Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Calls for State to build Mosque in Roscommon

135

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,510 ✭✭✭runawaybishop


    I know people from the area. They've been trying to donate things and help in any way they can. The locals are determined to help. But if there are people with reservations I'm sure they are not curtain twitchers or racist either. Most of the reservations involve the financial side and the lack of consultation.

    It helps that the hotel is trying to find staff exclusively from the area.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,633 ✭✭✭✭Widdershins


    It helps that the hotel is trying to find staff exclusively from the area.

    That seems like a good idea.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,320 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    That seems like a good idea.

    To be fair, that probably includes the counties around it :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,510 ✭✭✭runawaybishop


    Grayson wrote: »
    To be fair, that probably includes the counties around it :)

    Just the town itself is what i heard. Trying to alleviate any bad feelings from the locals who hoped the hotel would reopen and provide jobs.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,295 ✭✭✭Lt Dan


    Grayson wrote: »
    Thanks for fisking. It makes the post so much harder to reply to without fisking.

    96% of national schools in Ireland are under religious patronage. 90% are under catholic patronage. In these schools children are taught catholic dogma and doctrine. They are prepared for their first communion and confirmations during class time.


    Education , in Ireland is legally defined to include religious education. Most parents are clearly content with their children receiving religious education during their class time and in preparation for their sacraments. Ruairi Quinn sought to change things. Parents told him to jog on. Enlighten us, what is contained in Catholic Dogma education in Ireland in 2017 ?
    Grayson wrote: »
    These schools can refuse anyone who isn't catholic on the grounds that they're not catholic.

    Nor do they. They will cater,first to families who sent older kids to the schools . Fair enough.

    Grayson wrote: »
    They force non Catholics to sit in, but not participate in catholic lessons.

    Lies. No one is forced to sit in. They are free to leave the class.
    Grayson wrote: »
    And they are all state funded. The state will build and staff a catholic school for free. The state has spent billions doing this over the years.

    Schools built on Church land

    Why did Quinn's pet project fail again?

    Since 1970's how many brand new schools have the State built that are "Catholic Schools"?

    State have also funded Church of Ireland Patronized schools, even a Muslim and Jewish school in Dublin

    Grayson wrote: »
    The nuts thing is that in any discussion about the state funding of catholic education the argument is normally Catholics who are for it and atheists against it. There's no-one who actually denies it exists. Except you.

    Riuiri Quinn tried to change things. Parents said no. I made no comment about the argument being about Catholics for it and atheists against it. You did. I just said that Quinn's proposals were rejected
    Grayson wrote: »
    The vast majority of people against abortion in this country are Catholics.

    The vast majority of this country were baptized Catholic.

    I oppose abortion bar the grounds set out in the Constitution. I accept that abortion should be extended to other grounds. I am not a practicing Catholic and religious beliefs do not form part of my opposition to abortion on other all grounds.
    Grayson wrote: »
    Look at any pro life groups in this country and you'll find that the vast majority are catholic organisations or run by staunch Catholics.

    Vast majority of Pro Abortion supporters are ALSO Catholic. Obviously, not "Staunch" Catholics

    Italy is primarily Catholic, abortion is legal. Some 88 per cent of the population belonging to the Roman Catholic church

    Catholicism is the largest groups in Spain, with about 66% of the population claiming that they are Catholics - that is not saying that they pay any heed to the Church. Abortion laws are way more liberal in Spain than they are in Ireland.

    59 % of Austrians claim to be Catholic. They have abortion

    France, the biggest enemy of any notion of State religion and we saw what happened in the Paris Riots in the 1960's claim about 61 % Catholic and they definitely have abortion



    Grayson wrote: »
    An individual who is pro life isn't necessarily catholic but to deny any link between Ireland's anti abortion stance and the catholic church is stupid.

    What is even more stupid, dumb, disingenuous even , is to invent an argument that anyone has tried to deny that there is a link between anti abortion and the Irish Roman Catholic Church.

    Grayson wrote: »
    BTW, the state don't build churches but they do fund their renovation. A church can be designated a historic building and then the state pays for the refurbishments.

    They make good tourist attractions. Lord knows why
    Grayson wrote: »
    The catholic church complained abut this. Not because they didn't want the free money but because they weren't allowed upgrade or change the layouts of the buildings. Apparently planning authorities will only allow renovations on buildings if it restores them, not changes them.

    Hey, even they want to move with the times :D :P
    Grayson wrote: »
    As for Islam being the enemy of the west? You don't actually know any Muslims do you.

    A hell of a lot more than you and more than what you think! Deal with them 5 days a week!

    Grayson wrote: »
    They'd laugh at you.

