Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Covid 21

12357…10

Comments

  • #202
    Dohnjoe
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,204 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    myfreespirit wrote: »
    A small flavour of the dangerous ignorance of this contributor in other forum posts:

    "Can't make crazy amounts of money selling people vaccines they don't need every year with the water. Nor utilise them as RNA guinea pigs.

    See all the Nazi references in other post/quotes/images. Weren't they big on the human experiments through injections up at Auschwitz, too?"



    "Theory says mass depopulation is the eventual end-goal. Achieved through sterilisation elements in vaxxes and introduction of various diseases over time. Also utilising the populace for various DNA/RNA experiments over time through aforementioned annual RNA injections (Moderna, Pfizer/BioNTech, AstraZeneca are all funded by Gates Foundation and RNA based).

    Remaining survivors will be fully chipped and tracked, completely subservient to elite overlords/one world government."


    "Denmark is the new Auswitch. Disgusting.

    This should concern everyone, regardless of their stance on vaccination. Would make one very suspicious, too."


    "A lot of us were saying Bill Gates is a main funder of the vaccines that will eventually be approved and rolled out. "


    "If you're under the age of 60 with no underlying medical illness, you don't need this vaccine."

    Any right-thinking person will immediately recognise the calibre of argument that the poster is capable of

    NWO ✔
    Anti-vax ✔
    The elites ✔
    Bill Gates ✔
    Covid disinfo ✔
    Microchips ✔
    Cashless payments ✔
    Mainstream media lies ✔
    RFID chips ✔

    Going for the whole bingo card here


  • #203
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    myfreespirit wrote: »
    "If you're under the age of 60 with no underlying medical illness, you don't need this vaccine."

    Any right-thinking person will immediately recognise the calibre of argument that the poster is capable of

    Lol, trawling through post history; you're obviously starting to take it all very personally :D

    Like I said, you get those shots and report back here immediately :pac:


  • #204
    King Mob
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,345 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Deleted User wrote: »
    Like I said, you get those shots and report back here immediately :pac:
    ...Or you could support your claims right now.


  • #205
    The Nal
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,039 ✭✭✭✭The Nal


    King Mob wrote: »
    ...Or you could support your claims right now.

    InconsequentialPerfumedGadwall-size_restricted.gif


  • #206
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Have already linked to various things. Round and round and round is all these threads go :rolleyes: Provide link... someone asks for the same thing again... repeat ad infinitum.
    Good thing you guys provided scientific evidence re: the long-term safety of your new jabs anyway... Oh wait, you didn't :pac:

    This seems to be getting under the skin of a few of you now (excuse the pun), as you're actually going to be guinea pigs next year. And you're getting worried. We do actually need people like you volunteering yourselves up for new medicine/tech, so I commend you in certain ways ;) Not sure if the bravery outweighs the stupidity, though :pac:


  • #207
    King Mob
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,345 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Deleted User wrote: »
    Have already linked to various things. Round and round and round is all these threads go :rolleyes: Provide link... someone asks for the same thing again... repeat ad infinitum.
    But we've explained why what you've posted isn't adequate. You just keep ignoring those and other points because you can't address them.

    All you have is a single doctor's opinion.
    No evidence
    Just the word of a doctor who's spouting stuff about AI uplinks.

    That's not "various things" and that's not evidence that the vaccine will alter people's DNA.

    So yea, we're still going to ask to see the evidence you claim to have.

    Or you could just admit you can't provide the evidence and cop to lying.
    But this would be the honest thing to do...


  • #208
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    King Mob wrote: »
    That's not "various things" and that's not evidence that the vaccine will alter people's DNA.

    At least you accept there's no guarantee or evidence your RNA vaccines will be safe long-term. You seem particularly worried about the DNA thing, Mob. Bill might slip a little extra CRISPR in there for you personally. Then you'll be on here as King Mob 2.0, spouting twice the amount of nonsense :pac:

    Have a good day, guys. Don't forget to wash your hands (and brains).


  • #209
    Dohnjoe
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,204 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Deleted User wrote: »
    Have already linked to various things.

    Yeah, to absurd claims

    You linked to Denver airport being some sort of "sign" of your conspiracy stuff, nope, the owners of the airport have done that on purpose to get free publicity

    You linked to a Swastika shaped building. Again as some sort of "sign" or "symbol" of your conspiracy. It started construction in the 60's and the owners have acknowledged that it doesn't look good on google maps so they are changing it

    You linked to an osteopath making claims that a Covid vaccine will "alter DNA", and link people to some sort of "AI network", both of which are completely false claims

    You linked to children's clothing with skulls on them as some sort of "sign" of your conspiracy theory. I have a blanket with skulls on that, is that a foreboding "sign" of the NWO/Elite's coming mass-depopulation tyrannical reign?

    You linked to a video, which you clearly didn't watch, in which a man very carefully explains that a vial of vaccine might have an RFID chip on it, like a barcode. And that it is completely optional. Nope, you thought that was evidence they were going to implant microchips under people's skin

    Just linking something isn't evidence of anything, except for your obviously vivid imagination


  • #210
    King Mob
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,345 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Deleted User wrote: »
    At least you accept there's no guarantee or evidence your RNA vaccines will be safe long-term. You seem particularly worried about the DNA thing, Mob. Bill might slip a little extra CRISPR in there for you personally. Then you'll be on here as King Mob 2.0, spouting twice the amount of nonsense :pac:

    Have a good day, guys. Don't forget to wash your hands (and brains).
    You're dodging the questions and resorting to bizarre attempts at wit.

    I did not accept anything.
    I asked you to provide evidence for your claim, you again ran away.

    So let's drop the pretense.
    We know you've no evidence. You know you've no evidence.
    We all know you're lying. That's very clear now.

    So why are you making claims you know are false?
    That doesn't make any sense to me.


  • Advertisement
  • #211
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    Yeah, to absurd claims

    You linked to Denver airport being some sort of "sign" of your conspiracy stuff, nope, the owners of the airport have done that on purpose to get free publicity

    You linked to a Swastika shaped building. Again as some sort of "sign" or "symbol" of your conspiracy. It started construction in the 60's and the owners have acknowledged that it doesn't look good on google maps so they are changing it

    You linked to an osteopath making claims that a Covid vaccine will "alter DNA", and link people to some sort of "AI network", both of which are completely false claims

    You linked to children's clothing with skulls on them as some sort of "sign" of your conspiracy theory. I have a blanket with skulls on that, is that a foreboding "sign" of the NWO/Elite's coming mass-depopulation tyrannical reign?

    You linked to a video, which you clearly didn't watch, in which a man very carefully explains that a vial of vaccine might have an RFID chip on it, like a barcode. And that it is completely optional. Nope, you thought that was evidence they were going to implant microchips under people's skin

    Just linking something isn't evidence of anything, except for your obviously vivid imagination

    You need to go do something with your life, DoJo. Sick of paying for you to be on here posting b*llox :pac::pac:


  • #212
    anacc
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 229 ✭✭anacc


    Deleted User wrote: »
    And for the grand finale, here's a nice aerial view of one of it's buildings. Keeping in line with the whole Nazi imagery there on the right. All very in-line with the stuff Gates is spewing out; at least they're consistent :pac:
    denverairportswastika.jpg

    * Also, now that I notice it, looks oddly like two planes 'in' a building on the left. Probably nothing, either.

    Knowing you, you'll give us the whole "nothing to see here" etc etc. Regardless of what you say, this is an absolute disgrace.

    I heard about these buildings not so long ago. Your observation about the two planes on the left of the photo is on the money. These buildings were built shortly after WWII and were designed so that from the air you can see two bombers approaching the Swastika. Your observation about the buildings being part of a grand Nazi supporting conspiracy in Denver Airport is not on the money though because not only are the buildings in California, the design is actually triumphant about the Nazi defeat.


  • #213
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    anacc wrote: »
    I heard about these buildings not so long ago. Your observation about the two planes on the left of the photo is on the money. These buildings were built shortly after WWII and were designed so that from the air you can see two bombers approaching the Swastika. Your observation about the buildings being part of a grand Nazi supporting conspiracy in Denver Airport is not on the money though because not only are the buildings in California, the design is actually triumphant about the Nazi defeat.

    Thanks for that. I actually saw the next day after posting about Denver that the buildings in the last picture were actually based in California. A lot of sites include that picture with the Denver stuff, for some reason. Couldn't see much when I went looking on street view, but my understanding is it's an army owned building. That makes a lot of sense re: WWII. Was clear as day to me: two planes --> Swastika

    I didn't bother to even edit or talk about it further as the folk here can't see/don't understand symbolism :pac: I think someone above even posted that the swastika was an accident only realised afterwards *facepalm* :pac:

    What's your opinion re: Denver airport?


  • #214
    Dohnjoe
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,204 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Deleted User wrote: »
    Thanks for that. I actually saw the next day after posting about Denver that the buildings in the last picture were actually based in California. A lot of sites include that picture with the Denver stuff, for some reason. Couldn't see much when I went looking on street view, but my understanding is it's an army owned building. That makes a lot of sense re: WWII. Was clear as day to me: two planes --> Swastika

    I didn't bother to even edit or talk about it further as the folk here can't see/don't understand symbolism :pac: I think someone above even posted that the swastika was an accident only realised afterwards *facepalm* :pac:

    What's your opinion re: Denver airport?

    The building wasn't deliberately designed as a "secret" Swastika.


  • #215
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    The building wasn't deliberately designed as a "secret" Swastika.

    You're missing the point again. It was intentionally designed to be symbolic, something you don't understand.

    Where is the post you (or someone else) had up earlier? Was an interview from someone explaining how it was accidental :D


  • #216
    Dohnjoe
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,204 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Deleted User wrote: »
    You're missing the point again. It was intentionally designed to be symbolic, something you don't understand.

    It wasn't, this is the part you've made up. You've found an unintentionally Swastika shaped building in the world, and due to your paranoid views you've decided it's a "symbol" of something adhering to your conspiracy views.

    The people behind the building have acknowledged this
    https://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/27/us/27swastika.html

    Likewise you find symbols on children's clothing.

    This is pattern searching, and is common among conspiracy theorists, e.g. the Illuminati conspiracy theorists see pyramids in everything.


  • Advertisement
  • #217
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    It wasn't, this is the part you've made up. You've found an unintentionally Swastika shaped building in the world, and due to your paranoid views you've decided it's a "symbol" of something adhering to your conspiracy views.

    Likewise you find symbols on children's clothing.

    This is pattern searching, and is common among conspiracy theorists, e.g. the Illuminati conspiracy theorists see pyramids in everything.

    It's already been explained to you by a poster above. The point we're making is the two buildings shaped as planes, and the third building built in the shape of a Swastika are not accidental. It was done intentionally, as poster said above, to symbolise triumph in WWII.

    If you think the Navy accidentally built two buildings in the shape of a plane, and the third in the shape of a Swastika, there really is no helping you.

    Just as there's no helping you if you think it's completely normal to print "New Order", "Ho!" etc on a serious of "gender neutral" children's/toddler clothing. Really? 'Gender neutral' toddler clothing range, with a tv commercial featuring little black demon characters hanging over their beds? It's disgusting stuff. Get a grip, bro.


  • #218
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    It wasn't, this is the part you've made up. You've found an unintentionally Swastika shaped building in the world, and due to your paranoid views you've decided it's a "symbol" of something adhering to your conspiracy views.

    The people behind the building have acknowledged this
    https://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/27/us/27swastika.html

    Likewise you find symbols on children's clothing.

    This is pattern searching, and is common among conspiracy theorists, e.g. the Illuminati conspiracy theorists see pyramids in everything.

    You probably think this sort of crap is completely normal as well. Lady Gaga / Marina Abramovich 'spirit cooking' :
    https://www.hamptons.com/gallery/photoGallery/2068_9.jpg

    Interestingly, Abramovich did a commercial with Microsoft recently, which had to be pulled due to huge negative response. You may not, but a sizeable amount of other people see this through stuff enough to have the commercial removed. Should tell you all you need to know.

    You either have a complete inability to read into things AT ALL, or you just deny/lie about it, for who-knows-what reason.


  • #219
    runawaybishop
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,510 ✭✭✭runawaybishop


    [Deleted User] wrote: »
    Thanks for that. I actually saw the next day after posting about Denver that the buildings in the last picture were actually based in California. A lot of sites include that picture with the Denver stuff, for some reason. Couldn't see much when I went looking on street view, but my understanding is it's an army owned building. That makes a lot of sense re: WWII. Was clear as day to me: two planes --> Swastika

    I didn't bother to even edit or talk about it further as the folk here can't see/don't understand symbolism :pac: I think someone above even posted that the swastika was an accident only realised afterwards *facepalm* :pac:

    What's your opinion re: Denver airport?

    Christ, you harp on about not believing the msm and doing your own research (i.e searching for loopers that support your theory) but you clearly don't even bother to make a cursory effort yourself. You must be scarlet.


  • #220
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    runawaybishop wrote: »
    Christ, you harp on about not believing the msm and doing your own research (i.e searching for loopers that support your theory) but you clearly don't even bother to make a cursory effort yourself. You must be scarlet.

    Unfortunately, I think what's being discussed is beyond your understanding. Thanks for the (non) contribution, though :pac:


  • #221
    runawaybishop
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,510 ✭✭✭runawaybishop


    [Deleted User] wrote: »
    Unfortunately, I think what's being discussed is beyond your understanding. Thanks for the (non) contribution, though :pac:

    I understand, you have no real substantive issues to discuss. Pity, we used to have some good content in here.


  • Advertisement
  • #222
    Dohnjoe
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,204 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Deleted User wrote: »
    It's already been explained to you by a poster above

    It doesn't support your theory, which is:

    You believe the building was intentionally designed to look like a swastika - it wasn't. They only realised it after they broke ground.

    You believe the NWO/Elites who will shortly being depopulating the world are deliberately planting these symbols in buildings built in the 60's, airports and children's clothes today - nothing needs to be said about that.


  • #223
    An Ri rua
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,520 ✭✭✭An Ri rua


    harrylittle wrote: »
    one world government ... crash the economies to bring in a global reset ... a cashless society ...removal of property rights

    to quote un agenda 2030 " you'll own nothing but you'll be happy " just like the folks in north korea .. all vegans

    Are you suggesting we should eat the minks, yes?
    You likely own nothing anyway if you have time to invest in this b*lloxology.

    Ps is that you Simon Harris? Covid 19, Covid 17 and 18, Covid 21.
    Give me strength Lord.


  • #224
    silliussoddius
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,460 ✭✭✭silliussoddius


    Six years ago, this massive conspiracy resulted in 2 deaths in the US. We are currently at around 12,000,000% of this (aka 60,000 Benghazis) under the leadership of a president who done an interview with Alex. There is nothing new under the sun.
    https://thedailybanter.com/2014/10/20/inside-ebola-fever-dreams-internets-worst-right-wing-conspiracy-site/


  • #225
    King Mob
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,345 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Deleted User wrote: »
    It's already been explained to you by a poster above. The point we're making is the two buildings shaped as planes, and the third building built in the shape of a Swastika are not accidental. It was done intentionally, as poster said above, to symbolise triumph in WWII.

    If you think the Navy accidentally built two buildings in the shape of a plane, and the third in the shape of a Swastika, there really is no helping you.
    Notice how Dohnjoe provides a source for his claim, yet you have not.
    You also previously claimed that these were built by the nazis, which wasn't true. You claimed this because you didn't actually research the claim. You just parroted it from whatever youtube video you get your information from.
    Deleted User wrote: »
    Just as there's no helping you if you think it's completely normal to print "New Order", "Ho!" etc on a serious of "gender neutral" children's/toddler clothing. Really? 'Gender neutral' toddler clothing range, with a tv commercial featuring little black demon characters hanging over their beds? It's disgusting stuff. Get a grip, bro.
    Yes. Get a grip. Start listening to the messages in childrens clothes about how there's a global new world order conspiracy to implant us with microchips, alter our DNA and link our minds to a big evil AI...


  • #226
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    King Mob wrote: »
    Yes. Get a grip.

    How many years you two be hanging around this forum, again? :D


  • #227
    King Mob
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,345 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Deleted User wrote: »
    How many years you two be hanging around this forum, again? :D
    You're dodging points to deflect to random, increasingly strange personal attacks.

    Do you have any source or reference to show that these buildings were designed as symbols for some NWO plot?
    Do you have any comment or response to Dohnjoe's link that shows they were not?
    Do you have any explanation for why the New World Order would put a symbol like this in some random base?

    If not, I suspect you will once again ignore these questions are resort to a personal comment that you will try very hard to make witty.

    If that's the case, maybe we can skip all that and you can detail why you spend your time posting obviously silly and obviously false things on the internet. to me, that's pretty bizarre behaviour.


  • #228
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    King Mob wrote: »
    If that's the case, maybe we can skip all that and you can detail why you spend your time posting obviously silly and obviously false things on the internet. to me, that's pretty bizarre behaviour.

    You take things too personally on here. It's an anonymous message board for conspiracy theories. Stop attaching your self-esteem to everything. I don't really care about your opinion on any of this stuff as you admitted before that you don't believe *any* conspiracy theories. You're completely closed off to anything outside of mainstream media. Your mind is set from the get, and your same patterns play out over and over. This has been pointed out to you on many occasions across various threads.

    Myself and others have questioned why you're even on the forum. What do you get out of it? You and your friend are on every thread, always echoing each other's opinions, often posting simultaneously etc. If anything is bizarre, it is this. You spend a lot of time here. I'd like to know why. This is the only answer I'd be interesting in hearing from you about anything.

    Regardless, when someone comes along and takes the p*ss out of you both, even in a light-hearted way, you clearly can't handle it.

    I don't take any exchanges with you seriously. Please understand this; would make your life a lot easier.


  • #229
    King Mob
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,345 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Deleted User wrote: »
    You take things too personally on here. It's an anonymous message board for conspiracy theories. Stop attaching your self-esteem to everything. I don't really care about your opinion on any of this stuff as you admitted before that you don't believe *any* conspiracy theories. You're completely closed off to anything outside of mainstream media. Your mind is set from the get, and your same patterns play out over and over. This has been pointed out to you on many occasions across various threads.

    Myself and others have questioned why you're even on the forum. What do you get out of it? You and your friend are on every thread, always echoing each other's opinions, often posting simultaneously etc. If anything is bizarre, it is this. You spend a lot of time here. I'd like to know why. This is the only answer I'd be interesting in hearing from you about anything.

    Regardless, when someone comes along and takes the p*ss out of you both, even in a light-hearted way, you clearly can't handle it.

    I don't take any exchanges with you seriously. Please understand this; would make your life a lot easier.
    Again, weird, inaccurate personal comments and attacks because you can't address simple questions.

    And not sure why you're saying that he's my friend when you already figured out we're the same person and that we're actually government agents.


    But anyway, we can conclude due to lack of any convincing evidence or arguments, that the covid vaccine will not alter your DNA, nor is there any legitimate reason to ignore the advice of the vast majority of doctors and medical experts.


  • #230
    Dohnjoe
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,204 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Deleted User wrote: »
    You're completely closed off to anything outside of mainstream media. Your mind is set from the get, and your same patterns play out over and over.

    Cool, please list some sites where you get factual daily news from. Not blogs, or opinion pieces or forums, news about current affairs.

    As mentioned before people with irrational beliefs do not like the truth, accuracy and facts because they threaten their beliefs - any attack on their beliefs they see as a personal attack.


  • #231
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    King Mob wrote: »
    But anyway, we can conclude due to lack of any convincing evidence or arguments, that the covid vaccine will not alter your DNA, nor is there any legitimate reason to ignore the advice of the vast majority of doctors and medical experts.

    Again, regardless of any "evidence" or arguments, we can't conclude for certain what the vaccine will or won't do. Has been no long-term testing in humans, so you'll have to wait and see after you take it. Let's hope it's not another Pandremix.

    Anyway, this will go in endless circles and has already clogged up the thread enough. Let's agree to leave it there amicably.


  • Advertisement
  • #232
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    Cool, please list some sites where you get factual daily news from.

    RTE, of course :pac:


    tenor.gif?itemid=4932260


  • #233
    King Mob
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,345 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Deleted User wrote: »
    Again, regardless of any "evidence" or arguments, we can't conclude for certain what the vaccine will or won't do.
    But you've claimed that it WILL alter people's DNA to allow them to link up to an AI. This isn't true.

    You claimed that this is in support of a global conspiracy based on messages you've received via the images on children's clothes.
    This is silly.

    You can't really "agree to disagree" when the other person is lying and suggesting nonsense.

    Again, this doesn't have to go in circles. You could directly address the questions and points put to you rather than run away from them.


  • #234
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    King Mob wrote: »
    You can't really "agree to disagree" when the other person is lying and suggesting nonsense.

    Again, this doesn't have to go in circles. You could directly address the questions and points put to you rather than run away from them.

    Ok, you clearly just want to drag on and on and on. I actually have a life, so I won't engage your dribble any further. You obviously have notifications set up on your phone/computer for responses as well as you're always straight on here after a reply, lol. Are you that bored?

    I suggest you leave your bedsit/granny flat and do something productive. This ain't it :pac: Good luck with the vax.

    IGNORED.


  • #235
    King Mob
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,345 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Deleted User wrote: »
    Ok, you clearly just want to drag on and on and on. I actually have a life, so I won't engage your dribble any further. You obviously have notifications set up on your phone/computer for responses as well as you're always straight on here after a reply, lol. Are you that bored?

    I suggest you leave your bedsit/granny flat and do something productive. This ain't it :pac: Good luck with the vax.

    IGNORED.

    I believe this is the 4th time you've declared that you're not going to respond.

    And again rather than engage in the adult discussion you claim to want, you lash out with more bizarre and very inaccurate personal attacks.

    But the fact remains that you failed utterly to defend you claim that the vaccine would alter peoples DNA.
    All of your claims are equally suspect.


  • #236
    Dohnjoe
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,204 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Deleted User wrote: »
    RTE, of course :pac:

    It's a simple question, not sure why you are dodging it. Where do you get your news on current affairs from? which sites/sources

    You are claiming people shouldn't be getting their information from "mainstream media", okay, where should they be getting their information from?


  • #237
    Ted_YNWA
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,799 ✭✭✭✭Ted_YNWA


    Deleted User wrote: »
    Ok, you clearly just want to drag on and on and on. I actually have a life, so I won't engage your dribble any further. You obviously have notifications set up on your phone/computer for responses as well as you're always straight on here after a reply, lol. Are you that bored?

    I suggest you leave your bedsit/granny flat and do something productive. This ain't it :pac: Good luck with the vax.

    IGNORED.

    All you are doing is making your views less valid by going down the personal attack route.

    If you intend to ignore DohnJoe, do so.

    Don't constantly declare onthread & backtrack.


  • #238
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Ted_YNWA wrote: »


    If you intend to ignore DohnJoe, do so.

    Yeah, done for both. Thanks, Ted.


  • #239
    Dohnjoe
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,204 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Claims posters don't question things. Blocks posters who ask questions.


  • #240
    Ted_YNWA
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,799 ✭✭✭✭Ted_YNWA


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    Claims posters don't question things. Blocks posters who ask questions.

    Quoting for benefit of all.

    Posters should engage with others. Just because a question is asked, doesn't invalidate your view. It is simple debate.

    Just using the forum to soapbox your views with no engaging with community will be looked on dimly.


  • Advertisement
  • #241
    harrylittle
    Registered Users Posts: 308 ✭✭harrylittle


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    It's a simple question, not sure why you are dodging it. Where do you get your news on current affairs from? which sites/sources

    You are claiming people shouldn't be getting their information from "mainstream media", okay, where should they be getting their information from?

    For one ...Try gemmaodorethy.com ....good old fashion journalism that is no long tolerated in 'modern' ireland .....

    https://gemmaodoherty.com


  • #242
    Dohnjoe
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,204 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    harrylittle wrote: »
    For one ...Try gemmaodorethy.com ....good old fashion journalism that is no long tolerated in 'modern' ireland .....

    https://gemmaodoherty.com

    No, just no. She is notorious for going completely and utterly batshiat crazy. Here's one of the original boards threads on her
    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=110232256


  • #243
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Ted_YNWA wrote: »
    Quoting for benefit of all.

    Posters should engage with others. Just because a question is asked, doesn't invalidate your view. It is simple debate.

    Just using the forum to soapbox your views with no engaging with community will be looked on dimly.

    It's not disengagement with the "community". It's disengagement with two particular posters. You might want to ask yourself why many others have put those two on ignore as well. This has been said to you in the past.

    King Mob sh*t himself because I shared a video from a Doctor suggesting the vaccine will mess with people's DNA. She's had support from other Doctors who also share concerns about the safety aspect of a rushed vaccine that's never been used in humans before. If that poster is so worried about it (based on the fact he wouldn't stop going on about it), maybe he should allay his own anxiety and not run out to get it at the first opportunity.

    As for the weird/disturbing Celine Dion clothing crap; Fox News even did a segment calling it out as demonic and satanic. Thousands of likes/comments on the video in agreement. But those two posters think there's nothing weird about it at all. I guess the rest of us are all just wrong and "silly". Ok lads, sure thing :pac:

    Now, que incoming message from one of them about how I am using it as "evidence" for an imminent global takeover :rolleyes: No, I'm just calling it out as strange, disgusting propaganda that seems to echo various symbolism/propaganda elsewhere. The majority who see it obviously agree. It's fine for the lads to hold the minority opinion on stuff like this, but don't drag it around in circles and try to dishonestly make it a cornerstone of the main conspiracy theory being discussed. It's a laughably transparent tactic. Pull this kind of crap enough and people just stop bothering to engage with you.

    Some other guy on here said they were referencing the band with the "New Order" thing (lol). Designers here confirm that is not the case. Take the L on this one, guys ;)


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZQvnHBNYhDM


  • #244
    Dohnjoe
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,204 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Deleted User wrote: »
    It's not disengagement with the "community". It's disengagement with two particular posters.

    Anyone could be asking these same questions.

    Keep in mind that you are trying to spread medical and anti-vaccination disinformation (under the guise of a conspiracy) about a serious situation.


  • #245
    King Mob
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,345 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Deleted User wrote: »
    King Mob sh*t himself because I shared a video from a Doctor suggesting the vaccine will mess with people's DNA. She's had support from other Doctors who also share concerns about the safety aspect of a rushed vaccine that's never been used in humans before.
    It what way did I "**** myself". What a bizarre thing to claim.

    However, I in fact ask you what evidence this doctor supplied beyond her personal authority. You ignored the question.
    I asked what other evidence for your claim you had. You ignored the question.
    I asked you to explain how your claim is possible. You ignored the question.
    You were asked whether or not you agreed with the Doctor in questions other claim that the vaccine was to be used to link people up to an AI. You were also asked why you didn't mention that at all. You ignored those questions too.

    So given that you could not and did not defend your claim at all, and instead when on a bit of a whinge about people asking you direct questions about it, we can conclude that there's no evidence at all for your claim.
    SO the idea that the Vaccine will alter people's DNA is not true. Claiming it is true when you know you can't show it to be true is lying.

    Why should anyone listen to conspiracy theorists when they have to lie and dodge constantly?


  • #246
    The Nal
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,039 ✭✭✭✭The Nal


    harrylittle wrote: »
    For one ...Try gemmaodorethy.com ....

    Oh Jesus.......


  • Advertisement
  • #247
    silliussoddius
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,460 ✭✭✭silliussoddius


    Done a search for past posts on ebola. Many of the posts seem eerily familiar.
    https://www.boards.ie/search/submit/?forum=576&subforums=1&sort=oldest&date_to=&date_from=&query=ebola


  • #248
    ShatterAlan
    Registered Users Posts: 2,807 ✭✭✭ShatterAlan


    Is there any credibility to people dying by means but their cause of death being attributed to COVID-19?


  • #249
    King Mob
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,345 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    ShatterAlan wrote: »
    Is there any credibility to people dying by means but their cause of death being attributed to COVID-19?
    No.
    This is a myth spread by people who don't understand how medicine and viruses work.
    Or by those who are deliberately misunderstanding things.

    Usually this takes the form of someone pointing to a death certificate or similar that lists "respiratory failure" or something rather than Covid as the cause of death.

    However using this to cast doubt on the death toll of the pandemic is ignorant or dishonest.
    It would be like saying "this person didn't die because he got shot because he death certificate says he died of "massive blood loss" rather than "gun shot".

    Like with Trump's false claims of fraud there's been nothing to show that there is any large scale plan to falsify death certificates or causes of death.

    If there is any credibility to the claim, someone will have to post some pretty decent evidence.


  • #250
    Caraibh
    Closed Accounts Posts: 140 ✭✭Caraibh


    A man fell off a ladder in Croatia a few weeks ago and it was determined that he died of COVID-19.

    In the UK, anyone who dies within 28 days of a positive Covid test died of COVID-19. So if a person tests positive for COVID-19, isolates for two weeks, and on day 15 is run over by a bus, he, according to the method for counting COVID-19 deaths, died of COVID-19. Hence the 50,000 + deaths. The number is massively inflated.


  • #251
    King Mob
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,345 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Caraibh wrote: »
    A man fell off a ladder in Croatia a few weeks ago and it was determined that he died of COVID-19.

    In the UK, anyone who dies within 28 days of a positive Covid test died of COVID-19. So if a person tests positive for COVID-19, isolates for two weeks, and on day 15 is run over by a bus, he, according to the method for counting COVID-19 deaths, died of COVID-19. Hence the 50,000 + deaths. The number is massively inflated.

    Source for any of that?

    This has been claimed before but never actually substantiated.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement