Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The Great Covid Divide

13

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,532 ✭✭✭HBC08


    tara2k wrote: »
    Good point. We were talking about this in work last week. People were saying that they have grown out of the habit of going to the pub, spending €3 for a cup of coffee every day, going out for a meal at the weekend etc now, and they are not going to start doing it again once country opens back up. Think they've also realised how much money they were wasting on the above. The lockdown has gone on for so long now that people have changed their approach to life.

    Id be confident that a large majority of people (myself included) have not grown out of the habit of going to the pub when the chance presents itself.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,257 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    faceman wrote: »
    Well, I'm not used to supposin'. I'm just a workin' man. My boss does all the supposin'-- but I'll try one. Supposin' you talk us all out of this and, uh, the kid really did knife his father? covid preventative measures have done more damage?

    *dries hands and walks out of bathroom*

    Exactly.

    We could also say that preventative measures have saved us from the far worse damage that unchecked Covid would have done.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,648 CMod ✭✭✭✭faceman


    MrStuffins wrote: »
    Exactly.

    We could also say that preventative measures have saved us from the far worse damage that unchecked Covid would have done.

    We don’t know that. We do know that none of the modelling for predicting covid has been correct, particular Ireland.

    We can’t argue in auxiliary terms though. But we can look at facts and evidence.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/health/risk-of-cancer-epidemic-can-t-be-underestimated-researcher-1.4512249

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/health/cancer-services-will-not-fully-resume-until-year-end-under-hse-s-pandemic-plan-1.4517265

    https://www.irishmirror.ie/news/irish-news/health-news/ireland-facing-cancer-crisis-2021-23566598

    https://www.euronews.com/2021/03/31/number-of-teenagers-seeking-psychiatric-help-soars-amid-pandemic

    https://jrnl.ie/5401109


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,257 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    faceman wrote: »
    We can’t argue in auxiliary terms though.

    Agreed.

    And I agree we can look at facts and evidence, but to do so when the alternative is a hypothetical makes it kind of pointless when your argument is based on that hypothesis.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,034 ✭✭✭Ficheall


    tommybrees wrote: »
    If there was such a dangerous virus out there we wouldn't need Gardai to be enforcing these restrictions and fining people, because people would see for themselves how serious it can be and wouldn't need to be told 24/7.
    Exactly. That's why we don't need speed limits on the roads etc....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,346 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    Why are you quoting numbers for the overall pandemic? Historical numbers are irrelevant as to where we stand today. Relevant only for the history books and the debrief when this is over

    Look at the UK. They have one of the worst death tolls but in 2021 they are showing the way.

    Historical numbers are still very relevant.
    Texas has twice as many cases and deaths. Their herd immunity is miles better than ours. Then they have four times as many fully vaccinated as we do.
    Same with the UK. Far more cases per population and far more deaths = more herd immunity, plus four or five times more vaccinations (not fully vaccinated though)

    We're not comparable, no matter how much you want it to be true.

    The only reason people are calling for halting the lockdown is that the numbers are good.
    There was none of this back in Feb when cases were spiking.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,648 CMod ✭✭✭✭faceman


    MrStuffins wrote: »
    Agreed.

    And I agree we can look at facts and evidence, but to do so when the alternative is a hypothetical makes it kind of pointless when your argument is based on that hypothesis.

    No it’s not. That’s a bizarre statement to make


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,257 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    faceman wrote: »
    No it’s not. That’s a bizarre statement to make

    Saying the preventative measures will have done more damage that Covid did, without taking into consideration the damage done had these measures not been in place, is a bizarre statement.

    I got vaccinated for Hep A once and the vaccination did more damage than the Hep A did.

    Why? Because I had a sore arm for a day, while Hep A did no damage as I didn't contract it!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,115 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Ficheall wrote: »
    Exactly. That's why we don't need speed limits on the roads etc....

    And yet even when no cameras or gardai are around, the majority do not speed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,257 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    timmyntc wrote: »
    And yet even when no cameras or gardai are around, the majority do not speed.

    ;)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,115 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    MrStuffins wrote: »
    ;)

    And your point is?
    Its illegal to murder in this country also, yet without gardai continuously watching us, most of us can obey that law just fine.

    Instead of having the gardai fining people for travelling 5.1km, the majority should be trusted to behave sensibly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,257 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    timmyntc wrote: »
    And your point is?
    Its illegal to murder in this country also, yet without gardai continuously watching us, most of us can obey that law just fine.

    Instead of having the gardai fining people for travelling 5.1km, the majority should be trusted to behave sensibly.

    And what about the others?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,115 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    MrStuffins wrote: »
    And what about the others?

    What about them?

    Do you think its fair that the majority of the population get punished in a vain attempt to stop a small minority from acting out? The gardai enforcement and rules that are in place right now arent stopping them either you know.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,257 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    timmyntc wrote: »
    What about them?

    How do we deal with them?

    Are you suggesting that rules and law is self-evident, so we don't need Gardai or courts because people will just know not to commit crime?

    Have you seen Mad Max?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,346 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    timmyntc wrote: »
    And your point is?
    Its illegal to murder in this country also, yet without gardai continuously watching us, most of us can obey that law just fine.

    Instead of having the gardai fining people for travelling 5.1km, the majority should be trusted to behave sensibly.

    There is a chasm of a difference between people choosing to murder, and people choosing to continue their life in the same manner as early 2020.

    Over 10,000 COVID fines have gone out in the last few months. So that's 10,000 people who completely disregarded government rules. Not to mention the thousands others who merely got a warning.

    Haven't seen 10,000 murders at any time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,115 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    MrStuffins wrote: »
    How do we deal with them?

    Are you suggesting that rules and law is self-evident, so we don't need Gardai or courts because people will just know not to commit crime?

    Have you seen Mad Max?

    yes thats exactly what I'm suggesting. But I was thinking more along the lines of Escape From New York than Mad Max.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,648 CMod ✭✭✭✭faceman


    MrStuffins wrote: »
    Saying the preventative measures will have done more damage that Covid did, without taking into consideration the damage done had these measures not been in place, is a bizarre statement.

    I got vaccinated for Hep A once and the vaccination did more damage than the Hep A did.

    Why? Because I had a sore arm for a day, while Hep A did no damage as I didn't contract it!

    That makes no sense. You’re talking nonsense


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,704 ✭✭✭Nermal


    Padre_Pio wrote: »
    So they're running twice as bad as us historically, with a similar enough population over the past year.

    No comparison really.

    If your sole yardstick for success is minimising deaths, why ever open up at all?

    Why not live with current restrictions forever? It's horrendously expensive and totalitarian, but it is minimising deaths, isn't it?

    Of course, that would be ridiculous. Other things matter as much as avoiding death.

    The citizens of Texas clearly value individual freedom highly. As you say - no comparison to us.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,257 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    timmyntc wrote: »
    yes thats exactly what I'm suggesting. But I was thinking more along the lines of Escape From New York than Mad Max.

    Then it comforts me to get a deeper insight into the mind and other thoughts of someone who thinks Covid doesn't exist.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,257 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    faceman wrote: »
    That makes no sense.

    Exactly!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,024 ✭✭✭✭Baggly


    Mod

    Folks, the topic of this thread is financial inequality due to the pandemic. I will remind everyone to try to stay on that topic in this thread. Thanks.


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Lockdown is doing way more harm than good, look at the bigger picture and see where this is all leading.
    Every year they will be able to lockdown because it will be used as an excuse for every problem we will face.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,346 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    tommybrees wrote: »
    Lockdown is doing way more harm than good, look at the bigger picture and see where this is all leading.
    Every year they will be able to lockdown because it will be used as an excuse for every problem we will face.

    That's hard to quantify since near every country went into some form of lockdown.
    There's no control group to compare against.

    No country in the world made the choice to remain open and accept the death toll. Even the UK backed down after a few months when a thousand people a day were dying in April last year.

    So your statement is meaningless, unfortunately.

    Many people in Ireladn are doing ok, even with lockdown. The vast majority are still working, either on full pay or subsidised wages. People saved twice as much last year than in 2019.
    The way we work has also changed completely, with more companies shifting to online-only work.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,034 ✭✭✭Ficheall


    Baggly wrote: »
    Mod

    Folks, the topic of this thread is financial inequality due to the pandemic. I will remind everyone to try to stay on that topic in this thread. Thanks.
    I thought the OP just wanted a general whinge - apologies.


    On topic then, I "enjoyed working from home" as the OP puts it, throughout, and will pay tax on it as usual. I've no great desire to subsidise the poor PUP people who had the same income as I did but didn't get to do any work.


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Padre_Pio wrote: »
    That's hard to quantify since near every country went into some form of lockdown.
    There's no control group to compare against.

    No country in the world made the choice to remain open and accept the death toll. Even the UK backed down after a few months when a thousand people a day were dying in April last year.

    So your statement is meaningless, unfortunately.

    Many people in Ireladn are doing ok, even with lockdown. The vast majority are still working, either on full pay or subsidised wages. People saved twice as much last year than in 2019.
    The way we work has also changed completely, with more companies shifting to online-only work.

    Most countries did the lockdown because nobody knew any better. 1 year on we no for absolute certain this is nowhere near as dangerous as we thought. It might be dangerous to some, but 99 % of us will be grand. It's absolute fact.

    Lots of states in the US have reopened.
    There's plenty places that didn't do full lock down.

    People are doing just OK but I'm sure most would like to get There's lives back on track ASAP.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,597 ✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Ficheall wrote: »
    I thought the OP just wanted a general whinge - apologies.

    How dare you ya pup ya! :pac:

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,034 ✭✭✭Ficheall


    tommybrees wrote: »
    It might be dangerous to some, but 99 % of us will be grand. It's absolute fact.
    Have you a good reference for that "absolute fact"?

    I'm having difficulty finding a concrete number for the fatality rate, but presumably you have one. I guess you're counting hospitalized/ICU people who eventually recover as "absolutely grand" too?


  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 77,515 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    tommybrees wrote: »
    Most countries did the lockdown because nobody knew any better. 1 year on we no for absolute certain this is nowhere near as dangerous as we thought. It might be dangerous to some, but 99 % of us will be grand. It's absolute fact.

    Lots of states in the US have reopened.
    There's plenty places that didn't do full lock down.

    People are doing just OK but I'm sure most would like to get There's lives back on track ASAP.

    Well the UK has had various lockdowns, but still 4.4m reported cases. 1.1m reported to have suffered long covid, plus another 126k deaths.

    No one really knew how dangerous it was, but over a year on and only now getting vaccines rolled out does not paint a good picture.

    And I know some thought sod all this. Let's open up (or not lockdown). Look at what was happening in Italy a year ago. Fortunately we had time to prepare and we managed to flatten the curve. It would have been a much grimmer outcome without that preparation and indeed without those lockdowns.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,941 ✭✭✭growleaves


    I think this episode how shown how robotic the complaining about welfare is.

    Joe Hand-Soap will agitate to force a million people onto emergency welfare, - really UBI in disguise - declaim responsibility ('I trust the experts') and then without blinking complain about having to pay for people on welfare.

    Its just algorithmic, they can't help it.

    Some people have spent decades of their life being an I-pay-my-taxes bore (blah blah blah I work hard) and so don't even notice that they are the ones driving the biggest expansion of welfarism in history.


  • Registered Users Posts: 431 ✭✭Jeremy Sproket


    If private pension funds are raided (again) then it's only fair and fitting that public sector pension annuities are reduced by an equivalent margin that the private pensions will be by virtue of the cash grab.

    For example, if they decide to grab 0.5% per year for 5 years, then they will have taken 2.5% of my moneys. 1-(0.995^5).

    So public sector pension annuities should be reduced by a similar amount, ie, if someone was due to retire on €32,000, then give them €31,200 instead and instead of the lump sum on €96,000, give them €93,600.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,346 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    tommybrees wrote: »
    Most countries did the lockdown because nobody knew any better. 1 year on we no for absolute certain this is nowhere near as dangerous as we thought. It might be dangerous to some, but 99 % of us will be grand. It's absolute fact.

    Lots of states in the US have reopened.
    There's plenty places that didn't do full lock down.

    People are doing just OK but I'm sure most would like to get There's lives back on track ASAP.

    You don't know that.

    No one knows that. The world locked down, yet tens of millions got COVID, millions died, we have 4 or so variants out in the wild and we've still not got a grip yet on it.

    Your argument against lockdown is only based on evidence after a lockdown.

    You cant say that 99% will be fine.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    If private pension funds are raided (again) then it's only fair and fitting that public sector pension annuities are reduced by an equivalent margin that the private pensions will be by virtue of the cash grab.

    For example, if they decide to grab 0.5% per year for 5 years, then they will have taken 2.5% of my moneys. 1-(0.995^5).

    So public sector pension annuities should be reduced by a similar amount, ie, if someone was due to retire on €32,000, then give them €31,200 instead and instead of the lump sum on €96,000, give them €93,600.

    They should. But they won’t. No government will touch the public sector, and private sector workers will be expected to pick up the bill. It’ll be another manifestation of a Covid divide, as private sector workers get hammered while public sector workers increments and pensions are protected


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,395 ✭✭✭GazzaL


    Padre_Pio wrote: »
    That's hard to quantify since near every country went into some form of lockdown.
    There's no control group to compare against.

    No country in the world made the choice to remain open and accept the death toll. Even the UK backed down after a few months when a thousand people a day were dying in April last year.

    So your statement is meaningless, unfortunately.

    Many people in Ireladn are doing ok, even with lockdown. The vast majority are still working, either on full pay or subsidised wages. People saved twice as much last year than in 2019.
    The way we work has also changed completely, with more companies shifting to online-only work.

    Around 900,000 people are dependent on State supports, whether it's the EWSS, PUP, or unemployment benefits. That's over a third of the labour force. I know of lots of others who are not claiming any State supports because they've chosen to operate in the "grey economy" instead.

    Some people have been forced out of work for over a year with no plan to resume. It's not acceptable to throw entire industries under the bus to pander to fascists, morons, and hypochondriacs.

    The way some people work has changed completely. There are other industries where it is not possible to do everything online.

    Also, in terms of professional relationship building and management, it is also much preferable to be able to meet people in person. This is something that isn't properly understood by average desk jockeys.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,647 ✭✭✭beggars_bush


    They should. But they won’t. No government will touch the public sector, and private sector workers will be expected to pick up the bill. It’ll be another manifestation of a Covid divide, as private sector workers get hammered while public sector workers increments and pensions are protected

    Most public sector pensions are not very lucrative any more

    It all basically means the USC is here to stay for another 10 years


  • Registered Users Posts: 11 Madio Sane


    It has been very interesting reading the various points made so far. A startling figure to me is the 25% unemployment rate currently. That was the peak figure for The Great Depression! Now I know some of that figure will return to work when lockdown relaxes but there will be many more added to the figure when businesses wind up in the future as unfortunately some inevitably will. From recent media reports it appears the Government want to get rid of the PUP ASAP but keep the EWSS in place beyond June. This will probably become a political football as it did in September last year.

    From my own experience a big issue will be how to wean businesses off the EWSS. A big attraction of the scheme, as well as the €203-350 subsidy, is the 0.5% ER PRSI. I don't think the Govt can flick a switch and go back to business as normal with the employer paying the full wage and 8.8% or 11.05% ER PRSI. It will have to be a graduated approach starting at maybe 4-5% going to 8.8% to 11.05% after certain intervals or something like that. I would also have a concern over businesses which were allowed to tax warehouse debt being able to repay the debt. Whenever they do open back up they will have to pay all their current taxes like VAT, PAYE, & IT/CT on top of chipping away at legacy debts. The hope is obviously is for a spending boom which will allow for higher turnover and thus an ability to pay back.

    Employees returning to work could be a sticky wicket. This is especially the case in public facing roles because as mentioned before many workers will see remote working as major part of their working week. What if an employee even, if vaccinated, refuses to come back due to health/danger concerns? Now normally that would be a failure to fulfil their contract of employment and they could be terminated. However they might now argue that the employer cannot provide a safe working environment. (Even if vaccinated they can still contract and transmit Covid-19). I reckon there will be a plethora of cases to be heard in the courts in regard to this and other Covid disputes. Another might be where an employer insists an employee returns to the office. I understand that the burden will now be on the employer to prove the employee must return rather than remote work though I am open to correction.

    Sorry to end on an unpleasant note but I can easily see lockdowns being a feature of life in Ireland for the next 3-5 years even when enough of the population is vaccinated. I predict we will go into some sort of lockdown each December to early February. This was normally the peak time in hospitals before the pandemic and now there is a precedent for shutting down parts of the economy to protect the health service which would never have been tolerated before. Unless medical science innovates (and I hope it does) to find a way to eliminate viruses they will continue to circulate and mutate in the population for decades as we have seen from the history of coronaviruses.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,597 ✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Madio Sane wrote: »
    Sorry to end on an unpleasant note but I can easily see lockdowns being a feature of life in Ireland for the next 3-5 years even when enough of the population is vaccinated. I predict we will go into some sort of lockdown each December to early February. This was normally the peak time in hospitals before the pandemic and now there is a precedent for shutting down parts of the economy to protect the health service which would never have been tolerated before. Unless medical science innovates (and I hope it does) to find a way to eliminate viruses they will continue to circulate and mutate in the population for decades as we have seen from the history of coronaviruses.

    I don't know about that. This press release was from November 2019. 3 months before Covid hit. Worth a quick read.

    https://www.inmo.ie/Home/Index/217/13549

    Nobody seemed to be listening.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users Posts: 857 ✭✭✭PintOfView


    I don't know about that. This press release was from November 2019. 3 months before Covid hit. Worth a quick read.

    https://www.inmo.ie/Home/Index/217/13549

    Nobody seemed to be listening.

    That does highlight the deficiencies in the health service, which pre-dates covid.
    What's the answer?
    The budget has been increasing for years, without seeming to increase capacity!

    And successive ministers for health haven't been able to shake things up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,346 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    GazzaL wrote: »
    Around 900,000 people are dependent on State supports, whether it's the EWSS, PUP, or unemployment benefits. That's over a third of the labour force.

    Even if there isn't a recession this year, it'll take years to come back from COVID.

    Things don't turn on a dime. There's so many small businesses going to the wall it's depressing and we'll only see this once PUP is tapered off.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,597 ✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    It looks like the debate has begun.

    https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2021/0417/1210516-should-pandemic-winners-pay-a-solidarity-tax/
    Should 'pandemic winners' pay a solidarity tax?
    This includes people who found themselves temporarily or permanently out of work and saw their income streams drying up in the past year which may have necessitated liquidating any savings that they had put aside in the years before the pandemic.

    This phenomenon has been characterised by the much-talked of 'K-shaped' recovery that appears to be materialising.

    The corollary of this is that a more divided society could emerge at the end of the pandemic with the 'haves' at an even greater remove from the 'have-nots'.

    This prospect prompted a recent suggestion from the IMF that countries might consider the introduction of a temporary solidarity tax on individuals and businesses that have done well in the past year.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Madio Sane wrote: »

    Sorry to end on an unpleasant note but I can easily see lockdowns being a feature of life in Ireland for the next 3-5 years even when enough of the population is vaccinated. I predict we will go into some sort of lockdown each December to early February. This was normally the peak time in hospitals before the pandemic and now there is a precedent for shutting down parts of the economy to protect the health service which would never have been tolerated before. Unless medical science innovates (and I hope it does) to find a way to eliminate viruses they will continue to circulate and mutate in the population for decades as we have seen from the history of coronaviruses.

    I don't mean any disrespect as you are entitled to your view, it's one that I find most bizarre.

    At one point I wandered if this would be our lot every winter for a number of years but rationally I can't see it. Lockdown has created a multitude of issues and not just economic. To think that our Government would continue with them even when Covid is well under control? I can't see it.

    Remember that the members of NPHET and of our Government aren't just policy making robots. They are people with lives. Apart from the damage yearly lockdowns would do to our country I can't imagine it being something any one of them would want.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,216 ✭✭✭Del Griffith




  • Registered Users Posts: 144 ✭✭UI_Paddy



    I admire the rationale, and it's probably more likely than the solidarity payment Alan Kelly requested last year (which almost certainly would have caused issues with non-healthcare workers feeling left out when they too worked throughout the pandemic but didn't get the payment) but it's still just another one of those things I'll believe when I see it.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]



    The existing framework, in which we pay away 50% of income earned over €70k already seems like a solidarity tax to me.


  • Registered Users Posts: 308 ✭✭harrylittle




  • Registered Users Posts: 308 ✭✭harrylittle


    I don't mean any disrespect as you are entitled to your view, it's one that I find most bizarre.

    At one point I wandered if this would be our lot every winter for a number of years but rationally I can't see it. Lockdown has created a multitude of issues and not just economic. To think that our Government would continue with them even when Covid is well under control? I can't see it.

    Remember that the members of NPHET and of our Government aren't just policy making robots. They are people with lives. Apart from the damage yearly lockdowns would do to our country I can't imagine it being something any one of them would want.

    you have lot to learn.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,747 ✭✭✭✭wes


    communists ... ireland is quickly decending into a communist state

    A solidarity tax is not communism ffs.....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,724 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    The existing framework, in which we pay away 50% of income earned over €70k already seems like a solidarity tax to me.

    Yes, and 48.5% after 35/36k approx.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,648 CMod ✭✭✭✭faceman


    Over 400,000 people currently out of work but Pascal only sees 70,000 of them getting back to work before the end of the year. I dont see how he can expect it return to pre-covid levels by 2023. If businesses fold and there's no one to replace them, there's no work.

    https://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/more-than-70000-people-to-be-back-working-by-end-of-year-donohoe-1113828.html


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    you have lot to learn.

    Why do you think that?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 334 ✭✭Grassy Knoll


    People like me who were fortunate enough to have kept their job - the best tax is we spend our savings and boost the economy - we are getting the garden done and spending a fair bit on it - if we all were to do the same the taxes wouldn’t be long about improving.


Advertisement