    Beats getting head chopped off so.
    Grayson wrote: »
    They're just people getting on with their lives. They're not part of some secret conspiracy to invade Ireland. When I hear people say that they're the enemy of the west I think of the Jewish conspiracy.

    The Jews never claimed publicly to seek to attack the West. Hell, they wanted to be part of the West


    On the other hand, how many more Christian killings, (in fairness, they prefer to kill their own) suicide bombings etc do you need to witness?

    Grayson wrote: »
    How they were working to destroy christian Europe. You can see how accurate that was and how that turned out.

    Perhaps ask the French, German, Swedes, London.........
    Grayson wrote: »
    But this isn't really the thread for that discussion. there's loads of threads about that so feel free to go there and have a rant. Or even go and hop onto the BNP or Britain first homepages. Maybe even join these guys, http://www.sundayworld.com/news/crimedesk/anti-islam-group-patrolling-dublin

    You haven't a clue as to whom is coming into Ireland. Neither do those idiots! Suffice to say, bar a tiny but dangerous element that need watching, (and they are, by State Forces) we have been lucky. Fortunately, it should stay that way. Would not want to turn into dumps in England where the Islamic Fundamentals do not even bother hiding their attitudes anymore


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 475 ✭✭jimmy blevins


    Maybe we could compromise as we've got plenty of church's with empty seats, why not prioritise giving Christians asylum.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,204 ✭✭✭fiachr_a


    Maybe we could compromise as we've got plenty of church's with empty seats, why not prioritise giving Christians asylum.

    Too sensible.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,839 ✭✭✭Jelle1880


    Maybe we could compromise as we've got plenty of church's with empty seats, why not prioritise giving Christians asylum.

    But are they the right type of Christians ? :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,330 ✭✭✭readytosnap


    Lt Dan wrote: »
    sheep shearing ;)
    Around here they wont share their sheep with anyone.
    Nekarsulm wrote: »
    Thankfully, in Roscommon, people seem to be fairly " on message" and determined not to be seen as introverted curtain twitchers, with racist undertones.
    But that is what they are?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,028 ✭✭✭✭SEPT 23 1989


    Maybe we could compromise as we've got plenty of church's with empty seats, why not prioritise giving Christians asylum.

    They should always have been the priority in the western civilisation but the powers that be stood back and let them be slaughtered


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,305 ✭✭✭✭the_syco


    Can we knock down a few churches, for equality purposes?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,722 ✭✭✭nice_guy80


    put up a weather vane showing which way is south east

    job done


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,946 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Lt Dan wrote: »
    GAA Clubs are de facto Community Centers in many rural Irish towns . Why do you feel the need to snigger?

    Maybe because of their hypocritical views.

    Certain foreign sports good, certain foreign sports bad.

    Meant to promote Irish music, opportunity to cash in with foreign music in their stadia, no bother.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,320 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    Lt Dan wrote: »
    Education , in Ireland is legally defined to include religious education. Most parents are clearly content with their children receiving religious education during their class time and in preparation for their sacraments. Ruairi Quinn sought to change things. Parents told him to jog on. Enlighten us, what is contained in Catholic Dogma education in Ireland in 2017 ?



    Nor do they. They will cater,first to families who sent older kids to the schools . Fair enough.




    Lies. No one is forced to sit in. They are free to leave the class.



    Schools built on Church land

    Why did Quinn's pet project fail again?

    Since 1970's how many brand new schools have the State built that are "Catholic Schools"?

    State have also funded Church of Ireland Patronized schools, even a Muslim and Jewish school in Dublin




    Riuiri Quinn tried to change things. Parents said no. I made no comment about the argument being about Catholics for it and atheists against it. You did. I just said that Quinn's proposals were rejected



    The vast majority of this country were baptized Catholic.

    I oppose abortion bar the grounds set out in the Constitution. I accept that abortion should be extended to other grounds. I am not a practicing Catholic and religious beliefs do not form part of my opposition to abortion on other all grounds.



    Vast majority of Pro Abortion supporters are ALSO Catholic. Obviously, not "Staunch" Catholics

    Italy is primarily Catholic, abortion is legal. Some 88 per cent of the population belonging to the Roman Catholic church

    Catholicism is the largest groups in Spain, with about 66% of the population claiming that they are Catholics - that is not saying that they pay any heed to the Church. Abortion laws are way more liberal in Spain than they are in Ireland.

    59 % of Austrians claim to be Catholic. They have abortion

    France, the biggest enemy of any notion of State religion and we saw what happened in the Paris Riots in the 1960's claim about 61 % Catholic and they definitely have abortion






    What is even more stupid, dumb, disingenuous even , is to invent an argument that anyone has tried to deny that there is a link between anti abortion and the Irish Roman Catholic Church.




    They make good tourist attractions. Lord knows why



    Hey, even they want to move with the times :D :P



    A hell of a lot more than you and more than what you think! Deal with them 5 days a week!




    Beats getting head chopped off so.



    The Jews never claimed publicly to seek to attack the West. Hell, they wanted to be part of the West


    On the other hand, how many more Christian killings, (in fairness, they prefer to kill their own) suicide bombings etc do you need to witness?




    Perhaps ask the French, German, Swedes, London.........



    You haven't a clue as to whom is coming into Ireland. Neither do those idiots! Suffice to say, bar a tiny but dangerous element that need watching, (and they are, by State Forces) we have been lucky. Fortunately, it should stay that way. Would not want to turn into dumps in England where the Islamic Fundamentals do not even bother hiding their attitudes anymore

    Do you really have to reply to every single sentance one at a time. Is it an attempt at trolling?

    I said I'm not going to reply to your rants about islam and said this isn't the place for it. Obviously you can't let it go. I'm not going to continue to discuss that with you and drive the thread off topic. There's loads of other places where you can post your hatred.


    Back on topic(ish)...

    You said that I'd struggle to find a school that taught catholic dogma or doctrine. 90% of national schools do. That's nearly all of them.

    In your most recent reply you said "Lies. No one is forced to sit in. They are free to leave the class. ".
    Did you even bother reading the link I supplied where parents describe how their non catholic children have to sit through religion classes in national schools. I supplied a link that backs up my point and you decide to call me a liar.
    It doesn't matter if parents want catholic schools, the fact is that the catholic schools exist. They do teach catholic dogma and they are paid for by the state.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,503 ✭✭✭✭MEGA BRO WOLF 5000


    "Pakistanis came there 15 years ago to work in a local halal slaughterhouse, which has since closed, he said."


    Well it's time to go home then isn't it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,166 ✭✭✭Beyondgone


    They'll build a mosque in Roscommon eventually. Might as well do it now and appear willing as opposed to building it later and appearing forced. The Muslim population is increasing. Mosques are inevitable. The state will acquiesce in fear of appearing "racist". Build it. They will eventually anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,320 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    They should always have been the priority in the western civilisation but the powers that be stood back and let them be slaughtered

    Millions of arabs of all creeds have been slaughtered. Refusing to save someone because of their religion is stupid. Can you imagine if we prioritised anything else like that?
    Imagine if there are homeless Christians, Atheists, Buddhists and Muslims on the streets of Dublin but we only help the Christians? We leave the rest on the streets?

    Our priority should be people who need help. Sure we can prioritise amongst them. People who need medical help, children etc. But not by race, ethnicity or religion.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,349 ✭✭✭Jimmy Garlic


    Grayson wrote: »
    Millions of arabs of all creeds have been slaughtered. Refusing to save someone because of their religion is stupid. Can you imagine if we prioritised anything else like that?
    Imagine if there are homeless Christians, Atheists, Buddhists and Muslims on the streets of Dublin but we only help the Christians? We leave the rest on the streets?

    Our priority should be people who need help. Sure we can prioritise amongst them. People who need medical help, children etc. But not by race, ethnicity or religion.

    Whats better, helping a relative handful of mostly 16-40 year old men of questionable origin here by giving them a free life at great cost per head, or helping many more people who we know for sure are genuine refugees in Lebanon for example? Instead of squandering vast sums of money on chancers who were squatting and causing trouble in Calais the money would be much better spent on those who we know for sure are genuine. Oh and btw once upon a time refugees sought refuge until it was safe to go home.. When did that change to ''resettlement'', do you know?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,320 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    Whats better, helping a relative handful of mostly 16-40 year old men of questionable origin here by giving them a free life at great cost per head, or helping many more people who we know for sure are genuine refugees in Lebanon for example? Instead of squandering vast sums of money on chancers who were squatting and causing trouble in Calais the money would be much better spent on those who we know for sure are genuine. Oh and btw once upon a time refugees sought refuge until it was safe to go home.. When did that change to ''resettlement'', do you know?

    That's a different issue though. It's not should be discriminate who we help based on religion. It's how do we get the most value for money or how do we help the most people. And that's a valid discussion.

    Also, half of the initial group of 80 refugees arriving are children.

    Resettlement makes sense since there are occasions where a refugee can't go home. Syria could last for another decade. Even if it doesn't the country may not be in any state to move back to, especially for families. You can't house millions in tent cities until then.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,493 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    SILVAMAN wrote: »
    This isn't some Islamic dominated dump, rooted in the Middle Ages, which funds mosques, or any other type of religious building.
    Yeah, this is a Roman Catholic dominated dump, barely 25 years from the Middle Ages, which funds church car parks, parish halls and religious schools and hospitals.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,349 ✭✭✭Jimmy Garlic


    Grayson wrote: »
    Resettlement makes sense since there are occasions where a refugee can't go home. Syria could last for another decade. Even if it doesn't the country may not be in any state to move back to, especially for families. You can't house millions in tent cities until then.

    Most of urban Syria is now out of the hands of the head hunters, the place will have to be rebuilt. Plenty of work to be done rebuilding the place. You think millions should be imported into Europe. How many million?... and where is all the cash to maintain millions of people going to come from? Last time I checked Ireland didn't have any hand act or part in what's going on in Syria and Libya etc. Don't see why we should have to cough up to import people into Ireland at a cost of a couple of hundred thousand quid per person per year. I would like to see that money used to help people rebuild their lives in their home countries. Importing millions of people is unbridled insanity.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,203 ✭✭✭Jack the Stripper


    Riding is at an all time low in Roscommon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,320 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    Most of urban Syria is now out of the hands of the head hunters, the place will have to be rebuilt. Plenty of work to be done rebuilding the place. You think millions should be imported into Europe. How many million?... and where is all the cash to maintain millions of people going to come from? Last time I checked Ireland didn't have any hand act or part in what's going on in Syria and Libya etc. Don't see why we should have to cough up to import people into Ireland at a cost of a couple of hundred thousand quid per person per year. I would like to see that money used to help people rebuild their lives in their home countries. Importing millions of people is unbridled insanity.

    I never said specifically Europe. You're saying that. Although I do think Europe has the capability to take many in.

    The question is do these people need help, can we help them and how do we do it best.

    And I've never thought "Am I personally responsible" before helping someone. That's a nasty way to live life. Did I cause that tsunami? nah, fcuk em.

    You did say you'd like to see money spent on rebuilding their country. I'd love that too. It's just not possible at the moment and might not be for a long time. To be fair, I doubt very many of the millions who have been displaced internally, or externally, wanted to do so. Most of them would move home if they knew it was safe to.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,633 ✭✭✭✭Widdershins


    Victor wrote: »
    Yeah, this is a Roman Catholic dominated dump, barely 25 years from the Middle Ages, which funds church car parks, parish halls and religious schools and hospitals.

    The nice thing is anyone who dislikes it can choose one of the non denominational options, or work out an alternative for religion class for their child ( which might indeed involve remaining on their chair, which some would call ''sitting through'' it), you can be treated by a secular medic, or if you think it's such a ''dump'' you can even...Leave? :)


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,295 ✭✭✭Lt Dan


    Zebra3 wrote: »
    Maybe because of their hypocritical views.

    Certain foreign sports good, certain foreign sports bad.

    Meant to promote Irish music, opportunity to cash in with foreign music in their stadia, no bother.

    What utter rubbish

    They removed the ban on members playing foreign sport in 1971. Why? It failed miserably. Some very prominent GAA players were known to play socccer and or Rugby. Get over it!

    The last remaining issue was the playing of Garrison games in GAA grounds. Rather understandable that the GAA sought to protect their own interests and let the professional sports groups look after their own problems. Not like Dublin Soccer clubs wanted to share grounds with other clubs anyway. (Nor could they as there is a strong scumbag element within set of supporters of certain clubs. They must be on first name terms with the Gardaí Response Unit by now)

    If it were not for Croke Park, Irish Soccer fans and Irish Rugby fans might have had to go to England to watch their "home" games while Landsdowne was being built. If Ireland gets this Rugby World Cup , some of the games shall be played in GAA grounds!

    GAA have acted to suit and protect the interests of the GAA, like any proper organisation would. So, unless you have an alternative understanding as to the word "hypocritical" that no one has every heard, you are waffling.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,295 ✭✭✭Lt Dan


    Grayson wrote: »
    Do you really have to reply to every single sentance one at a time. Is it an attempt at trolling?

    You understand what Trolling means? Clearly not!

    The fact that you Can't try to deal with each point says a lot more and we both know that you want to. You are a spoofer and you have been found out.
    Grayson wrote: »
    I said I'm not going to reply to your rants about islam

    Did not stop you from getting into rants about Catholicism though or what you perceived to be Catholicism.

    You were asked what is contained in the so called so called Catholic dogma taught in classes in 2017. Very fair and valid question. You failed to answer because, you haven't a clue

    You were asked about the lack of the public response to Ruairi Quinn's efforts to change the status of schools in Ireland, you ran away from that too.

    You ignored that fact that you lied when you said that pupils were "forced" to sit in class while religious studies were being held.
    Grayson wrote: »
    and said this isn't the place for it. Obviously you can't let it go

    Let go of what? You made some idiotic statements, I replied,in detail.

    You are returning, well trying. That is debate but you are trying to shut people down because of your inadequacies of sticking to topics that you actually know what you are talking about.

    Can 't let go? You made a number of substantial statements that you have failed to back up. You should be called on that.


    Grayson wrote: »
    . I'm not going to continue to discuss that with you and drive the thread off topic. There's loads of other places where you can post your hatred.

    Translation : "I have come to realize that I am talking to someone , who, due to their Profession, is in a superior position to know what he is talking about and better stop now before I am embarrass myself. "

    "Hate"? What hate? Predictable garbage to raise the Hate and R word when you want to shut down the discussion. But you are happy to make clear Anti Catholic statements and not back them up.

    You haven't a prayer (excuse the pun) Sunny Jim on that issue. You think that because you know a few people that makes you enlightened and a know it all. But you keep keep telling everyone who cares what a great bunch of lads them Muslims are while we witness the contrary in Europe and the Middle East. Ignorance is bliss.
    Grayson wrote: »
    Back on topic(ish)...

    You said that I'd struggle to find a school that taught catholic dogma or doctrine. 90% of national schools do. That's nearly all of them.

    You got reading problems I did not say that . I asked you to enlighten us as to what is contained in this so called Catholic Dogma in schools in 2017. What are the teachers saying in their classes.

    Grayson wrote: »
    In your most recent reply you said "Lies. No one is forced to sit in. They are free to leave the class. ".
    Did you even bother reading the link I supplied where parents describe how their non catholic children have to sit through religion classes in national schools.

    The children are not forced to sit in the class. What one or two schools did is against the Department's own policy on this issue. One school , that you are relying on , hardly nation wide. You can be sure that such a practice does not happen in the schools any more
    Grayson wrote: »
    I supplied a link that backs up my point and you decide to call me a liar.
    It doesn't matter if parents want catholic schools, the fact is that the catholic schools exist.

    It does matter. If parents did not want Catholic schools, there would no longer be Catholic schools.
    Grayson wrote: »
    They do teach catholic dogma and they are paid for by the state.

    You were asked what is contained in the said "dogma" since you are all knowing. What are teachers teaching the students in 2017 about what Catholic values mean to day?

    What is actually discussed in religion classes. ?

    I will tell you what it is not, it ain't what was thought before 1980's !


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,295 ✭✭✭Lt Dan


    Grayson wrote: »
    Millions of arabs of all creeds have been slaughtered. Refusing to save someone because of their religion is stupid. Can you imagine if we prioritised anything else like that?
    Imagine if there are homeless Christians, Atheists, Buddhists and Muslims on the streets of Dublin but we only help the Christians? We leave the rest on the streets?

    Our priority should be people who need help. Sure we can prioritise amongst them. People who need medical help, children etc. But not by race, ethnicity or religion.

    Actually, we are obliged to help those immigrants who are Persecuted or would be persecuted on the grounds of religion, political opinion,ethnicity, nationality or a particular social membership group (eg Gays, women , disabled etc) because due to that fear of persecution they are unable or unwilling to seek the protection of their own country

    "those in need" also includes economic migrants. They (economic migrants) have no legal right to be in Ireland, unless they have work permits or are EU citizens or family members of same. If not, we have no obligation to them. Being from a poor country is not persecution, unless that poverty was forced upon them by their Country because of their religion, political opinion,ethnicity, nationality or a particular social membership group (eg MDC in Zimbabwe supporters who had State Aid cut by Zanu PF because they opposed Zanu PF)

    Every country has to prioritize their own people first, hence why we have immigration laws. You can't freely walk into Australia or America and work without Legal permission to do so.

    "Imagine if there are homeless Christians, Atheists, Buddhists and Muslims on the streets of Dublin but we only help the Christians? We leave the rest on the streets? "

    Actually, we ought to be checking what their immigration status is. If illegal immigrants , remove them from the country, provided that they can be safely sent home. Economic migrants are suppose to work after all.

    If they are refugees or EU/Irish Citizens , their religion etc is irrelevant, they will be treated the same as the native on the street and taken care of. (actually, their legal status is irrelevant in the eyes of the volunteer)


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,295 ✭✭✭Lt Dan


    Grayson wrote: »
    That's a different issue though. It's not should be discriminate who we help based on religion. It's how do we get the most value for money or how do we help the most people. And that's a valid discussion.

    Also, half of the initial group of 80 refugees arriving are children.

    Resettlement makes sense since there are occasions where a refugee can't go home. Syria could last for another decade. Even if it doesn't the country may not be in any state to move back to, especially for families. You can't house millions in tent cities until then.

    Not really a different issue. If the person on the street has no legal right to be in Ireland , he should be removed from Ireland. Many of the people referred to by Jimmy Garlic are not genuine asylum seekers and the government reports on this (all available on line) vouch for that.

    Why am I referring to asylum seekers. ? They are the class of people who make up most of the Muslim, Buddhist etc population.

    If they (Muslim, Buddhists etc) are not asylum seekers but are LEGAL economic migrants, they have an obligation to remain economically active. Being homeless suggests that they are not complying with the rules. (It gets more trickier if EU law (via family to EU citizens) gets involved on that point)

    It makes more sense getting value for money to deal with those who have a right to be in Ireland .

    (No one is questioning the genuine case of Syrians, before you start)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,275 ✭✭✭Your Face


    The state shouldn't encourage religion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,186 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    Billy86 wrote: »
    Love your effort to try and take offense at nothing though. Pretty gas. And edgy, very edgy.

    I take it you'll be happy for your taxes to go toward these refugees being taxi'd to and from everywhere? I mean you're saying they have that option, so that's all that can be assumed from it.

    Ah come on Billy, you should lighten up a bit.
    You're not in Toronto anymore.
    Billy86 wrote: »
    Nah, you have to draw a line on state involvement in religion. Give one an inch in terms of government spending and every one of them (and many of their followers) will try to take a mile. I'm all for different cultures, religions etc in Ireland but the state shouldn't be funding these institutions for a number of reasons, not least that if you give something to one all of the others will cry foul, persecution etc until they get given the same amount... and if just one of them finds a loophole or some way to get a tiny bit extra, the others will again all make noise until they get it too, and so on and so on.

    Maybe you are finally seeing the light.
    A fair few of us have tried to tell you that this is the tip of the iceberg and once population starts increasing demands start increasing.
    Nekarsulm wrote: »
    ...
    But that's not even necessary either. Here in Cavan town a private house beside the hospital is rented and used as a Mosque/school/drop in centre. Has been for at least a decade. Landlord (Irish lad) is delighted with the set up. :D
    They have recently received some funds from abroad and bought a building from the receivers for use as a cultural centre and mosque, but its slow going as it seems to be worked on by the congregation themselves on a voluntary basis.

    We can expect some nice fundamentalist learning coming out of Cavan down the road.
    Grayson wrote: »
    On a sunny day this is lovely.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lough_Key_Forest_Park

    But as a whole the county is pretty boring. There's feck all to do there.
    I do feel a bit sorry for the refugees. Unless they have cars or travel passes then they're effectively stuck in a small town in the middle of nowhere. It must be stupidly boring. I say this as a former culchie myself.
    Having said that, I'd imagine they prefer safe & warm to being in Syria or stuck in some of those refugee camps.

    Don't try disavow your roots.

    As many of my Dublin acquaintances and colleagues would say "once a culchie always a culchie."

    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,295 ✭✭✭Lt Dan


    Victor wrote: »
    Yeah, this is a Roman Catholic dominated dump, barely 25 years from the Middle Ages, which funds church car parks, parish halls and religious schools and hospitals.

    If you haven't already, perhaps refer to these sites, if you feel that way inclined

    https://www.aerlingus.com/html/en-US/home.html
    http://news.ryanair.com/ops/maintenance/?IXF
    https://www.britishairways.com/travel/home/public/en_ie
    http://www.irishferries.com/ie-en/to-britain-from-ireland/
    http://www.poferries.com/en/portal
    https://eurolines.buseireann.ie/
    http://www.etihad.com/en-ie/

    Read the papers in the last few weeks, haven't heard any Archbishop giving a long winded Statement about the affairs of the Nation. Word is, SFA are turning up for mass services.............

    Why didn't the State not buy the RCC owned land that now houses the schools and hospitals?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,186 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    Victor wrote: »
    Yeah, this is a Roman Catholic dominated dump, barely 25 years from the Middle Ages, which funds church car parks, parish halls and religious schools and hospitals.

    There is an awful lot of self loathing in this country.

    Yes the catholic church had inordinate amount of power up to say 1980s and then in 1992 the bishop casey affair was kinda the damn buster that start opening the floodgates.

    But nowadays you will find most people don't give them a second thought to the catholic church and it's teachings.
    Yeah people send their kids to "catholic schools" and get them baptised, confimed, etc in order to play along.
    But how many of them actually attend mass or church services regularly ?

    Usually I find that people who have such a loathing for so called "catholic dominated" Ireland have a fondness for importing loads of people who believe in an even more regressive and backwards religion and culture that makes your so called catholic middle ages look like 1960s San Francisco.

    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    jmayo wrote: »
    Ah come on Billy, you should lighten up a bit.
    You're not in Toronto anymore.

    Maybe you are finally seeing the light.
    A fair few of us have tried to tell you that this is the tip of the iceberg and once population starts increasing demands start increasing.
    I've always been against the state sponsoring or propping up any religion, so no change there. At the same time as not wanting to discriminate in favour of any particular religions I don't agree with discriminating against any particular religions either. If they want to believe in their sky fairies in peace, have at it.

    Should be back in Toronto toward the end of the year where the population is a lot higher than here and somehow it's not fallen under the proxy rule of the House of Saud.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,204 ✭✭✭fiachr_a


    jmayo wrote: »
    Usually I find that people who have such a loathing for so called "catholic dominated" Ireland have a fondness for importing loads of people who believe in an even more regressive and backwards religion and culture that makes your so called catholic middle ages look like 1960s San Francisco.
    Most crap towns out West will be full of Muslims in a few decades. Unlike the gays in SF, they won't integrate.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,114 ✭✭✭222233


    SILVAMAN wrote: »
    A Longford based Pakistani business man has called for the government to build a mosque in Roscommon, for the newly arrived Syrians. He apparently claims that to be there in Ballaghadereen is a "punishment " for them, and that they are being discriminated against, etc.
    http://www.irishtimes.com/news/social-affairs/religion-and-beliefs/calls-for-roscommon-council-to-build-mosque-1.3017962
    Fcuk that nonsense, I say. Let him put his money where his big mouth is and fund one himself. He might take the time to acquaint himself with our culture and laws. This isn't some Islamic dominated dump, rooted in the Middle Ages, which funds mosques, or any other type of religious building.

    I find that "punishment" statement to be super offensive to the people who live in that town, I'm sure they are perfectly happy and love their home place. Sure can't they travel to a mosque somewhere else


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,382 ✭✭✭Duffy the Vampire Slayer


    Ballaghaderreen is an awful hole though.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,114 ✭✭✭222233


    Ballaghaderreen is an awful hole though.

    Granted, I'm sure it's better than where these vulnerable women, children and men were taken from.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,219 ✭✭✭✭Nekarsulm


    fiachr_a wrote: »
    Most crap towns out West will be full of Muslims in a few decades. Unlike the gays in SF, they won't integrate.

    I presume your definition of "crap towns out west" starts at Clonskeah !!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 652 ✭✭✭DanielODonnell


    No need for mosques on Christian land, plenty of room in their houses for worship.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4 Calypso 1


    Here we go ,we give people a safe haven, and within weeks this guy is looking for us to build a mosque


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,498 ✭✭✭BrokenArrows


    Under no circumstances should the state be paying for a mosque, church or any other religious place of worship.

    And I totally agree that Syrians or any other refugees should be placed outside of Dublin in rural areas where the cost of housing will be less and they can increase the population in these areas.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 92,532 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Zaph wrote: »
    If the state funded the building of churches and places of worship for other denominations, then I'd have no problem with them doing so for a mosque. But they don't, if a religious denomination wants to build a church, synagogue, temple, meeting house or whatever they have to stump up for it themselves. So I fail to see how this is any different.
    TBH the state doesn't even build schools here.
    Billy86 wrote: »
    Nah, you have to draw a line on state involvement in religion.
    The referendum on the fifth amendment to do that won with 84.38% of the vote.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,023 ✭✭✭Donal55


    Under no circumstances should the state be paying for a mosque, church or any other religious place of worship.

    And I totally agree that Syrians or any other refugees should be placed outside of Dublin in rural areas where the cost of housing will be less and they can increase the population in these areas.

    Aren't all these refugees : architects, barristers, chiropractors,doctors,.......Vets, watchmakers, X ray inspectors and zoologists.

    Why would they be confined to rural areas when all these good jobs are in Dublin?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,646 ✭✭✭✭qo2cj1dsne8y4k


    Absolutely not. Let them fund it themselves


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,992 ✭✭✭Mongfinder General


    Under no circumstances should the state be paying for a mosque, church or any other religious place of worship.

    And I totally agree that Syrians or any other refugees should be placed outside of Dublin in rural areas where the cost of housing will be less and they can increase the population in these areas.

    They been placed close enough to the border in the hope that they fcuk off across it and join the Syrian community in the U.K.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25 Dr Martin


    Donal55 wrote: »
    Aren't all these refugees : architects, barristers, chiropractors,doctors,.......Vets, watchmakers, X ray inspectors and zoologists.

    Why would they be confined to rural areas when all these good jobs are in Dublin?

    Because Irish Times readers like to see diveristy on their tv screens, not next door ;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭donkeykong5


    After what happened in london 2 days ago. I as an Irish taxpayer would prefer if they and their mosque didn't come here. !


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,295 ✭✭✭Lt Dan


    Grayson wrote: »
    Do you really have to reply to every single sentance one at a time. Is it an attempt at trolling?

    I said I'm not going to reply to your rants about islam and said this isn't the place for it. Obviously you can't let it go. I'm not going to continue to discuss that with you and drive the thread off topic. There's loads of other places where you can post your hatred.


    Back on topic(ish)...

    You said that I'd struggle to find a school that taught catholic dogma or doctrine. 90% of national schools do. That's nearly all of them.

    In your most recent reply you said "Lies. No one is forced to sit in. They are free to leave the class. ".
    Did you even bother reading the link I supplied where parents describe how their non catholic children have to sit through religion classes in national schools. I supplied a link that backs up my point and you decide to call me a liar.
    It doesn't matter if parents want catholic schools, the fact is that the catholic schools exist. They do teach catholic dogma and they are paid for by the state.

    I strongly recommend that you educate yourself on what the word "Trolling" means. You made several statements, which deserve to be called out on. That ain't trolling, bro. Secondly considering the offensive statement made by a Pakistan Muslim , the subject of the article, it looks like you haven't a clue as to what the topic is about!!!!

    What rant on Islam? Screaming "rant" and "trolling" won't work anymore. Unless you are able to back up your statements, every statement, and not pee and moan when challenged, perhaps refrain from making such statements. Most of the statements, I should add, you have failed and refused to address ie what is contained in Catholic "dogma" in Schools today, 2017 A.D.

    The only thing anyone can see is an Anti Catholic rant from YOU. Some other idiot tried to attack the GAA while they were at it as well , and failed ,gloriously. These discussion forums are not a place where one can comment without being challenged, nor should they be.

    Unlike, me, you have not got a clue as to who is coming into this country! (I did say however, that the undesirable trouble makers are, so far, a "tiny minority" but they are being watched_

    "drive the thread off topic."

    The topic is about a Pakistan Muslim , living in Longford, trying to cause trouble demanding for facilities, which the intended recipients did not ask for, and the said Muslim making idiotic allegations of discrimination , despite the fact that there are perfectly good facilities 15 -20 miles away in the next town. He stated that sending these people to a town in Roscommon, would be "punishment"!!! That is a lot of "hate" there.

    You went off topic waffling about the Catholic Church. You started it.

    Don't start something that you can not finish.

    Re: I will repeat myself again, I will even point out my own personal observations from my old secondary school circa 2001 (our town had a primary school catering for Protestants) where there was one Sunni Muslim , a Jevoah's witness and two Protestants in the class.

    The Muslim and JW and one of the Protestants left the class group and headed down to the Assembly when religious class (which was far from Catholic dogma) was on. No one batted an eyelid. Each religious class was once a week, a double class ie 1 hour 20 minutes.

    You are holding onto an article for dear life, which by the way, reporters failed to contact the school for their side of the story. A few ignorant schools does not make up the majority. You will also have parents who like causing trouble that (a) don't want the child in the class - perfectly fair enough but (b) refuses to suggest or ask if the child could be taken out of the class during the religious class

    You also refuse to deal with Ruairi Quinn's FAILED attempt (not his fault) to improve the situation when he consulted with parents on this matter.


    FOR THE FOURTH TIME. ENLIGHTEN US AS TO WHAT CATHOLIC DOGMA IS TAUGHT IN SCHOOLS TODAY IN 2017

    "It doesn't matter if parents want catholic schools, the fact is that the catholic schools exist."

    Well it does matter. Who do you think is the State? Religious studies is part of "Education" in Irish law


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,295 ✭✭✭Lt Dan


    Donal55 wrote: »
    Aren't all these refugees : architects, barristers, chiropractors,doctors,.......Vets, watchmakers, X ray inspectors and zoologists.

    Why would they be confined to rural areas when all these good jobs are in Dublin?

    The are refugees, not economic workers. Access to work, at this present time ought not to be a priority right now , if their applications are only being processed right now.(thus having no right to work, IF, that is the case)

    You can not lump everything into Dublin either

    Once they are granted actual Refugee Status, they are then permitted to work etc, and are perfectly entitled to move to Dublin and find work in said posts that you specified


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 354 ✭✭Microdot


    This is only the start, next they will be driving the locals out so the can have the place for them self's.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement