Which Camera? Please read OP first

Sexual Chocolate · 21-03-2017 7:13pm

Thanks for that. The LX100 does look the part but is too out of my price range.

Any opinions on the Nikon B500 and the Fujifilm S9900w ?

Again its just for holidays and other amature stuff.

JohnBoy26 · 21-03-2017 8:18pm

Sexual Chocolate wrote: »

Thanks for that. The LX100 does look the part but is too out of my price range.

Any opinions on the Nikon B500 and the Fujifilm S9900w ?

Again its just for holidays and other amature stuff.

They both have tiny sensor so image quality isn't going to be great. If not going for something with a larger sensor you would be just better off using your phone tbh.

NewLeaf17 · 28-03-2017 3:55pm

I have been look at some of the Fujifilm enthusiast cameras and am interested in some of the retro looking ones such as X100F and X100T.

I have always just had basic enough camera's but now I want to invest in a good camera for family functions, family outings, work, holidays etc and I love the idea of the fixed lens and also I love the look of these cameras, the retro, classic look.

I would have an interest in taking photos but just for myself and framing for my own home etc

Just wondering if anyone could steer me in any direction as to what camera might suit me best.

Thanks for your advice

dory · 29-03-2017 3:46pm

Hello all. I'm looking to upgrade from my Sony A5000. I'm unsure of which way to go. I like the size, and I looked into the next one up, the Sony A6500 but the guy in a shop I went into said that photo wise there isn't too much of a difference, it's mostly video quality and I don't need better video quality.
I was looking into the pro Sony range, seem very expensive but they're more compact that the Canon and Nikon equivalent. I mostly do travel photography and some portraits. Anyone have any suggestions? I'm open with regards price. If I find the right camera but it's €2k then so be it.
Or should I just keep the A5000 and get some snazzy lenses? Maybe a wide angle one or something?
Thanks

CabanSail · 30-03-2017 2:35am

dory wrote: »

Hello all. I'm looking to upgrade from my Sony A5000. I'm unsure of which way to go. I like the size, and I looked into the next one up, the Sony A6500 but the guy in a shop I went into said that photo wise there isn't too much of a difference, it's mostly video quality and I don't need better video quality.
I was looking into the pro Sony range, seem very expensive but they're more compact that the Canon and Nikon equivalent. I mostly do travel photography and some portraits. Anyone have any suggestions? I'm open with regards price. If I find the right camera but it's €2k then so be it.
Or should I just keep the A5000 and get some snazzy lenses? Maybe a wide angle one or something?
Thanks

In what way is the A5000 limiting you now? What do you want to achieve and that camera has stopped you?

Bacchus · 30-03-2017 9:47am

NewLeaf17 wrote: »

I have been look at some of the Fujifilm enthusiast cameras and am interested in some of the retro looking ones such as X100F and X100T.

I have always just had basic enough camera's but now I want to invest in a good camera for family functions, family outings, work, holidays etc and I love the idea of the fixed lens and also I love the look of these cameras, the retro, classic look.

I would have an interest in taking photos but just for myself and framing for my own home etc

Just wondering if anyone could steer me in any direction as to what camera might suit me best.

Thanks for your advice

Need more information...

Is the 23mm focal length right for you or do you need something wider or closer to the subject. Personally I love the 23mm focal length (on DX sensors), it's very versatile. I had the X100 (actually still have it but gathering dust) and now the X-T2 with the 23mm lens. It's my goto setup for most situations. I do quite like 35mm (again on DX) though for something a bit closer.

Budget? What is it? You mention the X100F and X100T... they're the same camera, the X100F is just the newer version. Choosing between them essentially boils down to which one fits the budget. Both will be excellent choices but I've read many reviews of the X100F that basically put it on par with the likes of the X-Pro2 and X-T2 in terms of performance and image quality. If budget was quite large... I'd be going X-Pro2/X-T2 with a 23mm f2 lens. Same thing as the X100F but room to add lens in future.

Also, these are pricey enough cameras. Your money, do with it as you please but laying out that kind of money on a camera because you "love the idea of the fixed lens" and "the look of these cameras" seems impulsive to me. To be fair though, with the limited requirements you've managed to choose a damn good camera. Fuji are leading the way in mirrorless systems so I give them a thumbs up personally. I've seen others recommend the Olympus systems on here before. They have some camera that would also meet what you're looking for... if nothing else just look at another system to compare against.

cnocbui · 30-03-2017 11:47am

NewLeaf17 wrote: »

I have been look at some of the Fujifilm enthusiast cameras and am interested in some of the retro looking ones such as X100F and X100T.

I have always just had basic enough camera's but now I want to invest in a good camera for family functions, family outings, work, holidays etc and I love the idea of the fixed lens and also I love the look of these cameras, the retro, classic look.

I would have an interest in taking photos but just for myself and framing for my own home etc

Just wondering if anyone could steer me in any direction as to what camera might suit me best.

Thanks for your advice

Perhaps take a look at the Olympus Pen-F as a more versatile alternative with a not dissimilar aesthetic.

dory · 30-03-2017 3:52pm

CabanSail wrote: »

In what way is the A5000 limiting you now? What do you want to achieve and that camera has stopped you?

I'd like to be able to use an external flash. I had one on an old DSLR and noticed a huge difference indoors.
The photos are often blurry when not using a tripod. There's no image stablization.
And I blow up a lot of photos for my house so the best quality for that the better.

cnocbui · 30-03-2017 4:18pm

Perhaps have a look at an Olympus Pen F or E-M5 II, as Olympus have the best image stabilisation of any manufacturer. Those two models have excellent stabilisation - over 4 stops worth.

dball · 08-04-2017 9:11am

Hello People,

I have a €200 budget to buy a camera for a club bar. This will be left for use by anyone and everyone that wants to use it, It is primarily going to be used for building a social media and Facebook page.

It needs to be robust and very easy to use.

Can anyone recommend something fool proof?

sebphoto · 08-04-2017 9:30am

dball wrote: »

Hello People,

I have a â‚¬200 budget to buy a camera for a club bar. This will be left for use by anyone and everyone that wants to use it, It is primarily going to be used for building a social media and Facebook page.

It needs to be robust and very easy to use.

Can anyone recommend something fool proof?

I'd say if you have decent phone - use it.
Otherwise any point and shoot will do.

cnocbui · 08-04-2017 11:12am

dball wrote: »

Hello People,

I have a €200 budget to buy a camera for a club bar. This will be left for use by anyone and everyone that wants to use it, It is primarily going to be used for building a social media and Facebook page.

It needs to be robust and very easy to use.

Can anyone recommend something fool proof?

NIkon W100

08-04-2017 11:13am

http://www.currys.co.uk/gbuk/cameras-and-camcorders/digital-cameras/compact-and-bridge-cameras/panasonic-lumix-dmc-ft30eb-k-tough-compact-camera-black-10118739-pdt.html

Parcel motel it to yourself or find one from an Irish supplier. Great TOUGH compact. Will do everything you need it to do.

StripedBoxers · 09-04-2017 1:22am

Hi,

I am looking to pick up a camera, I want something that is going to last me a few years as I don't plan on selling it or anything, instead keeping it until it pretty much dies by itself.

I've been looking around, and Canon seem to be the most recommended, so I've looked up some of their cameras and have have found a few I like.

I'm looking for your thoughts/opinions on them and your suggestions for other cameras.

I want a camera that will last for a few years, is sturdy, will take photos and videos.

I'm happy to buy refurbished/second hand if it means getting a better camera for a good price.

The cameras I am looking at are:

Canon EOS 40D
Canon EOS 50D
Canon EOS 550D
Canon EOS 600D
Canon EOS 700D
Canon 1000D / Digital Rebel XS
Canon EOS 1100D / Rebel T3
Canon EOS 1100D / T6
Canon EOS M10

I'm leaning towards the M10 and the 600D, but I would like your opinions and suggestions on other cameras

Thanks.

JohnBoy26 · 09-04-2017 3:50am

StripedBoxers wrote: »

Hi,

I am looking to pick up a camera, I want something that is going to last me a few years as I don't plan on selling it or anything, instead keeping it until it pretty much dies by itself.

I've been looking around, and Canon seem to be the most recommended, so I've looked up some of their cameras and have have found a few I like.

I'm looking for your thoughts/opinions on them and your suggestions for other cameras.

I want a camera that will last for a few years, is sturdy, will take photos and videos.

I'm happy to buy refurbished/second hand if it means getting a better camera for a good price.

The cameras I am looking at are:

Canon EOS 40D
Canon EOS 50D
Canon EOS 550D
Canon EOS 600D
Canon EOS 700D
Canon 1000D / Digital Rebel XS
Canon EOS 1100D / Rebel T3
Canon EOS 1100D / T6
Canon EOS M10

I'm leaning towards the M10 and the 600D, but I would like your opinions and suggestions on other cameras

Thanks.

What's your budget and will the camera be primarily used for photos or video?

StripedBoxers · 09-04-2017 10:00am

JohnBoy26 wrote: »

What's your budget and will the camera be primarily used for photos or video?

€500 and primarily photos.

JohnBoy26 · 09-04-2017 1:32pm

StripedBoxers wrote: »

â‚¬500 and primarily photos.

A used nikon d7100 is what I would go for and a 35mm f1.8 lens

Full Marx · 10-04-2017 6:14pm

Hi folks I have been using a bridge camera (Fujifilm Finepix s4800) for a few years but I find judging pictures from the live view screen difficult so I have been looking to get a camera with a viewfinder. I also find it quite annoying to use on occasion and get to focus on what I want it to, the lack of control is sometimes frustrating.

I mentioned this to a friend and he recommended I get a DSLR camera, and he offered to sell me his old Canon EOS 20D with a lense.

I've never used a DSLR before but I suppose it would be good to learn.

I'm a bit concerned though because the camera he is offering is over ten years old and surely must be very obsolete? (although it seems to be in excellent condition, still in original packaging etc). It also has less MP, (although would the bigger sensor result in better pics?)

What would you recommend? Would the Canon EOS 20D be a good step up from the bridge or is the camera so old as to be not worth bothering with?

sebphoto · 10-04-2017 9:17pm

Full Marx wrote: »

Hi folks I have been using a bridge camera (Fujifilm Finepix s4800) for a few years but I find judging pictures from the live view screen difficult so I have been looking to get a camera with a viewfinder. I also find it quite annoying to use on occasion and get to focus on what I want it to, the lack of control is sometimes frustrating.

I mentioned this to a friend and he recommended I get a DSLR camera, and he offered to sell me his old Canon EOS 20D with a lense.

I've never used a DSLR before but I suppose it would be good to learn.

I'm a bit concerned though because the camera he is offering is over ten years old and surely must be very obsolete? (although it seems to be in excellent condition, still in original packaging etc). It also has less MP, (although would the bigger sensor result in better pics?)

What would you recommend? Would the Canon EOS 20D be a good step up from the bridge or is the camera so old as to be not worth bothering with?

What's your budget?
What kind of photos you are taking usually?

20d is really old. It has DIGIC II CPU, which could be good enough for you, however I would rather get old Canon 5D. It has the same CPU, but it is a full frame and it will give you fantastic image quality.
Keep in mind that it would be great if you will get a decent lens too.

Full Marx · 10-04-2017 9:26pm

sebphoto wrote: »

What's your budget?
What kind of photos you are taking usually?

20d is really old. It has DIGIC II CPU, which could be good enough for you, however I would rather get old Canon 5D. It has the same CPU, but it is a full frame and it will give you fantastic image quality.
Keep in mind that it would be great if you will get a decent lens too.

He is giving me the camera and lens (not sure what one, presume it was the one he got with it) for 50 quid.

I could spend about 300/ 350.

The photos I take are usually of various antiquities, ruins etc. Sometimes wildlife (in association with the former)

sebphoto · 10-04-2017 9:34pm

Full Marx wrote: »

He is giving me the camera and lens (not sure what one, presume it was the one he got with it) for 50 quid.

I could spend about 300/ 350.

The photos I take are usually of various antiquities, ruins etc. Sometimes wildlife (in association with the former)

Well for 50 quid, why not. You also need card reader (if you don't have one) and battery charger for 20d.
20d has very tiny LCD on the back. It's really difficult to judge whether your photo is sharp enough etc. It's a crop sensor, so keep that in mind. Regarding lenses - there are many different lenses available for 20d. Cheapest imho would be 50mm f/1.8 which cost circa â‚¬80 (second hand).

10-04-2017 10:05pm

It's easy to get caught up in the gear. Don't, if you can help it.

Your frustrations with the bridge camera are valid, IMHO. A DSLR might be just the thing you need to take more enjoyment from the craft and the results.

An EOS 20D is an old camera now, but, so what?

A google search turned up this set of sample images:

https://pixelpeeper.com/cameras/?camera=7

There's plenty a person can critique, but honestly, there's nothing wrong with what that camera is capable of for even twice the price your pal is asking.

Buy it, try it, see if a DSLR is for you. Change it only when you know you'll see a benefit in the results of your shooting. Anything else is just fluff for the most part.

Frankmagnet · 11-04-2017 4:18pm

Hi

Just looking for a bit of advice. I'm thinking of picking up a camera that will be mostly used for travel, holidays and family events. I don't think I want to get too into lenses etc

I really like the style of the Fuji x30. It has a viewfinder, not too big, seems to have good reviews.

It's seems to be discontinued. Is it still worth purchasing or would I have trouble down the line?

Budget is about €550.

The one mirrorless camera i was looking at was the a5100. How is the bundled lens for my general uses?

Any advice is appreciated. Thanks

Full Marx · 11-04-2017 11:25pm

JayZeus wrote: »

It's easy to get caught up in the gear. Don't, if you can help it.

Your frustrations with the bridge camera are valid, IMHO. A DSLR might be just the thing you need to take more enjoyment from the craft and the results.

An EOS 20D is an old camera now, but, so what?

A google search turned up this set of sample images:

https://pixelpeeper.com/cameras/?camera=7

There's plenty a person can critique, but honestly, there's nothing wrong with what that camera is capable of for even twice the price your pal is asking.

Buy it, try it, see if a DSLR is for you. Change it only when you know you'll see a benefit in the results of your shooting. Anything else is just fluff for the most part.

I've been looking at a 40d too, would that be a lot better than a 20d? I get get it for about 120Euro.

Many thanks everyone for the advice.

12-04-2017 12:17am

Full Marx wrote: »

I've been looking at a 40d too, would that be a lot better than a 20d? I get get it for about 120Euro.

Many thanks everyone for the advice.

The 40D will give you 10MP instead of 8MP, 6.5FPS instead of 5, 3" instead of 1.8" screen. Is that worth 70 euro extra?

Remember, if it breaks, it's just not worth spending anything on fixing it.

For me, I'd spend the 50 on your pals camera and see if a DSLR is right for you. You know it's in good condition, working properly etc. The extra 2MP and 1.5FPS are probably not so important. The 3" display is definitely nicer, but only if you stop and check and review pictures in the field. For me, I'd live with the 1.8" for a while and if you decide a DSLR makes sense, leave the 70 euro in the kitty to spend on a camera you really want.

dory · 12-04-2017 11:45am

Frankmagnet wrote: »

The one mirrorless camera i was looking at was the a5100. How is the bundled lens for my general uses?

I have the a5000 and it's great for travelling. It's small and the photos are great. I usually only carry the bundled lens and it does me grand. Got a zoom lens for â‚¬225 and I bring it out on special occasions. The price seems to jump a lot with them. I got mine for â‚¬400, then it went on sale for â‚¬330 for a while, now it's in one shop I saw yesterday for â‚¬450. And I bought it 2 years ago! So shop around, you might be able to get one second hand.

Frankmagnet · 12-04-2017 3:43pm

Thanks very much for the reply dory.

I'm kinda torn between a mirrorless like the a5100 and a good point and shoot like the Sony Rx 100 models.

If I'm using it a lot I can probably expand the a5100 when I get more experience, but that means more money on lenses etc. whereas the rx 1000 models is the one outlay.

StripedBoxers · 13-04-2017 1:28am

JohnBoy26 wrote: »

A used nikon d7100 is what I would go for and a 35mm f1.8 lens

Thank you so much. I've done some looking around online and found some other, similar cameras. I am not a pro photographer, however, photography is something I would like to get into, as a hobby rather than profession.

What would you opinion be on these cameras?

Nikon D3300, D5000, D5200 D600, D7000

I've seen some of them in refurbished condition, some include lenses, some don't, but I could always get a lens at a later date I'm sure, its the camera that is the main thing obviously.

Also while I am here, are there any website you could recommend for second hand cameras? I know of eBay and have found some others, I'm a bit wary though as I've never bought second hand cameras before so I'm unsure as to what to lookout for.

CabanSail · 13-04-2017 4:12am

I have the D600 and use it as a spare body. It was the first Fx body I bought and I really did not like it so quickly bought a D800 which I use a lot. Having said that I had to send the D800 in for srevice a while ago and so relied on the D600 for a few weeks. I have added a battery grip to each body to get the extra grip and shutter release.

The things I did not like about the D600 will probably not have any bearing on you. It is a good solid body which is weather sealed. It has the internal motor so can use older lenses. The shutter on it is much quieter than the D800 and I will use it when shooting at an event where noise is an issue. The reason i do not like that body is that it is laid out more like an entry level body than a pro body. The things which are easily accessible are more suited to those shooting Jpeg. If it were my only body I would soon get used to using it but much prefer the ergonomics of the pro bodies.

Just be warned that if you do buy a full frame body that your lenses are often going to be more expensive.

harr · 13-04-2017 9:19am

In a position next week to buy my first new camera,they have been all second hand up to this point...currently have a canon 50d and a canon m3.
Looking to upgrade the 50d ..
I have narrowed it down between two cameras the 80d or the 7d mark ii if I go with 80d I can then afford a decent lens with it ...for the 7d it will be body only and use what lenses I have currently..
It will used for sports ( Athletics ) some wildlife and portraits.. so looking for opinion from people who's has eather model ...pros or cons
The 7d mark ii is the front runner at the moment..
Thanks

StripedBoxers · 13-04-2017 1:31pm

CabanSail wrote: »

I have the D600 and use it as a spare body. It was the first Fx body I bought and I really did not like it so quickly bought a D800 which I use a lot. Having said that I had to send the D800 in for srevice a while ago and so relied on the D600 for a few weeks. I have added a battery grip to each body to get the extra grip and shutter release.

The things I did not like about the D600 will probably not have any bearing on you. It is a good solid body which is weather sealed. It has the internal motor so can use older lenses. The shutter on it is much quieter than the D800 and I will use it when shooting at an event where noise is an issue. The reason i do not like that body is that it is laid out more like an entry level body than a pro body. The things which are easily accessible are more suited to those shooting Jpeg. If it were my only body I would soon get used to using it but much prefer the ergonomics of the pro bodies.

Just be warned that if you do buy a full frame body that your lenses are often going to be more expensive.

Thank you so much for this, could I ask, what things did you not like about the D600?

My last camera was an Olympus SP560UZ so that is the type of camera I am used to though I don't mind changing from it.

Saruman · 13-04-2017 3:58pm

harr wrote: »

In a position next week to buy my first new camera,they have been all second hand up to this point...currently have a canon 50d and a canon m3.
Looking to upgrade the 50d ..
I have narrowed it down between two cameras the 80d or the 7d mark ii if I go with 80d I can then afford a decent lens with it ...for the 7d it will be body only and use what lenses I have currently..
It will used for sports ( Athletics ) some wildlife and portraits.. so looking for opinion from people who's has eather model ...pros or cons
The 7d mark ii is the front runner at the moment..
Thanks

Looks like much of a muchness. Both have strengths.

The 80D is much newer though whereas the 7D has a lot of pro features. Personally I would pick neither and try to trade up to full frame like a 5D mark III or iv or at least a 6D. You would also need to trade in any APS-C lenses as they won't work with a full frame camera.

harr · 13-04-2017 4:28pm

Saruman wrote: »

Looks like much of a muchness. Both have strengths.

The 80D is much newer though whereas the 7D has a lot of pro features. Personally I would pick neither and try to trade up to full frame like a 5D mark III or iv or at least a 6D. You would also need to trade in any APS-C lenses as they won't work with a full frame camera.

While I would love a full frame I am fairly heavily invested in APS-C lenses ...and my budget probably won't stretch to a full frame and a few lenses to suit it..

flyingsnail · 14-04-2017 11:54am

harr wrote: »

While I would love a full frame I am fairly heavily invested in APS-C lenses ...and my budget probably won't stretch to a full frame and a few lenses to suit it..

Wex Photographic are currently doing a double promotion on the 6D and the 7D II, you get £125 off at the checkout and another £ 125 cash back from Canon. The only downside is you will need parcel motel or similar for delivery.

http://www.wexphotographic.com/buy-canon-eos-7d-mark-ii-digital-slr-camera-body/p1560196

http://www.wexphotographic.com/buy-canon-eos-6d-digital-slr-camera-body/p1532845

harr · 14-04-2017 12:10pm

flyingsnail wrote: »

Wex Photographic are currently doing a double promotion on the 6D and the 7D II, you get £125 off at the checkout and another £ 125 cash back from Canon. The only downside is you will need parcel motel or similar for delivery.

http://www.wexphotographic.com/buy-canon-eos-7d-mark-ii-digital-slr-camera-body/p1560196

http://www.wexphotographic.com/buy-canon-eos-6d-digital-slr-camera-body/p1532845

Thanks very much for that ...

ianmcdoh · 17-04-2017 12:08pm

Im looking to upgrade from my Nikon bridge camera..... camera will be mostly used for holiday/sightseeing.... we have a budget of approximately €500. Any suggestions?

Sexual Chocolate · 21-04-2017 11:20am

Any opinions on the Panasonic TZ 60 ? I understand its 3 years old but they going for a decent price in the camera centre and they seem to have good reviews on youtube.

cnocbui · 21-04-2017 1:36pm

The TZ 60 has a 1/2.3 sensor, which is only a fraction larger than the sensor in a Samsung S7 phone (1/2.5).

Camera performance, particularly the ability to take photos in less than broad daylight lighting levels, is largely dependent on the sensor size, with bigger being better at imaging in low light levels. Cameras on phones are seeing far more serious development than compact cameras, which are dying out, so the ones in flagship phones now rival or better compact cameras.

The only real advantage of a compact camera over a phone is having an optical zoom.

My recommendation if you are seeking better quality than a phone camera can achieve would be to look at something with a bigger sensor which will then be more capable than a phone. Something with a one inch sensor like a Sony RX100 A bit more expensize than a TZ 60 but a considerably better camera and better value IMO. Likely much better resale value too.

Sexual Chocolate · 21-04-2017 10:37pm

Thanks for that. I know about the rx100. Argos are doing the mk1 for 375 last I checked but its just out of my price range.

bemak · 02-05-2017 12:00pm

I have a ten year old 450D which I still get good shots from. Have a Sigma 10-20mm, Canon 70-300mm and a Sigma 30mm which covers me for everything I need. Have been toying with the idea of upgrading the body to an 80D. Would it be worth it? Im only an enthusiast hence why I've spent my money on lenses but for someone who does a small bit of post production, with LR, am I going to notice the difference for candid photography? I'm tempted to get a Mavic Pro instead which would give me more options but I'm still undecided. Could get the drone for a while and then shift it when I've had my fun and get a good used 80D then?

CabanSail · 05-05-2017 2:50am

There is some improvement moving up to the 80D but not sure if it would make a lot of difference.

450D compared to 80D

The main advances would be better noise handling and an increase in fps (4 to 7)

It has video if that's important to you.

The 80D is weather sealed.

12MP to 24MP sensor - meh

Slightly heavier body too.

Rather than the Mavic Pro why not look at a Phantom 3 Std which is a bit more solid and resilient. When learning to fly is when you are likely to have an incident. Learning to fly a P3S would be a lot less cash in the air and you may be able to pick one up from someone who has upgraded. That is what I have done and have just come back from doing my Remote Pilot Course where we flew Phantom 4's and had a quick fly of an Inspire too.

The P3S is capable of getting some great aerial shots.

purple_rose · 07-05-2017 9:52am

I'm looking for a camera. I have a small compact camera which isn't the best. But I'm looking for a camera that will be good for taking pictures at concerts. Most concerts don't allow professional cameras so nothing too big or fancy.

Can anybody tell me what would i be looking for to take the best shots. All i know is cameras are expensive. My budget would be around 200€ which probably isn't the best but i would consider getting it from a Chinese online shop. I have had great experience with gearbest in the past but i know nothing about their cameras.

Neames · 18-05-2017 7:09pm

Folks,

I'm looking into buying a compact system camera. I want to do a little more than point and shoot. But I also dislike bulky slrs.

So something like a Sony a5000 would suit with options to add different lenses.

So any recommendations that won't break the bank.

Budget of about €300.

dory · 19-05-2017 11:58pm

Neames wrote: »

Folks,

I'm looking into buying a compact system camera. I want to do a little more than point and shoot. But I also dislike bulky slrs.

So something like a Sony a5000 would suit with options to add different lenses.

So any recommendations that won't break the bank.

Budget of about €300.

Yea, it's a good solid choice. I've had it 2 years now and only recently feel like I'd like to upgrade a bit. The only thing it's really missing for me is a shoe to put in an external flash.

JohnBoy26 · 22-05-2017 4:44am

Neames wrote: »

Folks,

I'm looking into buying a compact system camera. I want to do a little more than point and shoot. But I also dislike bulky slrs.

So something like a Sony a5000 would suit with options to add different lenses.

So any recommendations that won't break the bank.

Budget of about €300.

A micro 4/3 camera might be a better bet as they have far more lense options than the sony and the lenses are more compact too.

cnocbui · 22-05-2017 11:49am

JohnBoy26 wrote: »

A micro 4/3 camera might be a better bet as they have far more lense options than the sony and the lenses are more compact too.

People in Ireland seem solely focused on price and not concerned with utility.

JohnBoy26 · 26-05-2017 2:38am

cnocbui wrote: »

People in Ireland seem solely focused on price and not concerned with utility.

Many people also think big camera automatically= good quality photos. This may be the case with the right lens combo but your entry level dslr with the kit lense isn't going to be near as good as a micro 4/3 camera with a nice lens

gosull · 09-06-2017 2:23pm

Hi,

So I've been thinking about getting a good camera for a while now, looking for a DSLR, Canon or Nikon prefably, open to suggestions though. Willing to spend around €800, maybe a littttle bit more if I have to. The main type of pictures I will be taking are stills of people, views, but also football matches of players who will be moving around etc. Not sure if there's any other information you need to know to help suggest, if there is though just ask!

Appreciate all help and recommendations!

CabanSail · 11-06-2017 4:52am

gosull wrote: »

Hi,

So I've been thinking about getting a good camera for a while now, looking for a DSLR, Canon or Nikon prefably, open to suggestions though. Willing to spend around €800, maybe a littttle bit more if I have to. The main type of pictures I will be taking are stills of people, views, but also football matches of players who will be moving around etc. Not sure if there's any other information you need to know to help suggest, if there is though just ask!

Appreciate all help and recommendations!

The thing you should be looking at is which lenses will suit your needs and then a body to hang off the back of them.

georgefalls · 11-06-2017 8:50am

gosull wrote: »

Hi,

So I've been thinking about getting a good camera for a while now, looking for a DSLR, Canon or Nikon prefably, open to suggestions though. Willing to spend around €800, maybe a littttle bit more if I have to. The main type of pictures I will be taking are stills of people, views, but also football matches of players who will be moving around etc. Not sure if there's any other information you need to know to help suggest, if there is though just ask!

Appreciate all help and recommendations!

Consider having a look at PENTAX gear. You get a shed load for your money.
As good as if not better than Canon/Nikon.... IMHO

I've been using Pentax gear for more than 25 years

Which Camera? **Please read OP first**

Comments

Which Camera? Please read OP first