Build Back Better

Fodla · 24-11-2020 12:42am #1

What do people think about more and more world leaders using the slogan 'Build Back Better'? Johnson, Biden, Trudeau, the Head of WHO, to name but a few. No sooner had the pandemic been declared than did almost every world leader start talking about a "new normal". And now they're going to build back better it seems. Do you think it's just a coincidence that they're (once again) all saying the same thing?

King Mob · 24-11-2020 12:53am

Fodla wrote: »

What do people think about more and more world leaders using the slogan 'Build Back Better'? Johnson, Biden, Trudeau, the Head of WHO, to name but a few. No sooner had the pandemic been declared than did almost every world leader start talking about a "new normal". And now they're going to build back better it seems. Do you think it's just a coincidence that they're (once again) all saying the same thing?

Yes. It's a catchy alliterative slogan that states the obvious fact that there needs to be recovery from the effects of the pandemic with vague promises of improvement.
I think conspiracy theorists like to take phrases like this and twist them and add sinister connotations to them that they can't really explain or substantiate.

It is most likely a coincidence.
What other explanation is there?

Fodla · 24-11-2020 1:13am

King Mob wrote: »

Yes. It's a catchy alliterative slogan that states the obvious fact that there needs to be recovery from the effects of the pandemic with vague promises of improvement.
I think conspiracy theorists like to take phrases like this and twist them and add sinister connotations to them that they can't really explain or substantiate.

It is most likely a coincidence.
What other explanation is there?

The other explanation that has been put forward (see recent articles about Trudeau calling for a "reset") is that they're following a script.

King Mob · 24-11-2020 1:19am

Fodla wrote: »

The other explanation that has been put forward (see recent articles about Trudeau calling for a "reset") is that they're following a script.

Ok.
That's a bit silly.
What evidence is there for this "script"?
Who exactly wrote it and why would all these disperate world leaders follow it?

Why is that more likely than the obvious, simple non-conspiracy explanation?

Do you also subscribe to the notion of a "New World Order" which is based on pretty much the same logic?

Fodla · 24-11-2020 1:27am

King Mob wrote: »

Ok.
That's a bit silly.
What evidence is there for this "script"?
Who exactly wrote it and why would all these disperate world leaders follow it?

Why is that more likely than the obvious, simple non-conspiracy explanation?

Do you also subscribe to the notion of a "New World Order" which is based on pretty much the same logic?

I agree that it's a bit silly, but I don't think it's unreasonable to suggest that they're following a script. "New normal", "dark winter" and now "build back better". The evidence is that it's not just "build back better" that they're saying. If it was just that I could dismiss it as a coincidence. But the use of "new normal", "dark winter", and "build back better" suggests that they're following a script.

Who wrote it? It could be suggested, quite reasonably, in my opinion, considering how prominent they have been throughout all of this, that the WEF and Klaus Schwab wrote the script.

I believe that the purpose of the Great Reset is to overthrow democracy and national governments and replace them with a global government. So I guess that'd be the New World Order conspiracy theory come to pass.

King Mob · 24-11-2020 1:37am

Fodla wrote: »

I agree that it's a bit silly, but I don't think it's unreasonable to suggest that they're following a script. "New normal", "dark winter" and now "build back better". The evidence is that it's not just "build back better" that they're saying. If it was just that I could dismiss it as a coincidence. But the use of "new normal", "dark winter", and "build back better" suggests that they're following a script.

But these are obvious common phrases. There's nothing at all to suggest they're part of a script.
It's a silly conclusion to reach based on that alone.

And as you've agreed you've no evidence beyond the fact they used some of the same phrases.

It's coincidence. Conspiracy theorists however have a habit of taking coincidence and dreaming up mad plots and scenarios based on pretty much nothing to explain them.

Fodla wrote: »

Who wrote it? It could be suggested, quite reasonably, in my opinion, considering how prominent they have been throughout all of this, that the WEF and Klaus Schwab wrote the script.

That is not a reasonable conclusion. It's a very wild and bizarre conclusion with no basis in fact.

Have you a copy of the script written by this Klaus fellow? Did he give it to everyone? Or did he just tell them to use certain phrases?

Fodla wrote: »

I believe that the purpose of the Great Reset is to overthrow democracy and national governments and replace them with a global government. So I guess that'd be the New World Order conspiracy theory come to pass.

Again, this is a bizarre and frankly paranoid conclusion to jump to based on a coincidence.

If the options are
A) Politicians used catchy stock phrases in generic speeches
or

It's part of a giant global decades long conspiracy that was only found out because they used these phrases...

Which is more likely.

Rational people would pretty quickly agree it's A.

24-11-2020 9:40am

Fodla wrote: »

What do people think about more and more world leaders using the slogan 'Build Back Better'? Johnson, Biden, Trudeau, the Head of WHO, to name but a few. No sooner had the pandemic been declared than did almost every world leader start talking about a "new normal". And now they're going to build back better it seems. Do you think it's just a coincidence that they're (once again) all saying the same thing?

It would have to be very, very coincidental that they're all calling for a 'reset', referring to the pandemic as a "window of opportunity", all using the Build Back Better slogan, and all meeting in January once again to discuss it with Klaus Schwab (unelected "mastermind" of this 'Great Reset'/4th Industrial Revolution nonsense, who also constantly uses the phrases mentioned above).

Would be naive to think they're not all going off the same script. Trudeau, for example, is obviously a very weak politician. I think even most Canadians are aware at this stage that he's a complete puppet.

The question is what what will materialize from this upcoming Great Reset/Davos meeting. The Great Reset has been a dream of Schwab's for years. He wrote a s*tty book on it before the pandemic. He seems to particularly admire the Chinese system of governance; which, of course, is something we should be 100% avoiding here in the West.

Search it up on other forums, YouTube, Twitter etc. Everyone is unanimously suspicious and against the notion of The Great Reset. You'll probably get one or two on here telling you it's nothing, but they'd be in the minority. Research and make up your own mind.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pF_kXE-HXSQ

sydthebeat · 24-11-2020 9:44am

Apophenia

24-11-2020 9:47am

sydthebeat wrote: »

Apophenia

Lol, yeah, sure. It's all just extremely coincidental :pac:

You can imagine them all meeting up: "You guys were using the exact same slogan and phrases as us?! No way!" :pac:

King Mob · 24-11-2020 9:51am

Deleted User wrote: »

Search it up on other forums, YouTube, Twitter etc. Everyone is unanimously suspicious and against the notion of The Great Reset. You'll probably get one or two on here telling you it's nothing, but they'd be in the minority. Research and make up your own mind.

No. It's not unanimously suspicious, it's only suspicious to those who are they types who'd buy into ridiculous conspiracy theories and those who sell stuff to them.

People shouldn't do research on youtube and twitter. They should do actual research.
Especially if they aren't great on the old critical thinking.

sydthebeat · 24-11-2020 9:52am

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Lol, yeah, sure. It's all just extremely coincidental :pac:

Not at all.

Everyone from governments, global business's, national business, communities, social groups, households and individuals are considering how to better themselves after this covid crisis, and how to come out of the crisis into a better world.

Its the conspiracy theory headballs that think there is some kind of master scripted plan behind all this.

That's pure apophenia.

You're appointing a singular phantasmic reason behind a series of normal events

24-11-2020 9:56am

sydthebeat wrote: »

this.
That's pure apophenia.

You're appointing a singular phantasmic reason behind a series of normal events

You'd be in the minority of anybody who's researched it to think it's just coincidental and not connected.

But fair enough, we'll see how it plays out next year. For what it's worth, I obviously hope you're right and nothing much comes of it.

24-11-2020 10:03am

sydthebeat wrote: »

Everyone from governments, global business's, national business, communities, social groups, households and individuals are considering how to better themselves after this covid crisis, and how to come out of the crisis into a better world.

We won't be deciding anything, though. It will be done on our behalf by governments and unelected folk such as Klaus Schwab.

Just like the despicable idea of requiring everyone to sign up to annual vaccinations, digital vax passports etc to travel, attend concerts etc. People will have to step up and not consent to such fascism. I'm sure you can agree with that.

sydthebeat · 24-11-2020 10:05am

[Deleted User] wrote: »

You'd be in the minority of anybody who's researched it to think it's just coincidental and not connected.

But fair enough, we'll see how it plays out next year. For what it's worth, I obviously hope you're right and nothing much comes of it.

I certainly don't want to see "nothing much come of it".

I want to see a concerted effort to come out of this intro a changed better world. I want governments to reassess population policy to funnel people into very high density urban cities rather than a more planned dispersal across nations.

I want to see policy regarding energy usage really driven home as we can see the environmental and financial benefits from lower energy usage.

I don't want to see more of the same that existed beforehand. That would be a huge opportunity lost

King Mob · 24-11-2020 10:09am

Deleted User wrote: »

You'd be in the minority of anybody who's researched it to think it's just coincidental and not connected.

But fair enough, we'll see how it plays out next year. For what it's worth, I obviously hope you're right and nothing much comes of it.

But I'm going to bet that when the year has passed and none of the vague stuff you've claimed has happened or gotten closer, you'll still weasel out of admitting you've gotten things wrong.

It's why you guys don't want to make an definitive statements or give a solid time frame. That just makes it more obvious when the predictions fail.

Though more likely, it's not something you're doing, it's something being done by the youtube bull**** artists you follow. They're smart and know how to draw something out and hedge their bets.

24-11-2020 10:11am

sydthebeat wrote: »

I certainly don't want to see "nothing much come of it".

I want to see a concerted effort to come out of this intro a changed better world. I want governments to reassess population policy to funnel people into very high density urban cities rather than a more planned dispersal across nations.

I want to see policy regarding energy usage really driven home as we can see the environmental and financial benefits from lower energy usage.

I don't want to see more of the same that existed beforehand. That would be a huge opportunity lost

Fair points. I'd be suspicious of government leaders and billionaires preaching down about "climate change" to the masses, though. They're the very people who leave huge carbon footprints themselves. It's an easy way to further tax the average citizen, whilst they continue flying around in their jets. I don't think a lot of these people will be giving up their own lifestyles.

sydthebeat · 24-11-2020 10:13am

[Deleted User] wrote: »

We won't be deciding anything, though. It will be done on our behalf by governments and unelected folk such as Klaus Schwab.

Just like the despicable idea of requiring everyone to sign up to annual vaccinations, digital vax passports etc to travel, attend concerts etc. People will have to step up and not consent to such fascism. I'm sure you can agree with that.

Governments make decisions on our behalf every single day, that's literally their raison d'être.

As for Schwab and his great reset, he's a commentator and in a great position of power to influence policy makers. He's referring to exactly what I'm referring to previously..... A way to use this crisis as an opportunity to make the world better.

Its still up to the policy makers and elected governments to digest and contextualise the WEF comments.

Fear of change is not a healthy position to hold

24-11-2020 10:18am

sydthebeat wrote: »

.
Fear of change is not a healthy position to hold

Agreed, generally speaking. But suspicion/awareness of potential negative change is indeed healthy. See previously mentioned 'digital vax passports or have your freedoms restricted' as an example of this.

sydthebeat · 24-11-2020 10:19am

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Fair points. I'd be suspicious of government leaders and billionaires preaching down about "climate change" to the masses, though. They're the very people who leave huge carbon footprints themselves. It's an easy way to further tax the average citizen, whilst they continue flying around in their jets. I don't think a lot of these people will be giving up their own lifestyles.

Ah that's just a weak and ludite argument to be honest. There's more communication occurring digitally today than in any other time in human history.
Innovation is moving towards greener living every single day, and hopefully by 2050 dirty fuel will be a thing for the history books

24-11-2020 10:29am

sydthebeat wrote: »

Ah that's just a weak and ludite argument to be honest. There's more communication occurring digitally today than in any other time in human history.
Innovation is moving towards greener living every single day, and hopefully by 2050 dirty fuel will be a thing for the history books

It's not really, though. They've been going on about this a few years at least, yet:

https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-30960186.html

Now expand that out internationally. We'll see if these guys practice what they preach.

It's the same with the current restrictions, social distancing etc. They seem content enough to break those rules themselves. Hence people stop listening.

sydthebeat · 24-11-2020 10:40am

[Deleted User] wrote: »

It's not really, though. They've been going on about this a few years at least, yet:

https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-30960186.html

Now expand that out internationally. We'll see if these guys practice what they preach.

It's the same with the current restrictions, social distancing etc. They seem content enough to break those rules themselves. Hence people stop listening.

100% agreed with you here.
Golfgate was a significant point in the government losing the people.

Though I feel we've gone far off the track of this thread.

The Nal · 24-11-2020 10:41am

Deleted User wrote: »

Research and make up your own mind.

I have. It seems like the perfect time to implement some much needed change. Its a great idea.

24-11-2020 10:47am

The Nal wrote: »

I have. It seems like the perfect time to implement some much needed change. Its a great idea.

Which changes are you referring to?

As above, let's see if international leaders are better than our own in adhering to new rules themselves

banie01 · 24-11-2020 11:09am

Oh God! Now there's a website!
There'll be no vaccine injected in my veins in the hope that the world can recover!
I don't have veins, my blood is Bluetooth so I'll be safe anyway...
Is it time for full tinfoil suits yet lads? And is there a recommended brand? :pac:

https://twitter.com/JoeBiden/status/1331071296235507713?s=19

Fodla · 24-11-2020 11:18am

Deleted User wrote: »

Which changes are you referring to?

As above, let's see if international leaders are better than our own in adhering to new rules themselves

The fact that they couldn't be bothered to follow their own rules suggests that the rules are about controlling people.

The propagandists at RTÉ, Newsom, Murphy in NJ. Their behaviour suggests that they all know it's a load of nonsense. But they've succeeded in creating a society of snitches, and terrified people into submission, so I guess they can do what they like.

24-11-2020 11:44am

banie01 wrote: »

Oh God! Now there's a website!
There'll be no vaccine injected in my veins in the hope that the world can recover!
I don't have veins, my blood is Bluetooth so I'll be safe anyway...
Is it time for full tinfoil suits yet lads? And is there a recommended brand? :pac:

https://twitter.com/JoeBiden/status/1331071296235507713?s=19

I doubt Joe himself is aware of the website or that tweet

Dohnjoe · 24-11-2020 4:24pm

Fodla wrote: »

What do people think about more and more world leaders using the slogan 'Build Back Better'? Johnson, Biden, Trudeau, the Head of WHO, to name but a few. No sooner had the pandemic been declared than did almost every world leader start talking about a "new normal". And now they're going to build back better it seems. Do you think it's just a coincidence that they're (once again) all saying the same thing?

What's the conspiracy?

namloc1980 · 24-11-2020 4:32pm

Dohnjoe wrote: »

What's the conspiracy?

Alliteration apparently. They're taking over the world with alliteration.......run for your lives!!!

stoneill · 24-11-2020 4:36pm

Build back better is just a catchy phrase, if you take anything more out of it then there is something wrong with you.

Anyway the New World Order can be any worse than the Old World Order, all that changes is who you pay your taxes to.

King Mob · 24-11-2020 4:42pm

namloc1980 wrote: »

Alliteration apparently. They're taking over the world with alliteration.......run for your lives!!!

I'm sure there was some who believed Obama's "Yes We Can!" was code also.

I also get the feeling that if you told these guys about all the racist stuff Trump has said or implied, they'd be telling us it would be just snowflakes overreacting and reading too much into stuff.

Dohnjoe · 24-11-2020 4:49pm

King Mob wrote: »

I'm sure there was some who believed Obama's "Yes We Can!" was code also.

We had multiple threads about Obama being the "anti-christ" in here. Conspiracy theorists never change, only the subject matter.

Fodla · 24-11-2020 4:54pm

stoneill wrote: »

Build back better is just a catchy phrase, if you take anything more out of it then there is something wrong with you.

Anyway the New World Order can be any worse than the Old World Order, all that changes is who you pay your taxes to.

I've noticed that several posters mock and dismiss those of us who are worried about the Great Reset. I would like to know what those posters believe the Great Reset will consist of. Schwab has spoken of implantable microchips to read our thoughts, has said that the world will never go back to normal and that monumental changes are going to be made. He has said that all aspects of our societies need to be revamped. So what exactly is the Great Reset about? There's no way that it's going to consist of a few gentle recommendations. What are the monumental changes he's on about?

Fodla · 24-11-2020 4:56pm

growleaves wrote: »

No I don't believe its a coincidence. I believe its coordinated. Since when do the Prime Minister of the UK and the President of the US use identical rhetoric?

The 27 EU countries are officially coordinated as a matter of policy as we know.

All indications are that we will see the rollout of some globally coordinated scheme (whether you expect this scheme to be objectionable or not).

You're right. It's ridiculous to suggest that they all just happened to think of 'new normal' five minutes after a pandemic is declared and that they all just happened to think of 'build back better' as soon as a vaccine appears.

Dohnjoe · 24-11-2020 4:57pm

Fodla wrote: »

I've noticed that several posters mock and dismiss those of us who are worried about the Great Reset. I would like to know what those posters believe the Great Reset will consist of.

It's a global discussion forum. This has been explained, it's not complex to understand. Is there a part of it you don't understand?

The only people in the world who think it's anything else are paranoid conspiracy theorists, who always, without fail, think those types of things are sinister.

Also, for this "build back better" slogan stuff, what's the conspiracy?

The Nal · 24-11-2020 4:57pm

Fodla wrote: »

I've noticed that several posters mock and dismiss those of us who are worried about the Great Reset. I would like to know what those posters believe the Great Reset will consist of. Schwab has spoken of implantable microchips to read our thoughts, has said that the world will never go back to normal and that monumental changes are going to be made. He has said that all aspects of our societies need to be revamped. So what exactly is the Great Reset about? There's no way that it's going to consist of a few gentle recommendations. What are the monumental changes he's on about?

Well its not implantable microchips to read our thoughts.

King Mob · 24-11-2020 5:01pm

Fodla wrote: »

I've noticed that several posters mock and dismiss those of us who are worried about the Great Reset. I would like to know what those posters believe the Great Reset will consist of. Schwab has spoken of implantable microchips to read our thoughts, has said that the world will never go back to normal and that monumental changes are going to be made. He has said that all aspects of our societies need to be revamped. So what exactly is the Great Reset about? There's no way that it's going to consist of a few gentle recommendations. What are the monumental changes he's on about?

But as we've seen in the other thread, you've a bit of a habit of "reading between the lines" or as most other folks call it "making **** up".

You also have not actually read his book.

Dohnjoe · 24-11-2020 5:02pm

Fodla wrote: »

It's ridiculous to suggest that they all just happened to think of 'new normal' five minutes after a pandemic is declared

But that didn't literally happen. It's just a phrase that popped up after the pandemic and some world leaders have referenced it. It's simply like the "credit crunch" term that popped up during the financial crisis.

Why are you reading into this so much?

Fodla · 24-11-2020 5:05pm

Dohnjoe wrote: »

It's a global discussion forum. This has been explained, it's not complex to understand. Is there a part of it you don't understand?

The only people in the world who think it's anything else are paranoid conspiracy theorists, who always, without fail, think those types of things are sinister.

Also, for this "build back better" slogan stuff, what's the conspiracy?

What are the "monumental" changes Schwab is referring to? What does he mean by "the world as we knew it in the early months of 2020 is no more"? By “Many of our beliefs and assumptions about what the world could or should look like will be shattered in the process."? By “The combination of AI [artificial intelligence], the IoT [internet of things] and sensors and wearable technology will produce new insights into personal well-being. They will model how we are and feel […] precise information on our carbon footprints, our impact on biodiversity, on the toxicity of all the ingredients we consume and the environments or spatial contexts in which we evolve will generate significant progress in terms of our awareness of collective and individual well-being.”? By the 4th Industrial Revolution leading to “a fusion of our physical, digital and biological identity,”?

Fodla · 24-11-2020 5:06pm

King Mob wrote: »

But as we've seen in the other thread, you've a bit of a habit of "reading between the lines" or as most other folks call it "making **** up".

You also have not actually read his book.

You expect people to answer scores of questions, which I try to do. So please explain the Great Reset in detail to me. Specifically the monumental changes Schwab has spoken of.

Dohnjoe · 24-11-2020 5:10pm

Fodla wrote: »

What are the "monumental" changes Schwab is referring to? What does he mean by "the world as we knew it in the early months of 2020 is no more"?

Yeah, it has completely changed. We've had global lockdowns, economies literally shutting down (which has been very rare in history) and unprecedented working from home. November 2020 is completely different from January 2020, anyone can tell you that.

By “Many of our beliefs and assumptions about what the world could or should look like will be shattered in the process."? By “The combination of AI [artificial intelligence], the IoT [internet of things] and sensors and wearable technology will produce new insights into personal well-being. They will model how we are and feel […] precise information on our carbon footprints, our impact on biodiversity, on the toxicity of all the ingredients we consume and the environments or spatial contexts in which we evolve will generate significant progress in terms of our awareness of collective and individual well-being.”? By the 4th Industrial Revolution leading to “a fusion of our physical, digital and biological identity,”?

With all this change, the world can possibly usher in better technology, etc. We can potentially use the pandemic to our advantage. Change is painfully slow, but sometimes when there is a big crisis, e.g. a financial crisis or a pandemic, then we can speed up solutions and improvements globally, like tackling pollution and climate change

Does my paragraph scare you?

King Mob · 24-11-2020 5:11pm

Fodla wrote: »

You expect people to answer scores of questions, which I try to do. So please explain the Great Reset in detail to me. Specifically the monumental changes Schwab has spoken of.

I don't know. I never claimed to know. I haven't seen any particular reason to care what it is.
Your claims have proven to be false so far and based on some bad logic and outright dishonesty on your part.

And I don't ask dozens or scores of questions, I ask a few that just get ignored all the time.
Like the fact you still haven't said if you read his book or not.

I take this to mean you haven't read it.

So rather than ask other people to explain it to you, or scouring twitter for things to "interpret", or watch more youtube conspiracy crap, why not read his book?

Fodla · 24-11-2020 5:12pm

Dohnjoe wrote: »

Yeah, it has completely changed. We've had global lockdowns, economies literally shutting down (which has been very rare in history) and unprecedented working from home. November 2020 is completely different from January 2020, anyone can tell you that.

With all this change, the world can possibly usher in better technology, etc. We can potentially use the pandemic to our advantage. Change is painfully slow, but sometimes when there is a big crisis, e.g. a financial crisis or a pandemic, then we can speed up solutions and improvements globally, like tackling pollution and climate change

Does my paragraph scare you?

No, it doesn't. It's exactly what I was looking for. Thank you.

Fodla · 24-11-2020 5:15pm

King Mob wrote: »

I don't know. I never claimed to know. I haven't seen any particular reason to care what it is.
Your claims have proven to be false so far and based on some bad logic and outright dishonesty on your part.

And I don't ask dozens or scores of questions, I ask a few that just get ignored all the time.
Like the fact you still haven't said if you read his book or not.

I take this to mean you haven't read it.

So rather than ask other people to explain it to you, or scouring twitter for things to "interpret", or watch more youtube conspiracy crap, why not read his book?

I always try to answer your questions. Sometimes I maybe don't answer them well, but they're not always easy to answer.

I don't know why you think I was being dishonest re the article. Maybe I didn't explain my point well, but I wasn't trying to be dishonest. I was simply pointing out that the title of the article was more revealing than the content of the article.

I haven't read the book.

I avoid YouTube videos. I don't know why people are always accused of watching YouTube videos.

King Mob · 24-11-2020 5:20pm

Fodla wrote: »

I always try to answer your questions.

That's not true.
You keep avoiding them.
It's a common conspiracy theorist tactic to avoid questions they know show the flaws in their claims.

Fodla wrote: »

I don't know why you think I was being dishonest re the article. Maybe I didn't explain my point well, but I wasn't trying to be dishonest. I was simply pointing out that the title of the article was more revealing than the content of the article.

Because you were being dishonest about the article. You claimed it said something it didn't and you deliberately left out the author's note where he explicitly outlines his intent.
Then when this was pointed out to you, you avoided the points and questions repeatedly, then tried to move the goalposts to some nonsense about some other people posting it to twitter meaning the hold a belief they don't.

This is all dishonesty and you know it.
You can pretend otherwise if you like, but it's going to fool no one.

If you actually grew up and coped to it, you might actually earn some respect.

Fodla wrote: »

I haven't read the book.

Finally. Only had to ask you like six times.

Why have you not read the book and when do you plan to read it?

Fodla wrote: »

I avoid YouTube videos. I don't know why people are always accused of watching YouTube videos.

Because that's where the majority of the conspiracy nonsense you are parroting comes from.

Fodla · 24-11-2020 5:38pm

King Mob wrote: »

That's not true.
You keep avoiding them.
It's a common conspiracy theorist tactic to avoid questions they know show the flaws in their claims.

Because you were being dishonest about the article. You claimed it said something it didn't and you deliberately left out the author's note where he explicitly outlines his intent.
Then when this was pointed out to you, you avoided the points and questions repeatedly, then tried to move the goalposts to some nonsense about some other people posting it to twitter meaning the hold a belief they don't.

This is all dishonesty and you know it.
You can pretend otherwise if you like, but it's going to fool no one.

If you actually grew up and coped to it, you might actually earn some respect.

Finally. Only had to ask you like six times.

Why have you not read the book and when do you plan to read it?

Because that's where the majority of the conspiracy nonsense you are parroting comes from.

I don't know how many times I can say that it was WEF retweeting an article about owning nothing by 2030 a couple of months before a reset of all aspects of our societies that I found suspicious. Abolishing private property, but not just that, would certainly be to revamp society.

So the article is irrelevant in the context of the point I was making. I was specifically referring to WEF posting a link to an article about owning nothing.

namloc1980 · 24-11-2020 5:39pm

Fodla wrote: »

I don't know how many times I can say that it was WEF retweeting an article about owning nothing by 2030 a couple of months before a reset of all aspects of our societies that I found suspicious. Abolishing private property, but not just that, would certainly be to revamp society.

So the article is irrelevant in the context of the point I was making. I was specifically referring to WEF posting a link to an article about owning nothing.

I asked this earlier but didn't get any answer. When will my 4k TV, my share investments and all the other stuff I own by taken away from me?

King Mob · 24-11-2020 5:41pm

Fodla wrote: »

I don't know how many times I can say that it was WEF retweeting an article about owning nothing by 2030 a couple of months before a reset of all aspects of our societies that I found suspicious. Abolishing private property, but not just that, would certainly be to revamp society.

So the article is irrelevant in the context of the point I was making. I was specifically referring to WEF posting a link to an article about owning nothing.

Yea. More dishonesty and again you ignore the questions I ask.

Pretty typical...

King Mob · 24-11-2020 5:42pm

namloc1980 wrote: »

I asked this earlier but didn't get any answer. When will my 4k TV, my share investments and all the other stuff I own by taken away from me?

Well according to the article that's apparently not relevant, by 2030.

Fodla · 24-11-2020 5:47pm

King Mob wrote: »

Well according to the article that's apparently not relevant, by 2030.

It's not relevant because a lone Danish MP couldn't pull it off. But WEF and the UN, who are the architects of the Great Reset, could.

WEF retweeting it a couple of months before the reset suggests, not proves, that they agree with the idea of people owning nothing by 2030. It would certainly be one of the 'monumental' changes that Schwab has been promising.

King Mob · 24-11-2020 5:52pm

Fodla wrote: »

WEF retweeting it a couple of months before the reset suggests, not proves, that they agree with the idea of people owning nothing by 2030.

So them retweeting an article that doesn't state that they should abolish ownership suggests that they want to abolish ownership.

That's nonsense I'm afraid.

And as you've admitted, you can't find any evidence or anything to suggest that this is their goal beyond this laughable interpretation of a tweet of an article that doesn't even say what you claimed it said.

Similarly, I asked you to explain this issue with this, and guess what you ignored those questions too.

And you still ignore my previous questions.

namloc1980 · 24-11-2020 6:00pm

Fodla wrote: »

It's not relevant because a lone Danish MP couldn't pull it off. But WEF and the UN, who are the architects of the Great Reset, could.

WEF retweeting it a couple of months before the reset suggests, not proves, that they agree with the idea of people owning nothing by 2030. It would certainly be one of the 'monumental' changes that Schwab has been promising.

So everything privately owned will be "abolished" in 10 years? Have you actually thought of how nuts that is?

What's going to happen - are shadowy individuals going to march into every home in the world and confiscate everything they own? Do you think businesses are going to give up their assets to these shadowy people as well or are they in on the deal as well?

Build Back Better

Comments