Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Will any Sportives go ahead in 2021?

2

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,240 ✭✭✭Robxxx7


    Ring of Beara cycle also cancelled this year now .. rescheduled to 28th May 2022


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 794 ✭✭✭Biker79


    The CI calendar has quite a few sportive entries, as of yesterday.

    It says ' Events that are pending date approval will not appear on the calendar. '

    So they are approved for the calendar, but yet its still unclear if they will actually take place.. :confused:

    Nothing in the news section since Feb 2nd.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭ednwireland


    Biker79 wrote: »
    The CI calendar has quite a few sportive entries, as of yesterday.

    It says ' Events that are pending date approval will not appear on the calendar. '

    So they are approved for the calendar, but yet its still unclear if they will actually take place.. :confused:

    Nothing in the news section since Feb 2nd.

    if they are on the calendar them they have their date approved by CI ( you then still need to upload safety statements etc)

    looks like clubs haven't emailed CI to tell them to take events off the calendar, i cancelled ours on the 17th april, emailed CI and its not on the calendar.

    lets be honest there shouldn't be a single event on there if its not virtual until april 5th at the earliest.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,569 ✭✭✭harringtonp


    All the big ones being pulled. It's a year for the smaller club sportive. Many of the ones I've done have been as enjoyable as but much cheaper than the big ones.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,826 ✭✭✭✭dahat


    All the big ones being pulled. It's a year for the smaller club sportive. Many of the ones I've done have been as enjoyable as but much cheaper than the big ones.

    You can’t beat a sportive race for me, smaller school fundraiser type events. They can be absolute bananas at times.


  • Registered Users Posts: 53 ✭✭McBluffin


    Spotted this today for Oct 2021. You would want some mental strength to do solo.
    http://mondello24.com/?fbclid=IwAR3_Qkj8mUFTTzlua6J4E_5nJJa4YrTceSbzlPRuHNhqYPvTcBzLwLVP9gg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,261 ✭✭✭saccades


    McBluffin wrote: »
    Spotted this today for Oct 2021. You would want some mental strength to do solo.
    http://mondello24.com/?fbclid=IwAR3_Qkj8mUFTTzlua6J4E_5nJJa4YrTceSbzlPRuHNhqYPvTcBzLwLVP9gg

    A comfy saddle and good fuelling moreso imho, no big climbs, lots of good places trackside to set up Basecamp and being on a closed loop road makes it an "easy" 24.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,160 ✭✭✭nilhg


    saccades wrote: »
    A comfy saddle and good fuelling moreso imho, no big climbs, lots of good places trackside to set up Basecamp and being on a closed loop road makes it an "easy" 24.

    I'm not sure that easy and 24 hr race belong in the same sentence.......

    The circuit is 3.44km and can be a pig in the wind, lads at the pointy end will be doing close on 200 laps, that'll be hard on the head, yes it'll be handy to have easy access to the facilities but that can be a double edged sword, when I did the Athy version you knew that once you headed away from the cars you had 44.5km before you got back.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,261 ✭✭✭saccades


    nilhg wrote: »
    I'm not sure that easy and 24 hr race belong in the same sentence.......

    The circuit is 3.44km and can be a pig in the wind, lads at the pointy end will be doing close on 200 laps, that'll be hard on the head, yes it'll be handy to have easy access to the facilities but that can be a double edged sword, when I did the Athy version you knew that once you headed away from the cars you had 44.5km before you got back.

    I did mean relatively, if your looking at doing a 24 it's an easy one to do.

    Very short laps means no need to carry as much.
    You also get a cheer/info from the pit bitch each lap (5 mins?) Which gives you a massive mental boost. It's another 5 mins until you get that hot cup of tea you asked for etc.
    Also means other riders you can draft with for periods which means you'll set good times/distances as you work together.
    A race track has a much more composed surface so less need to concentrate on the road surface, which is important at night.

    I'm surprised they didn't do 12 hours splits for those thinking about doing longer time cycles (maybe they get enough and the track is too crowded?) But don't fancy a drop straight into 24 races.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,033 ✭✭✭who_ru


    Fred Whitton in Yorkshire postponed to Sept with the option to defer to 2022, have deferred.
    that looks a bloody tough one. you'd need serious mileage in the legs in terms of training and hill climbing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,299 ✭✭✭Mercian Pro


    The Orwell Randonnee has been pushed back to 28 August but, to quote the club, only time will tell if it's possible to proceed on the new date. One of the early season favourites, the Tour de Foothills, is understandably cancelled.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,960 ✭✭✭billyhead


    The Orwell Randonnee has been pushed back to 28 August but, to quote the club, only time will tell if it's possible to proceed on the new date. One of the early season favourites, the Tour de Foothills, is understandably cancelled.

    It's worth the wait if it goes ahead.


  • Posts: 531 [Deleted User]


    The Westsportif has been postponed until the end of June, email sent out last week, they are hopeful it will go ahead

    https://www.westportif.ie/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 256 ✭✭Jimbo789


    The Westsportif has been postponed until the end of June, email sent out last week, they are hopeful it will go ahead

    https://www.westportif.ie/

    I see they are still taking entries for this one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,569 ✭✭✭harringtonp


    65 E. Is that what sportives were charging before the pandemic ?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 197 ✭✭Corker1


    Seems a tad pricey.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,483 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    I think that one was always a bit more expensive - it's chip timed though iirc?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,569 ✭✭✭harringtonp


    Macy0161 wrote: »
    I think that one was always a bit more expensive - it's chip timed though iirc?

    That justifies it to some extent. Given the nature of sportives and the fact roads are open, there is nothing ever stopping a group of lads booking a hotel or b&b and just cycling the route with a pile of food in their pockets. 65x2 would get you a good room and they still get to enjoy the crack around town after ... If there is any ..this year being what it is

    I know AGS tried to stop that on the ROK some years back but I never understand what legal basis if any they had.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,483 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    I know AGS tried to stop that on the ROK some years back but I never understand what legal basis if any they had.
    When I did it, there was two checkpointed sections. Molls Gap was one. I don't know if they paid/ arranged closed roads (which they had) did it confer extra rights?


  • Registered Users Posts: 197 ✭✭Corker1


    I suppose there are two options of riding a Sportive route without paying the fee. On the day of the event or any other day.
    I think riding the route of a Sportive on the day of the event without paying is bad form. Especially if the Sportive is raising money for Charities or good causes. No one is forcing you to participate on the day. By all means ride the route any other day of the year with a group or solo if you do not want to be part of the Sportive and stump up the fee. Just because you can piggyback on the organisers efforts doesn't make it right and quite honestly to me, it smacks of meanness when I hear of people doing that.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 547 ✭✭✭lissard


    Corker1 wrote: »
    Just because you can piggyback on the organisers efforts doesn't make it right and quite honestly to me, it smacks of meanness when I hear of people doing that.
    Couldn't agree more - there are 364 other days in the year to do the same route if you are that way inclined.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 475 ✭✭selwyn froggitt


    Fred Whitton in Yorkshire postponed to Sept with the option to defer to 2022, have deferred.

    Yorkshire :eek:

    Wash your mouth out with soap :D

    It's held in the Lake District in Cumbria and always will be.


  • Registered Users Posts: 335 ✭✭AxleAddict


    65 E. Is that what sportives were charging before the pandemic ?

    A few were, some even more (yeah, Ring of Kerry, I'm lookin' at you) but most would typically be around €40 or less - particularly for smaller club sportives. Some sportives have early-bird pricing - as was the case with this one - think it was €45 or something around that - I've taken part in this one the last couple of years and I think they've thrown in a rain jacket and gilet as freebies. Lovely part of the county - would really recommend it to anyone who wants some great scenery and a bit of climbing. One of my favourite along with the Reservoir Dog and the Donegal Bay Spring Sportive.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,569 ✭✭✭harringtonp


    Corker1 wrote: »
    I suppose there are two options of riding a Sportive route without paying the fee. On the day of the event or any other day.
    I think riding the route of a Sportive on the day of the event without paying is bad form. Especially if the Sportive is raising money for Charities or good causes. No one is forcing you to participate on the day. By all means ride the route any other day of the year with a group or solo if you do not want to be part of the Sportive and stump up the fee. Just because you can piggyback on the organisers efforts doesn't make it right and quite honestly to me, it smacks of meanness when I hear of people doing that.

    These expensive sportive usually happen to be the big ones so you'll probably get accomodation easier and cheaper any other day too.

    I guess they are aimed at guys who are targeting the distance. We'll occasionally do close to 150km on a club spin and I've often found at past sportives that you're in a group with fellow club mates and the odd other soul. You may as well have been on a club weekend away.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 701 ✭✭✭Reality_Check1


    With all the money the average person spends on cycling gear, clothing, upgrades etc etc there’s very little excuse for not throwing a few quid to the organisers of a Sportif which is prob going to a good cause or at least the local club


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 218 ✭✭The Buster


    With all the money the average person spends on cycling gear, clothing, upgrades etc etc there’s very little excuse for not throwing a few quid to the organisers of a Sportif which is prob going to a good cause or at least the local club

    In general I agree with you but I think the price Westportif is charging is really extracting the urine. €65+CI day license + processing fee adds up to just under €75.

    The ROK was referenced above and was expensive but at least it was a charity event. Other than a additional voluntary donation there is no mention of the Westportif been a charity event.

    I dont think it is a timed event - the Westport Gran Fondo was a timed event so maybe that is what the earlier poster was thinking about.

    I have done this event a few times in the past and it is really enjoyable event but I dont see the value in €75 and will not be doing it this year.


  • Registered Users Posts: 142 ✭✭Steve SilverMint


    €65 is an outrageous price for a sportive, piss take


  • Site Banned Posts: 20,686 ✭✭✭✭Weepsie


    The Buster wrote: »
    In general I agree with you but I think the price Westportif is charging is really extracting the urine. €65+CI day license + processing fee adds up to just under €75.

    The ROK was referenced above and was expensive but at least it was a charity event. Other than a additional voluntary donation there is no mention of the Westportif been a charity event.

    I dont think it is a timed event - the Westport Gran Fondo was a timed event so maybe that is what the earlier poster was thinking about.

    I have done this event a few times in the past and it is really enjoyable event but I dont see the value in €75 and will not be doing it this year.

    It's a fundraiser for 2 clubs and a different charity partner each year. It was supposed to be make a wish last year, so presumably still them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 218 ✭✭The Buster


    Weepsie wrote: »
    It's a fundraiser for 2 clubs and a different charity partner each year. It was supposed to be make a wish last year, so presumably still them.

    I get its a fundraiser for the two clubs as they mention that on the event website. Absolutely no mention of the charity partner until you go to register and they ask if you would like to make an additional donation to their charity partner, which is Make-a-Wish again this year.

    Fair enough if it they are doing it for charity but I would have expected that they advertised that information


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,483 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    The Buster wrote: »
    The ROK was referenced above and was expensive but at least it was a charity event.
    I don't think it was ever the cost that the Rok really got criticized for, it was the entry process when they made you pay (non refundable) to enter the draw for entry! And that wasn't a CI event.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 335 ✭✭AxleAddict


    The Buster wrote: »
    I get its a fundraiser for the two clubs as they mention that on the event website. Absolutely no mention of the charity partner until you go to register and they ask if you would like to make an additional donation to their charity partner, which is Make-a-Wish again this year.

    Fair enough if it they are doing it for charity but I would have expected that they advertised that information

    Yeah - curious - I'm fairly sure the Make A Wish logo was more prominently displayed on the front page until they tweaked the layout of the website within the last week or so (to add the Westportif Junior section)

    Count yourself lucky you no longer need to look at my ugly mug :D

    https://web.archive.org/web/20210301223252/https://www.westportif.ie/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,299 ✭✭✭Mercian Pro


    The Buster wrote: »
    I get its a fundraiser for the two clubs as they mention that on the event website. Absolutely no mention of the charity partner until you go to register and they ask if you would like to make an additional donation to their charity partner, which is Make-a-Wish again this year.

    Fair enough if it they are doing it for charity but I would have expected that they advertised that information


    In the early years of this event, the main organisers were a number of hotels in Westport, no charity benefitted and you had to register the night before but with special rates in the hotels!


    Now it seems to be the two local clubs running it with a number of local sponsors. It's a great area for cycling but the charity arrangement is a bit like shaking a bucket rather than guaranteeing a specific donation.



    I also have a real issue with this: "Can I get a refund if I do not attend ?
    When paying for your entry on line it is stipulated that this is a non-refundable payment. As soon as a participant enters we incur costs such as admin etc. It is also not possible to transfer entries to any other Events, next year’s event, or a different competitor."

    Given the ongoing uncertainty about events happening or not, I really don't find this acceptable for this, or any other sportif, this year in particular.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,483 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    I don't know - most wouldn't have given a refund or transfer if you couldn't make it? It's a bit different to them having to cancel for whatever reason (which I would have an issue with).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,299 ✭✭✭Mercian Pro


    Macy0161 wrote: »
    I don't know - most wouldn't have given a refund or transfer if you couldn't make it? It's a bit different to them having to cancel for whatever reason (which I would have an issue with).


    Went as far as the payment stage on their website and couldn't find any other terms and conditions other than ones used by a UK firm to handle their charity donations. No mention anywhere of what happens if they cancel or inter-county travel is again restricted. I can only assume that their reference to your payment being non-refundable applies.


    As a matter of interest, do many other clubs need to fundraiser using sportives. I know I'm in a fairly large one but a quite small subscriptions, when you deduct the CI payment, more than cover the expenses for the year. It's a different matter with a few other sports clubs I'm in where big sums are needed to pay staff and pavilion costs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,569 ✭✭✭harringtonp


    As a matter of interest, do many other clubs need to fundraiser using sportives. I know I'm in a fairly large one but a quite small subscriptions, when you deduct the CI payment, more than cover the expenses for the year. It's a different matter with a few other sports clubs I'm in where big sums are needed to pay staff and pavilion costs.

    Our club works of a bank balance of just a couple of thousand euro. My view is (and its not necessarily everyones in the club) that a big balance opens a can of worms. What do you do with it ? Unless a club has a strong youth/junior base it's hard to imagine what you can do with the excess. You're far better off reducing the subscription level for the year (or in the case of our club membership fees were waived for 2021 for anyone who was a member in 2020 on the basis of a lack of club activity due to Covid) to keep the surplus at a small but healthy level. Huge surpluses draw the wrong people into a club and on to a committee, it's amazing how many out there have a strong scent for a money trail.

    When it comes to Sportives and charities, I always start from a bases of complete cynicism (think of Benjamin the donkey in Animal Farm :D ) until it's obvious that the charity is the main motive for the sportive. There's cute boyos out there in spades and they all realise that by saying you're supporting charities you're playing to peoples soft side. They know they can often get away without giving specifics. Bigger events are aware that pledging a thousand or two to a charity enables them to take in multiple times that amount through higher entry fees and more entrants.

    There are some great charity cycles out there, the ROK is the obvious one in spite of the stick they've got over pushing it as far as they can. But there are plenty of smaller club based ones (often with lower entry fees) where all proceeds after running expenses end up with the target charity.

    With regards to fund raisers for clubs or token handoffs to charities, unless you see very specific details on what exactly it is for, you may as well assume you are funding the committee and a select few others next sunny cycling holiday


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭ednwireland


    Our club works of a bank balance of just a couple of thousand euro. My view is (and its not necessarily everyones in the club) that a big balance opens a can of worms. What do you do with it ? Unless a club has a strong youth/junior base it's hard to imagine what you can do with the excess. You're far better off reducing the subscription level for the year (or in the case of our club membership fees were waived for 2021 for anyone who was a member in 2020 on the basis of a lack of club activity due to Covid) to keep the surplus at a small but healthy level. Huge surpluses draw the wrong people into a club and on to a committee, it's amazing how many out there have a strong scent for a money trail.

    reduced our club fees to a fiver for 2021, the sportive gave us enough to make donations to local charities ( we never specifically supported a charity with the event). also having a decent float meant that if we had to cancel the sportive at short notice we could cover expenses, buts we werent going to get rich running ours but we were one of the cheaper ones.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,569 ✭✭✭harringtonp


    reduced our club fees to a fiver for 2021, the sportive gave us enough to make donations to local charities ( we never specifically supported a charity with the event). also having a decent float meant that if we had to cancel the sportive at short notice we could cover expenses, buts we werent going to get rich running ours but we were one of the cheaper ones.

    I'm generally of the view that club sportives are great and deserve to be better supported. They're usually cheaper, well organised and use the event proceedings in a very constructive way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,483 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    the ROK is the obvious one in spite of the stick they've got over pushing it as far as they can.
    Pretty high cost, once you dig underneath "raised €x" iirc.


  • Registered Users Posts: 197 ✭✭Corker1


    Just as there are all shapes and sizes of Sportive, there is a multitude of motivations for individuals, clubs and organisations to get involved. And where filthy lucre is involved sometimes people with skewed motivations can embed themselves. I think it is important to have transparency when it comes to involvement of charities or good causes. I think rider motivations vary too. Some will definitely want to ride an event to support a specific charity, but I suspect what most riders want to get out of participating in a Sportive, is the physical challenge, camaraderie of the peleton and an enjoyable day on the bike. For many, that a charity will benefit is a bonus.
    Where I do have a problem is where an event organiser cynically uses a charity as a 'brand enhancer'. Using the charity logo on their website but not giving them a fair cut of the funds raised. A bit like the Ryanair scratch cards. Or only putting a link to 'donate here' or maybe giving only money raised from a raffle on the day to the Charity and none of the entry fees. I can only speak for our club by guaranteeing that every red cent raised from our Sportives goes to charities and community projects. The club neither gets or wants a cut. From my perspective, my priorities when organising a sportive are that all riders have the best day possible and get well looked after. That everyone gets around the course safely. That club members and community helpers have a positive experience. That all money raised goes to deserving charities and causes and that we enjoy running it enough, to want to come back and do it all over again the following year.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,299 ✭✭✭Mercian Pro


    Corker1 wrote: »
    From my perspective, my priorities when organising a sportive are that all riders have the best day possible and get well looked after. That everyone gets around the course safely. That club members and community helpers have a positive experience. That all money raised goes to deserving charities and causes and that we enjoy running it enough, to want to come back and do it all over again the following year.


    Long may you continue to deliver on those priorities Corker - looking forward already to the next outing on the Dog on 5 September. https://www.facebook.com/ReservoirCogsCC/


    I suppose I had hoped that the Leisue Commission in CI might factor some of those targets into their deliberations before sanctioning events but maybe that is too ambitious and impractical.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,098 ✭✭✭NamelessPhil


    The ROK and other major sportives are not always under CI control or authorisation. I think it is unfair to impute the Leisure Commission in sanctioning the charity activities of sportives.

    The Leisure Commission does take a variety of factors including those mentioned by you into consideration, especially rider safety and satisfaction, when reviewing events


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,325 ✭✭✭MayoSalmon



    I also have a real issue with this: "Can I get a refund if I do not attend ?
    When paying for your entry on line it is stipulated that this is a non-refundable payment. As soon as a participant enters we incur costs such as admin etc. It is also not possible to transfer entries to any other Events, next year’s event, or a different competitor."

    Possibly the most ridiculous terms I have ever seen. Doubt that it is even legal under consumer protection laws to be honest.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,299 ✭✭✭Mercian Pro


    The ROK and other major sportives are not always under CI control or authorisation. I think it is unfair to impute the Leisure Commission in sanctioning the charity activities of sportives.

    The Leisure Commission does take a variety of factors including those mentioned by you into consideration, especially rider safety and satisfaction, when reviewing events


    I am aware that the RoK has never been sanctioned by CI but the majority of other medium and large sportives have been. I have never been clear on the criteria used by CI and their website does little to enlighten me. In the 17 Strategic Goals of the Leisure Commission, none relate to the process of approving events unless you count "Update Event Approval Stamp for 2021".

    A number of the Goals do relate to visiting events and getting participant feedback which is great and hopefully this feeds into the approval system in following years. I would also hope that any misleading claims regarding charity involvement could also be factored in but, as I said, this may be too ambitious and impractical.

    PS - In light of MayoSalmon's post and previous discussions here, maybe organiser's approach to refunds could also be considered. The Commission might consider preparing guidelines for organisers that go beyond event safety issues (or maybe they have already?)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,144 ✭✭✭Benny Cake




  • Posts: 531 [Deleted User]


    Entries still available for the Loop Sportive 10th Oct.
    The only sportive I've done with a bottle of beer at the finish

    https://www.26extreme.com/product/the-carlingford-loop-sportive/


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 245 ✭✭oisinog


    Entries still available for the Loop Sportive 10th Oct.
    The only sportive I've done with a bottle of beer at the finish

    https://www.26extreme.com/product/the-carlingford-loop-sportive/

    I was looking at that the lack of clear start times cold be a big issue for people getting the Ferry


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,483 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    Lakelander Gravel Grinder gave you beer too!

    I'd be completely against CI getting involved in the charity (or otherwise) side of events tbh. Their concern should be the safety and insurance aspects, not taking on the role of charity regulator.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 11,668 Mod ✭✭✭✭RobFowl


    Macy0161 wrote: »
    Lakelander Gravel Grinder gave you beer too!


    Feckin brilliant for a tee-totaller ......


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,483 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    RobFowl wrote: »
    Feckin brilliant for a tee-totaller ......
    And someone driving home as it happens! Actually, pretty sure the aforementioned Reservoir Dog gave burger and a (mont) bottle one of the years I did it? I got the cap left on that time (I assume Mont are out of business now though?)


  • Registered Users Posts: 197 ✭✭Corker1


    Yes Macy, The owner of Mont Brewery was / is a member of Reservoir Cogs C.C. . For a few years he stood a big round at the Reservoir Dog. But alas the Mont Brewery is no more, which is a pity as it was a tasty brew.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement