Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

!! History HL 2015 ... predictions, guesses and discussion

135678

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2 niamh_walsh


    Is Vietnam unlikely to come up even thought it's the 50th anniversary?


  • Registered Users Posts: 26 Bourke97


    Is Vietnam unlikely to come up even thought it's the 50th anniversary?

    Never even thought of that! Id say a question on why the U.S. Became involved in the V. war and then why it was unsuccessful! Then a question on MLK or race, then an economic boom question, then maybe the Berlin blockade, Korea etc might be asked and their significance! The D&D it will be a Lenin/Stalin question on social and economic contributions/changes! And either hitlers rise to power/social and economic problems that led to rise to hitler/ the main characteristics of nazi state(tie in Nuremberg rallies with the propaganda and terror in that) or how all dictators used terror/propaganda to consolidate their power! I don't think there will be a question asked on the Nuremberg rallies on its own tbh! Nothing will be asked on WW2 I don't think because it was asked last year with the Soviet Union! Just look hitler/Lenin/Stalin and you'll be covered! Everything with race, foreign policy and a general essay on the involvement of US in Vietnam war! Does anyone else slightly agree with this?? Let me know so I might look over something else? Thanks! Seriously starting to stress about history now! There's just so much work in it! Love it but biggest regret doing it due to broad work load!


  • Registered Users Posts: 2 niamh_walsh


    Bourke97 wrote: »
    Never even thought of that! Id say a question on why the U.S. Became involved in the V. war and then why it was unsuccessful! Then a question on MLK or race, then an economic boom question, then maybe the Berlin blockade, Korea etc might be asked and their significance! The D&D it will be a Lenin/Stalin question on social and economic contributions/changes! And either hitlers rise to power/social and economic problems that led to rise to hitler/ the main characteristics of nazi state(tie in Nuremberg rallies with the propaganda and terror in that) or how all dictators used terror/propaganda to consolidate their power! I don't think there will be a question asked on the Nuremberg rallies on its own tbh! Nothing will be asked on WW2 I don't think because it was asked last year with the Soviet Union! Just look hitler/Lenin/Stalin and you'll be covered! Everything with race, foreign policy and a general essay on the involvement of US in Vietnam war! Does anyone else slightly agree with this?? Let me know so I might look over something else? Thanks! Seriously starting to stress about history now! There's just so much work in it! Love it but biggest regret doing it due to broad work load!

    Yeah that's pretty much what I'm learning too, might look over Jarrow March/Britain between the wars because that seems to come up in some way or another most years.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1 625Reasons2Cry


    Lyndon Johnson has been up almost every year either with Truman, Vietnam or by himself. Apprentice Boys & Coleraine are almost guaranteed to come up either together or by themselves and also Ian Paisley as a key personality. For dictatorship and democracy pick either France or Germany and you'll be sorted


  • Registered Users Posts: 17 podisyc


    Bourke97 wrote: »
    No you need to know the topic well to get a good grade! Referring to the case study just looks better and gives you extra marks as it shows you comprehend the question asked!

    Sorry probably wasn't very clear, I'm saying thst if the question is on just a case study, will I get less marks for my essay eveb if I know it in good detail.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13 brooksyy96


    orangey24 wrote: »
    I'm cutting down the courses a lot ...

    Case study: treaty
    Dictatorship and democracy: Stalin and Lenin USSR
    Movements for reform: GAA mainly, with cultural revivals
    USA: foreign policy, with particular focus on Vietnam war

    Does anyone think these have good chance coming up? I was hoping to learn a few essays for backup... Just wondering if anyone has essays on
    Characteristics of stalins rule
    How Lenin and Stalin brought about communism

    Technology of warfare (would really appreciate this)

    Any notes at all/ essays would be great! Didn't have a great teacher so don't really know how to go about it all

    im doing exact same


  • Registered Users Posts: 58 ✭✭fin709


    I'm studying everything on Hitler (his rise, propaganda, foreign policy, characteristics of nazi state) and technology of warfare.
    I think Technology of warfare is a sure thing this year as it hasn't been on since 2009, I think it's sure thing to be honest.
    Coleraine or Welfare State I think will definitely appear Northern Ireland and is anyone doing European Withdrawal from Empire?


  • Registered Users Posts: 358 ✭✭irishlad12345


    a friend of mine last year did a question on the Hungarian uprising after he finished his answer he seen that the question was "by the time of the Hungarian uprising" goes to show you have to read the question carefully :P


  • Registered Users Posts: 12 frie


    Our teacher is saying:
    DandD: Nazi Propaganda
    USA: Foreign policy after Vietnam
    NI: Attempts at finding peace
    Doc: Treaty and negotiations


  • Registered Users Posts: 26 Bourke97


    podisyc wrote: »
    Sorry probably wasn't very clear, I'm saying thst if the question is on just a case study, will I get less marks for my essay eveb if I know it in good detail.

    Oh sorry, if you just answer your question on the case study without anything else associated with it you will lose marks! But they would never ask a case study on its own e.g. How did Stalin bring about economic change and/or use the show trials to consolidate his power? You'd talk mostly on the economic changes i.e. Industrialisation, collectivisation etc, then the great purges! You'd lose marks for writing a really good essay on just the show trials because there wouldn't be enough detail? To ensure maximum marks you should always write on the background that led to the particular case study? Does this answer your question?
    Elaine_S wrote: »
    Hi all,

    So according to the HL predictions based off the mocks spoilers I've seen on here, there could be a question on:

    During the period 1870 - 1886,what were the factors that contributed to the development of The Home Rule Movement?

    I've found one essay on this so far on Mocks.ie. It got 85%.

    I was wondering if anyone had an essay worth a higher grade on this, pretty please?

    I'm the only one in my class doing HL and could do with some help!

    Thanks :)

    That is a guaranteed question I think! You should just look over the 2010-11 papers because I think our paper will be similar to one of those! I'll have a look for you at the essay and leave notes on where you can elaborate a bit? Is that okay?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22 Elaine_S


    Thank you so much!

    I've been given absolutely no predictions from my teacher for History, trying to narrow it down at this stage is a nightmare!


  • Registered Users Posts: 102 ✭✭gracew


    Bourke97 wrote: »
    If you go through the past papers you'll see that there is a sort of pattern to when things come up! You'll know what I'm talking about if you look closely! ☺️

    I had a look I can definitely see where you're coming from I don't know how I've missed it before! Thank you😄


  • Registered Users Posts: 26 Bourke97


    gracew wrote: »
    I had a look I can definitely see where you're coming from I don't know how I've missed it before! Thank you😄

    No bother at all! Hope you do well in your exams ☺️
    Elaine_S wrote: »
    Thank you so much!

    I've been given absolutely no predictions from my teacher for History, trying to narrow it down at this stage is a nightmare!

    No bother! I had a look there at the essay, it must have been a summer test or something because if you look at the top of the essay, the overall grade is 85%.. The essay is actually 91% ☺️ If you look at the last page you'll see the teachers markings throughout so I'd learn that essay ☺️ It's a great essay because it ties in the 1885 elections with it which would be a likely question for us! Hope you do well in your exams and happy studying ðŸ‘🎉


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22 Elaine_S


    Thanks again! It'll save me so much time just learning that one off! All the best to you! :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 2 Aimee2302


    Elaine_S wrote: »
    Thanks again! It'll save me so much time just learning that one off! All the best to you! :)

    Hi would you be able to post a link for this essay on mocks.ie? :) i cant seem to find it


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 64 ✭✭cmickdaly


    Teacher myself of HL History and state examinations corrector History HL since 2007.

    1) Don't predict anything. There is no real pattern in the papers no more than is a pattern in the lotto numbers.

    2) If you leave out stuff you do so at your own risk. No teacher should predict anything as they don't know either.

    3) The key to getting a good A or B grade lies in handing up a excellent RSR and having the skills in the DBQ well practiced. Most A and B students achieve very good marks in these areas. Most of the other essays are only of a average standard at best.

    4) if you are going to leave out a case study like the Bombing of Belfast on the basis it came up last year you are asking for trouble. Study all 3

    5) If you are going to cut down the course at least be sensible about it. In Dictatorship and Democracy you must study Hitler foreign and domestic, Mussolini, Stalin foreign and domestic, Lenin, British economic recession. No harm having a good essay on France studied either as it does come up, is rarely answered and does that do it get close to 85 %. In Northern ireland study Civil rights, Attempts to solve the troubles by British and irish governments (Sunningdale to Downing Street Declaration), Brookeborough and O'Neill, Social and cultrual impact of the Troubles. In USA Civil rights, Technology and Moon Landing, Foreign policy 1945-1989. No harm in knowing economic boom and bust too.

    6) Refer to the question atthe end of each paragraph.

    7) Plan every essay even if it takes 5 minutes. It's means you write a better answer overall in 35 minutes than a poor one in 40 minutes

    8) do the contextualistion part of the DBQ first and then parts 1 to 3. saves you losing time on spending too much effort on parts 1-3.
    9) Do test essays at home in around 40 minutes with book closed and give them to teacher to correct.

    You are more likely to get a A or B in HL History than either Geog, Business, Art, Biology, Chemistry, Music. Look at the stats.

    Best of luck.

