Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Bin charge protests and breastfeeding

  • 09-10-2003 7:30pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,449 ✭✭✭


    I heard in the news today that some Dublin bin charges protestors have been sent to jail. 9 people were given 2 week sentences and the 10th was given 1 week. Why the shorter sentence? The reason appears to be because she is a breastfeeding mother.

    Am I the only one who finds this judgement a disgrace? Seems to be a very obvious example of how women can play the sympathy card when it suits them and receive preferential treatement, yet demand equal treatment at other times, again when it suits them. Funnily enough, the judge in this case was also a woman.....

    I'm just wondering - was this protestor breastfeeding her child while she was taking part in blockades of bin lorries? :rolleyes: Anyway, for a mother with very young children to be putting herself in the situation where she could go to jail is particularly stupid and irresponsible.

    From RTE's aertel service
    Ten anti waste charge protesters have
    been sent to Mountjoy Prison for
    defying a High Court order.

    Nine were jailed for two weeks, and a
    tenth protester, who told the court
    that she is a breastfeeding mother, was
    jailed for a week.

    As the sentences were handed down by
    Miss Justice Mella Carroll, there were
    shouts of 'shame on you' from
    supporters of the protesters in the
    court.


«13456712

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,491 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    It is one thing to punish a perpetrator, another the child.


  • Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 32,387 Mod ✭✭✭✭DeVore


    And those fathers dont have kids to provide for?

    And before you say "they should have thought of that before breaking the law!".... so should she.

    I think we've been down the "equal" rights issue fairly recently...

    DeV.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 376 ✭✭K2


    Does anybody know at what age you would normally stop breastfeeding a baby? I heard the mothers husband on Joe Duffys radio show saying she was a devoted mother and had spent the past two years getting up during the night to feed her baby and how being away for a week would be a problem. So, I would assume that the child is at least 2 years old. The husband also stated that they were not protesting over the bin charges but it was more in relation to their right to protest.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 801 ✭✭✭puntosporting


    Its great to see that all these viscous criminals are being jailed:rolleyes:

    Country is a disgrace its one thing after another !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,745 ✭✭✭swiss


    Its great to see that all these viscous criminals are being jailed
    Absolutely. We let armed criminals and thugs walk away with token sentences at best, but we'll be damned if people who are engaged in a peaceful protest aren't going to get the proverbial book thrown at them.

    Back on topic, yes it is somewhat hypocritical to give the woman the shorter sentence, even though this clearly appears to be against the spirit of equality legislation. However, if the woman was breastfeeding her child, that would demonstrate an immediate need on the part of the child to continue breastfeeding. I don't know if this would be reason enough to warrant a more lenient sentence, but it certainly explains why it was done.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,972 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    I thought the Judge was about right, she noted the mothers position but did'nt let the plaintive sound of violins get the better of her. Breast feeding at two though....?

    Mike.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,163 ✭✭✭✭Boston


    its not that unusual mike, while some babes are never breat feed, others are for several years. I can remember a case where a 13 year old was still being breat feed, now thats ****ed up


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,875 ✭✭✭Seraphina


    they should have introduced the child to solid foods at that age

    no excuse
    bloody women


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Originally posted by Seraphina
    they should have introduced the child to solid foods at that age
    no excuse
    bloody women
    Oh, the temptation....
    No, it's too much. Can't resist...

    Breasts are solid...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 43,045 ✭✭✭✭Nevyn


    I breast fed my two but sorry once they start getting teeth it was bottle time.

    It could be that she is still feeding her child breast milk and not putting her to the breast.

    Sera the child would be on soilds as well at this age.


  • Advertisement
  • Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 32,387 Mod ✭✭✭✭DeVore


    The attitude of the bin protesters is amusing. They (with the exception of the *inevitable* SWF/P bandwagonning) probably have never seen the inside of a polling booth. Ok, fair enough, you dont *have* to vote. But where were they when the county councils were meeting? When the councillors were being elected?
    Why did this SUDDENLY explode into a big issue.

    I have no problem with them peacefully protesting but thats not what they are doing because in actual fact a lot of people dont mind paying and want their rubbish collected.

    Instead of peaceful protest we've have trucks hijacked, threats and intimidation and people who HAVE paid their taxes not getting the service they paid for because if they were allowed to get that service, their protest wouldnt be tiny and ineffective.

    Protest away but if your neighbour wants to conform to the law then you shouldnt involve him in your argument.

    I've been at two of their protests (I'm getting into independant film making kinda) and there were a couple of hundred at them and half of them were SWP groupies trying to sign people up.

    DeV.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,163 ✭✭✭✭Boston


    what exactly are you basing any of that on DeVore? The idea that these people have hard north dublin acents means they don't vote, sorry but bull. this didn't suddenly explode into a big issue, it has allways been a big issue, just that people like yourself only took notice when bin trucks where being stoped, then you complain about these tactics, well they worked on you didn't they?


    As for protesting away, i wonder how you neightbour will feel when your rubish hasn't been collected for a month and raths have invested your garden.
    threats and intimidation

    what do you call arresting people and treatening people. Your not from these inner city areas so you don't know why people are so upset, these are the people in irish society who always have and allways will be pissed on from above, and they have had enough of it, they see this as the thin end of a huge wedge. You have people paying to park outseide their own door, to get rubbish collect, to have running water, to turn on the TV, where does it end? you say people don't mind paying out money for their bin to be collected, i'm sure they do, and i'm sure you will when its 7-8-9 hundread a year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,924 ✭✭✭Cork


    Socialists across Europe have no problem with charges. Yet Joe Higgin's & his gang do.

    People outside Dublin - have no problem with paying to getting rid of refuse.

    Down in West Cork - the payment by wieght system is a success. Joe Higgins should come down to see this in operation.

    The government has brought personal taxation but Dubliners (who pay) pay considerably less for refuse disposal.

    It is time to bring back rates. Socialists across the EU have no problem with rates and they should inform their irish comrades of this.

    OH - Jail Terms - have more to do with not gaurenteeing to stand by high court orders.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,163 ✭✭✭✭Boston


    i agree bring back rates, average house price in dublin is around 300bgrand so about 10 grand a year sounds nice. and we sould link the paying of rates to the voting register, if you dont pay you can't vote, thats the democratic way. i wonder why this country is so feiced up, its because the minute someone stands up for anything theres another 10 telling him to sit back down again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Originally posted by Cork
    It is time to bring back rates. Socialists across the EU have no problem with rates and they should inform their irish comrades of this.

    Cork, as I've told you a dozen times by now in the politics forum, the protest is not over not wanting to pay for the service, it's over not wanting to pay twice for it. And socialists across the EU (as well as politicians of all manner of alignments) would take one look at our government's record on corruption and recommend something more akin to armed revolt rather than not paying bin taxes!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 43,045 ✭✭✭✭Nevyn


    The county councillors that voted in the charges wear all casting their votes along the lines of their political parties not as they people who voted them in wanted them to. And why did they do this they all see their current position as a jumping stone to becoming a TD and don’t want to rock the boat with their party.

    It is less then 8 years ago that they raise Car tax and said that a % of that would be funnelled into paying for bin and water charges, this was given out about at the time and now that they are introducing bin charges there is not talk of lowering car taxes.

    Currently they are saying it is only 5 euro everything you but the bin out and that should be every 2nd week if you recycle, and you know what you need to have a car to efficient recycle to do that. As of yet there are no plastic bins, the paper bin if you have on is once a month as for that composted there is an issue with that was well.

    This government is trying to scare people into staying at home and not calling them to brook over all the various scandals and abuses of power of the years.

    Dear gods if people get up of their arse over the bins what next, they might just decide to get active in other areas.

    Why anyone votes fine Fail if beyond me, and they are in for a shock when the older generation who have always voted that way dies.


  • Registered Users Posts: 920 ✭✭✭Macker


    probably have never seen the inside of a polling booth.


    And you base this on what exactly......????

    gob****e

    Macker


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,924 ✭✭✭Cork


    Originally posted by Sparks
    Cork, as I've told you a dozen times by now in the politics forum, the protest is not over not wanting to pay for the service, it's over not wanting to pay twice for it. And socialists across the EU (as well as politicians of all manner of alignments) would take one look at our government's record on corruption and recommend something more akin to armed revolt rather than not paying bin taxes!

    We have due process to take care of crimes in this country. Protesters aganist bin charges are not paying twice. People paid rates prior to 1977. These were abolished. So, local authoritys have the power to introduce service charges.

    If these protesters have paid twice - why are some of them in jail. Why can't they show this ,if they are up before the judge??

    In West Cork - People pay by wieght. This is fair - it encourages recycling.

    It is about time, local authoritys across Dublin adopted a similar system.

    Jackie Healy Rae was protesting aganist the smoking ban today out side the FF Ard Fheis. I am sure, when January 1st comes - Jackie will obey the law.

    If he does not - we might have another TD going to the Big House.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Originally posted by Cork
    We have due process to take care of crimes in this country.
    Indeed. Might want to let people like GV Wright know that for next time so Cork...
    Protesters aganist bin charges are not paying twice.
    Yes they are. Didn't read thaed's post either, did you?
    People paid rates prior to 1977. These were abolished. So, local authoritys have the power to introduce service charges.
    Indeed? Says who?
    If the tax relief scheme covered the bin charges properly Cork, we wouldn't be seeing these protests. Or do you think that people have so much time on their hands that jail seems like a bit of a lark?
    If these protesters have paid twice - why are some of them in jail. Why can't they show this ,if they are up before the judge??
    Because the judge isn't asking to see if they've paid twice, as you well know. Stop being disingenous Cork, you're not good enough at it to pull it off.
    In West Cork - People pay by wieght. This is fair - it encourages recycling.
    Actually, in West Cork they pay by weight and then turn about and pay a second time by PAYE.
    It is about time, local authoritys across Dublin adopted a similar system.
    Indeed it is. It's just that the protestors have decided that enough is enough, and they won't pay for the clusterfug that is the current system. Introduce pay-by-weight with proper tax credits and there won't be a protest. Introduce pay-by-weight and then expect people to forget that they already paid for the service in their PAYE, and don't expect anything but a protest, especially when they get to watch as judges and politicians get caught not paying taxes in the first place.
    Jackie Healy Rae was protesting aganist the smoking ban today out side the FF Ard Fheis. I am sure, when January 1st comes - Jackie will obey the law.
    I doubt it. JHR is Fianna Fail to the bone, even if he's wearing an independent's clothes right now. And he's as trustworthy as the day is long - meaning that you can't trust him for more than twelve hours at a stretch.
    If he does not - we might have another TD going to the Big House.
    Cork, he already goes to Dail Eireann once or twice a month, like all the other TDs...
    Mind you, the idea of a Fianna Fail TD in court isn't exactly new.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,924 ✭✭✭Cork



    Actually, in West Cork they pay by weight and then turn about and pay a second time by PAYE.
    [/B]

    No people pay their PAYE and then for other services they use eg. dog licence, motor tax and refuse charges. PAYE does not cover any of these services.

    I am sure VAT does not cover them either.

    Water Rates will be on agenda in the next few years. Water charges are being paid across the EU. Joe Higgins should consult his comrades across the EU on this.

    Services have to be paid for. The services local authorities provide are not all covered by PAYE.

    PAYE rates have fallen over the last few years. You cannot expect the state to pay to get rid of your trash.

    Paying Twice for a service is aganist the law. Joe Higgins should go to court to proove this when he gets out of the big house.

    But if he can't proof this. The local authority is right to charge for services it provides.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,163 ✭✭✭✭Boston


    paye rates may have fallen, but the revenue from them has never been higher. The services are allready being paid for through existing taxation, how do you think they where paying for it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 237 ✭✭ur mentor


    Looks like the row is going into the results of the protests and the rights and wrongs of punishments and avoiding discussing the underlying issues
    how do we manage to reduce waste
    how do we get this management paid for
    Perhaps if the system was equal then there would be no protest. It appears that if everyone paid for waste management from PAYE then
    1. tax would go up
    2. the amount of waste prodced would not be reduced in any way as waste removal would appear to be free or at least "Ive paid for it so I may as well make the most of it"
    3 People not on PAYE and on low income taxes would be subsidised by those on PAYE
    If it is charged for by weight then people will
    1. USe other peoples bins, skips, public waste bins etc.
    2/ Try to put less weight into bin to save money
    If it is a flat rate charge then
    -there is no incentive to recycle
    -people and neighbours come together to really fill each bin as full as possible
    - people and neighbours come together to share bins between them
    Any solutions


