Opinions on onlyfans and adult entertainment industry

Royal Irish · 19-10-2020 4:51am

Most of the Onlyfans content creators are doing it wrong. You need a following from somewhere else before doing it.

Take the twitch streamer Amouranth. Huge following on twitch and has over 6000 fans paying 11 dollars a month.

Randy Archer · 19-10-2020 8:08am

jam_mac_jam wrote: »

Wouldn't really bother me if my daughter worked as a stripper. Once it was what she wanted to do.

It's not really any of my business.

Someone get this chap a spine and a pair

You don’t really mean that

Wouldn’t really bother you ? You that sure ?

Richard Hillman · 19-10-2020 8:46am

A woman I used to work with went on it recently. I didnt know her well, she worked in a different department to me but I always like what I seen. I signed up for €5 for the first month and am very satisfied with the content

Pigsaw · 19-10-2020 10:28am

Richard Hillman wrote: »

A woman I used to work with went on it recently. I didnt know her well, she worked in a different department to me but I always like what I seen. I signed up for €5 for the first month and am very satisfied with the content

How did you find her in the first place?

Richard Hillman · 19-10-2020 2:33pm

Pigsaw wrote: »

How did you find her in the first place?

She promotes it via her Instagram of which I occasionally had a gander on.

iamstop · 19-10-2020 4:31pm

Richard Hillman wrote: »

She promotes it via her Instagram of which I occasionally had a gander on.

Which is...?

Mister Vain · 19-10-2020 7:19pm

Yeah you gotta be on all the time, constantly instagraming, snapchatting and facebooking.

8kczg9v0swrydm · 19-10-2020 8:34pm

Bubblesxoxx wrote: »

I have been a dancer in Dublin for a decade started in my early 20s a lot of the girls I work with are sound and believe me it’s definitely nothing you see on tv. However Ireland seems to have this negative attitude towards women in this industry or deems us all sex addicts or easy when the woman who gets bread in her local supermarket could be doing all kinds of dirty things that’s way worse than dancing and it seems to be okay because she’s doing it for free I don’t get the mindset of some of these people we have stage names in work to protect our identity.

Part of this job comes with a lot of stigma there’s been a few girls who had people find out their day jobs and contact their boss to try and get them fired it’s normally women who rat them out and try to ruin their lives over it. There’s nothing I’d love more than to be open about my job and how it’s helped me get through some dark times in my life but I just couldn’t handle all the derogatory labels and insults and lows people will go to try and ruin your life over it. Since covid hit I don’t know how the strip club industry in Dublin is going to survive.

I want to know what your opinions are on strippers and the likes of using onlyfans to make money nothing you say is going to bother me it’s more curios why people have a begrudging attitude towards these things when they do worse things for free with their husbands boyfriend or a random Jack the lad from coppers In Dublin on a night out.

Let me give you an insight into what some of these Christian minded folk might have against your occupation.

Sex is a beautiful and good thing, however it has a proper time and place (as many things do). This time and place is between a married man and his lawful wife in the privacy of their home etc. Anything else would be to cheapen the act, to destroy it's beauty, to destroy it's sanctity.

An erotic dancer is someone who deliberately arouses men in a way only their wives are supposed to. The scant clothing and suggestive poses is what does this. Moreover, the men who attend such shows (or whatever else) lust after the dancers, seeing them as pieces of meat there only to satisfy their urges. This is no way to look at another human being. Most would not look at their wives or girlfriends in such a way, but here, anything goes.

So I suppose the main points are 1) strippers cheapen the sexual act 2) the instill lust into the hearts of the men who look at them 3) they teach men to view women in a certain way (as pieces of meat) and 4) how could any wife/girlfriend be OK with their husband/boyfriend looking at strippers? How could any mother be OK with her son doing this?

MyStubbleItches · 19-10-2020 9:10pm

Holden Shrilling Dirt wrote: »

Let me give you an insight into what some of these Christian minded folk might have against your occupation.

Sex is a beautiful and good thing, however it has a proper time and place (as many things do). This time and place is between a married man and his lawful wife in the privacy of their home etc. Anything else would be to cheapen the act, to destroy it's beauty, to destroy it's sanctity.

An erotic dancer is someone who deliberately arouses men in a way only their wives are supposed to. The scant clothing and suggestive poses is what does this. Moreover, the men who attend such shows (or whatever else) lust after the dancers, seeing them as pieces of meat there only to satisfy their urges. This is no way to look at another human being. Most would not look at their wives or girlfriends in such a way, but here, anything goes.

So I suppose the main points are 1) strippers cheapen the sexual act 2) the instill lust into the hearts of the men who look at them 3) they teach men to view women in a certain way (as pieces of meat) and 4) how could any wife/girlfriend be OK with their husband/boyfriend looking at strippers? How could any mother be OK with her son doing this?

JESUS WILL SAVE US ALL

Jaysus Christ. · 19-10-2020 9:14pm

Down with this sort of thing.

Careful now.

19-10-2020 9:46pm

shame on any simpish man who pays these thots.

please for the love of all that is holy, do not give them any money.

endless free content out there, use it.
your mind will clear, you'll see the error of your thinking.

think about your monday morning when you're suffering and cursing life, dont let that be the price of some onlyfans pair of random tits for 5 minutes, its not worth it, they dont merit it, you're paying way over market rates.

AndrewJRenko · 19-10-2020 10:03pm

Holden Shrilling Dirt wrote: »

Let me give you an insight into what some of these Christian minded folk might have against your occupation.

Sex is a beautiful and good thing, however it has a proper time and place (as many things do). This time and place is between a married man and his lawful wife in the privacy of their home etc. Anything else would be to cheapen the act, to destroy it's beauty, to destroy it's sanctity.

An erotic dancer is someone who deliberately arouses men in a way only their wives are supposed to. The scant clothing and suggestive poses is what does this. Moreover, the men who attend such shows (or whatever else) lust after the dancers, seeing them as pieces of meat there only to satisfy their urges. This is no way to look at another human being. Most would not look at their wives or girlfriends in such a way, but here, anything goes.

So I suppose the main points are 1) strippers cheapen the sexual act 2) the instill lust into the hearts of the men who look at them 3) they teach men to view women in a certain way (as pieces of meat) and 4) how could any wife/girlfriend be OK with their husband/boyfriend looking at strippers? How could any mother be OK with her son doing this?

Do you have any insight as to why the opinions of your imaginary friend would be of any relevance to other people?

The_Brood · 19-10-2020 10:24pm

AndrewJRenko wrote: »

Do you have any insight as to why the opinions of your imaginary friend would be of any relevance to other people?

I thought "we are all in this together" and have to agree to basic moral understandings to function as a society? So yes there needs to be a strong reason given why sexual perversion that destroys families and creates obsessions and addictions is suddenly ok and wonderful and 'freeing.'

No reason has been given so far, other than 'it feels gud' and 'I won't listen to your imaginary friend' - as if this moral stance hasn't been echoed throughout all kinds of cultures from all corners of the globe wherever civilization has flourished.

Feisar · 19-10-2020 10:37pm

MyStubbleItches wrote: »

JESUS WILL SAVE US ALL

Cartman: “Now put a dollar in the box.” Or should it be, tuck a dollar in close to the box.

Feisar · 19-10-2020 10:43pm

85603 wrote: »

shame on any simpish man who pays these thots.

please for the love of all that is holy, do not give them any money.

endless free content out there, use it.
your mind will clear, you'll see the error of your thinking.

think about your monday morning when you're suffering and cursing life, dont let that be the price of some onlyfans pair of random tits for 5 minutes, its not worth it, they dont merit it, you're paying way over market rates.

As they say, “beauty is in the eye of the cash holder”. If some lad wants to spend a score a month subscribing to some doll off with him. How much does sky sports cost? There is no harm in paying for yer entertainment.

iamstop · 20-10-2020 3:32pm

Back in my day it was FHM, Maxim and Loaded. Then came Nuts and ...what was the other one?
Anyway, now it's OnlyFans.
Same sh1t, different format.

breezy1985 · 20-10-2020 3:50pm

Holden Shrilling Dirt wrote: »

Let me give you an insight into what some of these Christian minded folk might have against your occupation.

Sex is a beautiful and good thing, however it has a proper time and place (as many things do). This time and place is between a married man and his lawful wife in the privacy of their home etc. Anything else would be to cheapen the act, to destroy it's beauty, to destroy it's sanctity.

An erotic dancer is someone who deliberately arouses men in a way only their wives are supposed to. The scant clothing and suggestive poses is what does this. Moreover, the men who attend such shows (or whatever else) lust after the dancers, seeing them as pieces of meat there only to satisfy their urges. This is no way to look at another human being. Most would not look at their wives or girlfriends in such a way, but here, anything goes.

So I suppose the main points are 1) strippers cheapen the sexual act 2) the instill lust into the hearts of the men who look at them 3) they teach men to view women in a certain way (as pieces of meat) and 4) how could any wife/girlfriend be OK with their husband/boyfriend looking at strippers? How could any mother be OK with her son doing this?

So the jist of what you are saying is gay sex is wrong. Consensual 3 or moresomes are wrong a woman being ok with or even also enjoying strippers of female nudity is wrong.

And how dare the Christians lecture anyone on how to treat women

iamstop · 20-10-2020 3:57pm

"It's against my religion, I'm not going to do that" - That's fine. No problems here.

"It's against my religion, you can't do that" - GET THE BOAT! (That's about about as polite as I care to be)

breezy1985 · 20-10-2020 4:02pm

Aph2016 wrote: »

Strap yourself in and enjoy the decline.

You had me at strap

Harry Palmr · 20-10-2020 4:03pm

My only (fans) observation is that when relatively famous moderately well known types jump on it (Bella Thorne, Diora Baird) and the company changes it's terms and conditions it damages the platform for honest "bedroom totty" who are simply using it as a way of making some cash for a few weeks or months.

Softshoulder · 20-10-2020 4:12pm

Not really onlyfans related but what's with the amount of soft porn on instagram?

Every 2nd bird it seems has a new pic up trying to show off their rack or arse. Often some kind of caption like "WAP" to let everyone know they're thirsty. And there's this new craze of sitting on the floor. What's that all about?

I mean I don't complain too much, they're nice to look at but I can't imagine these having long stable relationships with men. Likely banged, babied and booted.

The same ones will be complaining about lack of respect then when they're advertising themselves as cum dumps.

Ash.J.Williams · 20-10-2020 4:33pm

iamstop wrote: »

Back in my day it was FHM, Maxim and Loaded. Then came Nuts and ...what was the other one?
Anyway, now it's OnlyFans.
Same sh1t, different format.

Not quite

iamstop · 20-10-2020 4:51pm

Ash.J.Williams wrote: »

Not quite

Care to elaborate?

Hqrry113 · 20-10-2020 4:54pm

Like most men I have no problem at all with women selling their pictures online or doing porn or being a slut or whatever.

I would have a problem with my mother/sister/daughter/girlfriend or anyone I care about doing stuff like that though.

Hqrry113 · 20-10-2020 4:57pm

Softshoulder wrote: »

Not really onlyfans related but what's with the amount of soft porn on instagram?

Every 2nd bird it seems has a new pic up trying to show off their rack or arse. Often some kind of caption like "WAP" to let everyone know they're thirsty. And there's this new craze of sitting on the floor. What's that all about?

I mean I don't complain too much, they're nice to look at but I can't imagine these having long stable relationships with men. Likely banged, babied and booted.

The same ones will be complaining about lack of respect then when they're advertising themselves as cum dumps.

It would definitely make you scared to have a daughter that's for sure, most western women have no respect for themselves these days and that's great tbh as a young person but not so much for fathers or brothers.

Feisar · 20-10-2020 4:58pm

Hqrry113 wrote: »

Like most men I have no problem at all with women selling their pictures online or doing porn or being a slut or whatever.

I would have a problem with my mother/sister/daughter/girlfriend or anyone I care about doing stuff like that though.

Hey! Nothing wrong with a bit of promiscuity!

Hqrry113 · 20-10-2020 4:58pm

Feisar wrote: »

Hey! Nothing wrong with a bit of promiscuity!

True that!

doc22 · 20-10-2020 5:14pm

iamstop wrote: »

Back in my day it was FHM, Maxim and Loaded. Then came Nuts and ...what was the other one?
Anyway, now it's OnlyFans.
Same sh1t, different format.

Zoo

Ash.J.Williams · 20-10-2020 5:28pm

iamstop wrote: »

Care to elaborate?

your ma wasn't in maxim

statesaver · 20-10-2020 5:48pm

Do people pay for naughty porn pics / vids ?

Why ?

un5byh7sqpd2x0 · 20-10-2020 5:53pm

Hqrry113 wrote: »

Like most men I have no problem at all with women selling their pictures online or doing porn or being a slut or whatever.

I would have a problem with my mother/sister/daughter/girlfriend or anyone I care about doing stuff like that though.

NIMBY!!

Greyfox · 20-10-2020 6:20pm

The_Brood wrote: »

I thought "we are all in this together" and have to agree to basic moral understandings to function as a society? So yes there needs to be a strong reason given why sexual perversion that destroys families and creates obsessions and addictions is suddenly ok and wonderful and 'freeing.'