    Anyone have any more questions I will be happy to help


  • Registered Users Posts: 12 frie


    Here guys, got 100% for this essay on characteristics of Stalins rule, hope it helps :)

    Stalin was an extremely self motivated, charismatic man and this shows both in his rise to power and his time as head of state. Although he was born to working-class parents, he quickly rose to prominence in the Bolshevik party following his expulsion from the seminary. His characteristics as a person can clearly be seen in his policies while in power, such as the creation of the cult of Stalin. He became ruthless in his control of power, using the show trials and purges to eliminate opposition to his rule. During Stalins time in power, Russia underwent huge industrial growth and development through his five year plans and his policy of collectivisation. Despite the huge loss of life during his time in power, Stalin declared that the end justified the means, Russia was now one of the worlds superpowers.
    Three show trials were held in Moscow during Stalins time in charge, both to cement his position and to eliminate possible opposition. Despite there being little or no evidence against the accused, all signed confessions of their guilt and were duely handed harsh rulings, usually of execution. The first show trial consisted of Zinoviev, kamenev and 14 other leading members of the communist party. They were accused of murdering Kirov, planning to kill Stalin and of working with Trotsky. Just a few years earlier, Zinoviev and kamenev had, together with Stalin, forced Trotsky into exile in Siberia. Stalin saw them as a threat to his rule and so had them eliminated. The secret police forced confessions out of the accused. The accused then learned off the lines they would say at the show trials, in front of an international audience of journalists and diplomats. There was no evidence against the accused other than their own confessions, but they were found guilty and were shot the next morning. The second show trial consisted of the trials of Radek, Pyatakov and 15 others, all former supporters of Trotsky. They were accused of conspiring with Germany and Japan and of wrecking and sabotaging the five year plans. All produced written confessions and were found guilty. 13 were executed and 4 were sent to Gulags.
    The third show trial, also called the great show trial, consisted of the trials of Bukharin, rykov and 18 others. Bukharin and rykov had been members of Lenin's politburo at the same time as Stalin so he therefore considered them threats to his rule. Yagoda had been head of the secret police and had carried out the purges, so he knew too much. They were accused of being trotskyiets, sabotaging the economy and attempting to assassinate Stalin. All pleaded guilty and were executed, except three minor officials. Bukharins family were threatened to force him to confess.
    Stalin used the purges to reduce the size of the communist party, which had become difficult to control. He had originally increased the size of the party in order to insure he had enough support to take over after Lenin's death. In 1934 he produced a list of undesirable party members who should be purged. They were: enemies of communism, hypocrites who secretly hated communism, those who disregarded party discipline, the bourgeois, the over ambitious and moral degenerates. By 1939, some 850000 party members had been purged, most were either shot or imprisoned by the NKVD. This became known as the great terror.
    The cult of Stalin was created to make the soviets believe Stalin was all-wise and all-powerful. He used propaganda images and made up heroic stories from his past to cement this image. Stalin was presented as a warm, modest and sincere man who was committed to the good of the soviet people. Towns and cities such as Stalingrad were named in his honour. He produced a book on himself describing his great achievements, while his opponent's such as Trotsky were removed from history books. A thank you letter to Stalin was produced by the communist party.
    That's part one guys, tell me if you want me to put up part two :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22 Elaine_S


    Aimee2302 wrote: »
    Hi would you be able to post a link for this essay on mocks.ie? :) i cant seem to find it

    I tried to post the link but it wouldn't allow me because I'm a new user apparently :S

    If you go to mocks.ie -> Leaving Cert -> History -> Basic Account -> Sample Answers, It's up at the top of the list!

    Hope that works for you!


  • Registered Users Posts: 26 Bourke97


    Aimee2302 wrote: »
    Hi would you be able to post a link for this essay on mocks.ie? :) i cant seem to find it

    Hi you have to register to get the essay!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2 Aimee2302


    Good stuff, got it :) thanks guys!


  • Registered Users Posts: 22 cab15


    frie wrote: »
    Here guys, got 100% for this essay on characteristics of Stalins rule, hope it helps :)

    .......

    That's part one guys, tell me if you want me to put up part two :)

    Yes please! Great essay. It's worded so much better than mine!


  • Registered Users Posts: 102 ✭✭gracew


    Bourke97 wrote: »
    No bother at all! Hope you do well in your exams ☺️

    Thank you, same to you! Let me know how you get on😊


  • Registered Users Posts: 13 brooksyy96


    I'm doing

    Unionism
    GAA
    Lockout(?)

    Stalin with some Lenin
    Technology of warfare

    Montgomery Bus Boycott/MLK
    Cuban Missile Crisis

    Does anyone have any other back up suggestions?
    Unionism? why? it came up last year


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 64 ✭✭cmickdaly


    i wouldnt say 100 % for the essay. Certainly not a A. Gradwise a B3 at best (if one applies the marking scheme correctly)


  • Registered Users Posts: 26 Bourke97


    brooksyy96 wrote: »
    Unionism? why? it came up last year

    Yeah I'd leave unionism? And do HR contributions 1870-1886 ?? Might come up! Something on HR or Land does!
    cmickdaly wrote: »
    i wouldnt say 100 % for the essay. Certainly not a A. Gradwise a B3 at best (if one applies the marking scheme correctly)

    What details would you put into that kind of essay on Stalin? For the main features/characteristics of his rule?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,136 ✭✭✭Anonymagician


    brooksyy96 wrote: »
    Unionism? why? it came up last year

    Yes Unionism came up last year but it also came up in 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009 and 2008. It was the documents topic for 2007 and 2006. Carson question hasn't come up since 2010. I think it's likely anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,136 ✭✭✭Anonymagician


    Bourke97 wrote: »
    Yeah I'd leave unionism? And do HR contributions 1870-1886 ?? Might come up! Something on HR or Land does!



    What details would you put into that kind of essay on Stalin? For the main features/characteristics of his rule?

    - Setting up totalitarian state ie secret police/cult of personality/propaganda etc

    - Five Year Plans

    - Collectivisation

    - Purges/Show Trials


  • Registered Users Posts: 39 KA97


    Does either stalin or lenin come up every year ? If so can you just learn both of them in depth for dictatorship and democracy and nothing else?


  • Registered Users Posts: 102 ✭✭gracew


    KA97 wrote: »
    Does either stalin or lenin come up every year ? If so can you just learn both of them in depth for dictatorship and democracy and nothing else?

    they didn't really come up last year but if you learn them in depth (mainly their traits that you can manipulate into any question) you'll be guaranteed a question


  • Registered Users Posts: 118 ✭✭Paddyg96


    For Political and Social reform I am learning

    Home Rule
    under

    -Butt
    -Parnell
    -Redmond

    and land agitation

    For Dictatorship and Democracy

    All hitler and Nazis
    All stalin with a bit of lenin


    Am I sorted for these two essays?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3 lizhession


    For dictatorships and democracy I'm focusing only on either Stalin or hitler (these are the two most popular topics for questions- atleast one comes up on each EVERY YEAR)

    Stalin --- domestic policies (social & economic transformation), foreign policies (involvement in ww2), main characteristics of Stalinist Russia (terror, economy etc), the show trials/propaganda/consolidation of power, and finally Lenin (social & economic transformation)

    Hitler & Germany -- the growth of fascism during the inter war period (characteristics/conditions for growth - weak governments, failing economy, cult of leadership etc), main characteristics of nazi Germany, social & economics difficulties and revival 33-39, propaganda/cult of personality/terror (incl. goebbels & Riefenstahl), foreign policy and ww2 ( note Q - to what extent did hitler foreign policy contribute to ww2 - same material can be used for a Q on causes of ww2)

    That's it


    I have 2 essays that I could post, A1s in both, one to what extent did Stalin transform society and economy in soviet Russia, and the other is to what extent did Hitlers foreign policy contribute to WW2 - would they help anyone?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22 Elaine_S


    lizhession wrote: »
    I have 2 essays that I could post, A1s in both, one to what extent did Stalin transform society and economy in soviet Russia, and the other is to what extent did Hitlers foreign policy contribute to WW2 - would they help anyone?

    I would really appreciate the essay on Hitler's Foreign Policy if it's not too much trouble! :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 64 ✭✭cmickdaly


    Bourke97 wrote: »
    Yeah I'd leave unionism? And do HR contributions 1870-1886 ?? Might come up! Something on HR or Land does!



    What details would you put into that kind of essay on Stalin? For the main features/characteristics of his rule?
    a

    as much narrative as possible and as little opinion as possible. essays that do well on these type of questions have a well planned structure. simply hit the key idea in each paragraph and expand on it and refer to the question at the end of each paragraph. a good student will always go for the narrative type question.

    so for example

    introduction (outline your structure and keep it short)

    struggle for power (paragraph 1)

    5 year plans (paragraph 2)

    collectivization (para 3)

    show trails (paragraph 4 - don't rely too much on the case study , you will be penalized)

    purges (para 4)

    cult of leadership (para 5)

    molotov/ribbentrop pact (para 6)

    conclusion (keep it short and don't have it too convoluted)

    Remember the correctors in the exam are encouraged to aid the candidate as much as possible. They are there to help and not play god.

    Do beware of people who put supposed A essays up on the internet. In fact any student who is even on this forum talking about predictions , short cuts, studying only two topics etc are probably taking risks with their own grade but most importantly are encouraging students to take risks with their exam.

    Feel free to PM me with any concerns. In less than a months time he correcting begins!!!!

    Best of luck
    Elaine_S wrote: »
    I would really appreciate the essay on Hitler's Foreign Policy if it's not too much trouble! :)

    be careful with these type of essays. How do you know they are of A standard?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3 lizhession


    Elaine_S wrote: »
    I would really appreciate the essay on Hitler's Foreign Policy if it's not too much trouble! :)




    To what extent was Hitler's foreign policy, 1933-39, responsible for the outbreak of WW2?