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,163 ✭✭✭✭Boston


    maybe these people are just pissed off because there being asked to pay for waste to be incenerated in their own back yard? i know i am,.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Originally posted by Cork
    No people pay their PAYE and then for other services they use eg. dog licence, motor tax and refuse charges. PAYE does not cover any of these services.
    It may not cover those services cork, but saying that those services weren't paid for out of PAYE tax is a lie. And since this isn't the Dail, I can call you on it.
    I am sure VAT does not cover them either.
    Nope, it's earmarked for personal jets...
    Water Rates will be on agenda in the next few years. Water charges are being paid across the EU. Joe Higgins should consult his comrades across the EU on this.
    Were he to do so and to explain the current government to them, their advice would probably be to emigrate or to lead an armed revolt cork, not to comply with FF!
    Services have to be paid for. The services local authorities provide are not all covered by PAYE.
    Nope, but they are meant to be. FF's attempts to castrate local authorities have lead to this impasse, so you don't get the right to turn around and demand that we accept a second bill for the same service!
    PAYE rates have fallen over the last few years. You cannot expect the state to pay to get rid of your trash.
    PAYE has fallen, VAT and other indirect taxation has risen to compensate (and then some), and we're even paying illegal taxes like VRT. (Hey, what would the EU say about that cork?)
    Paying Twice for a service is aganist the law. Joe Higgins should go to court to proove this when he gets out of the big house.
    Paying twice for something isn't against the law Cork. Caveat Emptor and so on. For a guy that's sure of a lot, you don't seem to know very much...
    But if he can't proof this. The local authority is right to charge for services it provides.
    Indeed it is - it's just that it's charging the wrong people. We've already paid. If the Local authority needs more cash, they should simply take the government to court for the cash we paid them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,925 ✭✭✭RainyDay


    Here's the solution - Let's just wait for the bin fairies to take away our rubbish :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Originally posted by RainyDay
    Here's the solution - Let's just wait for the bin fairies to take away our rubbish :D
    It'd work too, if they weren't busy delivering that new learjet for bertie...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,924 ✭✭✭Cork


    Originally posted by Sparks
    It'd work too, if they weren't busy delivering that new learjet for bertie...

    Governments across the EU have government jets. But accross the EU - they have waste charges.

    Landfill costs are rising as environmental standards rise.

    People are not paying twice for this service. Some expect the service without paying for it.

    I wonder - does he expect the state to pick up motor tax and dog licence fees?

    Joe in Wonderland


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Originally posted by Cork
    Governments across the EU have government jets.
    That's another lie. Do I have to post the UK government policy document on travel by airline again???
    But accross the EU - they have waste charges.
    And less corrupt and more competent politicians.
    For example, if Blair turned out to have blatently lied on his resume for years, he would be out on his ear.
    People are not paying twice for this service. Some expect the service without paying for it.
    Two more lies. People are being asked to pay twice and they are not expecting the service without paying for it.
    I wonder - does he expect the state to pick up motor tax and dog licence fees?
    Joe in Wonderland
    Are we going to do the name-calling thing? 'Cos if "joe in wonderland" is the best you've got, I've won before I start.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,924 ✭✭✭Cork


    Originally posted by Sparks

    Indeed it is - it's just that it's charging the wrong people. We've already paid. If the Local authority needs more cash, they should simply take the government to court for the cash we paid them.

    Local Authoritys have powers to impose charges. Could you point to where you are getting the pay twice data from?

    I could see local authoritys pulling out of waste collection and leaving it commercial companies.

    Commercial Companies will surely collect rubbish for free.

    In a perfect world every thing would be free.

    But refuse collection costs. You have landfill fees, wages and truck expenses.

    If Joe & his crew won't gaurentee that they won't breach high court orders - there is due process.

    So, where can it be shown that refuse charges - people are paying twice?

    People outside Dublin - have no problems with paying for a service. Maybe some Dubliners find it hard to accept that they'll have to take responsibility for their trash.

    As Kermit The Frog Said "Its cool To Be Green".

    Landfill is not the answer anyway.

    Payment by wieght is the way to go. This was introduced first in West Cork. North Cork is following from next January.

    Dublin - catch up.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,924 ✭✭✭Cork


    Originally posted by Sparks



    Two more lies. People are being asked to pay twice and they are not expecting the service without paying for it.

    Local Authoritys have no obligation to collect refuse that has not the correct amount of tags.

    I will PM you with a few Town Councils telephone numbers - If you need proof of this.

    Where are you getting the pay twice thing from?

    No local authority can charge for something twice.

    Could you supply a link or source by from a local authority act to back this up??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Originally posted by Cork
    Local Authoritys have powers to impose charges. Could you point to where you are getting the pay twice data from?
    Two places - one being the revenue commissionars, who have a partial (and rather inadaquate) tax relief scheme for local services (and they don't give tax relief on something that you haven't paid for Cork...); and the other being the reality that without a seperate funding source, waste collection has happened in the past, ergo it was paid for from general taxation.

    Simple, logical and clear as crystal to anyone that sits down and thinks about it soberly for more than four seconds.
    I could see local authoritys pulling out of waste collection and leaving it commercial companies.
    And I can see Gardai beating unarmed protestors illegally - doesn't mean it's right though...
    Commercial Companies will surely collect rubbish for free.
    Nope. But you can be damn sure they won't send you two invoices for one service...
    In a perfect world every thing would be free.
    But refuse collection costs. You have landfill fees, wages and truck expenses.
    And that's an implied lie. I've said it before, and I will keep on saying it cork - they're not asking for a free service, they're saying they will only pay for it once, not twice. Trying to imply that they're asking for a free service is a lie.
    If Joe & his crew won't gaurentee that they won't breach high court orders - there is due process.
    Yup.
    So, where can it be shown that refuse charges - people are paying twice?
    The start of this post.
    People outside Dublin - have no problems with paying for a service. Maybe some Dubliners find it hard to accept that they'll have to take responsibility for their trash.
    Actually, people outside dublin and people inside dublin have two things in common - neither expects a free service and neither wants to pay twice for something. The difference is that inside dublin they're actually doing something about it. A stand that will benefit everyone in the long term.
    But it's in the long term, so I'm not surprised you don't see that cork, long-term isn't a FF trait.
    Payment by wieght is the way to go. This was introduced first in West Cork. North Cork is following from next January.
    Dublin - catch up.
    And are they happy about paying twice? No. But for whatever reason they've decided not to bother protesting the fact. But if the protestors in fingall get their objective - not to pay twice for the same service - than you can be damn sure that west cork will be on the streets the next day. There aren't that many fools down there...
    Local Authoritys have no obligation to collect refuse that has not the correct amount of tags.
    Yup.
    Where are you getting the pay twice thing from?
    Top of this post please cork.
    No local authority can charge for something twice.
    They can and do. Nothing illegal about it either, just immoral. However, it's not illegal to refuse to pay for something twice.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,924 ✭✭✭Cork


    Originally posted by Sparks
    Two places - one being the revenue commissionars, who have a partial (and rather inadaquate) tax relief scheme for local services (and they don't give tax relief on something that you haven't paid for Cork...); and the other being the reality that without a seperate funding source, waste collection has happened in the past, ergo it was paid for from general taxation.

    .

    Now, the revenue commissioners are seperate from local authoritys. The Revenue commissioners collect tax and are not responsible for services other than tax collection.
    and the other being the reality that without a seperate funding source, waste collection has happened in the past, ergo it was paid for from general taxation.

    Directory Enquiries used be free from Eircom Phone Boxes. Motor Taxation was paid from geeneral taxation after the 1977 election. But things move on.

    Both public and private companies can charge for things that were once considered "Free".

    Local Authorities now charge for planning objections. Just because something was once free - you cannot expect it to be free forever.

    General Direct Taxation has come down in the mean-time & landfill costs have rocketed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Originally posted by Cork
    Now, the revenue commissioners are seperate from local authoritys. The Revenue commissioners collect tax and are not responsible for services other than tax collection.

    Even you're not that intellectually challanged Cork. Try to answer the question rather than pulling a bertie.

    The revenue commissionars manage central taxation. They know what central taxation pays for. And they provide an incomplete stab at tax relief for those that pay for their services directly to the local authority or private contractors. Which means one of two things:
    1) Santa's running the revenue commissionars and is giving away money during a recession;
    2) Local services are charged for in central taxation.
    Directory Enquiries used be free from Eircom Phone Boxes.
    And then Eircom was sold off as a private company.
    Motor Taxation was paid from geeneral taxation after the 1977 election.
    Do you really want to risk bringing VRT into this argument Cork?
    Both public and private companies can charge for things that were once considered "Free".
    Liar. Not only is this not true as you have written it, it assumes the protestors want the service provided for free, which they don't.
    Local Authorities now charge for planning objections. Just because something was once free - you cannot expect it to be free forever.
    Indeed. However, rubbish collection was never free and noone ever expected it to be. They do expect to only pay once for it though, and they have a perfect right to demand that they only pay for it once.
    And by the way, you need a reason to start charging for something that's been free for ages. And "profit" does not suffice as a reason for public authorities.
    General Direct Taxation has come down in the mean-time & landfill costs have rocketed.
    General direct taxation has come down and general indirect taxation has risen, more than compensating and increasing social inequity in the bargain.
    A rise in service costs should result in a rise in service charges, not charging twice for the same thing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,924 ✭✭✭Cork


    Local Authorities have no obligation to collect refuse. They don't come next or near my road.

    Commercial Contractors do. Every body down my road pays for commercial collectors to come in & collect refuse.

    Down the road - the council collects. They operate a tag a bag system. People on that road get a waiver scheme - we don't.

    People accross Cork have been paying for refuse for years. People are getting a service. If people on my road did not pay - the refuse bin would not come & empty the refuse.

    They are not legally oblieged to do so. There is no legal compulsion for local authoritys to collect refuse,

    In one Cork Town - people put out bins without the correct number of tags. Legally - the council did not have to collect it.

    If paying twice can be proven - you have won your case.

    I have my doubts, as local authoritys do seem to have the power to impose charges.

    I think the local government fund is a non specific contribution to local authoritys from central government. I don't think - it specifies what universal services are to be provided without charge.

    I don't think either of us is going to convince the other on this one. But - If the anti bin protestors have a hope - they need to win the payment twice arguement in the courts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Originally posted by Cork
    Local Authorities have no obligation to collect refuse. They don't come next or near my road.
    And the protestors have no obligation to pay twice for the same service.
    Commercial Contractors do.
    No they don't, not unless you have a contract with them. And if you have a contract with them, they can't demand payment twice.
    Every body down my road pays for commercial collectors to come in & collect refuse.
    As do I.
    People on that road get a waiver scheme - we don't.
    No, you don't get a waiver, you get tax credits instead, to a value of around 200 euro or so. Of course, that can either cover bin charges or local authority charges, but as I said above, the tax relief scheme is incomplete and inadaquate.
    People accross Cork have been paying for refuse for years.
    And people in fingal have been paying for refuse collection for years as well, and not only that, they paid for it this year. They're just not going to pay for it twice.
    People are getting a service. If people on my road did not pay - the refuse bin would not come & empty the refuse.
    Yes, but the protestors in fingal have already paid for the service.
    They are not legally oblieged to do so. There is no legal compulsion for local authoritys to collect refuse,
    And where have I said there was?
    In one Cork Town - people put out bins without the correct number of tags. Legally - the council did not have to collect it.
    Yup.
    If paying twice can be proven - you have won your case.
    Then I've won my case. Or didn't you read the posts I've written this evening?
    I have my doubts, as local authoritys do seem to have the power to impose charges.
    That's got nothing to do with it. No-one is saying "oh, I'm not paying for the service and I want it anyway". They're saying "I've paid for the service, and now I want it".
    I think the local government fund is a non specific contribution to local authoritys from central government.
    Non-specific?
    So what, bertie signs a cheque for a quarter-million euro and gives it to Wicklow County Council without any detailed bill?
    :rolleyes:

    Although, scarily, given that the FF/PDs are in charge, I wouldn't be overly surprised...
    I don't think either of us is going to convince the other on this one.
    That's only due to your lack of willingness to acknowlege reality. If you could manage to drop the FF line for thirty seconds while thinking about this, you'd see how daft you look arguing your point.
    But - If the anti bin protestors have a hope - they need to win the payment twice arguement in the courts.
    The payment twice fact hasn't been brought to the courts, yet.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,924 ✭✭✭Cork


    Originally posted by Sparks

    That's only due to your lack of willingness to acknowlege reality. If you could manage to drop the FF line for thirty seconds while thinking about this, you'd see how daft you look arguing your point.


    The payment twice fact hasn't been brought to the courts, yet.


    Point Of information. The waiver scheme in North & West Cork offers a discount to OAPs or hoseholds whose sole source of income is social welfare.


    Now. Local Authoritys is Ireland never offered a universal bin collection service. My area pays tax. We always had to pay a commercial operator.

    A universal refuse service was never on offer by my local authority to my road. We had to pay for one. This is the reality of life outside Dublin.

    If I had a parking fine quashed my my local authority and in the meantime I paid it. I would be entitled to a refund.

    Landfill is no longer an option from a environmental point of view. Landfill costs have rocketed. But you maintain that people have already paid for it thru central taxation.

    A portion of your tax does not go to local authoritys - it goes to a central fund. Cork tax does not go to Cork County Council. It is up to government - how to spend tax money.

    Your tax money could go on education, health or defence. There is no facility for people to target yheir tax money.

    The protestors in Dublin should admit that services have to be paid for. Even, down the line rates are re-introduced - we'd only be going back to a pre 1977 situation.

    But the differance - PAYE workers were paying much higher direct tax rates back in the 70's


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,925 ✭✭✭RainyDay


    Originally posted by Sparks
    And they provide an incomplete stab at tax relief for those that pay for their services directly to the local authority or private contractors.

    Hi Sparks - Tell us more about why the tax relief on waste charges is incomplete. I get full tax relief on the amount that I pay in waste charges (Dun Laoghaire Rathdown), so there is no double taxation for me. How could the tax relief be made more 'complete'?
    Originally posted by Sparks
    General direct taxation has come down and general indirect taxation has risen, more than compensating and increasing social inequity in the bargain.

    I'd really like to see the figures that support this statement. Remember that over the past 15 years or so, direct taxation has come down from 55% to 42% at the upper rate, the middle rate of 35% was dropped, and the lower rate has dropped from 25% to 20%. These changes make a vast difference to the amount of tax paid by anyone in employment. I can't see how increases in services charges, VAT or other indirect taxation would come anywhere near compensating for these drops in taxation.

    I really can't understand why the Irish nation is so surprised. As a nation, we have voted for reduced taxation in the past two general elections. You get what you pay for. If you pay less tax, you get less services - it's that simple. That is why our hospitals are overflowing, our school roofs are collapsing and our local authorities are starved of funds from central government.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,733 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hellrazer


    Here in Kildare the charges are approx €350 per year.Now since the recycling bin arrived I recycle about 80 percent of my waste but still have to pay 100% of the refuse disposal charge.
    In my opinion this is not right.There is no charge for the recycling bin but from next year there "will probably be a charge for this service".

    If this happens the council can take away the recycling bin and put all of the waste back to landfill.


    My point--There is no incentive to recycle waste in this country especially when the householder is probably going to have to pay to recycle their waste.
    What Cork is saying about paying by weight is the way to go with the incentive to recycle being free collection of the green bin.

    I personally dont have a problem with paying for waste charges but I dont want to subsidise my neighbour who decides that they dont want to pay.
    But what pisses me off with regards to the jailing of the protesters is that this country is becoming like a police state---our right to protest has been made illegal.Firstly they jail the protesters,what next?? allow the lorry drivers to drive over them????Probably a bit of an extreme statement but you see where Im going.
    Bertie and his associates are becoming a bit too powerful when it comes to changing laws without a Dail debate.

    Surely there is some part of our constitution which allows for free protest???

    And why dont the backbenchers/opposition have a vote of no confidence in the government?????Because not one of them has the balls to stand up for what they believe in.That the problem with this country----people sit back and let the people in power fu<k them over.

    Rant over!!!
    Richie.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,925 ✭✭✭RainyDay


    Originally posted by Hellrazer
    But what pisses me off with regards to the jailing of the protesters is that this country is becoming like a police state---our right to protest has been made illegal.
    This is factually untrue. No-one was jailed for protesting. They were jailed for stopping the trucks collecting rubbish from the rest of the community - big difference.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,733 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hellrazer


    Originally posted by RainyDay
    This is factually untrue. No-one was jailed for protesting. They were jailed for stopping the trucks collecting rubbish from the rest of the community - big difference.

    Stopping the trucks from collecting the waste WAS their protest.
    Like the way people stood in front of the JCBs in the Glen of the Downs protesting against destroying an area of significant beauty to build a dual carriageway.
    Blocking trucks/jcbs whatever is a well known form of peaceful protest.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,925 ✭✭✭RainyDay


    Originally posted by Hellrazer
    Stopping the trucks from collecting the waste WAS their protest.
    ....
    Blocking trucks/jcbs whatever is a well known form of peaceful protest.
    Yep, and that's why they are in prison. I do think it was a fairly harsh sentance, mind you. But if Joe/Clare and co had spent 10 minutes thinking about it, I'm sure they could have come up with a form of peaceful protest that attracted loads of media attention and didn't create a health hazard for the rest of the community. But they didn't - so they are in jail.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,733 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hellrazer


