Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

General Ongoing Doctor Discussion

11718202223

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    The Mirror reporting that Whittaker is leaving after the next series. If it's true it's a real shame because I think could have been a great Doctor but she was lumbered with a terrible showrunner and writer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,670 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    FunLover18 wrote: »
    The Mirror reporting that Whittaker is leaving after the next series. If it's true it's a real shame because I think could have been a great Doctor but she was lumbered with a terrible showrunner and writer.

    Well I am delighted - maybe it was the writing or the actor but it needs a change


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,249 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Hopefully, in 2023, we'll have a new show runner and Jodie can come back for the 60th anniversary and show us what she can really do.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Yeah but, The Mirror? Would take very large globs of salt with anything any UK redtop claims TBH.


  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 25,868 Mod ✭✭✭✭Doctor DooM


    Yeah every couple of years it seems we're in here saying the same thing, "don't trust the tabloids" :D


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 17,994 Mod ✭✭✭✭ixoy


    Whittaker leaving won't change the fundamental issue that is Chris Chibnaill. I still don't understand how he got the job - there's surely plenty of talented folk out there. We'd probably cobble better scripts between us on this forum.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    ixoy wrote: »
    Whittaker leaving won't change the fundamental issue that is Chris Chibnaill. I still don't understand how he got the job - there's surely plenty of talented folk out there. We'd probably cobble better scripts between us on this forum.

    The success of Broadchurch + Chibnall's a super fan. On paper it was a no brainer to be fair, given that's kinda similar background to RTD when he took the top job. For sure, Chibnall's work on Who + helming of Torchwood wasn't exactly stellar but the decision could still be mapped from source to result


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,284 ✭✭✭✭CastorTroy


    Was reading there are already names being said to be favourites to replace her.
    Will see how the next season goes now with less companions


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,881 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    The Guardian running with it now that she is quitting the show when her contract is up.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 25,868 Mod ✭✭✭✭Doctor DooM


    Hope she gets a decent last series if it's true, but aint holding too much faith.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,284 ✭✭✭✭CastorTroy


    So seems the favourite to replace Jodie is
    Michael Sheen
    . He seems high profile for the role


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,670 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    CastorTroy wrote: »
    So seems the favourite to replace Jodie is
    Michael Sheen
    . He seems high profile for the role

    Would be perfect for the role


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Yeah too high profile, guess the silly season of replacement speculation will begin.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,086 ✭✭✭✭Busi_Girl08


    Would thrilled if some kind of timey wimey/retcon retcon would happen to make Jo Martin the new Doctor. She out-Doctored Jodie in any scene she was in.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,631 ✭✭✭its_steve116


    CastorTroy wrote: »
    So seems the favourite to replace Jodie is
    Michael Sheen
    . He seems high profile for the role

    He'd be the first
    Welsh
    Doctor and ironically
    the show is produced in Wales
    .


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    They're also someone who has already been in the show as they were
    the voice of House in The Doctor's Wife


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,249 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Yeah but so were Peter Capaldi, Colin Baker, Anthony Ainley and Lalla Ward before they got their Time Lord roles.


  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 25,868 Mod ✭✭✭✭Doctor DooM


    I would bet money he's in the tabloids specifically because
    he and David Tennant have a discussion about Sheen becoming the Doctor in a recent episode of Staged.

    Silly season, as people said!


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Sounds about right Doctor Doom, and par for the course with tabloid rumours. Paper never refused ink and as always when this comes around, would remind that fadó fadó in ancient 2005 when the relaunch was coming, the tabloids "reported" everyone from Eddie Izzard to David Hasselhoff as lined up for the role.

    Also, unless people object, I'm going to say that spoiler-texting names seem unnecessary; the new Dr. Who tends to end up being the worst kept secret in British TV so kinda wanna just say "have at it"?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,967 ✭✭✭ebbsy


    Problem was, Jolie wasn't a strong enough actor to carry Chibnall's crap scripts.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    ebbsy wrote: »
    Problem was, Jolie wasn't a strong enough actor to carry Chibnall's crap scripts.

    I don't think you can blame her for that, most of the time it wasn't even the scripts but the stories themselves were crap and no amount of good dialogue could have saved them. I doubt any of her predecessors could have elevated them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,034 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    I dunno, a lot of the stuff written for David Tennant was really bad. "I'm so so sorry. Humans are fantastic, brilliant, amazing, best species in the universe". Surprisingly so given RTD has shown he can write amazing stuff on other shows (and occasionally on Doctor Who: "Midnight", "Turn Left") but I think on Doctor Who he let his giddy child side get the better of him. Tennant made it work enough for him to be considered many people's favourite Doctor though.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    On reflection I think the problem with Whittaker's doctor is that if pushed, I couldn't give you a postage stamp summary of who she is as a Doctor. The others in the revival had some pretty clear arcs that linked with their personalities but Whitaker is a bit of a blank slate. Literally in fact as IIRC, some of her first season amounted to a "who am I?" question that culminated in that controversial twist last year.

    And even when the RTD era sunk into some truly asinine, brain-dead storytelling (I love Davies but his sci-fi was often pretty awful), the foundation of a strong personality in its lead elevated the sometimes crappy plots. Same with the Moffat era. Maybe even moreso give he preferred those puzzle box arcs that were all mystery.

    I wonder was this a consequence of it being the first female doctor? That there was a nervousness, that a female Doc with an excessively outsized personality might have stirred the pot more than the casting already managed. So then the safest approach was this White Label Doctor; all the ticks and mannerisms you'd expect but absolutely none of the flavour we would see with a Baker or Smith iteration.

    I suppose that does come back to Chibnall holding the bag but it's not an especially hard equation to solve either. At least Jo Martin seemed to have more of a defined quality in her brief appearance.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,967 ✭✭✭ebbsy


    pixelburp wrote: »
    On reflection I think the problem with Whittaker's doctor is that if pushed, I couldn't give you a postage stamp summary of who she is as a Doctor. The others in the revival had some pretty clear arcs that linked with their personalities but Whitaker is a bit of a blank slate. Literally in fact as IIRC, some of her first season amounted to a "who am I?" question that culminated in that controversial twist last year.

    And even when the RTD era sunk into some truly asinine, brain-dead storytelling (I love Davies but his sci-fi was often pretty awful), the foundation of a strong personality in its lead elevated the sometimes crappy plots. Same with the Moffat era. Maybe even moreso give he preferred those puzzle box arcs that were all mystery.

    I wonder was this a consequence of it being the first female doctor? That there was a nervousness, that a female Doc with an excessively outsized personality might have stirred the pot more than the casting already managed. So then the safest approach was this White Label Doctor; all the ticks and mannerisms you'd expect but absolutely none of the flavour we would see with a Baker or Smith iteration.

    I suppose that does come back to Chibnall holding the bag but it's not an especially hard equation to solve either. At least Jo Martin seemed to have more of a defined quality in her brief appearance.

    Bit in bold hits the nail on the head.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,728 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Wonder would we have gotten more out of her as The Doctor if Moffat was still the showrunner. But previous poster was right when he said RTD had some absolute stinkers of episodes.

    Ive often rewatched a lot of the RTD and Moffat era episodes, but I just dont see myself rewatching anything from the new Doctor. Which is a pity, its such wasted potential. But maybe im biased as im also miffed they wrecked Gallifrey again and fcuked with the origin story.

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,086 ✭✭✭✭Busi_Girl08


    Wonder would we have gotten more out of her as The Doctor if Moffat was still the showrunner. But previous poster was right when he said RTD had some absolute stinkers of episodes.

    Ive often rewatched a lot of the RTD and Moffat era episodes, but I just dont see myself rewatching anything from the new Doctor. Which is a pity, its such wasted potential. But maybe im biased as im also miffed they wrecked Gallifrey again and fcuked with the origin story.

    Whoever takes over as showrunner will have a hell of a job to fix that retcon. At this stage are they better off taking a break a few years and coming back a-new, doctor newly regenerated and let's never speak of all of that again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,728 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Whoever takes over as showrunner will have a hell of a job to fix that retcon. At this stage are they better off taking a break a few years and coming back a-new, doctor newly regenerated and let's never speak of all of that again.

    Or the twelfth Doctor wakes up.
    *screams*

    "OH dear god, I just had the horrifying nightmare"

    Sorted.

    LOL.

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 731 ✭✭✭jimbob_jones


    Or the twelfth Doctor wakes up.
    *screams*

    "OH dear god, I just had the horrifying nightmare"

    Sorted.

    LOL.

    I have only recently caught up with the last series and I was left wondering at the end. Would the Timeless Child twist have worked if it turned out to be The Master rather than The Doctor ?

    The Master repressing the memories of all the years that they were expirimented on, on the face of it did seem that the scientist was killing them over and over again to get the secret of regeneration.

    Again a new show runner can hand waive it and say The Master was lying, or lied to by the Matrix or they can run with it and see where it goes.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Hey, we're all talking about a show with time-travel at its core, and one of the most porous and thinly sketched canon in pop culture. If the Timeless Child becomes that unpopular or unwieldy it'll be quickly rewritten out of the show's canon.

    Let's not forget this immortal line, now happily ignored since 1996. And that's not even the tip of the iceberg when it comes to "canon".
    "I'm half human... On my mothers side."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 731 ✭✭✭jimbob_jones


    pixelburp wrote: »
    Hey, we're all talking about a show with time-travel at its core, and one of the most porous and thinly sketched canon in pop culture. If the Timeless Child becomes that unpopular or unwieldy it'll be quickly rewritten out of the show's canon.

    Let's not forget this immortal line, now happily ignored since 1996. And that's not even the tip of the iceberg when it comes to "canon".

    Yep that is a very good point pixelburp.

    I forgot about that line.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,364 ✭✭✭campo


    Unless like Loki the timeless child aka the Dr is also River Song, She is half human on her mothers side and as was conceived in the Tardis could be timeless child yes it would mean some timey wimey wibbly wobbly but not impossible.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Hey, I'd never rule it out. Dr. Who being what it is, in 10 years time the "canon" will look completely different. There's a YT channel I subscribe to, and the author publishes a series of videos listing all the ludicrous, crazy things that are apparently "canon" in the show (Boris Johnson is an auton!).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,034 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    Fully human, no? Parents: Amy and Rory. Unless that whole "conceived within the timestream" thing was a cover story for the Doctor secretly banging Amy which seems the most likely explanation in the cynical normal universe but not quite Doctor Who :)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,364 ✭✭✭campo


    Well is she full human if she can regenerate, maybe half human and mothers and father side and the other half from time stream or something like that , but thinking back it never made sense that she could regenerate just because she was conceived in tardis.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I liked how the new series emphasised this idea that time travel didn't just cause a change in mentality, but physically as well; the Artron energy seeping into people. In fact IIRC, the old 8th Doctor range of books had a character who was, literally, a walking TARDIS. Was part of some large, rambling arc (as those books often had) featuring a divergent Doctor, corrupted during the 3rd regeneration by that eventual divergent 8th incarnation. Surprised the new series never played with that idea...



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    FYI: the VR game The Edge of Time is making its way to Consoles as a non-VR version title Edge of Reality. "Reality" doesn't have much of a trailer, but there's a greater sense of the game from the trailer for the VR game...




  • Registered Users Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Yeah was mentioned in the specific Season thread; bummed out about Whittaker leaving, her scripts never really gave her much of a chance to shine TBH.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,863 ✭✭✭dball




  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    That's all fine and dandy, but I think the BBC see Doc as too much of a cash cow to risk tampering with - or indeed, going on a hiatus. With Top Gear gone it's arguably the station's biggest global brand and while the show isn't near a viral hit as that David Tenant heyday - it's big enough that the executives wouldn't touch it too much.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,034 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    "Consciously aped Buffy"? Okay there was a blonde girl hanging around with a guy who looked human but wasn't and was more than a century old but that's kind of it really.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,881 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Holy shít a thousand times yes. Is he serious? I guess so if he's name dropping his agency. That'd be amazing, even if a non Brit in charge would probably be a no-no.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,881 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    He must definitely have a proposal for them.

    It's crazy thought that someone of his standing has to ask on Twitter what the structure of the BBC is when it comes to Doctor Who, I know the ownership of it is complicated and the BBC did lose ownership of it in the 80's for a bit Russell T Davies stated that when he wanted to reboot Doctor who in the 90's.


    I'm guess the tweet is also a bit of testing the waters to see what responses will be gotten from it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,670 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    I wouldn't be adverse to him taking over - he knows how to tell a story, B5 was a great show

    Are the tweets clues to the fact he already has the job - weird to put something like that out there, he surely must have connections



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I dunno, I could see the BBC being the type of station that's very insular and operated on a "who you know" basis. That's pure tongue wagging from me mind, I've no justification for that beyond feelings.

    The main problem against Straczynski is his nationality: like Bond, Who feels like a protected English/British brand the natives wouldn't like touched by a foreigner - let alone a Yank. My main worry would simply be he wouldn't be given the latitude to express his ideas. And he obviously has some if he's fishing this publicly



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,881 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    Reading his Twitter timeline over night he say straight out he is putting his hat in the ring for it and understands the nationality stuff might cause some pushback.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,881 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    A bit disappointed, Hoping what the BBC has falls through.




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,881 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    Honestly I would say yes, I am as I think the BBC need to move away from where they are now and bring in a fresh new voice to the show.


    Saying that I do like Davies and I'd he would have clout to give the show the kick in the ass it needs.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement