Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

BusConnects Dublin - Bus Network Changes Discussion

1215216218220221257

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,165 ✭✭✭Citrus_8




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,336 ✭✭✭Consonata


    Fairly grim way to view homeless folk. Most folk just want somewhere warm.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 949 ✭✭✭Burt Renaults




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,755 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    The planned bus corridors won't change much on the the Swords, Clongriffen, Lucan or Bray corridors where there is already near continuous bus lane. These routes are planned to have a 3 to 5 minute bus frequency on roads that wont be very different and currently have gaps of 15 mins or more right now. 3 min frequency buses on regular roads is fantasy, the world's most frequent bus services on dedicated roads with absolute priority can just about reach that frequency.

    The Blanch QBC will be a big improvement, the south side corridors seem to have been deliberately botched, most wouldn't stand up to any design scrutiny. Why that was done is anyones guess. But I don't see how board planala can approve some of the trash that the NTA submitted.

    If we introduced enforcement we could have a significant improvement but government doesn't wanna touch that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,243 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Seems like they're finally using the one standard with this phase (whether it's a new route or not), this is my local stop now - 8 different diagrams including the peak only routes!




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,924 ✭✭✭orangerhyme




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,924 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The Rathmines and Kimmage corridors both have the potential to finally deliver meaningful journey time improvements for buses through the use of multiple bus gates, forcing private cars to take alternative routes, and on the Rathmines corridor, more bus lanes, one way bus only traffic on Rathgar Road and bus only streets such as South Richmond Street and Camden Street.

    To suggest otherwise is just being unduly negative.

    The traffic queue relocator lights on Rathgar Road already do a great job in giving buses priority and these plans have the potential to deliver far more on the Rathmines route.

    Post edited by LXFlyer on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,755 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Yes the rathgar route is good, forgot about it because its been eons since it went to planning. Kimmage is a disaster as is some of the city centre junctions on all the south sode corridors



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,924 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The Kimmage corridor at peak hour will have three bus gates - one near KCR, one just before Harold’s Cross Green and one at the northern end of Harold’s Cross Green - that will mean far less cars using it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,165 ✭✭✭Citrus_8




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,208 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    Yeah let's put more burden and responsibility on the shoulders of bus drivers I'm sure it would do wonders for the current bus driver shortage



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,717 ✭✭✭Midnight_EG


    You always have a simple solution don't you? Do you expect drivers to be Guards too? I'll start spot-checking every passenger that gets on just because you reckon I need to, then I'll point them all to you when the complaints come eh? Or how about we just let people get about their business (that's none of ours to stick our nose into) and everybody except you is happy :)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,208 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    Also forgot to mention I wonder will DBs DL break room in the DART station be making comeback for the introduction of the L25. I believe it was being used for toilets for 46a drivers before the DL locals went to GAI.



  • Registered Users Posts: 165 ✭✭DUBLINBUSGUY


    Yes it is most if not all L25 duties are breaking in DL.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,165 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    Here you go, we came to the conclusion that we need a public transport police and drivers should be very loud about this.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,986 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Eh, the southern end of the Swords Road / Drumcondra road already has buses at three minutes frequency or less (obviously multiple routes overlapping) and it works fine. 3 minutes isn't anything special.

    Don't get me wrong, it can definitely be improved. I think one of the biggest issues I see with this frequency is dwell times. Often you can have a second bus waiting to get into a stop.

    The rear door use has already helped, but I think new ticket machines/validators that were much faster would help a lot, along with getting rid of cash fares and the short fare (or make it tag off).

    People really have to stop and wait at the right hand validator. With much faster validators I've seen abroad people don't even have to break their stride. I think you could easily reduce dwell times by 25%, but maybe as much as 50%, which would certainly help with bunching of buses at stops.

    I agree completely on camera enforcement. It would be a game changer IMO.

    As for some ones earlier comment, I think BusConnects is already considered a success. The 24/7 and orbital buses are already massively popular as is the €2 90 minute fare, young persons fare, etc. Passengers numbers up 10% on 2019 shows it is already a success and there is a big appetite for more and better services.

    Of course that isn't to say that it will be enough and that it won't finish up already being jammed and overcapacity like when the Luas opened and needing more work. But at least we will have a real network then.

    While there will be more bus enhancements needed post BusConnects, the real focus then will be on Metrolink, Dart+ and possible future Luas lines. I don't think there will be much more we can squeeze out of Buses post BusConnects, sure some BRT and Triaxles, but we would be getting to the limits of our city streets.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,243 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Went down to blackrock yesterday on the 17 as a last hurrah, seems all the signage for the S6 is in place around there now.

    Interesting to note the 84a deviation correctly shown on the diagram, yet the timetable shown is still the full 84/a timetable. I get they're keeping the same timetables for non-bus connects routes, but the stops for these variations really should only show the times for the variation!

    Also there's no diagrams shown if there's a lot of routes serving the same stop, which makes sense as it would be a lot of information to try convey in the one space.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,924 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    That’s where they need two panels.

    Maps & route diagrams are really important - local street maps should be added as well like in London.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,243 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Yes, two panels would be ideal.



  • Registered Users Posts: 77 ✭✭BusGuy


    Just saw today that stop 2819's timetable has changed, due to the fact that the S4 will be coming, making GAI to be the first to be coming there. Also, seems like the 44 will be the only route that will be coming to Business Park unless anything changes.


    EDIT: 44D looks like it to be coming there as well, but the 17 timetable at 3011 and 3012 still is there, yet 2 days away from the launch.


    EDIT: 2896 needs at least a small timetable if possible. 2897 has a big shelter, but the NTA needs to consider a new shelter. I know the footpath is a bit small. Also, the stop logo is not even CHANGED at 2896. I sent an e-mail to the NTA about the shelters, and they said they have no plans to replace 2896 as a shelter, even though their plan is to make all stops into shelters (probably).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,924 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,542 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    The IADT students in Dún Laoghaire have voiced their concerns about the loss of the 75 outside the campus to the Irish Independent today. I was reading the article on my phone earlier this evening.

    One student had told the paper that she will now have to get three buses each way between her home and the college every day from this Sunday.

    I'm assuming in the article that it's a combination of the 46a, either the S6/S8 and the 15.

    She also said that the changes to the bus service taking place in that part of Dublin from Sunday will allow her to drive a car in the near future.

    The NTA had gave out statements in the article that the new routes would be more frequent than the older orbital routes. They said the S8 will be every 20 minutes at weekdays and the 46a will be every 8 minutes at weekday.

    Is that weekday frequency for the 46a during the peak times or is that all day?




  • Registered Users Posts: 77 ✭✭BusGuy


    It can't be weekday frequency surely not, peak time services make the most sense to me.



  • Registered Users Posts: 77 ✭✭BusGuy


    When are the routes 87 and 88 coming in? Phase 7 or 8? I'm starting to figure out it's not going to be it for another while.



  • Registered Users Posts: 399 ✭✭Ireland trains


    46a frequency is 8min throughout the day (on paper).



  • Registered Users Posts: 165 ✭✭DUBLINBUSGUY




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,208 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    There used to be network maps at most stops pre Network Direct



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,243 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Well this comes as a surprise, Google Maps has the new routes loaded in before they start!

    W4 and W61/62 also now appear. Times still seem to only show as scheduled, however.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,899 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    On the above, this journey takes 3 times as long on the bus as by car. Perhaps it is an improvement, but that is not good ratio still.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,542 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    Just using Google Maps on my phone. Some very odd behaviour happening here on the Android app for me.

    When I look up the real time info for the L25 route on this app; the 2 bus stops at Annaville Terrace in Newtownpark Avenue don't have the L25 data added into those stops at all. It still just has the info for the 7b & 7d routes only. The new bus stop marking on Benamore Road also doesn't have any data for any bus routes. But most of the other stops have added the new route into them without any problem whatsoever.

    Is Dublin Bus going to allow the L25 to stop at Annaville Terrace or is it just going to skip it altogether?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 630 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    Still useless without the live times. Can't understand why they can't fix that, and yet they're adding new route maps. Someone in Google who lives in an apartment next door to Google!..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,924 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Presumably the car is using the M50.

    Orbital buses will never compete with cars in terms of journey times for every trip - that’s impossible.

    Take a trip though from the same stop to Rathfarnham Church at the same time, and the car shows 20 mins and the bus 22 mins.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,924 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,924 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Clearly they are finally updating Google Maps to use the correct API files.

    I would imagine that the live data will follow on from this.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,986 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    I hope they do, but I don’t think this is any indication of them switching to the new API.

    It is likely the NTA added the new routes to the data, both to the old and new API and thus the new routes show up on Google maps automatically. When new routes are added, Google etc. don’t do anything manually, it just shows up.

    On the other hand switching to the new API would require a developer to do some work to configure it and integrate it into Google Maps. Not hard to do, but I’d assume their teams are handling requests like this from all over the world.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,924 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The API feed from the NTA changed last April.

    Google Maps never switched it at the time, so has been showing the routes and timetables as they were last April ever since which has meant that with all the changes ever since it has been woefully incorrect.

    None of the numerous changes under Connecting Ireland were featured on Google Maps as a result, nor any of the Dublin City bus timetable changes and new routes.

    Before writing that post I went and spot checked running times against BusTimes for routes that I knew had revised running times, and I also spot checked the revised Bus Éireann routes and times, and some of the new Local Link routes.

    Based on those checks, I can say that they are now using the new API feed as all of the old data is gone and the new routes and timetables that have come on stream since April are now on Google Maps.

    I imagine that there is more work required to bring the live data on stream.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 259 ✭✭DaBluBoi


    Yeah I can finally see the W4 and W61/62 on Google Maps, which is a positive. I do note that when you click on the new routes, it seems to load every stop endlessly, as if they didn’t code in the termini correctly



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,243 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    As far as I'm aware, the up to date static data API feed (where all the stops, scheduled trips, etc. are pulled from) only works with the new version of the API, so if they are using it, they must have switched off the realtime info on their own end.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,899 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    My point is that there should be buses on the M50 at some times of the day at least, to remove these big differences in travel time.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 77 ✭✭BusGuy


    Big news: Stop 2896 just got a timetable diagram! Haven't visited it yet, but I HOPE it impresses me! Also, saw on Google Maps that 44D won't be stopping at most of the stops that the 44 stops at?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,980 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Looks like another bus set on fire tonight in town.

    Hopefully this behaviour ends quickly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,844 ✭✭✭rx8


    Yep, it was parked on Parnell Square west. Cops got them as far as I know.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,980 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Thanks.

    Why arent they (or parents) made to pay for the damage. I just dont get it.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 35,100 Mod ✭✭✭✭AlmightyCushion


    You want people's actions to have consequences?!?! We don't really do that type of thing here



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,980 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,208 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    Surely they shouldn't be lying buses over in the city centre unattended given the current climate



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,208 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    Fact of the matter a bus service on the M50 is not serving any bus stops so its not really that efficient especially if the bus has to leave the M50 to serve a bus stop/s then return to the M50.

    W4 already uses the M50 between Liffey Valley and Blanch as did the 76a and the proposed N8 will be using it from Blanch to the Airport. The other issue is the M50 is a carpark for the peak hours so time savings will likely be minimal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,542 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    Those groups of scumbags who are setting buses on fire on the streets of Dublin really are a new level of filth.

    Dublin Bus should make those responsible to pay for the damages to their fleet out of the scumbags (or scumbag parents) dole payments to really make them learn a hard lesson.



  • Registered Users Posts: 630 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    Yes cause that will make them feel less marginalised and more supportive of social cohesion.

    In any case, this is not a thread for such a social discussion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,542 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    The first L25 bus from Dún Laoghaire is using an SG this morning.

    The first S8 to Citywest is also using an SG as well.

    Both buses are in the green/yellow NTA livery.

    The route display for the L25 has Dúndrum written in English and Irish.

    However no 'via XXXXXX' sign is included underneath it.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement