Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Bicycles, Phoenix Park and traffic

24567…22

Comments

  • #52
    beauf
    Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    Hurrache wrote: »
    Sorta the point though, if you're using the park as a destination you shouldn't be in a hurry to get anywhere in it.

    If you're just using it to pass through and you're diverted around the glen then you're better off not using it, and be influenced enough by the diversions just not to bother with the park and take an alternative route. The glen way is the longer diversion compared to the North Road.

    I've the park between myself and the city and it's never a route I'd use when travelling in by car anyway, found it the slowest unless I wanted to get around Heuston.

    The issue is the alternative routes are heavily congested and deliberately bottle necked. North south routes are especially bad.

    Whats your alternative for D15 to city center thats quicker than the park driving?


  • #53
    beauf
    Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    magicbastarder wrote: »
    there's a glorious irony in a vehicle whose job it is to alleviate traffic being declared a failure because there was too much traffic for it to work.

    i was kinda getting at a '39P' or similar, a variation on an existing full route, which would go via the park, rather than a dedicated feeder bus.

    I was thinking that was what you had in mind.

    They've talked about that for decades. OPW don't want it AFAIK.

    An express route from Blanch Center to end of park and back again.


  • #54
    Hurrache
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,244 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache


    beauf wrote: »
    Whats your alternative for D15 to city center thats quicker than the park driving?

    Rush hours I just don't do it by car anymore, I understand not everyone can chose not to. Weekends and evenings I just do the Navan Road and either Stoneybatter or Cabra, depending on where I'm going.

    When I used to drive I would do Blackhorse Avenue, Stoneybatter and head towards Bolton Street in order to get to Parnell Square and cross onto the southside using Matt Talbot bridge. I changed offices around the time the cross city Luas works started. First time I tried it after the works were complete having not done it in a year or two I found all my routes in the city were inaccessible due to the Luas and had to get Google maps to help me.


  • #55
    SligoBrewer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,632 ✭✭✭SligoBrewer


    beauf wrote: »
    The issue is the alternative routes are heavily congested and deliberately bottle necked. North south routes are especially bad.

    Whats your alternative for D15 to city center thats quicker than the park driving?

    Park cycling.


  • #56
    Seth Brundle
    Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,327 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    The Irish Times is now reporting on the campaign to keep through-traffic out of the park...
    Thousands seek end of through-traffic in Dublin’s Phoenix Park


  • #57
    beauf
    Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    Same with journal. Full of comments from people who don't know the area wanting to close it off. Was the same on boards the last time.


  • #58
    Stark
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,035 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    I used to live in Dublin 15, now live in Dublin 20, know the park well, use it regularly both for recreation and as a route on the bike if I'm going somewhere north side if ever possible. I fully support the call for traffic restrictions. I have driven there for convenience many times to be honest, but would happily trade in that convenience as there would be so much to be gained that the inconvenience would be worth it.


  • #59
    beauf
    Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    SligoBrewer wrote: »
    Park cycling.

    I've cycled it for years. But I couldn't do it everyday any more. Also often I'm going multiple places and the bike is not viable.


  • #60
    Mercian Pro
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,299 ✭✭✭Mercian Pro


    Stark wrote: »
    I used to live in Dublin 15, now live in Dublin 20, know the park well, use it regularly both for recreation and as a route on the bike if I'm going somewhere north side if ever possible. I fully support the call for traffic restrictions. I have driven there for convenience many times to be honest, but would happily trade that in that convenience as there would be so much to be gained that the inconvenience would be worth it.


    Thanks forthat Stark.


    Reading some of the other comments I thought I had strayed into the Cars Forum (or whatever it's called). This is the Cycling Forum where proposals to restrict motor traffic and improve the lot of cyclists should be welcomed. When I was in Bolton Street in the Middle Ages (70's), we produced a report on the Phoenix Park that recommended closing it to through traffic. There was uproar, even in the Dail, with every local TD west or NW of the Park claiming it would be the end of civilisation as we knew it. At regular interval since, the same thing has happened. As recently as last year our Taoiseach added his voice to those of other TDs and Councillors demanding that Chesterfield Avenue remain as a major commuter route. OPW's response was to kick the can down the Avenue and say that they would commission a Transport and Mobility Study. There has been no further mention of this and OPW seem to want to return a situation where cars have unrestricted access to most parts of the Park.


    For those who commute regularly by bike along Chesterfield Avenue, will the new proposal of on-road cycle lanes be an improvement over the current off-road cycle paths? I suspect for a lot of less confident non-commuting cyclists, the cycle paths would be more popular.


  • Advertisement
  • #61
    07Lapierre
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,255 ✭✭✭07Lapierre


    Unless they restrict cars, the new cycle lanes will be useless, as they’ll be blocked by parked cars. Back to square one really.


  • #62
    eeeee
    Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 6,855 Mod ✭✭✭✭eeeee


    I commute through the park in normal times, the entire length of Chesterfield Avenue.
    In normal times I use the cycle path, despite walkers, runners, and most infuriatingly bike salmon. In fairness to the peds it's quite badly designed in that if they step out of their cars on Chesterfield Avenue they think the cycle lane is the footpad, despite the non walking signs.

    Unless they ban parking the Avenue itself is pretty unpleasant. I use it when not commuting cos I'm going faster. It's serious dooring/ pulling out in front of you territory.
    If they keep the parking ban on Chesterfield Avenue it would be fine to pedal on the hard shoulder.

    I signed the petition, keep cars out of the park. It shouldn't be a through way, or a carpark.


  • #63
    beauf
    Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    Mercian Pro wrote: »
    ...
    For those who commute regularly by bike along Chesterfield Avenue, will the new proposal of on-road cycle lanes be an improvement over the current off-road cycle paths? I suspect for a lot of less confident non-commuting cyclists, the cycle paths would be more popular.

    There's a wide range of cycling speed and ability on those paths even when commuting. The problem is the paths are flooded with pedestrians in the evenings and weekends. Must be impossible at the moment.


  • #64
    beauf
    Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    eeeee wrote: »
    ...I signed the petition, keep cars out of the park. It shouldn't be a through way, or a carpark...


    There's lots of different people of all sorts of physical abilities from young and old who use the park. Most of them use a car to access the park. Lots of locals use it and stop on the way to and from other places.

    Now we want to ban them and/or make them drive into the city and then back around to access the park from the other side in usually heavy traffic.

    Banning cars will effectively block a huge amount of people from enjoying it.


  • #65
    SligoBrewer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,632 ✭✭✭SligoBrewer


    beauf wrote: »
    I've cycled it for years. But I couldn't do it everyday any more. Also often I'm going multiple places and the bike is not viable.

    I wasn't referring to you, just everyone else who uses the park for driving.


  • #66
    SligoBrewer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,632 ✭✭✭SligoBrewer


    beauf wrote: »
    There's lots of different people of all sorts of physical abilities from young and old who use the park. Most of them use a car to access the park. Lots of locals use it and stop on the way to and from other places.

    Now we want to ban them and/or make them drive into the city and then back around to access the park from the other side in usually heavy traffic.

    Banning cars will effectively block a huge amount of people from enjoying it.

    Blocking a through road isn't banning cars, nor (shamefully) stopping people from driving to it.


  • Advertisement
  • #67
    Weepsie
    Site Banned Posts: 20,686 ✭✭✭✭Weepsie


    Parking on chesterfield road should be at the very least serverly restricted.

    It's used as a free car park mon-friday for thousands of cars.

    There's nearly a 10 k stretch (5 either side) of free parking available. It's completely absurd that the park is basically just car park at the best of times


  • #68
    beauf
    Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    Mercian Pro wrote: »
    ...For those who commute regularly by bike along Chesterfield Avenue, will the new proposal of on-road cycle lanes be an improvement over the current off-road cycle paths? I suspect for a lot of less confident non-commuting cyclists, the cycle paths would be more popular...

    Most of the roads in the park do not have cycle lanes.

    Most of the roads that you use to get to the park do not have cycle lanes.

    From the Zoo to parkgate you are on the road, and out side the zoo you are on the road.

    Even on the avenue you have to use the road at the roundabouts.

    So I'm wondering how are these less confident cyclists going to get to the park and anywhere in it, if not on a road.

    Personally I prefer the paths, and I'm slow and getting in the way of all these commuter racers. But I'll use the roads where it makes more sense. Often it does.


  • #69
    beauf
    Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    SligoBrewer wrote: »
    I wasn't referring to you, just everyone else who uses the park for driving.

    I also use it for driving and cycling.


  • #70
    beauf
    Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    Weepsie wrote: »
    Parking on chesterfield road should be at the very least serverly restricted.

    It's used as a free car park mon-friday for thousands of cars.

    There's nearly a 10 k stretch (5 either side) of free parking available. It's completely absurd that the park is basically just car park at the best of times

    Some exaggeration. The parking really is only around the zoo and about half way to the Áras at worst. Some of those are going to the zoo. Ave is 8k. Cars do not park from parkgate to the phoenix roundabout on both sides. That would only be 8k.

    I'm not saying that's desirable. But it never caused me a problem. But the the cycle lanes are very poorly designed. I do like using them though.


  • #71
    beauf
    Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    SligoBrewer wrote: »
    Blocking a through road isn't banning cars, nor (shamefully) stopping people from driving to it.

    "keep cars out of the park"

    Seems pretty clearcut.

    I'm all for better cycle facilities. And I know that if you remove roads the traffic can disperse. But it's generally in places where there's good alternatives like public transport etc.

    They can always trial it for 6 months and see if it works out.


  • Advertisement
  • #72
    beauf
    Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    More in the journal

    Traffic through Phoenix Park 'unlikely to change' as main avenue to remain for essential workers https://jrnl.ie/5099649


  • #73
    Hurrache
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,244 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache


    beauf wrote: »
    "keep cars out of the park"

    Seems pretty clearcut.

    I'm all for better cycle facilities. And I know that if you remove roads the traffic can disperse. But it's generally in places where there's good alternatives like public transport etc.

    They can always trial it for 6 months and see if it works out.


    Cars aren't currently kept out of the park. It's a restriction on them.


  • #74
    beauf
    Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    Hurrache wrote: »
    Cars aren't currently kept out of the park. It's a restriction on them.

    We know.


  • #75
    eeeee
    Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 6,855 Mod ✭✭✭✭eeeee


    beauf wrote: »

    I'm not saying that's desirable. But it never caused me a problem. But the the cycle lanes are very poorly designed. I do like using them though.

    It definitely has me.
    To stay out if the dooring zone on Chesterfield Avenue, you have to cycle well out. The cycle lanes are full of people, and in my experience the cars behind me aren't best pleased sitting behind me.
    I've lost count of the amount of cars that suddenly pull out in front of me along there, as well as cars that pass me out then suddenly pull in in front of me when they see a spot.
    The only bit of Chesterfield Avenue that doesn't have cars parked either side is the middle on my commute, there are lots parked both sides at the castleknock end too.
    The lack of cars there are the moment (I had to go into the office 1 day during the lockdown) made it way, way, way better and nicer to pedal through. It's not even vaguely comparable.
    The park is a destination not a through way or a carpark. I have yet to hear one single convincing argument for allowing it to become both again.


  • #76
    Stark
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,035 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    I also don't understand why there isn't a 30km/hr speed limit throughout the Park.


  • #77
    beauf
    Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    eeeee wrote: »
    ... there are lots parked both sides at the castleknock end too.
    ....
    The park is a destination not a through way or a carpark. I have yet to hear one single convincing argument for allowing it to become both again.

    People parking at the Castleknock end are using the park. Not commuting. So we ARE talking about not letting ANY cars into the park not just banning through journeys but also those using the park.


  • #78
    beauf
    Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    eeeee wrote: »
    ... The cycle lanes are full of people, and in my experience the cars behind me aren't best pleased sitting behind me.
    I've lost count of the amount of cars that suddenly pull out in front of me along there, as well as cars that pass me out then suddenly pull in in front of me when they see a spot.
    ....

    Maybe they should ban people not cycling as well.

    Cars looking for parking and doing a left hook pulling in can't be going that fast. I wouldn't be advocating using the road the whole way unless you are moving fairly fast. If you are not the cycle lane would be a better place to be.

    I only find the cycle lanes too busy with walkers in the evening on fine days or the weekend. Unless it's got significantly worst in the post year since I last did it.


  • #79
    KevRossi
    Registered Users Posts: 4,487 ✭✭✭KevRossi


    beauf wrote: »
    People parking at the Castleknock end are using the park. Not commuting. So we ARE talking about not letting ANY cars into the park not just banning through journeys but also those using the park.

    Sorry, but a lot of them are commuting. Park the car near the entrance so the traffic jam on the way out is shorter. Cycle in from there. I know this from experience.

    Can't blame them as it saves on parking charges in town and beats a lot of the commuting time.


  • #80
    Dr_Colossus
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,162 ✭✭✭Dr_Colossus


    KevRossi wrote: »
    Sorry, but a lot of them are commuting. Park the car near the entrance so the traffic jam on the way out is shorter. Cycle in from there. I know this from experience.

    Can't blame them as it saves on parking charges in town and beats a lot of the commuting time.

    +1, same on White's Road down by the service entrance to Farmleigh, same cars parked there daily with either a bike in the boot or on a rack that's used to commute the rest of the way.

    I wouldn't be against through traffic in the park if parking along Chesterfield avenue was removed entirely. Re-purpose the hard shoulder as a cycle lane and give priority to those cycle lanes at existing roundabouts.

    I cycle through the Phoenix Park year round normally and use the hard shoulder in the mornings when city bound as traffic/parked cars are less plus you get better speed with gravity and the prevailing wind. Use the cycle lanes coming back in the evening but they can be a disaster and dangerous on bank holidays and sunny evenings. I have used the North Road a number of times commuting home but the surface is pathetic with severe speed bumps even in the cycle lanes.


  • #81
    beauf
    Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    KevRossi wrote: »
    Sorry, but a lot of them are commuting. Park the car near the entrance so the traffic jam on the way out is shorter. Cycle in from there. I know this from experience.

    Can't blame them as it saves on parking charges in town and beats a lot of the commuting time.

    Only a handful are doing that. Also any one doing that isn't local as it would be easier to cycle from their house than do that. They also will then drive straight into the traffic immediately after the park in Castleknock or the Navan road.

    Most are people going for a jog or a walk.

    I know that from experience also.


  • Advertisement
  • #82
    beauf
    Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    Have to say cycling through the park is usually the best part of my commute. Rarely have a problem with the cars. The odd muppet at the roundabout.

    .. and headwinds out of town... real slog some days.


  • #83
    KevRossi
    Registered Users Posts: 4,487 ✭✭✭KevRossi


    Six options for a new layout for pedestrians and cyclists, laid out here in an article from early 2019.

    https://www.dublininquirer.com/2019/02/27/six-options-on-table-for-making-phoenix-park-safer-for-cyclists-and-pedestrians


  • #84
    magicbastarder
    Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,223 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    Stark wrote: »
    I also don't understand why there isn't a 30km/hr speed limit throughout the Park.
    because it wouldn't be policed.


  • #85
    Mercian Pro
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,299 ✭✭✭Mercian Pro


    magicbastarder wrote: »
    because it wouldn't be policed.

    Should be a suitable location for average speed cameras with number plate detection. The whole process could be automated like in the Port Tunnel.


  • #86
    magicbastarder
    Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,223 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    i like your thinking. unfortunately, those in charge don't.


  • #87
    eeeee
    Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 6,855 Mod ✭✭✭✭eeeee


    People must definitely park and ride at the castleknock entrance, and no where did I mention banning cars from the Phoenix park.
    What I said, and I'll say it again, is that the Phoenix park should not be used as a through way or a carpark.

    I don't see any justification for using both sides of Chesterfield Avenue as a carpark as it is at present. Pedestrians need space, and a lot like to stay in the current cycle lane. When it's sunny, or in the run up to last Christmas when the lights thing was on in the zoo the cycle lane is full of pedestrians.
    Moving the cycle lane to the hard shoulders makes more sense in terms of how people read space, and removes considerable risk from cars pulling in or out in front of you, dooring and punishment passes from cars who believe you should be on the cycle lane only.
    My experience of cycling the length of Chesterfield Avenue twice a day every day I go to work (pre covid) informs my opinion.


  • #88
    beauf
    Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    Well if you can drive through it and you can't park in it. What would you do in a car, just drive half way into it then drive right back out of it. Bit pointless.

    Both the Visitor center and Farmleigh have rear entrances. They don't need to make cars ho into the centre of the park to get to those places but they do. Typical of OPW.

    Same with Mary's hospital. You have to drive around the park to get at it, due to the one way gate. Why they can't build a wider gate to match what's there already I have no idea.

    On a busy day the Zoo car park is too small. There's overflow all around it. So instead of making it bigger they prefer to have people parking on the roads and grass in every direction.


  • #89
    beauf
    Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    eeeee wrote: »
    People must definitely park and ride at the castleknock entrance, and no where did I mention banning cars from the Phoenix park.
    ....

    Almost all the traffic is going to the quays. Block them and people won't use the park to get there.


  • #90
    Stark
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,035 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    Went for a cycle there earlier. Heavenly without the cars. Especially noticeable around some of the side roads like the S-bends near the Furry Glen which used to be a slalom course for motorists. Park is busier than I've ever seen it with people activity. Stopped off for a coffee in the Visitor centre. As busy as ever. Only difference is where the car park used to be full of cars, the place is now surrounded by dozens of bicycles. No indication that stopping car access is stopping people from making use of the Park.


  • Advertisement
  • #91
    beauf
    Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    Stark wrote: »
    ...As busy as ever. Only difference is where the car park used to be full of cars, the place is now surrounded by dozens of bicycles. No indication that stopping car access is stopping people from making use of the Park...

    Really...?

    No work no sports events, no kids matches, no shopping no DIY. No visiting people, no socialising. People have nothing else to do. All the parks are busier. It's not raining, nice weather.

    Seriously...


  • #92
    beauf
    Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    ...Going to be 20 degrees next week. Will that make more or less people use the parks....

    Will that be cause it's sunny or because they aren't working.


  • #93
    MojoMaker
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,747 ✭✭✭MojoMaker


    It's hard to follow, are you advocating for a status quo system where nothing changes and cars are allowed to resume using the park as a means to get to/from the Liffey quays and beyond, or are you advocating for a reduction in motorised traffic through the park so that it may be returned to its citizens as a public amenity, or some middle ground that's not really clear?

    In my own confusion it seems like you are lobbying for motoring traffic at the expense of pedestrian and bike traffic but I don't want to put my foot in it.


  • #94
    Weepsie
    Site Banned Posts: 20,686 ✭✭✭✭Weepsie


    beauf wrote: »

    Same with Mary's hospital. You have to drive around the park to get at it, due to the one way gate. Why they can't build a wider gate to match what's there already I have no idea.
    .

    The gates are there longer than some of the roads. They're very likely protected / listed in someway.

    I was out by 1 k on the length of chesterfield avenue, but that still leaves room for roughly 1500 cars to park, and I have been through it enough times to see every space being used.

    And thats before we start with an awful lot of the illegal parking that happens in the park and the parking on the grass.


    Convenience for privatae vehicles should always be the very last consideration given. There should not be that much public space left over for people to leave something sitting idle for up 10 hours a day (as happens during the week)


  • #95
    mvt
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 478 ✭✭mvt


    Just back from a nice spin through the park- after putting in a bit of effort during the week it was nice to stroll around.
    Took a bit of a detour home,within my five K's, to check out the new bike lane on the north quays & can only wonder what they were thinking.
    Also slightly disheartening to see a GB reg estate towing a camping trailer with a two bike rack crossing against me on the east link bridge with the wicklow mountains in the background.


  • #96
    beauf
    Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    Weepsie wrote: »
    The gates are there longer than some of the roads. They're very likely protected / listed in someway.

    I was out by 1 k on the length of chesterfield avenue, but that still leaves room for roughly 1500 cars to park, and I have been through it enough times to see every space being used.

    And thats before we start with an awful lot of the illegal parking that happens in the park and the parking on the grass.


    Convenience for privatae vehicles should always be the very last consideration given. There should not be that much public space left over for people to leave something sitting idle for up 10 hours a day (as happens during the week)

    I used to be though it at least twice a day for a good few decades and I've never seen cars park the full length except for some rare large public event like early bloom or some uncharacteristic heat wave.

    These places that people are complaining about are also where people park at the weekend. So they are not all commuters as it's being implied.


  • Advertisement
  • #97
    beauf
    Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    Convenience for privatae vehicles should always be the very last consideration given. There should not be that much public space left over for people to leave something sitting idle for up 10 hours a day (as happens during the week)

    Very simple to stop that, add they did before when they stopped people parking at the large parkgate entrance. They choose not to.


  • #98
    beauf
    Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    MojoMaker wrote: »
    It's hard to follow, are you advocating for a status quo system where nothing changes and cars are allowed to resume using the park as a means to get to/from the Liffey quays and beyond, or are you advocating for a reduction in motorised traffic through the park so that it may be returned to its citizens as a public amenity, or some middle ground that's not really clear?

    In my own confusion it seems like you are lobbying for motoring traffic at the expense of pedestrian and bike traffic but I don't want to put my foot in it.

    You're confused because people on these forums usually argue only one side and ignore anything else.

    People are only looking at it from their point of view cycling or commuting on their own in the park. That is it.

    No family outing with young and old who need transport to get to the park. No carrying a buggy and kids bike. No picnic hamper and other gear. No stopping in the way home for a walk or jog or call into a relative in Mary's. No people with a family pass for the zoo who go through it to get to the zoo regularly or pop in for short visit on the way too and from somewhere. Or just to drive an elderly person on a scenic drive around the park and sit in the car an get an ice cream. Numerous family cycling events or scouting events where you need bikes for all ages with you. Lots of things like that.

    All you get here is if someone can cycle or walk to it themselves then that's all that matters. No mention of consideration of others.

    The opw has basically ignored the needs of cyclists for decades. The cycle path was left unfinished at parkgate Street for years, I'm not even sure it's finished now. Likewise the pedestrian paths are poor and the signage abysmal. I've never seen park rangers policing the paths or even speeding. It's really an embarrassment the state it's been left in for so long.


  • #99
    beauf
    Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    KevRossi wrote: »
    Six options for a new layout for pedestrians and cyclists, laid out here in an article from early 2019.

    https://www.dublininquirer.com/2019/02/27/six-options-on-table-for-making-phoenix-park-safer-for-cyclists-and-pedestrians

    Some interesting options there. What do people think.


  • #100
    Mercian Pro
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,299 ✭✭✭Mercian Pro


    I think OPW don't really know what they want to do. That statement in the Dáil was in February of last year but by the end of the year they published this: "A core recommendation of the draft review is that OPW should commission a mobility study to consider inter-relaing issues to do with transport, traffic management, pedestrian and cycle mobility, mixed-mobility options etc. OPW is committed to advancing this recommendation in order to better understand the conflicting challenges and demands around traffic management and access in the Park."

    I have no idea whether this study was ever commissioned but nothing was published since then. Now they seem to be proposing something like option 1 or 2 but with the existing bike and footpaths given over exclusively to pedestrians. No mention any more of any provision for "leisure and inexperienced cyclists". They seem to have been ignored in the interest of social distancing.


  • #101
    KevRossi
    Registered Users Posts: 4,487 ✭✭✭KevRossi


    beauf wrote: »
    Some interesting options there. What do people think.

    I think Mon-Fri they should leave Chesterfield open to traffic, restrict parking to the Zoo and Papal Cross, make another parking if needed for commuters. It's an established commuter route/carpark and until such time as we get a decent public transport into the city it will have to stay.

    Close all other roads to traffic, except access to St Mary's via Chapelizod (make it 2-way) and OSI (via Chesterfield Ave). Mark out cycle lanes on all roads, the rest is for pedestrians.

    Sat-Sun: Close off middle of Chesterfield to through traffic, from Zoo to roundabout at Aras an Uachtarain. Close off all other roads to traffic, save for access to St Mary's / OSI. Close parking at Papal Cross. No parking on Chesterfield Ave.

    Promote markets, activities etc. through dedicated event management team. A semi permanent market stall or exhibition hall roof could be erected at Papal Cross car park for this.

    Promote cycling and walking. Get Dublin Bikes / Bleeperbike / MOBY bike share to place 500-1000 bikes in the park, for sole use in the park - this is easily managed by GPS.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement