Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Dublin routes news and general chat

1464749515266

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,804 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Van.Bosch wrote: »
    Spot on, I love a beer before going on holidays.

    Enforce the existing rules and that’s it, no boarding if drunk.


    Problem is, in the few seconds of interaction staff have with customers, once at the boarding gate and once at the door of the aircraft it might not be altogether apparent that a person or person(s) are altogether drunk...

    Knowing that they must ‘appear’ sober it’s easy for the guys just to... “ ok play it straight “ until airborne.... then another couple over a couple of hours in the air and .....:(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,804 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Who cares what they were drinking if they weren't causing any issue.

    The biggest problem seems to be people opening duty-free. Stop them from bringing it on board on certain flights and that issue would go away.

    Seen it done, ‘sealing’ the bag is fûck all use folks just rip it, into the bathroom with a bottle of Fanta and bang.... again I knew of a nervous flyer who did this and never a peep out of him, it calmed him if anything but not everyone is similar.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,853 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    https://www.dublinairport.com/latest-news/2019/12/03/dublin-airport-welcomes-15-new-services-this-winter

    Think passenger growth will be 4-5% again next year. If Brexit passes off ok, should restuteca bit of confidence. Pound also at its strongest v the euro in seven months ...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,189 ✭✭✭NewApproach


    This is off topic, but I recall a website before which lists the optimal airline loyalty program to use for each airline flight and booking class - can anyone recall the name of it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,963 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    I've heard the absolute worse is Glasgow - Ibiza, but some of these stories are giving it a run for its money.



    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSGvsi7uX6o


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipz9NTF3WYI


    Only 8 seconds, but heres another one to make you never want to go to Ibiza!


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DeOQUwBiRF0


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,918 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Shouldn't be acceptable any more than smoking is acceptable on an aircraft in my opinion.

    Not only is it disruptive and potentially threatening behaviour but I can only imagine what a nervous flier and cabin crew must go through on a flight like that.

    I'd ban alcohol altogether from airports (carrying on duty free should be just banned on certain flights IMHO) and flights if it were up to me. I just don't see the need for it. And if people can't go without it maybe they need to assess whether they have a problem.

    Might seem tough but i'd have no issue with a total ban on safety grounds let alone anything else.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,548 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    If airports couldn't shift booze (both duty free and bar) they'd need to add a few quid to passenger charges. That alone would put quite a few passengers and airlines off such a ban!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,918 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Some would say I'm being over the top about but my concern comes back to the smoking point.

    One of these days there is going to be a very serious incident involving alcohol consumption on a British or Irish flight to one of these destinations way beyond mere petty assaults.

    I see that sort of intoxicated group behaviour in passengers as a potential threat to flight safety, I really do.

    (As a minimum other passengers should not have to tolerate it as some deranged cultural quirk)

    My fear is it will take such an incident to force change. I don't see that behaviour is something that should be in any way tolerated on a flight.

    20 years from now we will be looking back on this the same way we view smoking on flights in my honest opinion in a 'I can't believe that use to be allowed' sort of way.

    Be better if they enforced the existing rules of course. But the drink policies really don't help.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    L1011 wrote: »
    If airports couldn't shift booze (both duty free and bar) they'd need to add a few quid to passenger charges. That alone would put quite a few passengers and airlines off such a ban!

    Maybe not such a bad thing. A “fly in peace” tax.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,560 ✭✭✭Noxegon


    I'd ban alcohol altogether from airports (carrying on duty free should be just banned on certain flights IMHO) and flights if it were up to me. I just don't see the need for it.

    I don’t see the need for screaming babies on flights; can we ban those too? :)

    I develop Superior Solitaire when I'm not procrastinating on boards.ie.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,918 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Noxegon wrote: »
    I don’t see the need for screaming babies on flights; can we ban those too? :)

    Babies are annoying and if it were up to me....

    ...but they are not raging alcos.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,229 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    Couldn't see it working, nervous fliers who 'need' a drink before flying will sneak some through or get tanked beforehand. Might be slightly easier to spot them at the gate, but doesn't really remove the issue.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,074 ✭✭✭Blut2


    I'd be completely OK with banning drink sales in the airport but its never going to happen for the stated financial reasons. But it also wouldn't solve the problem, I'd imagine the people on the IBZ flights would just bring their own booze to the airport in hotel mini bottles. Or get tanked up before security. They'd find some way of getting drunk.

    The only real way to combat it would be actual trained security (ie, bouncers) at the boarding gate, being very strict with anyone who looks/smells like they've been boozing. But that would delay boarding, and cost a fair bit, so its probably unlikely to happen until a bad incident happens on one of these flights.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,814 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    Might scanning boarding cards before purchasing alcohol help? Airlines can add flights to a database and the bar just scans the pass much like they do in duty free and if your on a flight not allowing it, the bar can’t sell you drink!

    Yeah people can just ask someone else to go get the pints and it wouldn’t stop it altogether, but it would prevent a great deal of drunken antics


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,229 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    Might scanning boarding cards before purchasing alcohol help? Airlines can add flights to a database and the bar just scans the pass much like they do in duty free and if your on a flight not allowing it, the bar can’t sell you drink!

    Yeah people can just ask someone else to go get the pints and it wouldn’t stop it altogether, but it would prevent a great deal of drunken antics

    A tenner ticket to the UK would quickly sort that out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,201 ✭✭✭ongarboy




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,918 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Oh dear. Could feel a downturn coming. There has been more seat removals than additions over past few months.

    No new airside or landside passenger infrastructure being built either.

    And still no rail link.

    The airport has hit the buffers of capacity and national incompetence.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,548 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Oh dear. Could feel a downturn coming. There has been more seat removals than additions over past few months.

    No new airside or landside passenger infrastructure being built either.

    And still no rail link.

    The airport has hit the buffers of capacity and national incompetence.

    This fall has absolutely nothing to do with infrastructure or capacity


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,867 ✭✭✭sparrowcar


    Oh dear. Could feel a downturn coming. There has been more seat removals than additions over past few months.

    No new airside or landside passenger infrastructure being built either.

    And still no rail link.

    The airport has hit the buffers of capacity and national incompetence.

    Are you a script writer for Eastenders?.. the drama of it all.

    1% fall is not a downturn and certainly November figures have nothing to do with infrastructure.

    I agree though that the infrastructure needs building asap.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,440 ✭✭✭The Rape of Lucretia


    L1011 wrote: »
    This fall has absolutely nothing to do with infrastructure or capacity

    True. What we have at the moment is an airport that is over capacity - but that just means the service is bad, not that people are deterred from using it. Its a monopoly after all.
    While a 1% drop is small to unnoticeable in practice, I would still read it as good news - it's a heck if a lot better than an increasing number.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    True. What we have at the moment is an airport that is over capacity - but that just means the service is bad, not that people are deterred from using it. Its a monopoly after all.
    While a 1% drop is small to unnoticeable in practice, I would still read it as good news - it's a heck if a lot better than an increasing number.

    Over capacity in terms of what ?

    Your opinion versus facts and studies. The airport at times is working to stand capacity. Look at the recent slot announcement, there is still 20%+ slots available, although not at attractive timings. The terminal isn’t at capacity yet. The runway isn’t at capacity yet or they wouldn’t be still granting slots.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Oh dear. Could feel a downturn coming. There has been more seat removals than additions over past few months.

    No new airside or landside passenger infrastructure being built either.

    And still no rail link.

    The airport has hit the buffers of capacity and national incompetence.

    This is as a result of the loss of Wow air, Norwegian and the loss of Cathay and Hainan for the winter months. None of which have been replaced.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,440 ✭✭✭The Rape of Lucretia


    Over capacity in terms of what ?.

    Over capacity in terms of their being a poorly implemented temporary facility as the South Gates. If it Dub airport were within its capacity, it would either not have that, or would have a proper terminal/gates facility.
    DAA could put up a tent and have people walk two miles. They could get on their plane. But I still wouldn't call that within its capacity.
    I use those gates a lot unfortunately for EI routes to France. They quite a pain, and evidence that the airport is above reasonable capacity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,867 ✭✭✭sparrowcar


    Over capacity in terms of their being a poorly implemented temporary facility as the South Gates. If it Dub airport were within its capacity, it would either not have that, or would have a proper terminal/gates facility.
    DAA could put up a tent and have people walk two miles. They could get on their plane. But I still wouldn't call that within its capacity.
    I use those gates a lot unfortunately for EI routes to France. They quite a pain, and evidence that the airport is above reasonable capacity.

    Your version of capacity and aviation approved versions of capacity are two very different things. The airport is nowhere near perfect and has a way to go but it's not at capacity.. fact.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,927 ✭✭✭Van.Bosch


    sparrowcar wrote: »
    Your version of capacity and aviation approved versions of capacity are two very different things. The airport is nowhere near perfect and has a way to go but it's not at capacity.. fact.

    Fact? Not sure, could you not argue it is at capacity from a stand point of view at peak times? Agree it doesn’t mean the airport is at capacity but there are capacity issues.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,867 ✭✭✭sparrowcar


    Van.Bosch wrote: »
    Fact? Not sure, could you not argue it is at capacity from a stand point of view at peak times? Agree it doesn’t mean the airport is at capacity but there are capacity issues.

    Yes you are correct about stands. Way past capacity. I was referring to the posters comments on terminal and gate capacity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,756 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    Aer Lingus add Rhodes, Greece.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,131 ✭✭✭Living Off The Splash


    Jamie2k9 wrote: »
    Aer Lingus add Rhodes, Greece.

    Pity they won't be using an Airbus 330 for the longer flight.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,560 ✭✭✭Noxegon


    Over capacity in terms of their being a poorly implemented temporary facility as the South Gates.

    I don't mind the South Gates that much, but I really hate the way arrivals are bused to the end of the pier and back again.

    The direct walking distance – if passengers were allowed to do it – is less than a third of the length of the hike from the extremities of the 100 gates.

    I develop Superior Solitaire when I'm not procrastinating on boards.ie.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,609 ✭✭✭California Dreamer


    I use those gates a lot unfortunately for EI routes to France. They quite a pain, and evidence that the airport is above reasonable capacity.

    Try landing in an airport like Doha and being on a remote stand that takes 20/30 minutes to get to the gate. Dublin's problems are tiny compared to others around the world.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,927 ✭✭✭Van.Bosch


    Try landing in an airport like Doha and being on a remote stand that takes 20/30 minutes to get to the gate. Dublin's problems are tiny compared to others around the world.

    Would have thought the new airport in Doha wouldn’t have those type of issues?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,762 ✭✭✭✭Inquitus


    Van.Bosch wrote: »
    Would have thought the new airport in Doha wouldn’t have those type of issues?

    I flew there direct from DUB on Qatar a few weeks back and we parked at a remote stand that was a 15 min coach ride to the Terminal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,060 ✭✭✭Sexual Chocolate


    Yeah I recall the bus ride from the gate to the stand being quite long in Doha this year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,853 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    https://m.independent.ie/business/irish/daa-must-challenge-irish-firms-for-more-competitive-tenders-38779632.html


    DAA 'must challenge' Irish firms for more competitive tenders

    Not surprising the result finds very poor value for money !


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,996 ✭✭✭Slashermcguirk


    Great to see United Airlines starting direct flights from Dublin to San Francisco in 2020. Aer Lingus already offer that direct route from Dublin but always good to see more direct transatlantic flights out of Dublin.


  • Registered Users Posts: 168 ✭✭Kev11491


    Great to see United Airlines starting direct flights from Dublin to San Francisco in 2020. Aer Lingus already offer that direct route from Dublin but always good to see more direct transatlantic flights out of Dublin.

    Indeed, that and easier connections to the likes of Hawaii


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,081 ✭✭✭theguzman


    The Boeing 787 has really been a game changer for the industry we wouldn't see routes like appearing only for that aircraft.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 893 ✭✭✭HTCOne


    With the yields EI have enjoyed on this route, it was only a matter of time!

    So does that mean SFO will be 17 x weekly in summer? Or was 10 x weekly EI ever confirmed?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,478 ✭✭✭✭cson


    Might still drive some traffic for EI with interline connections given they still have the partnership with UA.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 168 ✭✭Kev11491


    cson wrote: »
    Might still drive some traffic for EI with interline connections given they still have the partnership with UA.

    Can't see this lasting long tbh


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,965 ✭✭✭trellheim


    cson wrote: »
    Might still drive some traffic for EI with interline connections given they still have the partnership with UA.

    Much of the US traffic will take the high-status UA Mileageplus folks whose corporate booking system will default to United for status maintenance

    First west coast competition fair play


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,758 ✭✭✭stockshares


    Lads Ive been looking on Tap Air for flights from Dublin and according to their Route map https://www.flytap.com/en-ie/destinations/destinations-map
    there are direct flights from Dublin to the following:
    Lisbon
    Bilbao
    Barcelona
    Madrid
    Valenica
    Alicante
    Malaga
    Tangier
    Seville
    Faro
    Porto
    Terceira(Azores)
    Ponta Delgado(Azores)

    Can anyone let me know if the above is correct? Apart from Dublin to Lisbon I havent seen these flights announced before.

    Thank you


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,474 ✭✭✭VG31


    They're connections via Lisbon.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,758 ✭✭✭stockshares


    VG31 wrote: »
    They're connections via Lisbon.

    Thank you


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 333 ✭✭TK Lemon


    https://www.google.ie/amp/s/www.rte.ie/amp/1103032/

    New route to St Petersburg?

    Article is not clear, will FR be serving Dublin to St Petersburg? If not, then why is it news that Ryanair will be serving Russia because they already do with their Maltese subsidiary.

    If they do operate this route, I for one will be using it as this is one of the cities in which Irish citizens have been grated E-Visa status.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 260 ✭✭davebuck


    Any word yet on Hainan returning on the Beijing route? if they are returning why leave it so late to advertise the route?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,608 ✭✭✭IngazZagni


    TK Lemon wrote: »
    https://www.google.ie/amp/s/www.rte.ie/amp/1103032/

    New route to St Petersburg?

    Article is not clear, will FR be serving Dublin to St Petersburg? If not, then why is it news that Ryanair will be serving Russia because they already do with their Maltese subsidiary.

    If they do operate this route, I for one will be using it as this is one of the cities in which Irish citizens have been grated E-Visa status.

    The article is just an assumption that Ryanair will start operating there because of a relaxation on the strict rules that have prevented airlines flying there before plus the easier visa process.

    Also I believe you are confusing Ryanairs Malta Air with Air Malta. You're not the first and won't be the last. Malta Air is just a front for tax compliance and for certain union agreements. It's still using the Ryanair brand.


  • Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators Posts: 2,290 Mod ✭✭✭✭Nigel Fairservice


    TK Lemon wrote: »
    https://www.google.ie/amp/s/www.rte.ie/amp/1103032/

    New route to St Petersburg?

    Article is not clear, will FR be serving Dublin to St Petersburg? If not, then why is it news that Ryanair will be serving Russia because they already do with their Maltese subsidiary.

    If they do operate this route, I for one will be using it as this is one of the cities in which Irish citizens have been grated E-Visa status.

    Nothing set in stone there from the looks of it. I'm heading over in February via Lufthansa and Frankfurt. I'll try and sort the e-visa in January.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,131 ✭✭✭Living Off The Splash


    I see that Ryanair has a new Dublin to Menorca route starting this summer. Was this officially announced?


  • Advertisement
Advertisement