    The basic principles of Hitler's foreign policy centred around three main aims. Firstly, Hitler wanted to destroy the Treaty of Versailles (TV) to make Germany free from its restrictive clauses following WW1. Secondly, Hitler wanted to unite all Germans in one single country, particularly those in Austria and the Sudeten Germans of Czechoslovakia, a theory which would be called 'Grossdeutschland', meaning greater Germany. Thirdly, Hitler sought to provide Germany with 'Lebensraum', or 'living space', particularly within Poland, Ukraine and Russia, which would provide Germans with sufficient food and raw materials. These aims could only be achieved if Germany greatly increased her armed forces and remilitarised itself.

    After coming into power in 1933, Hitler proceeded cautiously in foreign policy, giving the illusion that he was a man of peace while he consolidated his domestic power. The first steps to re-armament was to withdraw from the Disarmament Conference held in Geneva that year. He did this by means of challenging the other powers within the League of Nations (LN) to disarm as Germany had done. When France refused to disarm, Germany withdrew from the LN and begun to remilitarise. Hitler introduced conscription, building up an army to the strength of 550,000 men and also announced the existence of the German airforce known as the Luftwaffe. Hitler also signed a 10 year Non-Aggression Pact with Poland in January 1934, substantiating Germany's claim to peaceful intention. Germany's rearmament led to the formation of the Stresa Front by Britain, France and Italy against Germany due to fear of German expansion.

    Further success was found in 1935 in The Saar plebiscite and the Anglo-German Naval Pact. In the TV, the Saar region had been given to France for 15 years to extract coal. Now 90% of the people of the Saar had voted to return to German control. Weaknesses began to show within the LN and the TV. Britain undermined the Stresa Front by signing a Naval Agreement with Germany allowing Hitler to increase its navy by up to 35% of the British navy but have the same amount of submarines (U-Boats) as the British. Also, during the Italian invasion of Abyssinia with which Britain and France remained preoccupied, Hitler invaded the Rhineland. Hitler wanted to remilitarise the Rhineland which was banned under the TV. In March 1936, hitler marched 35,000 troops into the Rhineland. As a result of the Abyssinian crisis, the LN failed to act upon this and Hitler was unchallenged. The war in Abyssinia saw the end of the Stresa Front and it showed up the weaknesses of the LN. Thus it was clearly shown that the TV was no longer sacrosanct.

    Hitler and Mussolini formed the Rome-Berlin Axis in 1936 in which Mussolini agreed to support Hitler's takeover of Austria (Anschluss). Hitler, as an Austrian native, felt Austria should be the first acquisition of the new German Empire. Hitler demanded of the Austrian Chancellor, Dr Schuschnigg, that the Nazi Party be legalised and that the Nazi, Dr Seyss-Inquart, be appointed Minister of the Interior, to which Hitler threatened immediate invasion should he refuse. A plebiscite was to decide the fate of Germany and Austria's unification, before which, Seyss-Inquart invited Germany into Austria to "help preserve the peace". Austria was taken over and in March 1938, a Nazi supervised referendum produced a 99.75% vote in favour of Anschluss. The British did not attempt to stop the union because they felt that the Austrians and Germans had a right to be united.

    In 1938, a similar situation erupted in the Sudetenland, a German speaking area of Czechoslovakia, home to 3 million Germans. The Sudeten leader, Konrad Henlein, demanded to be united with Germany however the Czechs were prepared to resist German threats. France favoured action but Britain remained cautious and disfavoured a possible war. Thus the Munich Conference was organised. The political leaders in attendance, Chamberlain (Britain), Daladier (France) and Mussolini and Hitler, together decided that the Sudetenland was to be given to Germany. Once again, Hitler's tactics of taking Europe to the brink of war had succeeded. Germany was now in a stronger position - in taking over the Sudetenland, Germany had taken most of Czechoslovakia's heavy industries and defences. Britain and France's policy towards Hitler was characterised by appeasement. Britain believed that if they gave in to Hitler's demands, they would prevent a European war. Nazi Germany was also seen as a barrier to the threat of Communism from the Soviet Union. Britain was economically not ready for war and longed for peace following WW1 as did the French.

    In 1939, the preparations for war had begun. Hitler took over what remained of Czechoslovakia and the weaknesses of the policy of appeasement began to show. While Britain and France merely protested, Britain began to change policy. Prior to this, the British believed that Hitler's aims were limited; now they knew he sought European domination and clearly Poland would be Hitler's next target. In the same year, Hitler demanded access to the port of Danzig and a rail link to East Prussia through the Polish Corridor but Poland rejected these demands. Britain and France agreed to support Poland against "any action which clearly threatened Polish independence". Hitler made an agreement with Italy known as the Pact of Steel which formed a military alliance between the two countries. However, the key to the safety of Poland was the Soviet Union. The Nazi-Soviet Pact was a 10 year non-aggression pact which allowed Germany to avoid fighting a two-front war. On the 1st of September 1939, Hitler invaded Poland. France and Britain declared war on Germany two days later. The Second World War had begun.

    The causes of the outbreak of WW2 can indisputably be found in the tactics of Hitler's foreign policy which he ruthlessly and cunningly executed in his plot for European domination. However, in assessing blame, it is most significant to note the failure of the appeasers and the League of Nations to deal with Hitlers consistent aggression and manipulation. Their anxiety to prevent war after the economic and social degradation of WW1 had put them on a defensive stance, allowing them to engage in an extraordinary amount of foolish wishful thinking. Chamberlain expressed his views in a radio broadcast - "Hitler gave his word and he broke it... Can you wonder his word is, for us, not worth the paper it is written on!" I would also note the failure of the USA to deal with Hitler by following their own policy of isolationism - it was only interested in affairs in its own continent and was reluctant to send troops to fight in faraway wars. I believe they are also somewhat responsible for the outbreak of WW2, although not to the same extent.

    Word count: 1022


  • Registered Users Posts: 447 ✭✭IrishLoriii


    Seeing as people are helping out with essays can anyone help me with American Foreign policy PLEASE?! It hurts my head thinking how screwed I am :(


  • Registered Users Posts: 12 frie


    Seeing as people are helping out with essays can anyone help me with American Foreign policy PLEASE?! It hurts my head thinking how screwed I am :(

    Our teacher gave us this, hope it helps :)
    USA Foreign Policy
    (1) The Cold War: 1945 - 1962
    Truman
    End of World War 2
    Potsdam conference - division of Germany
    Fear of Communism - Kennan telegram
    Truman Doctrine
    Marshall Plan
    Berlin Blockade
    NATO
    Losing China
    Korea
    Eisenhower
    Korea
    Domino theory
    Vietnam ?
    NASSA
    Military Industrial Complex
    Kennedy (JFK)
    Cuba
    Vietnam ?
    Berlin Wall
    (2) The Cold War : Vietnam war (and LBJ)
    Johnson
    Why was the U.S. Involved in Vietnam?
    Why did their involvement rapidly escalate under Johnson?
    What impact did it have on LBJ's Presidency?
    What were the main events/incidents of the war? Tonkin resolution, Operation rolling Thunder,
    My Lai massacre, credibility gap
    Why did the U.S. Lose the war?
    (3) The Cold War: Detente
    Nixon
    Vietnam/ Vietnamisation
    Nixon Doctrine
    Cambodia
    China
    Moscow/ SALT 1/ peaceful co-existence
    Arab-Israeli war1973
    Chile and the CIA
    Ford and Carter
    Continued Detente
    Ford- Helsinki agreement - respect boarders, allow travel and trade, respect human rights
    Carter- SALT 2
    Soviet invasion of Afghanistan
    US boycott of the 1980 Moscow Olympics
    Iran Hostage crisis
    Reagan
    Aggressive approach to "the evil empire"
    Huge arms build up - $550 billion per year/ stealth bomber developed
    START (strategic arms reduction talks)- failed
    Star Wars


  • Registered Users Posts: 102 ✭✭gracew


    Has everyone got a sample essay for the results of the treaty for the document case study please??


  • Registered Users Posts: 358 ✭✭irishlad12345


    if a question about how the presidency developed from roosevelt to reagen do we just write a paragraph on each president that was in charge between them ?


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 27,263 CMod ✭✭✭✭spurious


    if a question about how the presidency developed from roosevelt to reagen do we just write a paragraph on each president that was in charge between them ?

    You would have to show how the role of President developed with each one.
    I presume it would take in things like Nixon's disgrace etc..

    Depends on the actual question and how it is worded.


  • Registered Users Posts: 39 KA97


    lizhession wrote: »
    For dictatorships and democracy I'm focusing only on either Stalin or hitler (these are the two most popular topics for questions- atleast one comes up on each EVERY YEAR)

    Stalin --- domestic policies (social & economic transformation), foreign policies (involvement in ww2), main characteristics of Stalinist Russia (terror, economy etc), the show trials/propaganda/consolidation of power, and finally Lenin (social & economic transformation)

    Hitler & Germany -- the growth of fascism during the inter war period (characteristics/conditions for growth - weak governments, failing economy, cult of leadership etc), main characteristics of nazi Germany, social & economics difficulties and revival 33-39, propaganda/cult of personality/terror (incl. goebbels & Riefenstahl), foreign policy and ww2 ( note Q - to what extent did hitler foreign policy contribute to ww2 - same material can be used for a Q on causes of ww2)

    That's it


    I have 2 essays that I could post, A1s in both, one to what extent did Stalin transform society and economy in soviet Russia, and the other is to what extent did Hitlers foreign policy contribute to WW2 - would they help anyone?

    Are you able to post the Stalin essay ? Would really appreciate it :) struggling haha


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 249 ✭✭Frigating


    How well would this fare me?
    USA: Foreign policy, Cuba, Berlin, Vietnam, Korea
    D&D: Stalin, Lenin, possibly the Jarrow March
    MPSR: Labour movement, Lockout, cultural movement

    And does anyone have any tips for studying history? Read over essays, read over notes, rewrite either etc? I'm reading over everything, but I feel like it's going in one ear and out the other.


  • Registered Users Posts: 90 ✭✭Chicharito11


    If you had to pick ONE essay to bank on for each topic, US, D&D and P+S in NI, what would it be? I'm well prepared atm but I'm just looking for a reason to put that bit extra in to some essay topics.

    I would go:
    US: Montgomery Bus Boycott/Race Relations in some way

    D&D: Stalin in some way, think his question will involve his policies in general, Non-Aggression Pact, Collectivisation etc and maybe consolidating power?

    NI: Coleraine University for me, or Terrence O'Neill. No reasoning behind O'Neill, just a gut feeling.


  • Registered Users Posts: 90 ✭✭Chicharito11


    Frigating wrote: »
    How well would this fare me?
    USA: Foreign policy, Cuba, Berlin, Vietnam, Korea
    D&D: Stalin, Lenin, possibly the Jarrow March
    MPSR: Labour movement, Lockout, cultural movement

    And does anyone have any tips for studying history? Read over essays, read over notes, rewrite either etc? I'm reading over everything, but I feel like it's going in one ear and out the other.
    I'd do something on Montgomery Bus or race relations in some way if you want to be safe for US, and I'd sacrifice Jarrow and just do a glance over Hitler instead.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22 Elaine_S


    lizhession wrote: »
    To what extent was Hitler's foreign policy, 1933-39, responsible for the outbreak of WW2?

    The basic principles of Hitler's foreign policy centred around three main aims. Firstly, Hitler wanted to destroy the Treaty of Versailles (TV) to make Germany free from its restrictive clauses following WW1. Secondly, Hitler wanted to unite all Germans in one single country, particularly those in Austria and the Sudeten Germans of Czechoslovakia, a theory which would be called 'Grossdeutschland', meaning greater Germany. Thirdly, Hitler sought to provide Germany with 'Lebensraum', or 'living space', particularly within Poland, Ukraine and Russia, which would provide Germans with sufficient food and raw materials. These aims could only be achieved if Germany greatly increased her armed forces and remilitarised itself.

    After coming into power in 1933, Hitler proceeded cautiously in foreign policy, giving the illusion that he was a man of peace while he consolidated his domestic power. The first steps to re-armament was to withdraw from the Disarmament Conference held in Geneva that year. He did this by means of challenging the other powers within the League of Nations (LN) to disarm as Germany had done. When France refused to disarm, Germany withdrew from the LN and begun to remilitarise. Hitler introduced conscription, building up an army to the strength of 550,000 men and also announced the existence of the German airforce known as the Luftwaffe. Hitler also signed a 10 year Non-Aggression Pact with Poland in January 1934, substantiating Germany's claim to peaceful intention. Germany's rearmament led to the formation of the Stresa Front by Britain, France and Italy against Germany due to fear of German expansion.

    Further success was found in 1935 in The Saar plebiscite and the Anglo-German Naval Pact. In the TV, the Saar region had been given to France for 15 years to extract coal. Now 90% of the people of the Saar had voted to return to German control. Weaknesses began to show within the LN and the TV. Britain undermined the Stresa Front by signing a Naval Agreement with Germany allowing Hitler to increase its navy by up to 35% of the British navy but have the same amount of submarines (U-Boats) as the British. Also, during the Italian invasion of Abyssinia with which Britain and France remained preoccupied, Hitler invaded the Rhineland. Hitler wanted to remilitarise the Rhineland which was banned under the TV. In March 1936, hitler marched 35,000 troops into the Rhineland. As a result of the Abyssinian crisis, the LN failed to act upon this and Hitler was unchallenged. The war in Abyssinia saw the end of the Stresa Front and it showed up the weaknesses of the LN. Thus it was clearly shown that the TV was no longer sacrosanct.

    Hitler and Mussolini formed the Rome-Berlin Axis in 1936 in which Mussolini agreed to support Hitler's takeover of Austria (Anschluss). Hitler, as an Austrian native, felt Austria should be the first acquisition of the new German Empire. Hitler demanded of the Austrian Chancellor, Dr Schuschnigg, that the Nazi Party be legalised and that the Nazi, Dr Seyss-Inquart, be appointed Minister of the Interior, to which Hitler threatened immediate invasion should he refuse. A plebiscite was to decide the fate of Germany and Austria's unification, before which, Seyss-Inquart invited Germany into Austria to "help preserve the peace". Austria was taken over and in March 1938, a Nazi supervised referendum produced a 99.75% vote in favour of Anschluss. The British did not attempt to stop the union because they felt that the Austrians and Germans had a right to be united.

    In 1938, a similar situation erupted in the Sudetenland, a German speaking area of Czechoslovakia, home to 3 million Germans. The Sudeten leader, Konrad Henlein, demanded to be united with Germany however the Czechs were prepared to resist German threats. France favoured action but Britain remained cautious and disfavoured a possible war. Thus the Munich Conference was organised. The political leaders in attendance, Chamberlain (Britain), Daladier (France) and Mussolini and Hitler, together decided that the Sudetenland was to be given to Germany. Once again, Hitler's tactics of taking Europe to the brink of war had succeeded. Germany was now in a stronger position - in taking over the Sudetenland, Germany had taken most of Czechoslovakia's heavy industries and defences. Britain and France's policy towards Hitler was characterised by appeasement. Britain believed that if they gave in to Hitler's demands, they would prevent a European war. Nazi Germany was also seen as a barrier to the threat of Communism from the Soviet Union. Britain was economically not ready for war and longed for peace following WW1 as did the French.

    In 1939, the preparations for war had begun. Hitler took over what remained of Czechoslovakia and the weaknesses of the policy of appeasement began to show. While Britain and France merely protested, Britain began to change policy. Prior to this, the British believed that Hitler's aims were limited; now they knew he sought European domination and clearly Poland would be Hitler's next target. In the same year, Hitler demanded access to the port of Danzig and a rail link to East Prussia through the Polish Corridor but Poland rejected these demands. Britain and France agreed to support Poland against "any action which clearly threatened Polish independence". Hitler made an agreement with Italy known as the Pact of Steel which formed a military alliance between the two countries. However, the key to the safety of Poland was the Soviet Union. The Nazi-Soviet Pact was a 10 year non-aggression pact which allowed Germany to avoid fighting a two-front war. On the 1st of September 1939, Hitler invaded Poland. France and Britain declared war on Germany two days later. The Second World War had begun.

    The causes of the outbreak of WW2 can indisputably be found in the tactics of Hitler's foreign policy which he ruthlessly and cunningly executed in his plot for European domination. However, in assessing blame, it is most significant to note the failure of the appeasers and the League of Nations to deal with Hitlers consistent aggression and manipulation. Their anxiety to prevent war after the economic and social degradation of WW1 had put them on a defensive stance, allowing them to engage in an extraordinary amount of foolish wishful thinking. Chamberlain expressed his views in a radio broadcast - "Hitler gave his word and he broke it... Can you wonder his word is, for us, not worth the paper it is written on!" I would also note the failure of the USA to deal with Hitler by following their own policy of isolationism - it was only interested in affairs in its own continent and was reluctant to send troops to fight in faraway wars. I believe they are also somewhat responsible for the outbreak of WW2, although not to the same extent.

    Word count: 1022

    Great essay, thank you for posting! :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 26 Bourke97


    I have an essay on Stalin that's an A1 that I got from a friend who went to Yeats and it's a brilliant essay, it's on Stalin transform of society and economy!

    Structure:
    Intro
    Paragraph one( rise to power/cult of personality)
    Para two( collectivisation)
    Para three ( industrialisation)
    Para four( about marriage- how he wanted bigger pop growth and women to work outside the home)
    Para 5( the show trials/the great purge and socialist realism)
    Para 6( first five year plan)
    Para 7( second 5year plan)
    Para 8( third 5year plan)
    Conclusion!

    Would this essay be okay to use for a question on the main characteristics of Stalin rule and just twist on the day to match it?? Please let me know thank you


  • Registered Users Posts: 39 KA97


    Is anyone able to PM me some essays or somethings, really struggling with time right now :/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,509 ✭✭✭✭randylonghorn


    Frigating wrote: »
    And does anyone have any tips for studying history? Read over essays, read over notes, rewrite either etc? I'm reading over everything, but I feel like it's going in one ear and out the other.
    Highlight (or make a list of) key points for each essay / question / topic. Put away the notes, go for a walk and see can you remember them. Rinse and repeat if necessary.

    Look at the relevant questions on past papers, take a sheet of paper and write down the key points you would use to answer each one and the order / approach you would use.


  • Registered Users Posts: 58 ✭✭aquse


    Would it be a good idea to quote someone in their original language and then translate it? For example a Soviet poster saying "Сталин, спасибo за счастливое детство!" which translates to "Stalin, thank you for a happy childhood! " and goes hand-in-hand with indoctrination of children.

    I mean, it might be a tad bit impressive and I'm Russian, so it isn't difficult.

    Or Noep?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,509 ✭✭✭✭randylonghorn


    aquse wrote: »
    I mean, it might be a tad bit impressive and I'm Russian, so it isn't difficult.
    In that case, I'd go for it.

    I wouldn't be learning Russian in order to be able to do it though! :pac:

    Call it my bump of trouble itching, but just be careful about your timing in the exam, and don't get totally carried away writing about one question which you probably know / understand / feel more strongly about than most students. ;)

    But if you can bring a small bit extra to a question without losing track of time, why not?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2 MylesVII


    On U.S history, every year either Race Relations or Moon Landing has come up, Should I be safe with them? Not worried about the other topics :)


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement