Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest
Replacment for Cessna 172
Comments
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
Negative_G wrote: »Since you can't be bothered to scratch the surface whatsoever, go and take a look at where the DF currently have personnel overseas. Particularly in Africa. And then look at a map and join the dots.
In all seriousness though, do you expect the DF to get your (or the general public) permission prior to using their assets?
Your post offers absolutely nothing other than your inference that the aircraft is on a "jolly".
Well who pissed on your chips?
:D:D
Thanks for that very informative post that added to my query!
Perhaps I should have put a:rolleyes::) in it as well to show that it was in jest. 0 -
-
-
-
-
-
California Dreamer wrote: »Well who pissed on your chips?:D:D
Thanks for that very informative post that added to my query!
Perhaps I should have put a:rolleyes::) in it as well to show that it was in jest.
Nobody. Thankfully. I just take issue with your post as it is more akin to what you would expect in the comments on the journal.
You suggested that the aircraft was on a jolly without including all of the pertinent information.
Your post was deliberately misleading and instead of trying to make an effort to find out why, you just decided to jump to a conclusion.0 -
Negative_G wrote: »Nobody. Thankfully. I just take issue with your post as it is more akin to what you would expect in the comments on the journal.
You suggested that the aircraft was on a jolly without including all of the pertinent information.
Your post was deliberately misleading and instead of trying to make an effort to find out why, you just decided to jump to a conclusion.
You sound like you have a serious problem so might I suggest that before you go on the attack you report the post.
Maybe it was on a jolly, I still don't see the need to go to the Canaries, could they not have routed back to Malaga which was the intended destination? Hence why, with an interest in aviation I came to this forum, this thread in particular to ask the question so seriously either answer it, report it or just move on but stop taking it so seriously!
0 -
California Dreamer wrote: »You sound like you have a serious problem so might I suggest that before you go on the attack you report the post.
Maybe it was on a jolly, I still don't see the need to go to the Canaries, could they not have routed back to Malaga which was the intended destination? Hence why, with an interest in aviation I came to this forum, this thread in particular to ask the question so seriously either answer it, report it or just move on but stop taking it so seriously!
I have no problem, I can assure you. I just have a problem with people trying to push an agenda based on no facts.
You had no intention of finding out why it was down there. You stated it was off on a jolly and said you saw no reason for it, these were your own words. You didn't ask a question.
You were told why it was down there which was subsequently confirmed by social media posts. When this was confirmed beyond any doubt you claimed your original post was in jest and them continued to claim that it could've/should've been done differently.
Malaga was quite obviously never the intended destination and was a fuel stop judging by how long it spent there on FR24.
The long and short of it is that you seem intent on pushing your agenda based off your initial "jolly" reference so short of contacting the Air Corps directly and asking one of the crew you are unlikely to get the answer you desire on here.
As for why they didnt stop in Morocco, perhaps this was a short notice flight and diplomatic clearance to land couldn't be secured in time. Perhaps the authorities wouldnt allow the aircraft to land with weapons or DG on board (if there was any). Perhaps there was a lack of ground support. Fuel concerns. Handling/airport charges. There are a plenty of reasons why it might not have landed in Morocco. Who knows.
I see no need to report a post if it can be addressed and debunked with facts and evidence which is happily the case in this instance.0 -
Advertisement
-
Advertisement