Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Fighter jets for the Air Corps?

Options
12829313334197

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 590 ✭✭✭Leonidas BL


    Make sure to keep up to date here > https://twitter.com/DOD_Ireland

    ESimrJ9XkAIl6VM?format=jpg&name=small

    :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,281 ✭✭✭CrankyHaus


    donvito99 wrote: »
    Do the 'European Nations' actually give a damn whether or not we have fast jets capable of escorting Russian aircraft with effectively every right to skirt our airspace? Does it keep them up at night? Does it feature at every NATO summit?

    Even the British don't seem to be particularly aggrieved at having to do the heavy lifting. It looks a bit funny to see us pitching for a seat on the UN Security Council but if Saudi Arabia can chair the UN Human Rights Council Advisory Committee then I suppose anything goes.


  • Registered Users Posts: 675 ✭✭✭Gary kk


    zone 1 wrote: »
    let the russians in whats the damage , we cant patrol it , let them off. give them knock at least they can refuel runway is perfect for them.. at least their patrolling it paddy cant 2 casa .......

    Might make some money out of it. Sure Vlad is always good for it


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,075 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Well we can forget about fighter jets now I'm afraid. This virus is going to blow such a hole in the economy it's going to take at least 5 to 10 years to recover!


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,431 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    I wouldn't worry between the world economy , oil price crash ,and a probable Italian level **** storm in Russia ,I can't see the Russians bothering much in the next few years ...
    Unless of course all of the above destabilize Russia so much that they need a good external crisis to keep Vlad in power ..

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,075 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Well now that the nation has had to throw everything bar the kitchen sink at the economy....I think it would be a good idea to look at a more gradual and cheaper approach to the vexed question of kicking the AC into the 21st century with some decent jets. I reckon thst Aero Vodichody L39 NG looks a pretty good proposition at around 12 mill a pop. Succesful upgrade of a well proven design...and I reckon we could get by with 6 in Baldonnel and 4 each in Cork and Galway. Say what ya will..but if this order was placed I reckon the guys in the AC would be well chuffed.

    Also of interest today. I see that Angela Merkel has just had the German Air Force One up and running. Shame we didnt manage to get a replacement jet for the retirement Gov't Jet before the auld virus set in.


  • Registered Users Posts: 590 ✭✭✭Leonidas BL


    Well now that the nation has had to throw everything bar the kitchen sink at the economy....I think it would be a good idea to look at a more gradual and cheaper approach to the vexed question of kicking the AC into the 21st century with some decent jets. I reckon thst Aero Vodichody L39 NG looks a pretty good proposition at around 12 mill a pop. Succesful upgrade of a well proven design...and I reckon we could get by with 6 in Baldonnel and 4 each in Cork and Galway. Say what ya will..but if this order was placed I reckon the guys in the AC would be well chuffed.

    Also of interest today. I see that Angela Merkel has just had the German Air Force One up and running. Shame we didnt manage to get a replacement jet for the retirement Gov't Jet before the auld virus set in.

    I always thought the Scorpion jet from Textron would be a good starter jet. One of its missions is maritime patrol so it would have actual uses as opposed to the L39 which dosent give us anything extra over the PC-9 really! Do ya not think Jonny?

    https://scorpion.txtav.com/en/logbook/scorpionjet-logbook-entry?id=74E600B776BC40C7A4C483CD7CA37981


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,818 ✭✭✭donvito99


    I always thought the Scorpion jet from Textron would be a good starter jet. One of its missions is maritime patrol so it would have actual uses as opposed to the L39 which dosent give us anything extra over the PC-9 really! Do ya not think Jonny?

    https://scorpion.txtav.com/en/logbook/scorpionjet-logbook-entry?id=74E600B776BC40C7A4C483CD7CA37981

    If we weren't going to be the first customer, this would be a great aircraft for the AC.

    It would allow for maritime patrol to continue in the event of a CASA being deployed in a transport role overseas. It also uses the same engines as the Learjet.


  • Registered Users Posts: 590 ✭✭✭Leonidas BL


    donvito99 wrote: »
    If we weren't going to be the first customer, this would be a great aircraft for the AC.

    It would allow for maritime patrol to continue in the event of a CASA being deployed in a transport role overseas. It also uses the same engines as the Learjet.

    I would say it wouldn't be the end of the world being the first customer in this aircraft. As you said the engines are from the Learjet, but also the avionics and equipment is also straight off the shelf.

    I remember a couple of years ago the F-35 after something like 15 years development, couldn't make it to Farnborough airshow :/
    Anyhoo the Scorpion flew over no bother even though it was only a prototype.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,075 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    I suppose if they ever get around to getting some fighter/trainer jets it will be at the cheaper end of the spectrum and could be a toss up between the check Vodochedy, the Scorpion and the Korean Eagle. The latter is the most expensive and can do mach 1.5. Maybe get 8 of a cheaper plane first and follow up with 6 of the pricier jobbies?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,075 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    I must admit I like the Scorpion Leo


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,355 ✭✭✭punchdrunk


    This is nowhere near feasible, or desirable!

