Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Cork - BusConnects

1246

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,818 ✭✭✭donvito99


    Love the sole anti-Bus Connects comment on that video.

    'Its all about the cyclists .. Buses only getting 3m of lane width'



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,917 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The final revised network for Cork was published today:

    https://busconnects.ie/cork/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,477 ✭✭✭chalkitdown1


    Happy overall with the new routes, however, the wife won't be best pleased with having to soon take 2 different buses to get from from Skehard Road to Apple. I would have thought the 202 service was one of the most popular east/west routes in the city and something worth keeping?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,329 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    The new 1 is the new main east west corridor from Mahon to Ballincollig as they want it to mirror the future Luas line and be a 24 hour service.

    Based on the higher frequency and the 90 minute ticket there'll be a high frequency transfer from the 1 to the 3 (to Apple) in the city centre.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,399 ✭✭✭thomil


    From my experience when I was still working at the Church of Saint Jobs, the bus almost completely emptied out when it reached Merchant's Quay, as back then, a lot of Apple employees, particularly those working the international jobs up in Hollyhill, lived in the city center and would get of either there or at the previous stop. A new crowd would then get on at Merchant's Quay for the rest of the journey. It's been a while since I worked there though, so I'm not sure how much this has changed in recent years.

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,459 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Infrastructure plans are out:

    Really ambitious but I do feel a lot of this will get caught up in objections. The plans for Ballincollig town centre, Kinsale Rd bus gate and the area around Sherman Crawford St come to mind on first glance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,630 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    Construction not due to be completed until 2030. For the east west line would they not just build the Luas? Is it really that big of a deal if it’s under-utilised for a few years while apartment construction picks up? On this schedule we are spending 8 years between consultation, planning and construction to build bus lanes only to go back to the drawing board two years later to start work on tram lines over the same route to be ready for 2040.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,459 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Agreed. This chicken and egg situation with the Luas is helping no one. Work with the relevant stakeholders and if there’s a timeline for the Luas in place, developers can be sure that the properties they build will have good transport access.

    Imagine being able to live waterfront near Marina Park with a tram that’ll take you to to town in 5/10 mins and Mahon in 5/10 mins. It’d be a massive sell. Rather than at the minute being 1km into a derelict post industrial wasteland with no decent public transport and the vague promises of a Luas sometime in the future.

    (I note that there is a lack of future thinking here as well in these plans, see the N28 at Maryborough Hill or possibly long term the N22 at Poulavone).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,753 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    First glance at the proposed bus corridors. Seems like a total dogs dinner. No serious attempt to provide CONTINUOUS priority for buses and cycling. Bikes are forced onto diversions to accommodate cars. Multi lane roads like south link and north link are completely left to cars, no attempt to reallocate space to sustainable modes. Turning lanes cutting into bus lanes at all junctions. This needs to be binned and started again, the brief hasn't been read. Also why do no designers read dmurs?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 594 ✭✭✭DylanQuestion


    I disagree about the North and South Links. Almost no buses will be using these roads and there are no major populations living along these roads (at least the N40 and N27) with any type of access to the roads to make bus stops. As well as that, the housing near the roads are low density. Having bus lanes would be a waste of space as there would never be any type of need for them. The N40 is supposed to be a 'freeway' running through the southside (originally around it but we know what happened there) so that cars don't need to drive through residential roads or the city centre to get to either side of the city. That idea is very much enforced in these plans. As the Douglas Road will be local access only now with three bus gates, the thousands of cars a day that use the Douglas Road will need to go somewhere, even if there was a huge reduction in car usage in favour of buses (as is the hope). The South Douglas Road likely won't be able to fit this excess traffic, and so people south of the N40 and east of the N27 are being told to use the N27 to access the City Centre or the Southern Distributor (also partially included in this through the extension of Grange Road to Carrigaline Road, the Kinsale Rd - Douglas bus corridor) to get around the city west of the N27

    As for the rest of your comment, I can't give an opinion just yet. I have only looked at the Maryborough - City Centre route and it looks good to me. Fingerpost changed to a junction with bus priority, a bus gate added to allow buses onto East Douglas Street (which is being made a cul-de-sac for private cars), Old Carrigaline Road made two way, bus gates on Douglas Road look practical, etc. Will be extremely controversial though

    Post edited by DylanQuestion on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,630 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    How would local access only be policed?

    Again given the level of effort that will be required, particularly in Douglas and the upcoming disuse of the N28 for traffic, its hard not to look at this and wonder why not just run a tram from Carrigaline via the N28, Maryborough hill and Douglas Road to the City Centre and just rip the whole band aid off at once?