    Do you not think that now with them being jailed they have more media attention than any other form of protest could have generated.
    In a way the government are shooting themselves in the foot by jailing these protesters.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,925 ✭✭✭RainyDay


    Originally posted by Hellrazer
    Do you not think that now with them being jailed they have more media attention than any other form of protest could have generated.
    In a way the government are shooting themselves in the foot by jailing these protesters.
    Maybe, but the Govt didn't jail the protesters - The courts jailed the protesters. The courts operate independently of the Govt. The jailing of the protesters was not a political decision.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,951 ✭✭✭✭Villain


    Originally posted by RainyDay
    Maybe, but the Govt didn't jail the protesters - The courts jailed the protesters. The courts operate independently of the Govt. The jailing of the protesters was not a political decision.

    The Injunction was brought by the council so they are to blaim for handling the situation arse ways and generating a surge in these protests. With the Unions involved this will get messy.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 43,045 ✭✭✭✭Nevyn


    and mess it will be, if enough ot the union members push on it the union will have to resposnd and we could see this spreading to all sorts of strikes over the winter.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,163 ✭✭✭✭Boston


    Originally posted by RainyDay
    Yep, and that's why they are in prison. I do think it was a fairly harsh sentance, mind you. But if Joe/Clare and co had spent 10 minutes thinking about it, I'm sure they could have come up with a form of peaceful protest that attracted loads of media attention and didn't create a health hazard for the rest of the community. But they didn't - so they are in jail.

    well what type of health hazard do you call permently uncollected rubbish, these guys didn't start to block trucks because they where asked to pay, they blocked them because they where told their rubbish wouldn't be picked up, and they where trying to prevent a health hazards, the trucks are aloud to move once they collect everyones rubbish, the bin men have no problem iwth this, but the LA's are bloking them from doing it, who is really causeing the health hazard here


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,924 ✭✭✭Cork


    Stopping the trucks from collecting the waste WAS their protest.

    Blocking trucks is not protesting. It just costs the local authoritys money. If these people think they pay for this service - let them prove it in court.

    Local Authoritys have power to impose charges for services it provides. Any public or private sector organisation can do this.

    People outside Dublin have no problem with these charges.

    People are responsible for thir own trash. It is up of everybody to reduce, recycling & re-use. You cannot expect the state to pick up the tab for your garbage.

    The days of landfill are numbered anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,951 ✭✭✭✭Villain


    Originally posted by Cork

    People outside Dublin have no problem with these charges.

    We have other problems do, we have people dumping ditches and in forest areas, theres an illegal dump a mile from we'r my parents a renting and it's huge much bigger than those that were in the media months ago. I can't comment too much on it coz the local authorites are bringing the owner to court but some well respected large carlow companies have dumped there in the past. There also was evidence of animal remains when the local authorites surveyd the site. Dumping is still evident all be it on a much reduced scale.

    My parents live in a rural area in Carlow and they burn anything that is burnable beacuse its costs something like 13 euro a week for one wheely bin.

    Burning is bad for the enviroment but it costs less, (I don't support it btw ).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,925 ✭✭✭RainyDay


    Originally posted by irish1
    The Injunction was brought by the council so they are to blaim for handling the situation arse ways and generating a surge in these protests. With the Unions involved this will get messy.
    The council are not the Govt. They are the council.

    In fact, the immediate cause of the recent disruption was the change in legislation last year to allow the councils NOT to collect rubbish from those who won't pay the fee. So I fully accept & understand that the Govt are responsible for this. But they didn't send anyone to jail - the Courts did that.

    But if you really want to look at the root cause, you've got to look at the dramatic reduction in income taxes over the last 15 years which has resulting in cuts in the subvention to local authorities from central Govt. But I know most people prefer to remain 'in denial' on that point - It's far easier to rant (inaccurately) about double taxation than to face up to the truth that you get what you pay for.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,163 ✭✭✭✭Boston


    Originally posted by RainyDay
    But if you really want to look at the root cause, you've got to look at the dramatic reduction in income taxes over the last 15 years which has resulting in cuts in the subvention to local authorities from central Govt.

    what are you rabbiting on about, this is complete fiction, revenue from income tax is several times what it was 15 years ago, infact 15 years ago every penny of income tax was spent on meeting nation debt interest repayments.


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement