Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Property Market 2015

Options
12467129

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,273 ✭✭✭The Spider


    who_ru wrote: »
    none of the bold text is true.

    Yeah? Have a read of the below link, Ivan Yates has done his homework, then come back to me.

    http://www.independent.ie/opinion/columnists/ivan-yates/vulture-capitalists-wont-build-the-25000-new-houses-we-need-but-our-real-developers-will-30874675.html


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,992 ✭✭✭Mongfinder General


    The Spider wrote: »

    Ivan Yates. I wouldn't bet on it.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 32,279 Mod ✭✭✭✭The_Conductor


    The Spider wrote: »

    Spidey- you do realise its Ivan Yates who wrote that piece?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,528 ✭✭✭gaius c


    Millem wrote: »
    But what they don't say is that for the month of November mortgage approvals were up 42% for ftbs.
    http://www.irishtimes.com/business/financial-services/mortgage-approvals-soar-as-buyers-seek-to-beat-restrictions-1.2043799
    We were looking in south dublin in December and there was loads of cash buyers bidding who wouldn't make the 31st dec deadline. Every house I rang up enquiring had offers over the asking price :eek:

    I'm one of them actually and we applied as part of a long-term plan to do so, not a rush to beat any sort of deadline.

    We won't spend a cent on poor value houses though and we also don't intend to draw down the full amount we're approved for. Let the market "moderate" and we'll be ready to go when prices are right. If it keeps going up like it has, we'll just stay renting and saving.
    Ibec are forecasting private sector pay rises of an average of 2% for 2015- and the ESRI are forecasting an inflation rate of 2% for the Irish economy.

    IBEC say one thing.
    http://www.irishtimes.com/business/economy/more-than-half-of-companies-planning-pay-rises-this-year-1.2052210

    ISME say another.
    http://www.irishtimes.com/business/economy/smes-urged-not-to-increase-wages-1.2052968

    ISME are more important because SME's employ far, far more people than the MNC's represented by IBEC. A tiny segment of the labour force will see pay increases. The rest will get zilch.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,003 ✭✭✭handlemaster


    Is it true irish water wont take in charge new developments ?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,528 ✭✭✭gaius c


    Ivan Yates. I wouldn't bet on it.

    Ah now. He has unique insight to share with us from his time examining the bottom of pint glasses in Wales.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,273 ✭✭✭The Spider


    Spidey- you do realise its Ivan Yates who wrote that piece?

    I certainly do, what he says makes sense.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,992 ✭✭✭Mongfinder General


    gaius c wrote: »
    Ah now. He has unique insight to share with us from his time examining the bottom of pint glasses in Wales.

    Celtic Bookmakers. How on earth does a bookie go out of business with the amount of mugs on this country?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,731 ✭✭✭yankinlk


    No personalising your posts- and no sniping.
    This is a one and only warning.

    Can i just ask who was being reprimanded here? Cause it seems only those that are against the populist view are going to get the slaps here. if it was both (or everyone) i stand corrected.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 32,279 Mod ✭✭✭✭The_Conductor


    yankinlk wrote: »
    Can i just ask who was being reprimanded here? Cause it seems only those that are against the populist view are going to get the slaps here. if it was both (or everyone) i stand corrected.

    I had two people in mind....... alongside a general warning- as threads like this have an annoying habit of descending into squabbles.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,528 ✭✭✭gaius c




    Just a tad dramatic there. Some of these areas have nice areas also.

    Perhaps but the house prices there are eyewatering multiples of the household incomes of folk who would typically live there.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,528 ✭✭✭gaius c


    Celtic Bookmakers. How on earth does a bookie go out of business with the amount of mugs on this country?

    It's an interesting tale. He expanded big time into physical locations but ignored online betting so he lost a huge chunk of his turnover over time and his costs increased thanks to increased rents.

    Basically, he bet big and he bet wrong.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,003 ✭✭✭handlemaster


    gaius c wrote: »
    It's an interesting tale. He expanded big time into physical locations but ignored online betting so he lost a huge chunk of his turnover over time and his costs increased thanks to increased rents.

    Basically, he bet big and he bet wrong.


    But at least he tried and was successful for a long time. Better to have tried and failed than not tried at all.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,992 ✭✭✭Mongfinder General


    But at least he tried and was successful for a long time. Better to have tried and failed than not tried at all.


    Not in this country. Try being self employed, going bust and then trying to claim benefits from the State.


  • Registered Users Posts: 981 ✭✭✭Stojkovic


    3 beds in Citywest, Balbriggan, Darndale, Clondalkin, Ballyfermot all headed north of 300k. I wouldn't put an animal in these places. Please tell me I'm wrong in my analysis?
    Bull**** my friend.
    Houses in Ballyer arent even hitting 200k. Maybe in nicer parts of Clondalkin and certainly not in Darndale.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,852 ✭✭✭Glenbhoy


    murphaph wrote: »
    Yup. Ireland does its level best to encourage our underclass to have more and more children but disincentivises decent working people from doing so.

    In Berlin we pay (on decent salaries) a grand total of 160 a month for full time childcare for our 2 year old and that includes breakfast, lunch and snack. That reduces to 23 a month once he turns 3 (just his food basically).

    Ireland needs to seriously consider the repercussions of an ever growing underclass and a shrinking contributing class. It is a ticking time bomb.

    We pay approx 2k for a 5yo, 4yo and 2yo and that's a good rate for Dublin. I know this isn't the forum for this, but what is the reason for this differential?
    I suppose our state doesn't want to (and certainly can't afford to in any case) provide/subsidise childcare, why is that? I think that even when we could have afforded to assist with this, our representatives (reflecting the will of the people who elected them) have always been in favour of giving people more disposable income and allowing them to use the cash as they see fit, that's why our public sector expenditures are targeted at salaries as opposed to services.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,992 ✭✭✭Mongfinder General


    Glenbhoy wrote: »
    We pay approx 2k for a 5yo, 4yo and 2yo and that's a good rate for Dublin. I know this isn't the forum for this, but what is the reason for this differential?
    I suppose our state doesn't want to (and certainly can't afford to in any case) provide/subsidise childcare, why is that? I think that even when we could have afforded to assist with this, our representatives (reflecting the will of the people who elected them) have always been in favour of giving people more disposable income and allowing them to use the cash as they see fit, that's why our public sector expenditures are targeted at salaries as opposed to services.



    2k. Jesus wept. That is just wrong.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,992 ✭✭✭Mongfinder General


    Stojkovic wrote: »
    Bull**** my friend.
    Houses in Ballyer arent even hitting 200k. Maybe in nicer parts of Clondalkin and certainly not in Darndale.

    I hope it stays that way. If there is a 15-20% rise per year for even 2 years, where would that leave prices?


    Headed north of 300k.


  • Registered Users Posts: 130 ✭✭mr_seer


    For the benefit of those claiming that house prices won't fall because of a lack of supply, I would like to remind them that there was a lack of supply in Dublin in 2006 and 2007. The ESRI, CSO and all the national papers consistently claimed that prices would keep going up because of demographics - pent up demand and an insufficient supply response. We were consistently told that people had to readjust their expectations and settle for an apartment. Sadly this narrative has reared its ugly head once again by the same people who got it so badly wrong the last time. Prices in Dublin subsequently fell by up to 60%. The principal difference is that this time, we don't have the incomes, demographics or ability to borrow to back up this new bubble that has been created by the government policy. You can only rig a market for so long and in Dublin at least, there are significant signs that it is slowing rapidly. Cash buyers are gone from the market, viewings are down big time and the new CB rules will reduce real demand even further. I expect a pretty major downward correction later in 2015


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,852 ✭✭✭Glenbhoy


    gaius c wrote: »
    It's an interesting tale. He expanded big time into physical locations but ignored online betting so he lost a huge chunk of his turnover over time and his costs increased thanks to increased rents.

    Basically, he bet big and he bet wrong.

    I believe that Ivan was pretty confident that FOBT (one armed bandits to the rest of us) were going to be allowed in Ireland as they are in shops in the UK, these machines prey on punters in shops and generally in more deprived areas. The crack cocaine of gambling as they've been called.

    Re the article itself, loads of rubbish, but he's right in his criticism of NAMA, plaudits for selling on UK assets at a 'profit' into a rising market, well done NAMA.

    As for calling in Owen O'Callaghan for advice.....


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,852 ✭✭✭Glenbhoy


    2k. Jesus wept. That is just wrong.

    And it is a pretty good price as other Dublin based parents will doubtless confirm, anyway it should drop significantly over the next few years, I'm thinking of giving the 5yo some new responsibilities, time to woman up as they say:)


  • Registered Users Posts: 981 ✭✭✭Stojkovic


    I hope it stays that way. If there is a 15-20% rise per year for even 2 years, where would that leave prices?

    Headed north of 300k.
    Not in Ballyer it wont.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,731 ✭✭✭yankinlk


    mr_seer wrote: »
    For the benefit of those claiming that house prices won't fall because of a lack of supply, I would like to remind them that there was a lack of supply in Dublin in 2006 and 2007. The ESRI, CSO and all the national papers consistently claimed that prices would keep going up because of demographics - pent up demand and an insufficient supply response. We were consistently told that people had to readjust their expectations and settle for an apartment. Sadly this narrative has reared its ugly head once again by the same people who got it so badly wrong the last time. Prices in Dublin subsequently fell by up to 60%. The principal difference is that this time, we don't have the incomes, demographics or ability to borrow to back up this new bubble that has been created by the government policy. You can only rig a market for so long and in Dublin at least, there are significant signs that it is slowing rapidly. Cash buyers are gone from the market, viewings are down big time and the new CB rules will reduce real demand even further. I expect a pretty major downward correction later in 2015


    zzzzzz. another for the 100% reversal brigade. how many years of an up market did ireland have at 2006? property does not follow the stock market. it does not reverse on a dime. there is no dead cat bounce in property. simples.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,273 ✭✭✭The Spider


    mr_seer wrote: »
    For the benefit of those claiming that house prices won't fall because of a lack of supply, I would like to remind them that there was a lack of supply in Dublin in 2006 and 2007. The ESRI, CSO and all the national papers consistently claimed that prices would keep going up because of demographics - pent up demand and an insufficient supply response. We were consistently told that people had to readjust their expectations and settle for an apartment. Sadly this narrative has reared its ugly head once again by the same people who got it so badly wrong the last time. Prices in Dublin subsequently fell by up to 60%. The principal difference is that this time, we don't have the incomes, demographics or ability to borrow to back up this new bubble that has been created by the government policy. You can only rig a market for so long and in Dublin at least, there are significant signs that it is slowing rapidly. Cash buyers are gone from the market, viewings are down big time and the new CB rules will reduce real demand even further. I expect a pretty major downward correction later in 2015

    Yep and then we had the banking crisis and major recession, the problem with the above is that by all accounts we're now in economic recovery, and house price drops generally don't happen when an economy is on the up.

    More jobs being created generally doesn't mean a drop in property values!


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,003 ✭✭✭handlemaster


    http://m.independent.ie/business/personal-finance/property-mortgages/politicians-in-revolt-over-mortgage-restrictions-30880434.html




    Be mindful the government will be making moves this year for reelection this will be following populist opinion such as the deposit scheme withdrawal or watering down.


  • Registered Users Posts: 84 ✭✭ElizKenny


    We had some apartments that were never in negative equity but we were all for selling them once the market picked up as the rent for them went down a lot.

    The rents (and their values) started falling in 2008 and we couldnt wait to get out, but decided to wait and watched them fall even more.

    But now that rents are on the up and the values are reasonable again, and most importantly the mortgages are 6 or 7 years less than they were we have done a complete about turn in our thinking. And it turns out we were right not to sell them, as theyve turned a small profit every year but the last couple of years its got rather big.

    Now it doesnt matter to us if there are falls in the future anymore. It wont be too many years before we own them all outright and all rent (minus running costs) is pure profit.

    We have gone from being desperate to sell, to thinking about buying more in the space of a few years.
    I wonder has that happened to many people? The landscape changes so quickly.
    Maybe next year we'll be wanting to sell again :) But I doubt it at this stage.

    So after my ramblings, all i really wanted to say was that you never know one way or the other whats coming with the economy, or with property prices. But im thinking, moderate yearly price growth until the next big economic upheaval. They bug increases we had last couple of years were just the hard bounce off the bottom where it overshot. I think we are getting into more reasonable rates of increase now.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,731 ✭✭✭yankinlk


    http://m.independent.ie/business/personal-finance/property-mortgages/politicians-in-revolt-over-mortgage-restrictions-30880434.html




    Be mindful the government will be making moves this year for reelection this will be following populist opinion such as the deposit scheme withdrawal or watering down.

    The deposit rule, like borrowers wont get around that, yeah.

    Back in boom times, few people ever had the 8% deposit. in reality they begged, borrowed and CU'd it and banks looked the other way.


  • Registered Users Posts: 84 ✭✭ElizKenny


    yankinlk wrote: »
    The deposit rule, like borrowers wont get around that, yeah.

    Back in boom times, few people ever had the 8% deposit. in reality they begged, borrowed and CU'd it and banks looked the other way.


    Ive had financial advisors, indy ones and some from the big banks, who will readily tell you how to get a deposit together without having the deposit.
    Very easily done if you needed to do it. I didnt, so never availed of their "expertise".

    I find its good to get different opinions for different "financial advisors", but all of them will coach you in getting around minimum deposit rules.


  • Registered Users Posts: 658 ✭✭✭johnp001


    I hope it stays that way. If there is a 15-20% rise per year for even 2 years, where would that leave prices?


    Headed north of 300k.

    Earlier on this thread you stated that you personally needed prices in the areas you named to reach €320k so that you could "escape" a "hell hole" (your words in quotes)

    This would mean typical buyers in these areas would need to generally have at least €64k deposit and income of c70k.
    IBEC came out recently saying they were hopeful of 2% wage inflation this year. There is no way that, even with a mild economic recovery, 15-20% YoY price rises are at all sustainable.
    Analysis of asking price changes over on thepropertypin show that Dublin market has peaked.
    Latest CSO figures show Dublin prices marginally down for November.
    PPR average prices for Dublin have dropped markedly and consistently since July.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 84 ✭✭ElizKenny


    johnp001 wrote: »
    .
    Analysis of asking price changes over on thepropertypin show that Dublin market has peaked.
    Latest CSO figures show Dublin prices marginally down for November.


    Thats why i like the idea of a thread where peoples colours are nailed to the mast.
    When I was lurking last year i read exactly the same thing as you have just posted.

    And look where we are year on year now.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement