering every party SF,Ff,FG has its origins in armed conflict, what do people view as an adequate time frame in which we should begin to oveook that fact and normalise them ?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,933 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Wesser wrote: »
    The young people don't remember the troubles or any violence in the North. It's a new generation coming through.

    We can't expect to foist coalition with SF on the Unionists in the 6 counties, without our being open to the same possibility in the 26.

    It's a new political paradigm, the immediate response to what is a dramatic shift in the landscape will be whether or not the leadership of FFG can actually deal with the outcome.

    Is it to be the coalescence of FF/FG into the actual single party of the centre right that many perceive them to be?

    Or will one of them grasp the nettle?
    Step into the brave new world and see how tempering leftist policy with fiscal reality plays out?

    It is the most seismic electoral result I can recall, and if a Government can't be formed the only winners in the next election will be SF!


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,600 ✭✭✭BanditLuke


    threeball wrote: »
    Have they turned over the paedophiles they were protecting yet?

    FFG protected the church pedos for years.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 667 ✭✭✭Balf


    DM1983 wrote: »
    Generational wealth has to be redistributed in society. The typical FFG base won't like it but that's the answer to protect the country for the future.

    Can't blame populism if you choose to ignore root cause.
    I think you have correctly identified the core issue.


    I'd just add that another part of the mix is realism over what regional development means. Which large parts of the country, containing a good number of voters, don't want to hear.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,819 ✭✭✭Fann Linn


    omega man wrote: »
    Some people just don’t want to work hard anymore to achieve a better standard of living. Some want the state to provide this for them. They rightly or wrongly believe SF will deliver this.
    You'd really want to examine the demographics of those who voted SF. They're not all track suit wearing single parent drug takers who want foreva homes.
    Despite that continual generalisation.

    I love those bitter lemons.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,915 ✭✭✭Cupatae


    Those people earning 105k are paying another 105k in tax. You want to tax them even more to give out more welfare payments to the do nothings. Best of luck with that strategy. I won't be hanging around.
    Your basically trying to kill ambition via tax, welcome to a Socialist Shangri la, you'd be better off in Cuba at least they have decent healthcare and a free ice cream every afternoon.

    They are only paying that amount because it is benifical to them in some way shape or form, dont try sell it like they are here out of the goodness of there heart, anyone on the money willing to leave over money, is only about one thing... MONEY and you can be sure they are taking out a hell of alot more than they put in


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 148 ✭✭macwal


    Balf wrote: »
    That's worth thinking about.


    We might label it the Margaret Cash factor. You can give her a house and supports worth literally hundreds of thousands, but she'll still probably have the hump and, if she votes at all, will vote for SF.


    Yet, she's a product of our society not producing an answer to what's admittedly a very difficult question. What could we colletively do, what policies could our State adopt, that would make Margaret Cash turn out more like, I dunno, Michelle Obama (just picking a reasonably competent human at random)?


    Michelle seems to have gotten through life without ever feeling the need to turn up in a police station with a half-a-dozen kids in tow looking for a house. (And then getting one, in case we forget.)




    I don't think it's the question that's difficult, but more so the answers.



    The problem goes back several generations. People shouldn't be "rewarded" when they drop a few sprongs, they should be rewarded in their later life when they raise decent, contributing human beings. In most cases like the one you referenced, it's unlikely to be the case.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,600 ✭✭✭BanditLuke


    A great day for Ireland, my Mam voted not FF for the first time in her life in her 60s.
    All over for FF dominance , they're never coming back that strong again thank god!

    Massive mistake running Martin as leader in this election. Tainted by association and it's not the distant past. We are all still paying for his and his pals mistakes.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,787 ✭✭✭I see sheep


    Because people are never happy, we live in a buoyant economy, near full employment, a high quality of living, a high life expectancy but parties like sinn fein appeal to the lowest common denominator, people only think we have it bad, while it's no utopia we rank as one of the happiest/successful/wealthiest countries in the world, just because cynthia and her childers can't get a house near her mammy and oisin has to work in spar because he went to college and did an arts degree doesn't mean everyone else has to suffer through a few years of lunatics like sinn fein in power

    Short version: You've been lucky in life and are happy so that's all that matters.
    If anybody is struggling it's their fault.


  • Registered Users Posts: 687 ✭✭✭bunderoon


    rtron wrote: »
    Let's just get it over with.
    Vote them in.
    Watch them feck up the country.
    Then revote FF in 4 or 7 years whatever it is.

    You do realise that the country is still f**ked dont you?
    As soon as we were forced to take on the debts of foreigners, money was then lent to us again. We are paying back 6,000 million a year ALONE in interest.
    As we are not allowed to print out own money and control interest rates, we get hit when the EU central bank decides to stop printing...

    My hope for SF is to sort out as much of the Corporate corruption and local government waste as possible.
    One of many many examples one be to have seen O'Doherty oversee the costings of the NCH. I'd bet it wouldn't be the 1,500 million that its going to end up costing. The same types of hospitals in other similar countries costing no more than 200 million...
    And you must remember, all of this money is borrowed AT interest...

    I would fear though that SF wouldnt tackle the lifers on the dole and other social handouts. A huge section of society that also breeds social unrest and additional work for the councils and Gardai. Social welfare is supposed to be temporary until you get back on your feet, not the generational income that it's become.

    We are fooling ourselves if we think that too much could change regardless of who is in power. But it would be great to make a start in undoing the great damage that FFG have done to us.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    They're the only decent size party that havn't screwed us massively before. Give them a chance
    The manifesto is right out of the FF playbook of 1977! One can see how we might be quite easily screwed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,721 ✭✭✭Balmed Out


    Earthhorse wrote: »
    It's a very naïve vote. Sinn Féin are basically FF lite. No real political convictions. What way is the wind blowing? Grand we'll go with that. If they do get into power it won't be the disaster some are expecting but it won't be the change others think they've voted for.

    I think ff are less shamelessly populist as they had been under Bertie but sf have pretty much just copied his approach. Let's hope the media etc have learned something as the electorate hasn't.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,600 ✭✭✭BanditLuke


    Fann Linn wrote: »
    You'd really want to examine the demographics of those who voted SF. They're not all track suit wearing single parent drug takers who want foreva homes.
    Despite that continual generalisation.

    I love those bitter lemons.

    Funny thing is those people in tracksuits and the druggies don't vote. The attempt SF as a party representative of them is pathetic.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,503 ✭✭✭✭noodler



    Now, can someone explain to me

    2) Considering every party SF,Ff,FG has its origins in armed conflict, what do people view as an adequate time frame in which we should begin to oveook that fact and normalise them ?


    It's an interesting, if utterly deranged, case of whataboutery right there.

    The attempt to talk away SF's role in recent and even present criminality is quite disingenuous.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Cupatae wrote: »
    You re right we should keep voting the same way and hope for different results. You must be FF& FG completely out of touch with reality.

    Nope. I'm not a supporter of either party... But I don't expect SF to be any better than FF/FG. In many respects, especially for long-term effects, I expect them to be worse. Oh, sure, there will be short-term benefits, but they're probably going to kneecap the Irish economy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,268 ✭✭✭threeball


    Strumms wrote: »
    They are quite right of center, they even have multiple members attending YAF conferences, there is nothing center about them...

    They could have members attending Nazi rallies, doesn't make the party or the policies they implemented right wing. As was pointed out to you they are actually far to far to the left.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,802 ✭✭✭✭suicide_circus


    As with Brexit, this is the democratic will of the people and it is for the "establishment" now to do some soul searching and figure out why this happened.

    This is a cry for help by those who feel left behind and those who quite reasonably wanted an end to the duopoly of FFG.

    It's not my personal preference but i hope they do the state some service because i want this country to do well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 774 ✭✭✭RonanG86


    I'm finding a certain duality here.

    Apparently the country is doing brilliantly and we have full employment blah, blah, blah, but at the same time it's full of Social Welfare scabs who want everything for nothing and they all vote for Sinn Fein's pie in the sky promises? Aren't those two things at least a bit incompatible with each other?

    Now, I'm aware that unemployment by definition only deals with people who are fit, able and willing to work and excludes those in third level education, but I'm pretty sure if you're on Jobseekers, the state considers you willing to work. I'm pretty sure from my line of work, that most 'generational' Social Welfare families that FG and FF supporters are getting butthurt about are actually on Jobseekers rather than 'faking' a disability or two. So there actually can't be that many of them if we have full employment? (Also my experience is that said class of individual is less likely to vote than the populace in general anyway)

    And I don't think there are enough college students to make up the numbers for SF, even if every single one of them voted for SF (which they don't).

    So maybe, just maybe, there's a sizeable contingent of hard working, employed people, who because of the ass backwardness of the housing market, the health system, childcare, insurance etc. etc. voted for Sinn Fein?

    Nah, that can't be it. It's the scabs, isn't it?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,787 ✭✭✭I see sheep


    Trying to explain Irish politics abroad is finally going to get easier.

    It's always been - 'There's no proper left wing party and one of two centre right parties with exactly the same policies run the government every time.'

    At least there's a serious left wing option finally!

    Absolutely delighted


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,257 ✭✭✭Elessar


    Short version: You've been lucky in life and are happy so that's all that matters.
    If anybody is struggling it's their fault.

    Translation: "The struggles in my life are always somebody else's fault"

    The inability of certain Irish people to accept any kind of personal responsibility is astounding.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,787 ✭✭✭I see sheep


    Nope. I'm not a supporter of either party... But I don't expect SF to be any better than FF/FG. In many respects, especially for long-term effects, I expect them to be worse. Oh, sure, there will be short-term benefits, but they're probably going to kneecap the Irish economy.

    Ha ha good lad, keep making IRA jokes, that went well for ye/media this time :P Up the shinners


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,915 ✭✭✭Cupatae


    Nope. I'm not a supporter of either party... But I don't expect SF to be any better than FF/FG. In many respects, especially for long-term effects, I expect them to be worse. Oh, sure, there will be short-term benefits, but they're probably going to kneecap the Irish economy.

    So whats the alternative ? vote in FF or FG again and keep the status quo going? pander to the high earners and corporations? and everything else is secondary ? I can see how 100k+ earners think theirs nothing wrong with the country it d be hard to see the misery from there ivory towers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,017 ✭✭✭boetstark


    Cupatae wrote: »
    Best of luck to them then, we arent benifiting by having them here and we shouldnt be held hostage to keep em here by voting a certain way either, economies go up and down but always rise for the most part,

    My heart bleeds for people earning 105k per year and crying about of bit of extra tax, how would you survive on 90 k a year ohhh the humanity! hang on there till i change my vote.

    M90k per year, maths isn't your strong point


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,787 ✭✭✭I see sheep


    Elessar wrote: »

    The inability of certain Irish people to accept any kind of personal responsibility is astounding.

    I agree, The inability of FF/FG cowboys to accept any kind of personal responsibility in running the country like a **** show for 100 years is astounding.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,915 ✭✭✭Cupatae


    boetstark wrote: »
    M90k per year, maths isn't your strong point

    It was a figure thrown out to make a point, clearly common sense isnt your strong point.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,555 ✭✭✭wexfordman2


    omega man wrote: »
    Some people just don’t want to work hard anymore to achieve a better standard of living. Some want the state to provide this for them. They rightly or wrongly believe SF will deliver this.

    Some people are working exceptionally hard, and handing over 20k of their hard earned wages in rent, then another 10k in childcare.l, before they can think about actually livingz saving for the future, saving for retirement etc.

    Your lazy generalisation is what has put SF where they are today denial of the obvious, a refusal to tackle the day to day issues that working people are struggling with every day if their lives.

    I am heading towards my fifties, have worked all my life, have been a floating voter, am in a relatively comfortable position, earn a good wage, have a negligable mortgage, and am relatively secure.

    I look at the position people ten years younger than me or more are in. People making a start in life, starting a family, starting a career, and looking to start a home. I look at these people and wonder in awe what keeps them going against all the odds, never mind the struggles they will face in trying to provide for their own retirement.

    Your assumptions are lazy, ignorant and I'll informed.

    I voted FG this time round, and SF second pre intacticly voted to keep ff out, and to try and put manners on fg. I have huge respect for much of what FG have done since the econimicly, and socially. I have huge respect for them finally tackinling SSM and abortion, and for the way they represented Ireland in the brexit negotiations.

    I abhore their right wing economic stance, the creation of a child care industry, and an industry of landlords and shared living. I abhore their stance on retirement, and the increase in retirement age.

    You keep up with your simplistic analysis of the voter, it will serve you well I am sure.


Advertisement