    Post edited by snotboogie on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 594 ✭✭✭DylanQuestion


    Bus gates at Well Road, Bellair and Ballinlough Road. Cars can access their house on Douglas Road using the the various points of access to the road from South Douglas Road (like Belvedere Lawn, Rosebank and Cross Douglas Road), Ballinlough Road/Bellair, Eglantine Park and Woodview. Cars can freely move around the local access areas, but the three bus gates prevents someone from driving from Douglas to the city centre on the Douglas Road, reducing traffic on the road for buses while mantaining local access for houses and schools. I assume the buses will have a scanner so only buses can get through. I think there is already one at the back of Mahon Point



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,459 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    From the South Douglas Road to the Elysian, the N27 is gaining bus lanes in either direction which will require narrowing the general traffic lanes to 3m and reducing the speed limit. As Dylan pointed out, the rest of the N27 is a free flowing 100km/h dual carriageway, the buses will be using the adjacent Kinsale Rd.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,241 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl



    Some of the details are really strange.

    I don't understand the motivation to keep the Tivoli Dual Carriageway a 60kmh Dual Carriageway for instance: traffic is often backed up there, I would have thought it a prime candidate for a bus lane, especially if it's all 60kmh. And some of the cycle routes are a bit off the wall, they're effectively "get out of the way of important traffic" routes, rather than actually offering anything for cyclists. Often on narrow, steep longer routes than the obvious route.

    Lots of good stuff in there too though. On balance I would like to see all of it done, rather than none of it done.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,329 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Local councillors coming out in force against BusConnects. Some are openly calling for the entire scheme to fail. What a depressing little country we live in.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,818 ✭✭✭donvito99


    Local councillors are elected on a couple of hundred votes. That is what critical infrastructure rests on in this country.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,630 ✭✭✭snotboogie




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,329 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Absolutely embarrassing that we have these councillors calling the shots. BusConnects will die a death at the hands of these dinosaurs in City Hall and the nimbys that will be emboldened by their stance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,242 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Damn bus connects and it's plan to make owning a car illegal!




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,399 ✭✭✭thomil


    Accounts like that make me despair. Spreading lies and BS without any effective way of taking them down. Kinda makes me wish we could approach infrastructure projects in a more China-like way and just send idiots like that off to labor camps for a decade or two!

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 594 ✭✭✭DylanQuestion


    You cannot live in the city centre and expect parking on the road in front of your house. You can't even live in the city suburbs I think and expect that, but especially not in a city centre. However, it's just luck that some people have driveways and some don't. The city centre is hundreds of years old, built when cars didn't exist. The vast majority of the suburbs with spaces for cars are less than 50-100 years old. It's not a big City Centre VS City Suburbs fight. It's funny too that they seem to think the Lord Mayor is doing this to benefit herself, when she has nothing to do with anything and lives on likely the most controversial of all the routes, i.e. Maryborough - City Centre, whereby cars will no longer be able to access the City Centre on Douglas Rd



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,862 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Where I live, I must pay an annual fee to park outside my house. The only benefit I get, is everybody else has to pay an hourly fee.

    Before this was introduced, I could not get into my house because of all the thoughtless parking, so I welcomed the charges.

    Big houses built over 120 years ago or so, (before cars) would have a mews at the back, accessed by a laneway, for the carriage and horses. These mews buildings have generally be redeveloped into homes, with no thought of the horse or the carriage. We should bring both back into use - which would reduce emissions (well apart from methane and other noxious gases).

    If parking restrictions were enforced, a lot of traffic problems would reduce. No-one has a right to park on the public road in front of their house.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,917 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    There’s only one thing to do with social media like that - ignore them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 169 ✭✭Risoc


    It’s not just social media. Colette Finn was on Neil Prendeville this morning getting all the usual tropes from our Neil and a few callers-in.

    “So the government are at war with car owners?”

    “They want cashless transport. So they’re at war with old people now too.”

    “They’re at war with farmers too.”

    “All of this to cut twenty minutes off a bus journey. Wouldn’t it be better to spend this on houses?”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,329 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Councillors still trying to kill BusConnects in Cork. One if them tried to bring a motion of no confidence in BusConnects to a vote of the council 😭. This country is going nowhere when you're dealing with this level of nonsense.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,964 ✭✭✭cantalach


    Amazing…an article discussing opposition to the plan which doesn’t mention Terry Shannon. That’s a first.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 594 ✭✭✭DylanQuestion


    This is doomed. Submissions close today. Nearly 1000 submissions and I bet most are against. Some easy fixes in my eyes:

