Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

BusConnects Dublin - Bus Network Changes Discussion

1114115117119120257

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,965 ✭✭✭trellheim


    Simple stuff that would speed up the network

    A.I at O'Connell bridge with cameras pointing west along the north quays (count number of buses waiting to turn south )



    Cameras also pointing down D'Olier St ( count number of buses waiting at fleet street junction ) -

    Work quickly to come up with algorithm that prioritizes clearing D'Olier St as it holds far more than LUAS (balance against cameras counting on Rosie Hackett/Hawkins St to ensure they get some as w ell )

    Make LUAS track on College Green (the old 15 terminus) usable by buses as well, end the lunacy of that space being dedicated to trams it should have dived under trinity not around


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,688 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    I havent seen the new plans but read that the NTA are saying that something like there will be 40% less trees cut down under them.

    Anyone know what this means in real terms, is there concrete examples where under the old plans there was an uninterrupted bus lane but now the bus will have to join the main line of car traffic? Disaster if so, BC has to be about speeding up journey times to get people to switch to public transport.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,548 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Muahahaha wrote: »
    I havent seen the new plans but read that the NTA are saying that something like there will be 40% less trees cut down under them.

    Anyone know what this means in real terms, is there concrete examples where under the old plans there was an uninterrupted bus lane but now the bus will have to join the main line of car traffic? Disaster if so, BC has to be about speeding up journey times to get people to switch to public transport.

    Its 40% less mature trees - there's cases, e.g. around Liffey Valley, where hundreds of scrubby trees planted after road widening in 2010/1 will be cut down and replaced, with the figures actually increased from previous estimates. They're not the huge London Planes that everyone got worked up over

    Most of the changes involve removing more car space instead although there's a few capitulations.


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,403 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    Muahahaha wrote: »
    I havent seen the new plans but read that the NTA are saying that something like there will be 40% less trees cut down under them.

    Anyone know what this means in real terms, is there concrete examples where under the old plans there was an uninterrupted bus lane but now the bus will have to join the main line of car traffic? Disaster if so, BC has to be about speeding up journey times to get people to switch to public transport.

    In cases where the bus lane is interrupted, there are normally some other measures proposed. Bus gates, bus priority signals, one way traffic etc.

    There are no cases that I can think of where bus priority disappears entirely.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,005 ✭✭✭✭AlekSmart


    trellheim wrote: »
    Simple stuff that would speed up the network

    A.I at O'Connell bridge with cameras pointing west along the north quays (count number of buses waiting to turn south )



    Cameras also pointing down D'Olier St ( count number of buses waiting at fleet street junction ) -

    Work quickly to come up with algorithm that prioritizes clearing D'Olier St as it holds far more than LUAS (balance against cameras counting on Rosie Hackett/Hawkins St to ensure they get some as w ell )

    Make LUAS track on College Green (the old 15 terminus) usable by buses as well, end the lunacy of that space being dedicated to trams it should have dived under trinity not around

    Amen to that Trinners bit.

    From memory,I recall some conversations relating to a Tunnell under the Campus.

    Was it from a consortium offering a build & operate scenario ?

    I think TCD's senior people had a coronary at the very thought of machines burrowing neath their hallowed halls etc,which,of course,would immediately collapse into the chasm.

    Once that fear had been instilled,it was game over.

    Looking at the current College Green codology,it is hard to accept that it is the result of several years of professional planning and design across a broad swathe of disciplines.

    Some Senior Engineer actually signed-off on this mess....Inspected,Assessed Reviewed and Approved a setup largely unsuitable for purpose,and in many areas significantly increasing the risk profile for users.

    A class of Senior Infants,issued with a foolscap page and some crayons,would find it difficult to any worse.

    With the same group of 'Professionals' remaining at the Irish Administrative Helm,we can expect the good ship BusConnects to maintain it's new course through the Iceberg field. :o


    Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.

    Charles Mackay (1812-1889)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,818 ✭✭✭donvito99


    It's all well and good to blame the 'professionals' for College Green, but what has to be acknowledged is that their hands, legs and everything else were tied by the politicians and myriad of public and private stakeholders (Dublin Bus, taxi men, the car park cartels, and so on) who shoe horn themselves into everything.

    Their only choice was to conjure up the 'solution' that we now see i.e. a mess of pedestrians, cyclists, taxis, buses and trams AND maintaining private vehicle access at certain times because that keeps all the vested interests happy to some extent.

    The useless 100m bi-directional cycle lane is a good example of engineers having to squeeze a solution in to tick a box on a list which was developed out of a protracted exercise in compromise.

    What is required to sort the mess is not a tunnel but rather a decision on what kind of transport modes we allow into the core city centre in future.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,666 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    Make LUAS track on College Green (the old 15 terminus) usable by buses as well, end the lunacy of that space being dedicated to trams it should have dived under trinity not around

    What space are you referring to? You mean the part where the Trinity stop is?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,243 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    MJohnston wrote: »
    What space are you referring to? You mean the part where the Trinity stop is?
    Doesn’t matter if that’s made a bus lane as they’ll be put back into the one lane choke point right after it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,666 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    p_haugh wrote: »
    Doesn’t matter if that’s made a bus lane as they’ll be put back into the one lane choke point right after it.

    But that’s the only part that the buses aren’t sharing space with trams here though, so I’m confused what the poster is referring to


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,440 ✭✭✭cdaly_


    MJohnston wrote: »
    Well there are, but elderly people (thankfully decreasingly) don't use the internet much.

    Don't forget that elderly people are the people who invented the internet!...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,107 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    whatever about bus gates, I'm skeptical about the idea of "bus priority signals". I assume the idea is that the signal will detect a bus arriving and give it a green light. IIRC a similar system was installed in the 80s or 90s and quickly fell out of use; even if it is properly maintained, what use is a green light if the shared lane ahead is already blocked with cars?


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,403 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    loyatemu wrote: »
    whatever about bus gates, I'm skeptical about the idea of "bus priority signals". I assume the idea is that the signal will detect a bus arriving and give it a green light. IIRC a similar system was installed in the 80s or 90s and quickly fell out of use; even if it is properly maintained, what use is a green light if the shared lane ahead is already blocked with cars?
    See the signal controlled priority section on page 5 of each corridor.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,107 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    Peregrine wrote: »
    See the signal controlled priority section on page 5 of each corridor.



    yeah looks great, but what if that single lane is already bumper-to-bumper, which in many places it will be.
    (Bus gates are different as they're effectively cul-de-sacs for non-bus traffic and the cars are turning off onto a different road.)


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,403 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    loyatemu wrote: »
    yeah looks great, but what if that single lane is already bumper-to-bumper, which in many places it will be.
    (Bus gates are different as they're effectively cul-de-sacs for non-bus traffic and the cars are turning off onto a different road.)

    Yeah, it only works for short sections. The longer the section is, the less effective it will be.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,755 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    loyatemu wrote: »
    whatever about bus gates, I'm skeptical about the idea of "bus priority signals". I assume the idea is that the signal will detect a bus arriving and give it a green light. IIRC a similar system was installed in the 80s or 90s and quickly fell out of use; even if it is properly maintained, what use is a green light if the shared lane ahead is already blocked with cars?

    We had these circa 2002 under the cityswift plan. It was switched off because, although it improved bus journey times, it delayed motorists. We have the bus gate on bachelors walk now with bus only signals but typically this lane is tailed back 1km with cars ignoring the bus lane.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,868 ✭✭✭Alkers


    There's a similar (not the same) bus priorty setup near Bushy Park
    https://www.google.com/maps/@53.3064306,-6.2897148,3a,75y,30.49h,70.16t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sMSyFLBJRr-99KCnYGSVtLw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
    Although there's a yield sign on the ground, the cars are stopped via the signal while the bus is given a green light.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 983 ✭✭✭Stephen Strange


    cgcsb wrote: »
    We had these circa 2002 under the cityswift plan. It was switched off because, although it improved bus journey times, it delayed motorists. We have the bus gate on bachelors walk now with bus only signals but typically this lane is tailed back 1km with cars ignoring the bus lane.

    It's only effective when combined with anpr enforcement of the bus lane and yellow boxes imo. I also wish they'd get rid of the taxis from those bus lanes as they tend to duck and dive between whichever lane they think they'll get through first.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,645 ✭✭✭Qrt


    Alkers wrote: »
    There's a similar (not the same) bus priorty setup near Bushy Park
    https://www.google.com/maps/@53.3064306,-6.2897148,3a,75y,30.49h,70.16t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sMSyFLBJRr-99KCnYGSVtLw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
    Although there's a yield sign on the ground, the cars are stopped via the signal while the bus is given a green light.

    Does it do...anything?


  • Registered Users Posts: 920 ✭✭✭Last Stop


    Alkers wrote: »
    There's a similar (not the same) bus priorty setup near Bushy Park
    https://www.google.com/maps/@53.3064306,-6.2897148,3a,75y,30.49h,70.16t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sMSyFLBJRr-99KCnYGSVtLw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
    Although there's a yield sign on the ground, the cars are stopped via the signal while the bus is given a green light.

    There’s more on Rathgar Rd and Terenure Rd East.

    Which begs the question, if these ones actually work, then why are they proposing to change the road layout at these locations? It would suggest that they don’t work currently so we’re essentially trying to reinvent a broken wheel!!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,818 ✭✭✭donvito99


    Last Stop wrote: »
    There’s more on Rathgar Rd and Terenure Rd East.

    Which begs the question, if these ones actually work, then why are they proposing to change the road layout at these locations? It would suggest that they don’t work currently so we’re essentially trying to reinvent a broken wheel!!

    The only one I've seen in operation is on Templeogue Road. Locals will not stop for it.

    So it's not so much a broken wheel as it is a system that was never properly implemented or abandoned with subsequent changes to other junctions.


  • Registered Users Posts: 920 ✭✭✭Last Stop


    donvito99 wrote: »
    The only one I've seen in operation is on Templeogue Road. Locals will not stop for it.

    So it's not so much a broken wheel as it is a system that was never properly implemented or abandoned with subsequent changes to other junctions.

    So what makes you think that the new ones will work?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,818 ✭✭✭donvito99


    Last Stop wrote: »
    So what makes you think that the new ones will work?

    I don't think they will and I never said they would. Calm down lad.


  • Registered Users Posts: 920 ✭✭✭Last Stop


    donvito99 wrote: »
    I don't think they will and I never said they would. Calm down lad.

    Fair enough.

    This does strike me as a massive compromise to bus priority. Even over a short distance, the bus will be caught behind cars and with such high frequencies, bunching is inevitable!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,114 ✭✭✭PhilOssophy


    I dunno if it is still there but there used to be a bus priority thingie up towards Terenure and it was a complete waste of time. It took about 15-20 minutes to get through Terenure cross roads no matter what. Maybe it has improved but I remember when I lived out that way I used to walk to beyond Terenure and get a bus from there because that system did not work.
    The only way people would obey it is if it had a red light camera on it but even then, it is an ideal world scenario which is often ruined by what else is around it, such as 2 roads into 1 a la Terenure.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,541 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    Oh I have to tell you. I am loving these new videos on BusConnects CBC's. Here is another one on the Bus Gate simulation.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,478 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    I posted this elsewhere but I find it incredibly satisfying to watch, hopefully Bus Connects ends up like this

    https://twitter.com/HorneJerome/status/1235568774729908226

    Also, are we ever going to get taxis out of bus lanes? That needs to happen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,497 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Also, are we ever going to get taxis out of bus lanes? That needs to happen.

    But that would involve putting the public interest ahead of a vested interest...

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users Posts: 19 pk1991


    Does anybody know anything about the revised network? I was under the impression that the NTA were aiming for a Q1 2020 release of the final version?


  • Registered Users Posts: 28 huddledDuke12


    pk1991 wrote: »
    Does anybody know anything about the revised network? I was under the impression that the NTA were aiming for a Q1 2020 release of the final version?

    With all of this COVID-19 stuff, I would say this will likely be put off indefinitely.

    I'm very surprised at how operational public transport has been over the past few days.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,107 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu



    I'm very surprised at how operational public transport has been over the past few days.

    fewer passenger and less traffic. If there were no passengers and no traffic the transport system would be amazing!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,818 ✭✭✭donvito99


    A commute by bus for me has gone from about 40mins on average to just over 20mins with the outbreak of COVID 19. So that's an approximate 50% reduction in journey time as a result of near empty buses, every other stop being served and no traffic.

    The Core Bus Corridor that I'm on is said to have journeys that take as long as 75mins today, reduced to 25-30mins post Bus Connects.

    If conditions today are arguably better than what Bus Connects will provide, how realistic are these future journey times? Obviously Bus Connects is about other things like reliability and cycling, but I'd be interested to see the basis for these estimates.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,755 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    donvito99 wrote: »
    A commute by bus for me has gone from about 40mins on average to just over 20mins with the outbreak of COVID 19. So that's an approximate 50% reduction in journey time as a result of near empty buses, every other stop being served and no traffic.

    The Core Bus Corridor that I'm on is said to have journeys that take as long as 75mins today, reduced to 25-30mins post Bus Connects.

    If conditions today are arguably better than what Bus Connects will provide, how realistic are these future journey times? Obviously Bus Connects is about other things like reliability and cycling, but I'd be interested to see the basis for these estimates.

    Obviously the journey times assume normal conditions there's no global pandemics in the transport model.


  • Registered Users Posts: 920 ✭✭✭Last Stop


    donvito99 wrote: »
    A commute by bus for me has gone from about 40mins on average to just over 20mins with the outbreak of COVID 19. So that's an approximate 50% reduction in journey time as a result of near empty buses, every other stop being served and no traffic.

    The Core Bus Corridor that I'm on is said to have journeys that take as long as 75mins today, reduced to 25-30mins post Bus Connects.

    If conditions today are arguably better than what Bus Connects will provide, how realistic are these future journey times? Obviously Bus Connects is about other things like reliability and cycling, but I'd be interested to see the basis for these estimates.

    Projects like this often exaggerate the benefits to justify the costs. Didn’t the college green planning fall down on journey times? From recollection the board inspector tried one of the routes and found that the modelling grossly underestimated journey times in the area.

    To be fair though, even on days like today, there are some additional features of Busconnects such as removal of cash fares and rationalisation of bus stops which will improve journey times.

    These measures however will be countered by bunching of buses particularly on a number of corridors where the proposed number of services exceeds the design capacity of a CBC


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,818 ✭✭✭donvito99


    cgcsb wrote: »
    Obviously the journey times assume normal conditions there's no global pandemics in the transport model.

    My point is that, even in the midst of a global pandemic when conditions are probably superior to what Bus Connects will provide, the service isn't reaching the reduction proposed by Bus Connects.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,818 ✭✭✭donvito99


    https://twitter.com/Costellop/status/1243147503861628930
    An update from the
    @BusConnects
    team - due to Covid restrictions another public consultation will be run later this year.

    The current consultation will still continue so dont worry if you have already made a submission, and there will be full engagement again later this year!


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,965 ✭✭✭✭PopePalpatine


    Looks like we're letting a good crisis go to waste.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,946 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Absolute shambles.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,755 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Are people going to be better able to make submissions when they're back in work? What's the logic?


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,398 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    cgcsb wrote: »
    Are people going to be better able to make submissions when they're back in work? What's the logic?

    I'd say that the reason they're doing another consultation after this is all over is that they had to cancel the in person meetings. I'd imagine that if someone was to go to court over this, it'd be easy to argue that they didn't have the necessary consultation due to the fact that they announced public meetings and then cancelled them.

    Frustrating, but NTA do seem to be doing this right, legally speaking at least.


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,403 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    There's no way the NTA could get away with calling this period the final public consultation and get away with it. The September one will be more like a continuation of this as opposed to a new phase.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,755 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    All submissions are in writing though. The meetings are material to the consultation, there's no new information at the meetings that isn't already in the booklets and questions can still be answered electronically. When this crisis is over and people have to go back to crushing themselves onto PT after a period of chilled home working there'll be a lot of anger at the inaction. We're 2 years into this project, not even a planning application completed.


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,403 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    cgcsb wrote: »
    All submissions are in writing though. The meetings are material to the consultation, there's no new information at the meetings that isn't already in the booklets and questions can still be answered electronically. When this crisis is over and people have to go back to crushing themselves onto PT after a period of chilled home working there'll be a lot of anger at the inaction. We're 2 years into this project, not even a planning application completed.

    Try telling a judge that the 80 year old whose front garden is being CPOed had every chance to meet with a solicitor on Skype and could have Zoomed the NTA after reading the online documents. It won't fly.

    If it was a consultation to built a motorway near my house and they tried to do it during a global pandemic, I would be livid. The same goes for this even if I support it.

    Hell, I haven't been able to meet up with some people that I had intended to share notes with.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,398 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Peregrine wrote: »
    Try telling a judge that the 80 year old who's front garden is being CPOed had every chance to meet with a solicitor on Skype and could have Zoomed the NTA after reading the online documents. It won't fly.

    If it was a consultation to built a motorway near my house and they tried to do it during a global pandemic, I would be livid. The same goes for this even if I support it.

    Hell, I haven't been able to meet up with some people that I had intended to share notes with.

    Particularly so considering that the NTA announced that there would be public meetings as part of the consultation. I'd imagine that the local area consultations for Metrolink, which are online only, would continue without any trouble, as they were never meant to have public meetings.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,755 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Peregrine wrote: »
    Try telling a judge that the 80 year old who's front garden is being CPOed had every chance to meet with a solicitor on Skype and could have Zoomed the NTA after reading the online documents. It won't fly.

    If it was a consultation to built a motorway near my house and they tried to do it during a global pandemic, I would be livid. The same goes for this even if I support it.

    Hell, I haven't been able to meet up with some people that I had intended to share notes with.

    People facing CPO are contacted directly. Their internet access isn't a problem. They've already been having consultation with the NTA for years, long before the pandemic.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,114 ✭✭✭PhilOssophy


    Are people really suggesting they plough on here and have a public consultation?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,897 ✭✭✭Polar101


    https://www.rte.ie/news/2020/0513/1138062-nbru-transport-reform/
    NBRU calls for Metro and Bus Connects projects to be abandoned

    NBRU wants to get rid of Metro and Bus Connect, and instead build a rail line to Navan, the airport and between Heuston and Connolly. And they want to finish the Western Corridor as well.

    Not sure if understand the logic of dumping Busconnect.


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,403 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    Polar101 wrote: »
    https://www.rte.ie/news/2020/0513/1138062-nbru-transport-reform/
    NBRU calls for Metro and Bus Connects projects to be abandoned

    NRBU wants to get rid of Metro and Bus Connect, and instead build a rail line to Navan, the airport and between Heuston and Connolly. And they want to finish the Western Corridor as well.

    Not sure if understand the logic of dumping Busconnect.

    NBRU were completely against the network redesign and were actively spreading lies about it. They were quiet about Core Bus Corridors and are now calling for BRT anyway so it looks like they want the entire project to be dropped just to get rid of the network changes.

    Unless the article gets a lot of traction, I'm inclined to not give it oxygen. Half of it is crazy. As the NBRU might say: it's based on what's desired, not what's needed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,522 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    who cares what NBRU thinks or wants. They have no qualification in the field and should be listened to just as much as Starbuck's opinion on it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 592 ✭✭✭wotswattage


    From the article:
    To this end it says both Bus Connects and the Metro in Dublin should be dropped and that Bus Rapid Transit systems could solve congestion in Dublin, Cork, Limerick and Galway at the fraction of the cost.

    These would require dedicated roadways and priority junctions for buses.

    Is that not in essence what Bus Connects is ? :confused: (correct me if I'm missing something)
    Good to see it being proposed in the other cities


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 806 ✭✭✭jams100


    Polar101 wrote: »
    https://www.rte.ie/news/2020/0513/1138062-nbru-transport-reform/
    NBRU calls for Metro and Bus Connects projects to be abandoned

    NBRU wants to get rid of Metro and Bus Connect, and instead build a rail line to Navan, the airport and between Heuston and Connolly. And they want to finish the Western Corridor as well.

    Not sure if understand the logic of dumping Busconnect.

    NBRU are just looking for attention and sadly they are getting it. I wouldn't be surprised if the government did drop the metro as no government in Ireland has any foresight whatsoever. In two years we'll be back to the same ****e as 3 months ago.


Advertisement