Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Squawk as you see fit (Off Topic Thread)

1235728

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,780 ✭✭✭jamo2oo9


    I would've always thought it'll be Toulouse that Airbus would sponsor instead of Cardiff!


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,403 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    True. But they've been sponsoring Cardiff for around 6 years now under their previous name 'EADS'.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,265 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    (Reuters) - U.S. planemaker Boeing (BA.N) has disclosed an agreement with Iran to provide airplane parts, relaxing a three-decade freeze in ties as part of a broader package of sanctions relief.

    The agreement sets out general terms and conditions for the "potential sale of certain goods and services related to the safety of flight," Boeing said in a regulatory filing.

    It marks the first acknowledged dealings between U.S. aerospace companies and Iran since the 1979 U.S. hostage crisis led to sanctions that deepened during the decade-old international dispute over Iran's nuclear program.

    Boeing said its agreement with state carrier Iran Air covered airplane parts, manuals, drawings, service bulletins, navigation charts and data.

    Boeing has also opened discussions with Iran Air Tours, a subsidiary of Iran Air, for similar goods and services, it said.

    This could mean that we will see their 747-100's flying for years to come :)


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,927 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    smurfjed wrote: »
    This could mean that we will see their 747-100's flying for years to come :)

    Boeing finds a market for all those used B747's and B737 classic's!!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 594 ✭✭✭sully2010




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,533 ✭✭✭Zonda999


    http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/news/family-of-nut-allergy-girl-are-removed-from-flight-30521385.html

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/travel_news/article-2729688/It-s-not-nut-free-airline-Family-four-year-old-girl-suffered-allergic-reaction-removed-flight-asking-cabin-crew-not-serve-cashews-board.html

    Admittedly not the greatest sources here guys but what do you make of this? I don’t really understand the situation to be honest

    The initial flight had to return to DUB when on the crossing from DUB to EWR, the girl had the allergic reaction

    The airline accommodated them after this by bringing them on a “nut-free” flight to the states, good of them in fairness

    Then on the return journey, when the family (Who were in business class apparently, not first class as the article would tell you, there is no first class on this route!) requested on the plane that no nuts be served, were then asked to get off the flight? Surely, the airline would have made the same accommodation of the second “nut free“ flight for the journey home? Or is it a case that the airline forgot about this and it was too late to disrupt normal service when they were on the plane?

    Because the independent and DM are jumping on this, I want to assume this story is biased against United airlines btw..


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,927 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    Anyone ever try watch paint dry? Why not watch a webcam of an Icelandic volcano!

    http://www.livefromiceland.is/webcams/bardarbunga/


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,927 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    Zonda999 wrote: »
    ....
    Admittedly not the greatest sources here guys but what do you make of this? I don’t really understand the situation to be honest

    The initial flight had to return to DUB when on the crossing from DUB to EWR, the girl had the allergic reaction. The airline accommodated them after this by bringing them on a “nut-free” flight to the states, good of them in fairness.

    Surely, the airline would have made the same accommodation of the second “nut free“ flight for the journey home? Or is it a case that the airline forgot about this and it was too late to disrupt normal service when they were on the plane?..
    Sounds to me as if the logistics for the return journey were not in place. They were put up in a hotel and flown home the next day. So a small slip from the airline but they still provided good service to the family involved.

    I have had this approx 10 years ago on a flight out of DUB. ALL chocolates (and confectionery that may have been made in a nut contaminated environment) were removed/not loaded in the catering supplies. Family boarded first and allowed to wipe down a block of 4 seats. Announcements made pre-boarding at the gate and again during boarding onboard as well as post take-off. Little boy on the day was hyper allergic to nuts and apparently adrenaline shot was not guaranteed to prevent death.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,816 ✭✭✭billie1b


    Tenger wrote: »
    Sounds to me as if the logistics for the return journey were not in place. They were put up in a hotel and flown home the next day. So a small slip from the airline but they still provided good service to the family involved.

    I have had this approx 10 years ago on a flight out of DUB. ALL chocolates (and confectionery that may have been made in a nut contaminated environment) were removed/not loaded in the catering supplies. Family boarded first and allowed to wipe down a block of 4 seats. Announcements made pre-boarding at the gate and again during boarding onboard as well as post take-off. Little boy on the day was hyper allergic to nuts and apparently adrenaline shot was not guaranteed to prevent death.

    Have had this myself on a flight, must be terrible as a parent or even the person with the allergy to go through day in/day out


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,812 ✭✭✭ProfessorPlum


    I have to say it was either very brave or very stupid for the parents to continue their journey outbound. According to the article, the girl had a full blown anaphylactic reaction to the nuts that required adrenaline, diversion and a hospital admission, and despite the fact that it was the first time she had a reaction, they were happy to continue the next day. How did they have time to have her assessed for other potential allergies? Had they fully all of the potential contaminants that they needed to be wary of? Had they learned and been confident enough in how to use the epipen?
    I think United did a great job being able to accommodate them on the outbound flight the next day, and I assume the return may have gotten lost in the system, but they put them up and accommodated them the following day. I really don't see what the parents are complaining about. Now that they're home, I hope they spend a but more time learning about their child's life threatening illness and finding out how to best protect her.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,536 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Booked my first Ryanair flight since 2010. Worth giving the new cuddly image a go for it being a third of the price (20 quid return to Manchester, seeing as there's 16.50 of APD I'm actually costing them rather a lot).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,573 ✭✭✭pajor


    Better be fixed by Paddy's Day next year. :rolleyes:

    http://www.thejournal.ie/government-jet-broken-1650016-Sep2014/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,536 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    pajor wrote: »
    Better be fixed by Paddy's Day next year. :rolleyes:

    http://www.thejournal.ie/government-jet-broken-1650016-Sep2014/

    Its not worth fixing, it needs replacing but that's politically impossible to do any time other than just after a general election...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,780 ✭✭✭jamo2oo9


    Politicians can always use the commercial airlines... It's cheaper for the state


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,927 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    MYOB wrote: »
    Its not worth fixing, it needs replacing but that's politically impossible to do any time other than just after a general election...
    I love that the journal headline states "one of the Govts jet has broken down". Images of an aircraft on a hard shoulder spring to mind.
    It was flown with no issues over to the US for its annual maintenance and problems were spotted during the course of this process.

    MYOB wrote: »
    Booked my first Ryanair flight since 2010...................20 quid return to Manchester..............
    While I am an upfront EI fanboy....how can you you not take that deal?
    It costs me approx E20 to get back to up North from Dublin on Bus Eireainn when I have to!!!!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,297 ✭✭✭✭Jawgap


    jamo2oo9 wrote: »
    Politicians can always use the commercial airlines... It's cheaper for the state

    I think better use of scheduled services and a Net Jets account would render MATS obsolete.

    The money expended could be put to better use by the Air Corps.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,533 ✭✭✭Zonda999


    http://www.controller.com/listingsdetail/aircraft-for-sale/BOEING-747-8/2012-BOEING-747-8/1316191.htm

    Anyone want to hazard a guess as to what they'd be looking for for this?:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,536 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Zonda999 wrote: »
    http://www.controller.com/listingsdetail/aircraft-for-sale/BOEING-747-8/2012-BOEING-747-8/1316191.htm

    Anyone want to hazard a guess as to what they'd be looking for for this?:D

    Too much - I believe thats the frame Lufty rejected as its wildly out of spec with production models.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,265 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    I don't think so, I believe that it was supposed to be HZ-HMS1, destined to someone who died before the aircraft was delivered.

    http://boeing-test-flights.blogspot.ie/2012/07/n458bj-hz-hms1-prince-sultan-bin.html

    The problem with aircraft like this is the interior cost, usually its more than the aircraft purchase cost.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,927 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    Zonda999 wrote: »
    http://www.controller.com/listingsdetail/aircraft-for-sale/BOEING-747-8/2012-BOEING-747-8/1316191.htm

    Anyone want to hazard a guess as to what they'd be looking for for this?:D

    List price is $375m.........lets offer them $75M and use it for the Govt Jet!!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,533 ✭✭✭Zonda999


    I can't imagine the Air Corps would be able to handle that at Baldonnel though!:D

    Trying to sell that must be close to impossible though and they're surely willing to take a monstrous discount off list!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,265 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    must be close to impossible
    Actually i think that it was recently sold. Remember that with online ads, you can be looking at an agency trying to sell something and not the principal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,265 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    15027897679_a757769d67_o.jpg

    Seen in Dublin airport as you go for the 200 gates..... what on earth is this supposed to symbolise ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,265 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    15028171867_62a85bea34_o.jpg

    Crappy IPAD photography, we had talked about this French VIP airline a while back, are they actually in operation? I was in CDG on 3 days and that aircraft didn't appear to have moved.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,789 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    passed it a few times when taxiing in CDG, like the livery. According to FR24 it does actually see time in the air...

    http://www.flightradar24.com/data/airplanes/f-htag

    https://www.lacompagnie.com/en/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,533 ✭✭✭Zonda999


    15196915266_91386184a5_b.jpg

    I got excited for a minute when I saw the picture! :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,707 ✭✭✭BeardySi


    oh ffs...... that just takes the biscuit...


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,403 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    Kind of related. Here's the smallest 747 you'll ever see :pac:
    Nimr wrote: »
    *sigh* Journalism really hits a new lows every time they report something in aviation

    08fec59af199165872be9df534a01f59.png

    http://rt.com/usa/us-laguardia-crash-landing-442/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,265 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    smurfjed wrote: »

    I wonder what colour the weather radar display showed ?!


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,403 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    Has anyone read this? Is it good?

    I'm just starting now.


  • Registered Users Posts: 48 DC403l


    Anybody know when the aer lingus schedules for summer 15 come out? I'm just wondering did Aer Lingus discontinue the Stockholm arlanda service? It's meant to be all year acording to wiki


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,927 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    DC403l wrote: »
    Anybody know when the aer lingus schedules for summer 15 come out? I'm just wondering did Aer Lingus discontinue the Stockholm arlanda service? It's meant to be all year acording to wiki

    Some are already in the system (can be seen on ei.com) final confirmation is usually end Sept/early Oct. So another 1-3 weeks to go.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,265 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    Female Top Gun leads UK's first Iraq combat mission: As Britain goes to war for first time in six years, two Toronto jets make sortie over jihadi territory... but drop no bombs
    DailyMail 28th Sep.

    Are these made in Canada? :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,533 ✭✭✭Zonda999


    The following was posted today on the Facebook page of Cork TD Jim Daly. I emboldened the few bits here people might find interesting.
    Ever wondered why Ryanair has not bought the old Terminal or whether Cork -Dublin route will be restored or if transatlantic flights from Cork will become a reality. Below is an article that I wrote which appeared in this week's Southern Star to answer these and other questions re Cork Airport
    The future of Cork Airport is of particular importance to West Cork as efforts continue on many fronts to grow tourism numbers in the years ahead. Last Friday morning at 7.30am I and a number of my party colleagues joined the Minister for Transport, Sport and Tourism Paschal Donohue at a meeting with management at Cork airport to discuss the above and many other questions regarding the future of the airport. On arrival, the fog continued to envelop the airport causing me to wonder why such a location was chosen for the airport which was opened in 1961 and catered for 10,000 passengers in its first year of operations.

    Cork Airport is the second largest airport in the state and currently serves 50 routes and expects to accommodate 2.15 million passengers in 2014. The new terminal completed in 2006 at a cost of well in excess of €100 million has capacity for up to 4 million passengers which is double its existing passenger numbers.
    The biggest challenge to Cork Airport is competing with a resurgent Shannon Airport which has recently gained independence from the DAA is debt free and has agreed a €0 fee arrangement with Ryanair for all passengers landing and taking off from the airport over the next five years. By contrast Cork Airport is almost €200 million in debt and charges up to €8.60 per passenger on year 6 rising incrementally from €0 on year one. While making an operating profit of €5 million euro per annum, the airport is straddled with servicing its enormous debt and coupled with depreciation records a loss of €15 million per annum. This clearly is not a sustainable position for the airport.

    The most interesting figure relating to Cork Airport is the percentage of passengers resident in Ireland using the airport each year. At Cork almost 70% of travellers are resident here already versus just above 50% at Dublin and Shannon. Here lies the greatest opportunity for Cork Airport – to grow the number of inbound tourists to the airport. This will result in a major bonus for tourism in the region. Areas like Germany are very poorly served by existing routes and the development of such routes is a no brainer when it comes to increasing visitors to West Cork an area that has always been popular with the German tourists.

    Unlike its nearest neighbours Kerry and Waterford, Cork airport does not receive any state subventions from the tax payer each year. The debt issue has to be tackled by Government intervention. National Aviation policy needs to recognise Cork Airport as a regional airport and designate it as the principal international Gateway to the Wild Atlantic Way. Cork Airport should also be designated as the convention and conference gateway for Business tourism in the South of Ireland as the development of the Cork Convention Centre progresses. The State’s Tourism bodies and the two local Authorities need to join forces in a coordinated way to develop on a public private model a marketing fund to attract new routes and promote areas like West Cork to the British, French and German markets.

    Plans are at an advanced stage to bring back the Cork Dublin route initially as a transatlantic feeder route by Stobart Air. It is hoped this service might be in place by April 2015 but its future will be determined by demand set against the backdrop of improved road, rail and Bus travel on the same route. The Cooperation of airlines in using the route as a feeder to onward journeys from Dublin will be key to its success. The existing runway at 2.1Km’s in length can facilitate the introduction of transatlantic flights to the East coast of the United States and this possibility is currently being discussed with airline companies with the hope of establishing a number of routes to the US in the next couple of years. The old terminal is available for rent to any company and has been viewed by a number of interested parties. The annual rates bill on such a large structure would be very significant and the existing concrete floors would not be ideal for the laying of cable and fibre optic wires etc. However the premises are available for lease to any company including Ryanair with I’m told no reasonable offer being refused.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,265 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    [IMG][/img]11775753186_c2e0834c33.jpgGulfstream G650 N44KJ Private by mm-photoart, on Flickr Linked to the collection of Matthias Michel and used for educational purposes.

    As my "gossip" has now made it into the public domain, its sad to see an aircraft destroyed like this.

    Both engines were cooked during the engine start whilst under the control of the crew.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,927 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    smurfjed wrote: »
    ......
    Both engines were cooked during the engine start whilst under the control of the crew.
    How would one actually do that? It seems shocking to me, stupidity or a simple thing if distracted?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 821 ✭✭✭eatmyshorts


    smurfjed wrote: »
    [IMG][/img]11775753186_c2e0834c33.jpgGulfstream G650 N44KJ Private by mm-photoart, on Flickr

    Both engines were cooked during the engine start whilst under the control of the crew.
    How'd they manage to do that?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,265 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    It appears that they selected CRANK rather than START, one engine at a time, with both rotating they opened the FUEL COCKS, and then selected MANUAL IGNITION, the result equals $14 million.

    I live in a glass house so I never take pleasure in others misfortunes, my purpose with these discussions is to allow others to learn from the events. But this event is really bizarre, and the methodology used to start the engines had nothing to do with Gulfstream nor Flight Safety procedures.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,536 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    C4 News there just had a reporter standing on a flight path so they could zoom out from an approaching plane to her - talking about West Africa and Ebola.

    It was an Aer Lingus A320. Don't think that's been near Sierra Leone any time recently!


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,812 ✭✭✭ProfessorPlum


    Oh Christ. That should be all we need to start a mass panic!


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,927 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    Here's the weather in Bermuda!!!


    Look at this TAF for Bermuda Airport (TXKF).......


    TAF TXKF 171736Z 1718/1818 13045G55KT 9000 -RA SCT014 OVC030
    TEMPO 1718/1806 3200 RA BKN008 OVC012
    PROB40 TEMPO 1718/1806 1600 +SHRA BKN008 OVC012CB
    PROB30 TEMPO 1718/1806 0800 +TSRA SCT005 OVC008CB
    BECMG 1720/1722 14065G90KT 3200 BLPY BKN008 OVC012
    BECMG 1722/1724 15090G120KT
    TEMPO 1723/1801 VRB25KT
    BECMG 1800/1802 27090G120KT
    BECMG 1802/1804 27065G90KT
    BECMG 1804/1806 27045G65KT 6000 -SHRA BKN015
    BECMG 1806/1808 29025G35KT
    BECMG 1812/1815 27015G25KT 9999 NSW SCT015 BKN065
    BECMG 1815/1818 27015KT=


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,812 ✭✭✭ProfessorPlum


    Tenger wrote: »
    Here's the weather in Bermuda!!!


    Look at this TAF for Bermuda Airport (TXKF).......


    TAF TXKF 171736Z 1718/1818 13045G55KT 9000 -RA SCT014 OVC030
    TEMPO 1718/1806 3200 RA BKN008 OVC012
    PROB40 TEMPO 1718/1806 1600 +SHRA BKN008 OVC012CB
    PROB30 TEMPO 1718/1806 0800 +TSRA SCT005 OVC008CB
    BECMG 1720/1722 14065G90KT 3200 BLPY BKN008 OVC012
    BECMG 1722/1724 15090G120KT
    TEMPO 1723/1801 VRB25KT
    BECMG 1800/1802 27090G120KT
    BECMG 1802/1804 27065G90KT
    BECMG 1804/1806 27045G65KT 6000 -SHRA BKN015
    BECMG 1806/1808 29025G35KT
    BECMG 1812/1815 27015G25KT 9999 NSW SCT015 BKN065
    BECMG 1815/1818 27015KT=

    Must be hurricane season!!



    (Quivers in boots!)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 821 ✭✭✭eatmyshorts


    Must be hurricane season!!



    (Quivers in boots!)
    Be grand. Sure take it to minimums and have a look!! :-)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,265 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    have a look!! :-)
    Out the side window :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,265 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    This is a new twist....
    SANTO DOMINGO, Dominican Republic — Dominican Republic officials say they have arrested a woman who was carrying more than $70,000 in her stomach and $69,000 hidden inside her suitcase.
    The spokesman for the National Drug Control Agency says the money in the woman’s stomach was divided up among 16 capsules and the cash is likely tied to drug trafficking.
    Spokesman Dario Medrano said Friday that the 40-year-old woman was arrested at the airport in the popular tourist district of Punta Cana after arriving on a flight from Brussels. Her name has not been released.
    Dominican authorities say this is the first time they have arrested someone who was smuggling money in their stomach.

    How on earth do you swallow money?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,812 ✭✭✭ProfessorPlum


    smurfjed wrote: »
    This is a new twist....



    How on earth do you swallow money?

    I've heard stories of prisoners from the joy turning up in the Mater A&E having swallowed all manner of stuff. The best I heard was a guy who linked his bed springs together and swallows them.
    But that is a lot of money all the same!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 18,184 ✭✭✭✭Lapin


    Where's the drone thread gone ?


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,927 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    Lapin wrote: »
    Where's the drone thread gone ?

    Quick, call the men in black...........he is asking too many questions..........










    If you mean the "possible drone over the North Sea" thread....it was moved to Military as seemed might get a better response over there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,265 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    This is a pretty neat seat design..... can you imagine MOL ordering them :)

    http://www.paperclipdesign.hk/meerkat.html


  • Advertisement
Advertisement