    • Make the Douglas Road and South Douglas Road one way in the opposite directions, with one bus and one car lane each. I'm not sure how to add cycle lanes without doing CPO on Douglas Road (i.e. felling of mature trees and knocking of a historic wall). Parts of South Douglas Road should be wide enough to add a two way cycle lane, and maybe CPOing won't be as resisted there as there are less historic areas
    • Remove any bus gate plans and replace them with priority lights to let buses get ahead (outside of Ballincollig Main Street)
    • On the Luas line, make the bus lanes run in the middle of the road to mimic how the Luas will
    • Retain all of the trees on Boreenamana Road. It and the Douglas Road are the main objections when it comes to tree felling, so should be an easy win to retain them


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,329 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    The consultants for this are very very against one way running on different roads for bus services as it inevitably means that on at least one leg of the journey a lot of people have a much longer walk at the end to get home etc. Case studies show that this difference is enough to put people off using the bus.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 594 ✭✭✭DylanQuestion


    In general I would agree with you, like doing it on Boreenmana Road and Ballinlough Road. However, I personally think that the vast amount of short connecting roads between South Douglas Road and the Douglas Road makes it viable here. They could also route it down Capwell Road rather than going all the way down Summerhill South to make it even more connected, or else find a way to run it through St Finbarr's




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,963 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    Bit of a bump, but Ballincollig is festooned with anti-Bus-Connects signs

    1) Save our trees!

    2) Don't cut down 60 trees!

    3) Save our right turn lanes!


    I mean really.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,753 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Save our right turn lanes? Seriously?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,329 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    It's true. The signs being nailed to the tree is the pièce de résistance.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,561 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Does Batt o 'keefe still live in that estate ? Could cause another layer of hassle ,

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,753 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Heaven help us the karens will be chaining themselves to the right turn lanes. A new level of entitlement.



  • Registered Users Posts: 77 ✭✭gooseman12


    It looks like the latest revisions for Cork are up on the bus connects site now, https://busconnects.ie/cork/

    I've only just glanced at 2 of the routes and there appears to be some considerable watering down of the plans.

    Summerhill North appears to have reverted to exactly as it is right now, no bus lane, short bike lane at bottom and all parking retained.

    Ballincollig also has all parking on main street reinstated and bus gate removed.

    I dont know if the strategy is go hard in round 1 and go soft in round 2 and meet somewhere in the middle or what but i hope this doesn't become a pointless exercise in retaining the status quo as that does absolutely nothing for the city.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,399 ✭✭✭thomil


    It's a complete capitulation to NIMBYs, vested interests and the generally ignorant populace of the city bat large. Might as well cancel the entire project and leave things as it is at this point because the new plans will deliver NO improvement at all. NTA should have just gone in and forced the original plans through the courts!

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,395 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    It'll be interesting actually, as there's a legal case to be made that a plan that doesn't sufficiently take into account the current state of the environment is not a plan at all. The government has already been taken to court over a weak Climate Action Plan once so far, and lost, so this has the potential to end up in a Judicial Review as well.

    The courts may well decide that plans that don't reduce emissions enough aren't acceptable.



  • Registered Users Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    I don't know Cork, but certainly reads as a massive watering down.

    People worried about losing some of their garden and the impact on property value, with no regard for the property value increase due to improves public transport. They'd also get compensated for the garden loss.... talk about win win win.


    Overall, surely it's still an improvement that can be built on in medium term?...



  • Registered Users Posts: 28 corkoniense


    Sounds disappointing. None of my recommendations appear to have been accepted anyway! The original plans provided an estimated travel time along the routes in 2030(I think) if the project proceded as is, versus the estimated travel time if nothing was done. I wonder will the updated plans provide updated estimates? Or is it all an exercise in wishful thinking?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,329 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    A capitulation to nimbys and local political interests. Waste of time as these new plans won't improve the bus experience, so best to scrap it altogether to be honest.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,241 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I'm with others here: it looks watered down to the point of being mostly useless



  • Registered Users Posts: 77 ✭✭gooseman12


    "However it is no longer proposed to introduce a bus gate and the number of on street car parking spaces has been increased to retain more existing spaces than previously proposed" (Page 16 of the Ballincollig Document)

    I think this sentance alone sums it all up for me, bus gate removed and more car parking spaces! I mean, if there is anything at all in the world that the town of Ballincollig needs, it is not car parking, the place is overflowing with spaces.

    I think many of us, including myself, had hoped that TII would get this done with as little influence from the city council and the naysayers as possible but unfortunately that has not happened.



  • Registered Users Posts: 453 ✭✭BagofWeed


    A joke plan for an increasingly joke of a city.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,036 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    If the NTA should have learnedanything from the BusConnects Dublin experience, it's that the infrastructure improvements should be done in a localised way using Part 8. These big city-wide plans only poke every bear of a NIMBY across the whole city and galvanise people against the plan.

    BusConnects should be a network redesign and the common branding, standard bus stops, etc. The road layout changes can be more easily done under Part 8. Start off by picking some low hanging fruit of pinchpoints where benefits can be realised but also relatively uncontroversial. Those works could be done much quicker that way than jumping through all the hoops a mega project like BusConnects entails. I'd be confident more works would be done by 2030 using this route rather than going through the slog that is BusConnects (where clearly nothing of note will be done by 2030).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,753 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Looks like a cancellation to me. I guess there's no seriousness behind the various strategies and acts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,231 ✭✭✭Yggr of Asgard


    I think it's fair to say that the original Cork Bus Connect plan has been scrapped because what is remaining is a few route changes and some minor adjustments.

    This was supposed to be a major improvement for public transport in the city, with more frequent and reliable buses, dedicated lanes, and better connections. But thanks to a vocal minority of nimbies (not in my backyard), who opposed any changes to their precious roads and parking spaces, the plan has been shelved.

    This is a huge setback for Cork and its residents, who deserve better options for getting around. It appears to me that the nimbies have shown once again that they have more influence than the wider public, who would benefit from a more sustainable and efficient transport system. In my opinion they have ignored the facts and the evidence, and instead focused on their own selfish interests.

    They have ruined the proposed Cork Bus Connect plan, and they have done a disservice to the city and its future. They have put their own convenience over the common good, and they have stifled progress and innovation. They have shown that they don't care about the environment, the economy, or the quality of life of their fellow citizens.

    I'm not surprised, yet still disappointed. We need to stand up to the nimbies and demand better transport solutions for Cork. We need to make our voices heard and show that we care about our city and its future. We need to support the Cork Bus Connect plan and make it happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,329 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    I'd urge everyone to put in a submission for the second consultation along the lines of the above excellent post. This can't just die a death to local nimby and councillor interests.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,231 ✭✭✭Yggr of Asgard


    I usually am not one for going and providing feedback about public policy, but enough is enough, this caving to single issue people (don't take my right turn), not in my backyard pressure must stop, we need efficient public transport that connects people, workplaces and shops to survive.

    Cork is the second-largest city in Ireland and a major economic and cultural hub. However, its public transport system is inadequate and unreliable, causing congestion, pollution and frustration for residents and visitors alike.

    An efficient public transport system would reduce traffic and improve air quality in Cork. According to a recent study by the European Environment Agency, Cork has the worst air quality in Ireland and ranks among the worst in Europe. The main source of air pollution in Cork is road transport, which emits harmful particulate matter and nitrogen dioxide. By providing more frequent, reliable and affordable public transport options more people would be encouraged to leave their cars at home and use public transport instead. This would ease the pressure on the roads and lower the emissions of greenhouse gases and pollutants.

    An efficient public transport system would also boost the economy and tourism of Cork. Cork has a vibrant and diverse economy, with sectors such as pharmaceuticals, technology, education and food. However, the lack of public transport infrastructure hinders the growth and development of these sectors, as it makes it harder for workers, students and customers to access them. By improving the connectivity and accessibility of public transport, more businesses would be attracted to invest in Cork, creating more jobs and opportunities for the local population. Moreover, an efficient public transport system would enhance the attractiveness of Cork as a tourist destination, as it would make it easier for visitors to explore the city and its surroundings.

    An efficient public transport system would also improve the quality of life and social inclusion of Cork's residents. Cork is a diverse and multicultural city, with people from different backgrounds, cultures and abilities. However, the current public transport system does not cater to the needs and preferences of all these groups, as it is often inaccessible, delayed or requires multiple changes to reach a desitination.

    By designing a public transport system that is inclusive, accessible and affordable for everyone, more people would be able to participate in the social and cultural life of the city, reducing isolation and fostering community cohesion.

    In conclusion, an efficient public transport system is needed for Cork, Ireland, as it would bring multiple benefits to the city and its people. It would reduce traffic and improve air quality, boost the economy and tourism, and improve the quality of life and social inclusion of Cork's residents.

    Therefore, I urge you to participate in feedback to the authorities and stakeholders, so that they take action and invest in a better public transport system for Cork.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,561 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    So basically it'll be buy a few new buses , stick a bus connects sticker on them - proclaim it a success ,

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,318 ✭✭✭pigtown


    It depends on the public reaction.

    The draft Limerick Shannon Metropolitan Area Transport Strategy was incredibly conservation and underwhelming and got panned. The revised one is a much one ambitious proposal.

    If people don't complain about the current proposal then the NTA won't be too inclined to change it



  • Advertisement
Advertisement