    If you knew anyone in the air corps or read about the issues you’d know how absurd this notion is!

    Due to government incompetence and a pathetic military budget the air corps are in bad shape

    Massive brain drain- nowhere near enough crews for the aircraft it has- huge retention problem

    Huge issues around support systems such as air traffic control

    Not enough hangar space for expansion
    Not enough techs and antiquated work practises that mean 24hr ops are a pipe dream

    Lack of radar beyond what the civvies at the airports can offer, the country is practically blind to what’s in our airspace

    No longer have finner or gormanstown operational

    Struggle to keep even a basic air ambulance service going in daylight hours, mon-fri

    The issues are huge, fighter jets are not even on the map in terms of priority!


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,355 ✭✭✭punchdrunk


    Heavy lift choppers and cargo transport/logs planes are what’s badly needed


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,779 ✭✭✭1o059k7ewrqj3n


    Is there a similar gap in NATO defences like Ireland anywhere else in Europe? I'm thinking Finland and Sweden but they at least have some Air Force even if they aren't in NATO.


  • Registered Users Posts: 675 ✭✭✭Gary kk


    We are not in nato so its not up to us to bridge any gap in radar or air defense for those countries


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,779 ✭✭✭1o059k7ewrqj3n


    Gary kk wrote: »
    We are not in nato so its not up to us to bridge any gap in radar or air defense for those countries

    I know that, but it is a gap for NATO, and any planning they do has to contend with this.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,355 ✭✭✭punchdrunk


    Steyr 556 wrote: »
    I know that, but it is a gap for NATO, and any planning they do has to contend with this.

    UK still in NATO so not a problem for them


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,075 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Totally agree Punch...up to a point. I'm assuming that the investment in new aircraft will be accompanied by an uplift in expenditure on new hangarage / proper radar / salary reviews and investment in engineering infrastructure. So no disagreement with your points in general, that's a given and is totally essential. By the way...with 4 Pilatus coming through in the supply chain and two brand spanking new CASA C295'S as well, I think that some of your concerns have been addressed!


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,849 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Steyr 556 wrote: »
    Is there a similar gap in NATO defences like Ireland anywhere else in Europe? I'm thinking Finland and Sweden but they at least have some Air Force even if they aren't in NATO.

    Finland has 62 F/A-18 Hornets and 50 odd various trainers

    Sweden has 60+ JAS-39 Gripen and 60 odd trainers

    Some Air Force indeed. Now its fair enough that Russia is on their doorstep, but I've has said before and will say again, sovereignty is only as strong as the means to enforce it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,075 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Bout time we acquired a few aircraft!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,626 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    According to Wikipedia the pc9s are due to be replaced in 2025. It will be interesting to see what they end up with


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,880 ✭✭✭sparky42


    roadmaster wrote: »
    According to Wikipedia the pc9s are due to be replaced in 2025. It will be interesting to see what they end up with
    Honest bet, that date is going to be shifted well out, be surprised if it's 2030 before we see anything and who knows what will be on the cards at that point.


  • Registered Users Posts: 675 ✭✭✭Gary kk


    roadmaster wrote: »
    According to Wikipedia the pc9s are due to be replaced in 2025. It will be interesting to see what they end up with

    Pc10s what else


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,849 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    roadmaster wrote: »
    According to Wikipedia

    Right.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,626 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    sparky42 wrote: »
    Honest bet, that date is going to be shifted well out, be surprised if it's 2030 before we see anything and who knows what will be on the cards at that point.

    They will probably wait until the wings are about to fall off, I wonder will the operation off 112 cut the expected life of the 139 fleet. But then again they got good value out of the alouttes , Cessna and the casas will be over 30 years in the air when they retire


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,075 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Time to bang in the order now for 14 to 18 jets.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,880 ✭✭✭sparky42


    roadmaster wrote: »
    They will probably wait until the wings are about to fall off, I wonder will the operation off 112 cut the expected life of the 139 fleet. But then again they got good value out of the alouttes , Cessna and the casas will be over 30 years in the air when they retire


    I think they are below their planned usage rate anyway at the moment, so so far I don't think the 112 operations will materially affect them. Though of course that depends on the usage for the rest of their lifespan. But yeah given our habit with military equipment, they will be replaced when they simply can't get off the ground anymore.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,075 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    The expert has spoken.


  • Registered Users Posts: 40,209 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Time to bang in the order now for 14 to 18 jets.

    could be useful to track down people undertaking unnecesssary travel and deal with them


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,467 ✭✭✭Heraldoffreeent


    could be useful to track down people undertaking unnecesssary travel and deal with them

    Can't, Johnny wants to keep them for the Bray Airshow.


Advertisement