You sound like a 70 year old granny thats completely out of touch with the real world. As long as everyone involved is over 18 people can decide for themselves what they think is and isint morally wrong

lucalux · 20-10-2020 6:39pm

I think having, say, ten people pay you for 'content' which ends up on reddit, 4chan and other places for free, is a terrible business model, regardless of the morality of it all

Also girls of 18-22 might regret a LOT of what they put out there eventually, cos it's forever, but that's very individual

The_Brood · 20-10-2020 7:02pm

Greyfox wrote: »

You sound like a 70 year old granny thats completely out of touch with the real world. As long as everyone involved is over 18 people can decide for themselves what they think is and isint morally wrong

Good luck explaining how I'm wrong? Sexual addictions, broken marriages, all kinds of sexual crimes - that's the real world. The fact that so many partake in this does not in any way shape or form make it right. The western world is as "sexually liberated" as it wants and as depressed and as miserable as never before. Not a coincidence. It's a societal poison.

IAMAMORON · 20-10-2020 7:08pm

statesaver wrote: »

Do people pay for naughty porn pics / vids ?

Why ?

All my friends do, I wouldn't be into it though.

Why not?

IAMAMORON · 20-10-2020 7:12pm

The_Brood wrote: »

Good luck explaining how I'm wrong? Sexual addictions, broken marriages, all kinds of sexual crimes - that's the real world. The fact that so many partake in this does not in any way shape or form make it right. The western world is as "sexually liberated" as it wants and as depressed and as miserable as never before. Not a coincidence. It's a societal poison.

I think the beauty of it is that they are expressing and acting out their own perception of what liberation is about. Using the online medium allows them to carry on the way they wish.

It has nothing to do with sex crimes or broken marriages. it is about sexual expression, freedom of choice and personal liberation.

Sex crimes and broken marriages existed a long long time before pornography or dirty movies were invented.

mouldybiscuits · 20-10-2020 7:16pm

The_Brood wrote: »

Good luck explaining how I'm wrong? Sexual addictions, broken marriages, all kinds of sexual crimes - that's the real world. The fact that so many partake in this does not in any way shape or form make it right. The western world is as "sexually liberated" as it wants and as depressed and as miserable as never before. Not a coincidence. It's a societal poison.

I actually have the opposite opinion. Sex is the most natural thing in the world and it should be something to be enjoyed and celebrated. Judgemental and negative opinions from people like you do a lot of damage to society. People are pressured to feel ashamed of one of the most natural and pleasurable pastimes.

The_Brood · 20-10-2020 7:37pm

mouldybiscuits wrote: »

I actually have the opposite opinion. Sex is the most natural thing in the world and it should be something to be enjoyed and celebrated. Judgemental and negative opinions from people like you do a lot of damage to society. People are pressured to feel ashamed of one of the most natural and pleasurable pastimes.

Are we human beings that value advancement and civilization, or cavemen dancing around in our own feces? Everything about the latter is also 'natural,' and I am sure for some is also 'a pleasurable pastime.' If feces dancing is nothing to be ashamed of, sure neither should your genital spraying all over the place. If that's your thing, go enjoy your feces orgies out in the caves. But don't subject the rest of us to it. Those that prefer to live with dignity, show interest in the sciences, in art, in culture, faith etc. - more and more each day our choices are being taken from us, as your 'pleasurable pastimes' are shoved down our throats in school, entertainment, the media, shops, etc. everywhere one turns to.

And if you don't want other people's opinions, maybe don't go on the internet?

IAMAMORON · 20-10-2020 7:39pm

Crikey.

Feisar · 20-10-2020 7:40pm

statesaver wrote: »

Do people pay for naughty porn pics / vids ?

Why ?

You wouldn't steal a car would you? Piracy laws I presume.

Stihl waters · 20-10-2020 7:40pm

The_Brood wrote: »

Are we human beings that value advancement and civilization, or cavemen dancing around in our own feces? Everything about the latter is also 'natural,'

Think about that for a moment and reflect on what you think "normal" is

The_Brood · 20-10-2020 7:45pm

IAMAMORON wrote: »

I think the beauty of it is that they are expressing and acting out their own perception of what liberation is about. Using the online medium allows them to carry on the way they wish.

It has nothing to do with sex crimes or broken marriages. it is about sexual expression, freedom of choice and personal liberation.

Sex crimes and broken marriages existed a long long time before pornography or dirty movies were invented.

They are doing it for money....like, literally. Would you be so passionately spending your time white-kniting a bunch of naked 70 year old dudes flaunting it about? Your brain is hooked on porn, they are playing on your addiction to get money from you, and use fake woke politics to get you to defend them with utter nonsense how all this is supposed to be simply about "liberation." For real?

Hook, line, and sinker.

The_Brood · 20-10-2020 7:48pm

Stihl waters wrote: »

Think about that for a moment and reflect on what you think "normal" is

"Natural" is the word, and be my guest: explain to me why celebrating people having fun with their genitals and what comes out of it is natural and brave and freeing, but people doing the same with their ass I guess is....unnatural?

Be scientific.

What lovely discussions we are having in the woke world.

IAMAMORON · 20-10-2020 7:48pm

The_Brood wrote: »

They are doing it for money....like, literally. Would you be so passionately spending your time white-kniting a bunch of naked 70 year old dudes flaunting it about? Your brain is hooked on porn, they are playing on your addiction to get money from you, and use fake woke politics to get you to defend them with utter nonsense how all this is supposed to be simply about "liberation." For real?

Hook, line, and sinker.

Stop rambling please.

It is only a bit of porn.

How other people spend their time or their money is none of your business.

Homelander · 20-10-2020 7:51pm

I mean calling it a form of sexual expression and liberation is a bit stupid, it's entirely about money. Which is grand, more power to them, some of them making insane money for doing relatively little.

But they wouldn't be partaking in this "liberating" activity or expressing themselves via the internet for free.

Personally I wouldn't be bothered if my partner had an OnlyFans aside from the inevitable awkwardness of explaining to people or knowing that people close to you will most definitely be signing up for a gawk.

It's not one of those things I think about. I don't use OnlyFans. I don't understand people that pay for it either. But it's a free world, let people do whatever they do and enjoy it.

Greyfox · 20-10-2020 8:01pm

The_Brood wrote: »

Good luck explaining how I'm wrong? Sexual addictions, broken marriages, all kinds of sexual crimes - that's the real world. The fact that so many partake in this does not in any way shape or form make it right. The western world is as "sexually liberated" as it wants and as depressed and as miserable as never before. Not a coincidence. It's a societal poison.

You are wrong as the year is 2020 and not 1960. Your making up your own imaginary moral high ground and failing to realise that sex is no longer sinful. The fact is porn and onlyfans are legal as they do no harm as long as adults understand the risks and nobody has a right to tell someone that their not allowed to do a legal activity. It would be the same as you telling a 21 year old that there not allowed alcohol. The fact that too much porn, onlyfans and strippers is going down a very very dodgy road is a different issue.. everything in moderation as they say

breezy1985 · 20-10-2020 8:27pm

The_Brood wrote: »

Good luck explaining how I'm wrong? Sexual addictions, broken marriages, all kinds of sexual crimes - that's the real world. The fact that so many partake in this does not in any way shape or form make it right. The western world is as "sexually liberated" as it wants and as depressed and as miserable as never before. Not a coincidence. It's a societal poison.

"Broken Marriages" can you expain to me how they are more broken these days?
Do you mean the 2 people split up because from what I can see thats way better than the type the church promote where 2 people have to stay together no matter how much abuse is metted out and under the good old RC days where the church and state legally allowed a man to beat and rape his wife.

Ill take 2020 broken over 1980s broken thank you

AndrewJRenko · 20-10-2020 8:47pm

The_Brood wrote: »

Are we human beings that value advancement and civilization, or cavemen dancing around in our own feces? Everything about the latter is also 'natural,' and I am sure for some is also 'a pleasurable pastime.' If feces dancing is nothing to be ashamed of, sure neither should your genital spraying all over the place. If that's your thing, go enjoy your feces orgies out in the caves. But don't subject the rest of us to it. Those that prefer to live with dignity, show interest in the sciences, in art, in culture, faith etc. - more and more each day our choices are being taken from us, as your 'pleasurable pastimes' are shoved down our throats in school, entertainment, the media, shops, etc. everywhere one turns to.

And if you don't want other people's opinions, maybe don't go on the internet?

Maybe if you don't want to see other people's faeces orgies, don't search for it on onlyfans?

Who put you in charge of what people show online?

kowloon · 20-10-2020 9:26pm

Deleted User wrote: »

Women are making ferry loads by just posting feet pics.

I hear there's a veritable cornucopia of those videos online.

I'll get my coat...

B.A._Baracus · 20-10-2020 10:35pm

Homelander wrote: »

Well it's hardly that black and white. Tons of people have girlfriends or get laid regularly but still pay for porn or OnlyFans.

The idea that only overweight neckbeard types pay for sexual content is fairly outdated.

Single, in a relationship, skinny, fat, old or young...
Only a complete fool would pay.

Opinions on onlyfans and adult entertainment industry

Comments