Mass sexual assaults covered up for 4 days by German media - READ OP BEFORE POSTING

The Highwayman wrote: »

Jesus wept when is madness going to stop?

When you stop the mass migration of 'refugees'/migrants from the third world into Europe.

So never.

DEFTLEFTHAND wrote: »

The Irish went to places like New York to live in ghettos and work their arses off in menial jobs to try and make a better life for themselves and families. If things went belly up, they'd be out on the streets.

There was no sense of entitlement, they knew it was going to be rough going from the get go.

My point is that we emigrated to Anerica, England, Canada, Australia and a few to Argentina one time. This moronic mantra that we just emigrated with overtones that it was every country in the world is complete rubbish. And then using that to defend and support the mass migration of people from Islamic countries into Europe, it's wrong on every level. The cultures in my opinion are far too diametrically opposed and different.

I'd probably find the hypocrisy & number of times pro-immigration supporters have been proven wrong on this issue funny. If it wasn't for it being real & causing such harm & severity to individuals and communities.


Just off the top of my head some bullsh*t that was heard during summer 2015 & leading up to the Paris attacks.

- the immigrants are highly skilled. Not only was this quickly shown to be false, but has estimations that will cost a fortune to train

- They are needed to support the aging workforce. In light of the costs to integrate and educate, it raises serious questions on why local EU nations experiencing unemployment such as Greece/Spain weren't utilised for the workforce as would be expected under the eu objectives.

- As per usual any objections to pro immigration on the grounds of terrorism (some racist, some legitimate concerns) was met with name calling and character judging. This was heard from Merkel a number of times in regards to Ireland not doing enough & Poland/hungarys nationalistic response as sovereign nations to act in the interest of their own people first and foremost.

- The death of a young boy from drowning is blood on the EUs hands for not doing enough to help. So the response is to support illegal trafficking, import thousands of immigrants who will have no want to return to their homelands over the EU when the region is stabilised, and disregard policies left right and centre.


Pro immigration supporters seem unable to answer how many murders, rapes, assaults, general violence etc are acceptable before they admit their might be a problem they did not foresee in their support of importing mass numbers of immigrants from a different culture; a culture, history & religion they quite frankly from my experiences don't understand yet seem determined to protect at the cost of their own. These supporters are often the type who supported all the inane social justice campaigns of last year like gamer gate, New York woman getting harassed for 10hrs etc.
Yet have their heads in the sands over both reported and anecdotal scenarios claiming no true Scotsman/Muslim when a Muslim-derived terrorist group shoot up France, when native European women & female children are raped by immigrants such as in Finland and Sweden, when native women in Germany are recommended to dress more modestly so as not to incite assault around these camp areas, when mass assaults occur in camps over simply religious denominations, when anti-rape courses are provided to immigrant men, when immigrants camp out on the remains of others in a cemetery & leave it thrashed.

It's honestly mind boggling that these are the type of people pro immigration supporters want in Ireland and other eu countries, or see as "minor" collateral effects of their open door policy. I've tried to understand it.

nokia69 wrote: »

as if Turkey is the only other muslim country in the world

A while back I heard Ban Ki Moon saying that Europe and Germany need to do more to help Syrian and other refugees, this made me wonder how many his own country would be taking in, not many I would wager

the people of Europe are the biggest mugs in the world

South Korea & nearby Japan don't do mass immigration, in fact there are more asylum seekers / economic migrants from nearby SE asian nations in western european countries.

A lot of good points made so far on here. I fully agree with the poster who said when the Irish emigrated to USA, Canada, Australia etc they had nothing but the shirt on their backs. They had to work hard and got no state help from their host country. You either made it or you were on the street. I feel in Europe we are expected to provide migrants with things over and above what they'd get in most countries of the world.


I've always maintained from early on in the Middle East crisis that it's common sense that most refugees should be hosted in the surrounding Arab and Gulf countries. Culturally and socially there are much closer links than states in Europe. Some of these Gulf countries have vast petrodollar fuelled resources that could easily provide accommodation and services to refugees. Furthermore when the conflict eventually subsides refugees would be more likely to return to Syria/Iraq if they are located on the Arabian peninsula rather than based in Europe. I feel no pressure was exerted on these countries to pitch in. They are all well able to fund the conflict and keep it going but don't want to deal with the fallout. This piece illustrates why refugees are choosing Europe. Basically they have more rights and benefits plus a lot of Gulf countries aren't party to the U.N.refugee charter and don't offer citizenship to foreigners.


It seems as if ordinary Germans are copping on to the open arms policy of Merkel.
(Not allowed to post the survey but it's available online in December 2015. Basically it says Germans are becoming sceptical of economic benefits accruing from migrants)

Germany have taken in upwards of 1.1m refugees last year which is a noble undertaking. However what if another million or probably more arrive this year? Then what? What if another million arrive in 2017? The unrestricted entry of so many people is naive at best. I can't find the article but I remember hearing recently on the radio that by German government figures they estimate that only 6-10% are able to participate in the workforce straight away. This isn't really surprising but was airbrushed when we were encouraged to take masses of unskilled, with no host country language, 3rd world people. What do you expect? How much will it cost to educate/train the remainder? Will the females be "allowed" to work by their patriarchal families?
If there was a labour shortage or worrying future demographics why didn't they entice unemployed people from Spain or Greece who generally would be skilled and would just need to become proficient in German.


I am personally for immigration but it must be tightly controlled. Many of the nationalities are not countries currently embroiled in war e.g. Pakistan, most of Africa, Balkans etc so should be given short shrift. Also another query I have re refugees is I'd imagine most countries they're leaving wouldn't have a good civil administration or are unorganized at best. Hence they could have no documents or bogus ones. They could lie about country of origin and say they've no papers. What is the response to that? A small few could be criminals (both petty and serious) in their native states but because of poor record keeping there's no way of verifying their status. For instance if I want to go live in Australia, Canada, USA, Gulf and there's even a whiff of a criminal incident on my record I'll be denied entry (and rightly so). I just imagine that with such a surge of people coming at once (plus pressure from the PC brigade) it's impossible to have proper checks and verification on all.

Most countries in the Balkans are already given short shrift and many are refused visas and residence permits even if they emigrate legally. For years my wife was treated like a leper because she came from a wartorn country (for work, not as a refugee) and endured racist slurs by people who don't even know where her country is and/or assume it to be some backwards shtiehole where everyone marries their cousin. Don't drag them into this, and don't tar them with the same brush. I know it's now kosher to harass Eastern Europeans because they're white but they're not the ones raping women on the streets of Berlin and never have been.