Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

US Open 2019

24567

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,619 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Osaka gone!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,695 ✭✭✭Chivito550


    Zverev is being Zverev again. I'm giving up on him at this stage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,695 ✭✭✭Chivito550


    Jaysus, Diego not giving Cilic any chance judging by that post match interview.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,533 Mod ✭✭✭✭yerwanthere123


    mzungu wrote: »
    Medvedev is playing well but he needs to quit acting like a brat. Nobody wants another Kyrgios.

    Yeah, it was OK to give it to the crowd once, but to do it in the next match too just reeks of looking for trouble.

    Glad to see Schwartzman progress, he may be one of my favourite ATP players. Plays tennis as it should be played.

    Sad to see Osaka bow out, very unlucky to meet Bencic in the 4th round, although once again her lack of a plan B was exposed. Hoping Bencic or Andreescu make the final from the top half now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,695 ✭✭✭Chivito550


    Rusedski is hard to listen to.

    He commentates like a fan. Full of non stop praise for Nadal. Everything is amazing, everything is the best ever. He's like Butch Harmon with the golf. It's like these guys are trying to promote the sport rather than commentate on the actual match. It's nauseating.

    We know Nadal is one of the greatest ever. We don't need to keep hearing about it. Same re Roger and Novak. Just commentate on the tennis please.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,733 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    Chivito550 wrote: »
    Rusedski is hard to listen to.

    He commentates like a fan. Full of non stop praise for Nadal. Everything is amazing, everything is the best ever. He's like Butch Harmon with the golf. It's like these guys are trying to promote the sport rather than commentate on the actual match. It's nauseating.

    We know Nadal is one of the greatest ever. We don't need to keep hearing about it. Same re Roger and Novak. Just commentate on the tennis please.

    You think Rusedski is bad you should listen to one of the commentators on ESPN. He would put you to sleep.

    I am looking forward to Wawrinka/Medvedev this evening, could be a cracker. Haven't really been too excited about this US Open it seems very bland. Looks like Nadal will cruise into the final and I think Wawrinka will join him. He seems to have hit a good vein of form now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,619 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    I really don't want Nadal to win this slam!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,151 ✭✭✭✭josip


    walshb wrote: »
    I really don't want Nadal to win this slam!


    Now that Djokovic is out, I think Hector is right about this.
    No matter how much he doesn't want to be :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,619 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    josip wrote: »
    Now that Djokovic is out, I think Hector is right about this.
    No matter how much he doesn't want to be :)

    Hector plays the long game with Nadal. Gets it right eventually...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,695 ✭✭✭Chivito550


    What makes people so sure Nadal will beat Federer? Roger has won the last 6 meetings between the two away from clay. 14 sets to 4 during those 6 matches.

    Cilic blew Rafa off the court in the second set. He couldn't sustain it, but a better player can.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,619 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    I am not near sure. 50-50 match for me.....

    Love to see them finally meet at Flushing Meadows. I don't think they have ever played each other there...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,941 ✭✭✭dominatinMC


    walshb wrote: »
    I am not near sure. 50-50 match for me.....

    Love t0 see them finally met at Flushing Meadows. I don't think they have ever played each other there...
    Would also love to see them play at USO - only slam they have never faced off at, a bit mad that they have never done so really.
    I thought Fed looked really poor in opening rounds but is playing great stuff now. Nadal was playing average/above average until last night, in Sets 3 & 4, he was outstanding. Long way to go yet so would also have it 50/50


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,619 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Would also love to see them play at USO - only slam they have never faced off at, a bit mad that they have never done so really.
    I thought Fed looked really poor in opening rounds but is playing great stuff now. Nadal was playing average/above average until last night, in Sets 3 & 4, he was outstanding. Long way to go yet so would also have it 50/50

    True....even the recent matches (more the the slams) Fed has won away from clay were all hard fought wins. OZ 2017 was razor close (best predictor here I guess, as it's a hard court). SW19 just gone was a bit clearer, but a few moments here and there in these type matches can completely change the winner and loser

    I think if Fed moves fast and well he has an excellent chance.


  • Site Banned Posts: 41 thesiegeof


    I think Fed could win this. It's him or Nadal. Why can't the others step up?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,619 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    thesiegeof wrote: »
    I think Fed could win this. It's him or Nadal. Why can't the others step up?

    There just isn't the real 'one' in an era type talent...


  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 41 thesiegeof


    walshb wrote: »
    There just isn't the real 'one' in an era type talent...

    I could be wrong but apart from Murray and Stan, there's only 2 other players who've won grand slams since 2005 apart from the big 3! Cilic and Del Potro I think. That's crazy. 7 players in total and 3 of them have won 47 between them. It looks like it's going to be 3 years since anyone else apart from the big 3 won one. And they're all ageing!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,532 ✭✭✭EagererBeaver


    The big three have won 54 of them.

    Safin in Australia 05 was the last to win below the ones you've mentioned.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,695 ✭✭✭Chivito550


    The big three have won 54 of them.

    Safin in Australia 05 was the last to win below the ones you've mentioned.

    Gaston Gaudio


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,930 ✭✭✭jr86


    Delighted to see Medvedev beat Stan. It's a pity the former didn't meet a fit Novak in the quarter as that would have been a belter

    Med is revelling in the role of the villain this week. Great to see. Wouldn't shock me one ounce if he took out Fed aswell


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,532 ✭✭✭EagererBeaver


    Chivito550 wrote: »
    The big three have won 54 of them.

    Safin in Australia 05 was the last to win below the ones you've mentioned.

    Gaston Gaudio

    Gaudio won the French in 04, not 05.

    Got confused by the point poster was making earlier. The 47 figure is post-2005.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,533 Mod ✭✭✭✭yerwanthere123


    Medvedev is running on fumes now with all the matches and that leg strapped up. Even if he makes the final Nadal would rip him a new asshole.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,309 Mod ✭✭✭✭mzungu


    Looking forward to seeing how Medvedev fares in the semi-final. I am not sure that his injury will hamper him too much as he was still able to play quite well despite it.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,008 Mod ✭✭✭✭whiterebel


    Bad news for Fed. Medical time out called at the start of the 5th.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,532 ✭✭✭EagererBeaver


    ****ing Dimitrov not knowing his place.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,930 ✭✭✭jr86


    jr86 wrote: »
    Delighted to see Medvedev beat Stan. It's a pity the former didn't meet a fit Novak in the quarter as that would have been a belter

    Med is revelling in the role of the villain this week. Great to see. Wouldn't shock me one ounce if he took out Fed aswell

    Woops - sorry for doubting you Grigor :)

    Fed's very poor recent US Open record continues.

    It's there for Nadal now!


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,909 ✭✭✭Gwynplaine


    How much longer will Federer go after this? 1 more year.
    Rafa will win and be on 19. He'll have passed him out by this time next year. I want to see Rafa win Australia again, then he'll have won all 4 at least twice.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,532 ✭✭✭EagererBeaver


    I think Rafa's chance to grab a second Australian may have passed. 2014 vs Stan and 2017 vs Fed is where it should/could have happened. Can't see him ever being Djokovic there.

    On the 2017 note, Dimitrov gave Nadal an almighty scare in the semi. I wouldn't rule him out here just yet.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,930 ✭✭✭jr86


    Gwynplaine wrote: »
    How much longer will Federer go after this? 1 more year.
    Rafa will win and be on 19. He'll have passed him out by this time next year. I want to see Rafa win Australia again, then he'll have won all 4 at least twice.

    Federer will probably still go on a while yet. In fairness only 2 months ago he had two championship points in a major

    His US Open form has been very mixed though. Since 2011 he's lost to Berdych, Robredo, Cilic, Del Potro, Millman and Dimitrov. He'll be very disappointed with his return here this decade

    That said I don't see him winning another slam overall. I expect both Nadal and Djokovic to surpass him.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,008 Mod ✭✭✭✭whiterebel


    I'd say the service game where he saved 7 break points in the 4th seemed to do for his back. Even though he had a chance to break back to go even in 10th game, he couldn't see it out. He seemed to have problems turning in the backhand. Sad to see it end like that, I think he'd have had a good shout against Nadal.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,309 Mod ✭✭✭✭mzungu


    Would have liked to see Fed go further, but he was outplayed on the night.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,849 ✭✭✭764dak


    I hope Serena and Nadal lose.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,733 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    Serena 2-0 up. Svitolina had break points and game points in both games but couldn't take them. Serena is hammering svitolinas second serve.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,733 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    3-0 now. Serena on fire.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,241 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    Floppybits wrote: »
    3-0 now. Serena on fire.

    She is playing very well ,moving well today .
    She was like an old woman in that Wimbledon final against Halep ,couldnt move at all.

    Can anyone explain to me why this match is on first ,seems idiotic scheduling.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,533 Mod ✭✭✭✭yerwanthere123


    She is playing very well ,moving well today .
    She was like an old woman in that Wimbledon final against Halep ,couldnt move at all.

    Can anyone explain to me why this match is on first ,seems idiotic scheduling.

    Really? Bencic-Andreescu always had potential to be the better match.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,156 ✭✭✭✭Rjd2


    Andreescu at times does look knackered, but having watched her this week she is really clutch as her awesome record when it goes to three sets proves.

    She won't have any fear of Serena whatsoever, I give her a big chance of winning that. Serena lets not forget has a poor record in Slam finals recently. :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,930 ✭✭✭jr86


    764dak wrote: »
    I hope Serena and Nadal lose.

    Ha - Nadal will drop what maybe 20 games in total between the semi and the final?


  • Registered Users Posts: 224 ✭✭PicardWithHair


    It will be fun in a few years time when Nadal continues to get stronger and stronger and stronger, muscles and sweat pumping off him - when the media FINALLY starts to ask questions ...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,756 ✭✭✭sxt


    It will be fun in a few years time when Nadal continues to get stronger and stronger and stronger, muscles and sweat pumping off him - when the media FINALLY starts to ask questions ...
    Will the same media be asking questions of Federer when he is in his early forties and reaching finals?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,619 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    It will be fun in a few years time when Nadal continues to get stronger and stronger and stronger, muscles and sweat pumping off him - when the media FINALLY starts to ask questions ...

    Eh, you need to start watching Nadal more. He’s getting weaker and weaker and weaker... as is Roger. Problem isn’t Nadal, it’s the lack of real serious challenges from younger men..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,619 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    sxt wrote: »
    Will the same media be asking questions of Federer when he is in his early forties and reaching finals?

    Indeed. How on earth is a 38 year old Fed beating a 33 year old Nadal...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,756 ✭✭✭sxt


    walshb wrote: »
    Indeed. How on earth is a 38 year old Fed beating a 33 year old Nadal...

    Beats me. 5 or 6 years ago Federer just could not physically compete with Nadal or any of the top guys in a gruelling long match, now he can
    Beating nishikori, Nadal and djkovic in the quarters, semis and final would have been one of the most impressive feat in tennis. The three fitness guys on tour


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,619 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    sxt wrote: »
    Beats me. 5 or 6 years ago Federer just could not physically compete with Nadal or any of the top guys in a gruelling long match, now he can
    Beating nishikori, Nadal and djkovic in the quarters, semis and final would have been one of the most impressive feat in tennis. The three fitness guys on tour

    Yes, but god forbid you questioned RF the way some question Nole and Nadal...

    Btw, I question none of them!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,756 ✭✭✭sxt


    walshb wrote: »
    Yes, but god forbid you questioned RF the way some question Nole and Nadal...

    Btw, I question none of them!

    Yes . I think you pointed that out well in the Wimbledon thread, about the hypocrisy of people accusing Nadal and djkovic but not Federer.

    If people want to scrutnize Nadal and djkovic than they most scrutinise federer equally


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,309 Mod ✭✭✭✭mzungu


    Medvedev looking good so far. Two sets up.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,158 ✭✭✭Royale with Cheese


    Don't think he's played that great. His serve has been off, although he's growing into the match now. I don't think he'd take a set off Nadal playing like this.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,309 Mod ✭✭✭✭mzungu


    He has the break in the third now.

    Him against Nadal would be a good final.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,695 ✭✭✭Chivito550


    Serious choke from Berretini there. Nadal not looking great. Medvedev has a chance in the final if he keeps to this level.

    Is there some sort of rule that Rusedski has to commentate on all Nadal matches or something! He makes me want to stop watching tennis!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,532 ✭✭✭EagererBeaver


    Medvedev has a huge chance and if it wasn't Nadal, I'd want him to do it. Would be great to see him stick it to the yank crowd and also to challenge the rest of the next generation to step up.


  • Registered Users Posts: 224 ✭✭PicardWithHair


    Medvedev has 0 chance, he was baggelled by Nadal a few weeks ago.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement