United People, It's Time For Ruddy Change!

For Forks Sake wrote: »

Perhaps some words of wisdom may explain it to Jeff - in this particular instance, if you lie down with dogs (the headbangers of II) you'll get up with fleas.

This Integrity Ireland group are some bunch of buckos. How does Jeff pick em? They make DDI look like the YFG Trinity branch.

His latest post contains letters from a husband and wife who contacted Rudd with the correspondence they have sent to Jobpath. Call me sceptical, but there’s an unmistakable hint of Ruddish from the letters.






Re: JobPath.
.
Below is two letters (husband and wife) being sent to Seetec who are carrying out (along with Turas Nua) the state ordered JobPath operation.
.
The creators of the letters found their rights abused - sought advice - and subsequently have sent formally off, the following letters as you will read below. I have obtained full express permission before reproducing them here.
.
The husband and wife that are sending them, would like them also shared not only to further highlight the tactics of private businesses within JobPath - but to also give others a chance to be aware of other important aspects which could now or later, relate to others in similar situations.
.
NOTE: For privacy reasons alone, I have removed the names and location of the persons involved.
============================================
.
Husband letter.
.
To whom it may concern in Seetec,
I, XXXXXX XXXXX, husband of XXXXX XXXXX, am formal notifying you of a grievance with your private company – in particular, with a staff member who implied that my wife using my own personal information, should carry out an illegal act.
.
Your representative further imposed upon my wife, unorthodox measures that if carried out would seriously impeach upon my freedom of movement.
.
The first implied suggestion from your member of staff, was that my wife, XXXXX, use my private social media account details including PPS number, to gain access to a Seetec website across the open web, to a server where a UK Seetec registered company has its website and data collecting servers stored.
.
I am very much aware that had she done this, it would have been an illegal act not just within Irish legal jurisdiction but in UK legislation also.
.
It is not a legal requirement for any person to have a social media account or to be subsequently forced to open one in order to access any website server facilities, no matter where they are based.
.
The next outrageous step a Seetec representative took, was to imply that I should make myself fully available as a chauffeur to such a serious extent, something which would seriously impede my working week, so to provide an unpaid transport service.
.
Your representative was aware of the fact there is no adequate public transportation in our rural area to avail of while trying to attend Seetec ill timely appointments. Your representative sought to see that your company escaped cost coverage of the only other possible, workable alternative - a taxi service. It was even suggested that we, an unemployed person and another disabled person, myself, pay for this on a twice daily basis.
.
Again, this is something which impose a serious financial strain on our household income.
.
It didn’t matter a damn to your representative that I am a disabled person at all, at any stage. The impeachment on my freedom and the completely unlawful further illegal demand of personal information use, not my wife’s, added to your company’s immoral tactic of implying benefit payments would be cut or stopped if she could not attend - due in part to no transport, public or affordable, being available. The methods and practises of your representatives in our government designated area, are condemnable as underhand tactics that would come only from the lowest of the low.
.
As your top legal representatives are fully aware (Dublin Highcourt, 19th OCTOBER 2017. CASE 332 JR FAGAN -V- SEETEC EMPLOYMENT & SKILLS IRELAND & ORS), Seetec, Turas Nua and the Department of Social Protection does not have the legal authority to cut or fully stop any benefit payment – or even imply that any or all can do so by any act or by further contacting the Department of Social Protection, while persons tried to be blackmailed into compliance are in fact still fully engaging in all other ways as outlined within the 2013 state tender document your company is supposed to adhere to by law.
.
Further to even more subsequent blackmail attempts (illegal under the Non-Fatal Offences Against The Person Act, 1979), made by a Seetec representative regarding her payments and not choosing to enter into a private contract any private company, your private business should stop allowing your staff to create an impression your agents are with the Department of Social Protection. They are not. Seetec, a private company, has been hired as a service to facilitate a service, all be it forced conscription based or not! As such Seetec (and Turas Nua) are employees or in legal terms “agents”, working on behalf of a state department, being subservient to it.
.
Your private company and its agents at no level, do not have the legal right to impose any restrictions on a person by way of their freedom of movement. This legal right is guaranteed under the Irish constitution. Your company’s day to day actions are therefore repugnant to the Irish constitution.
.
Let me remind you again that your company’s continuing illegal activity is currently already before the courts of Ireland – and there are more cases pending. Some are further on hold as they await a legal decision to come down in the Dublin Highcourt on January 23rd, 2018, regarding a judicial review of JobPath.
.
Despite an already made Highcourt admittance, under presented sworn affidavit, stating non-ability to cut benefits - your private company has done nothing to change its misguided and illegal approach to gaining a person's consent. Seetec for all intent purposes by its continuing poor modes of operation, continues in such a fashion as to ensure it can later profit via intimidating, lying and illegal acting Seetec representatives.
.
Attached to this formal submission of personal grievance, I am additionally sending you a copy of a letter given to one of your local representatives. It is been sent through my e-mail account, due to the fact that my wife, XXXXX, is unable to use e-mail.

XXXXX XXXXX has made it clear at all times, in non-aggressive engagement with Seetec representatives that she has been and is still, willing to engage within the JobPath setup in order to try gain full time employment. Despite this, deplorable acts of blackmail and bullying and illegal ones still continue via your lower company’s representatives. These continue to be noted and unless they cease immediately, will result in another further court action to add to present ones lined up within Irish court rooms across Ireland from others also being treated disgracefully by your company.
.
I acknowledge that this correspondence is reaching you over a Christmas period. Therefore, by the end of the first working week of January 2018, if an adequate response is not further gained to my formal grievance and an adequate notification of how your company intends to stop its immoral and illegal actions pertaining to my wife and self, I shall be taking this matter further, which will also include local and national media.
.
Yours,
XXXXX XXXXX
======================================
.
Wife Letter.
.
I, XXXXX XXXXX, attended as requested by letter supplied to myself, - location removed -, meeting on the 14th/12/2017.
.
While there, a Seetec agent misrepresented himself as a member of the Department of Social Protection. At no time did they inform myself or anyone else that they were in fact employees of a private company and subservient to the Department Of Social Protection, one also under legal contract to the Department of Social Protection according to the terms and conditions laid out within the 2013 state tender application your company agreed to adhere to.
.
The Seetec representative illegally and incorrectly informed me that I must sign a private contract or your private profit seeking enterprise would see to it that my benefit payments would be cut off if I did not sign straight away – without additionally being allowed examine any particular detailed conditions within said contract or allow adequate time to allow myself to read the related material.
.
The Seetec representative did not fully allow or inform myself of the contents of contract demanded to be signed, in any way at all. There was no negotiation or discussion – just threats upon my person that would cause penalty to myself and family. This is something illegal as outlined within the Non-Fatal Offences Against The Person Act 1997. I wish to make this very clear. I am very much aware, as is my family solicitor law firm, of what constitutes a legal contract and what falls outside a legal basis for one.
.
The Seetec representative did not inform me of my rights. They were not fully allowed – just denied.
.
The Seetec representative did not present myself with a copy of any contract, that I wished to take home for further attempt to understand that what I was prior being blackmailed into signing.
.
I am still a willing and fully engaging participant as can be evidenced via my Personal Progress Plan (PPP) and Seetec continuing engagement. Due to the subsequent immoral and illegal Seetec misrepresentations, blackmail attempts and illegal use of my husband’s personal information, not also including intimidating behaviour and breach of my rights, I hereby legally withdraw my consent from Seetec, the company’s possession of any parts of my personal information. I further withdraw my consent to Seetec, the use and transfer of any information pertaining to myself.
.
Yours,
XXXXX XXXXX

kbannon wrote: »

I wonder where Jeff holds his political clinics.

In his constituency office, otherwise known as the space under the stairs