Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Ireland Team Talk XI: Team of nervoUS MOD warning Post 1

1191192194196197203

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Wales rang the changes against Georgia and all we learned was that Wales are cack. which everyone already knew.

    there’s no point in bringing in a 23 of young lads with no caps and some auld lads with a handful. Georgia have a decent pack but the Irish lads are likely to face a tougher test in a mid-intensity interprovincial. Farrell is probably going to use this opportunity to bed in some combinations and give a few more young lads a go with experienced international quality players around them. that is incredibly more valuable than putting out a scratch side, getting bashed up by a big Georgian pack and stumbling to ~15 point victory.

    Agree with the above, but its also worth noting that most of the guys that came into the Welsh starting XV were guys who were on the bench the previous week. They werent doling out caps to new guys left and right. It was as much rotation as anything else. They had only 4 guys under the age of 24 in their 23. The age profile of their squad wasn't miles off the age profile of ours vs England.

    And England sent out a strong side with very little experimentation at all, if any, against the Georgians.

    People expecting Ireland to go mad with young lads will be sorely disappointed. The others haven't. We won't either. And there's a reason for that, as you've pointed out. Expectations need to have a basis in reality.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,498 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    If we want our lineout to have improved at all versus Scotland, surely we need to use this game to implement changes and have a dry run?

    Hopefully it will improve with Henderson involved/calling it, but we can't just rely on that. Kelleher has to have another crack, to see if he can rectify what he was doing wrong against England. If Ryan is going to call them properly, he needs another go. We're not going to get it right against Scotland because we had an extra run-out in training, given inexperience seems to be at the root of many of the issues?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    jesus do any of you lads read some of the other views ...who is saying anything about throwing out a load of young lads? Anyway, Some of these lads fall into the exact same bracket as Doris and Kelleher, elite young talent.

    If Murray is selected tomorrow, anybody defending it, is talking cack and moving the goalposts significantly.

    I and many others see absolutely no point picking an experienced side against Georgia. As i said Marmion, Dillane, McCloskey all deserve a shot. baird, Cooney are deeply questionable omissions. Nobody is talking about picking craig Casey at 9 and H/Byrne at ten.

    The problem is that he saw fit to make one change to a squad with absolutely no limits and pressure etc. I never ever said anything about starting young lads. Young lads are going to play. Personally i have a feeling he now needs to back up Doris, kelleher, JGP, Keenan. There's no point changing them.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,625 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I think part of the reason you attract so much criticism on here, Niallof9, is that you absolutely hammer Farrell, yet you actually seem to agree with a fair amount of what he's been doing:
    Niallof9 wrote: »
    Farrell has probably been the quickest of any coach to do it en masse.
    ...
    Its not just Casey and harry Byrne (who are probably still too raw)
    Niallof9 wrote: »
    We tend to back a player and then its harder to get off the team than on it hence the huge individual cap numbers our players rack up. We're seeing the same with Ryan (albeit deserved). Healy is the opposite now at this stage. A legend who needs to be challenged for his own sake which is where EOS comes in,so fair enough.
    Niallof9 wrote: »
    so you have a choice play an international against a hardened team, even ten minutes or an 80 in a pro 14. there's an argument that yes the latter is better for development.


    And, despite that, you then occasionally go full bore with crap like the following:
    Niallof9 wrote: »
    Yeah and i'd enjoy a coach that had a set of balls to play people who are performing.

    You do have the crux of a point, but the hyperbole and contradictions don't do you any favours.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    aloooof wrote: »
    Didn't Ringrose get his international debut when he was 21 and start all 6 nations games at 22?

    He was ready for that summers tour, thats my point. and the argument at the time was he wasn't ready. He was. Ultimately it didn't matter and people can say the same this time. But personally i think they're kidding themselves.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Niallof9 wrote: »
    jesus do any of you lads read some of the other views ...who is saying anything about throwing out a load of young lads? Anyway, Some of these lads fall into the exact same bracket as Doris and Kelleher, elite young talent.

    If Murray is selected tomorrow, anybody defending it, is talking cack and moving the goalposts significantly.

    I and many others see absolutely no point picking an experienced side against Georgia. As i said Marmion, Dillane, McCloskey all deserve a shot. baird, Cooney are deeply questionable omissions. Nobody is talking about picking craig Casey at 9 and H/Byrne at ten.

    There will be a backbone of experienced players starting against Georgia. Murray could easily be one of them.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    There will be a backbone of experienced players starting against Georgia. Murray could easily be one of them.

    And there is nobody on this forum who would have said that would be the case. There is absolutely no point in it happening. Its a shocking call, there's no two ways about it. He might as well select Healy again and bring back Kearney its that conservative.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,625 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Niallof9 wrote: »
    He was ready for that summers tour, thats my point. and the argument at the time was he wasn't ready. He was. Ultimately it didn't matter and people can say the same this time. But personally i think they're kidding themselves.

    The 2016 Summer tour? Payne didn't start any of those 3 Tests at 13 tho., so it wasn't Payne keeping him out of the team. He started 2 at FB.


  • Subscribers Posts: 41,836 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    If Billy Burns starts, then i would have absolutely no problem with Murray starting alongside him.

    This hyperbolic rag losing over one selection is just silly when you need to take a holistic view of the whole selection (which hasn't even bloody happened yet)


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    aloooof wrote: »
    The 2016 Summer tour? Payne didn't start any of those 3 Tests at 13 tho., so it wasn't Payne keeping him out of the team. He started 2 at FB.

    Look you can go all the way back if you want to read it. Ringrose was ready that summer block of games. There was people on here saying he wasn't ready, better in the league. He was ready a few months later, miraculously enough.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Niallof9 wrote: »
    And there is nobody on this forum who would have said that would be the case. There is absolutely no point in it happening. Its a shocking call, there's no two ways about it. He might as well select Healy again and bring back Kearney its that conservative.

    Okay well turns out there is two ways about it; I think you're wrong. There's no point sticking out a wolfhounds team. There will be a backbone of experience.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    Okay well turns out there is two ways about it; I think you're wrong. There's no point sticking out a wolfhounds team. There will be a backbone of experience.

    Yes of course. Cooney or Marmion = Wolfhounds.

    anyway i'll leave it there. i think people are kidding themselves here.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,625 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Niallof9 wrote: »
    Look you can go all the way back if you want to read it. Ringrose was ready that summer block of games. There was people on here saying he wasn't ready, better in the league. He was ready a few months later, miraculously enough.

    Fair enough. I don't think we suffered enormously from not bringing him thru earlier tho, based on what we achieved in 2016.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    Throwing out caps for the sake of it is not the most valuable way to develop the team. Even Gatland when he picked his random teenagers did it sparingly. Very often, it was wasted development time (Tom Prydie making his Wales debut 2 years before the u20s debut for example).

    We're developing players at a pretty good rate this year, and there's already a fairly young cohort of players there to choose from.

    I'd rather see them isolate positions where we specifically need solutions and bring players in there to play with experienced partners, because lets not forget you often learn more from the guys you're playing alongside than you do from the opposition. I'd also be keen to see them sort the line out before the next game.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Niallof9 wrote: »
    Yes of course. Cooney or Marmion = Wolfhounds.

    anyway i'll leave it there. i think people are kidding themselves here.

    I've never argued specifically for Murray. Murray could be there if there is inexperience all around him. Putting out a team without an experienced backbone would be a pointless match akin to wolfhounds. I'm repeating myself.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,178 ✭✭✭Brief_Lives


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nltAi6TSKrs

    the boys make some good points...
    we were missing... Furlong, Beirne, Leavy, Sexton, Henshaw, Ringrose, Larmour, Addison...


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    anyway all we can say is there is a block of very good talent, as good as Kelleher and Doris, coming through. its hardly a shock that some would have them involved. if these lads aren't the talent we think they are we are in big trouble. personally i think we might as well find out now in an environment without pressure, money, crowds, seedings all the usual excuses. i never said these guys are to start. he could have called them in even for match day or whatever, absolutely no harm. i probably threw out the whole shocking as i was quite angry. on relfection fine it doesn't really matter, i just don't get it sometimes. There's no question some of the calls make little sense. Baird for example. If Murray is selected to start its also baffling and something nobody on this forum would have predicted or wanted a few months back.

    that segment of players missing is significant. I'd discount Sexton cause we need to move on now and Addison hasn't proved anything.

    People need to stop comparing Ireland to wales or whoever. Each system is different. We're naturally getting a new crop of players coming through. Wales have tried loads of young players. With such a poor provincial system in Wales of course its going to turn out differently. Personally i favor NZ's and Australias approach to these matters. Anyway its nowhere near as bad as it was. LArmour, Ryan Ringrose, Furlong, Doris, Kelleher all backed young. Its nearly written in stone that 7 or 8 of these lads left out will be internationals next season. Casey has been unreal. Coombes looks like that big bruiser we need. Baird has that O'Brien zip. harry looks so much better than his brother. All the good parts of Ross' game as well. Larmour to come back, Kelleher will settle. Doris has that Heaslip look about him. Its far from doom and gloom that maybe i'm giving off, i'm quite optimistic. I do think we need more edge to this team though and i'd just like it all to happen sooner. But maybe Farrell sees the development pathway in a more a structured sense and being a fan of Jurgen Klopp and how he deals with youth i take the points on board. But the crap Easterbuy was coming out with today is nonsense and the selection of Murray will be nonsense as well.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,625 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Niallof9 wrote: »
    People need to stop comparing Ireland to wales or whoever. Each system is different. We're naturally getting a new crop of players coming through. Wales have tried loads of young players. With such a poor provincial system in Wales of course its going to turn out differently.

    I don't want to labour the point but, for example, just over 2 weeks ago, you weren't willing to give others this benefit of the doubt:
    Niallof9 wrote: »
    Penny, Lyttle, Harry Byrne, Lowry, JJ, Casey, Hume, and a one or two others would be live options for any other 6 nations squad in a tournament like this. Look at Scotland, Wales and Englands squad for this. its a joke really and it smacks of the IRFU or AF going all out to win a nothing tournament to prove something.

    In any case, I think the rest of your post was all pretty reasonable tbh (I suspect if you had said as much from the outset, I don't think you'd have gotten such a backlash). I'd particularly agree with the following:
    Niallof9 wrote: »
    Anyway its nowhere near as bad as it was. LArmour, Ryan Ringrose, Furlong, Doris, Kelleher all backed young.
    ...
    Its far from doom and gloom that maybe i'm giving off, i'm quite optimistic.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,036 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    Niallof9 wrote: »
    People need to stop comparing Ireland to wales or whoever. Each system is different. .... Personally i favor NZ's and Australias approach to these matters.

    Tell me more about comparing/not comparing Ireland to other countries :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,641 ✭✭✭Dog Botherer


    i would absolutely not be favorably comparing Australia’s rugby union set up to basically anyone. maybe Samoa.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    Yeah_Right wrote: »
    Tell me more about comparing/not comparing Ireland to other countries :D

    I said i favor their approach. I didn't compare it at all. AS a rugby person i will always back players picked on form and potential. To many on here form didn't exist or doesn't exist, which is quite clearly a joke of a position to take. People are using Wales as an example of why Ireland don't need to change. Anyway there's plenty of people on here who are happy with the status quo and always have been. Questioned Ringrose, Larmour, now people going on about Kelleher. It will never change and there's no point trying to argue with some of you, its such a chore. The riposte is where were you in 2018. Where were you in 2019 when Farrell and Easterbuy were heavily involved in the calamity.

    It doesn't matter cause Baird et al will all be internationals in 12 months time so i suppose everyone is just wasting their time. As i have conceded Farrell is the most progressive coach it seems so far. I just see this as a massively wasted opportunity for no reason other than to say you have to earn your stripes.. Cooney, McCloskey, Dillane i'm sure would all disagree on that one. Further to that i do think he and the coaching team are out of their depth, but the two aren't necessarily connected. In the future he'll possibly be a great head coach but we shouldn't have risked it on an inexperienced first timer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    Have a KitKat.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    whatever. I'd be fairly certain i'll be proved right, in time. No doubt many of you will be saying give it time...and we'll be crying again come 2023, wondering where it all went wrong.

    He needs to keep the core of the team now for this Georgia game, now that he's backed the you need to earn your stripes line. Marmion, Dillane, Daly, McCloskey all need to start. Bring Stockdale in for some redemption. Billy Burns at ten.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,625 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Niallof9 wrote: »
    To many on here form didn't exist or doesn't exist, which is quite clearly a joke of a position to take.

    Many? I've been posting here a number of years and I can't recall anyone taking that position.

    Do you have any examples to back that up?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,812 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    He can still pick a pretty inexperienced team for Georgia...for example

    15 Shane Daly
    14 James Lowe
    13 Chris Farrell
    12 Stuart McCloskey
    11 Jacob Stockdale
    10 Billy Burns
    9 Conor Murray
    1 Eric O'Sullivan
    2 Ronan Kelleher
    3 John Ryan
    4 Iain Henderson
    5 Ultan Dillane
    6 CJ Stander
    7 Will Connors
    8 Caelan Doris


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    some of the older lads used to take that line. I completely reject it. And it doesn't matter Schmidt even referenced form and Farrell is clearly using it for the most part.

    Moving it on what side do we expect? surely Burns has to start.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    bilston wrote: »
    He can still pick a pretty inexperienced team for Georgia...for example

    15 Shane Daly
    14 James Lowe
    13 Chris Farrell
    12 Stuart McCloskey
    11 Jacob Stockdale
    10 Billy Burns
    9 Conor Murray
    1 Eric O'Sullivan
    2 Ronan Kelleher
    3 John Ryan
    4 Iain Henderson
    5 Ultan Dillane
    6 CJ Stander
    7 Will Connors
    8 Caelan Doris

    Yeah now that he's gone with it, its a fair side apart from at 9 if we're being honest about what we wanted from this block of games etc. But it looks likely Murray will start. Either way Ireland with an inexperienced or experienced team are putting at least 30 points on these lads. So we learn nothing anyway. Look whos to say he won't use an Italian game for something, or Scotland. Meaningful, tough games but games where you could learn a thing or two.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,036 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    Niallof9 wrote: »
    I said i favor their approach. I didn't compare it at all. AS a rugby person i will always back players picked on form and potential. To many on here form didn't exist or doesn't exist, which is quite clearly a joke of a position to take. People are using Wales as an example of why Ireland don't need to change. Anyway there's plenty of people on here who are happy with the status quo and always have been. Questioned Ringrose, Larmour, now people going on about Kelleher. It will never change and there's no point trying to argue with some of you, its such a chore. The riposte is where were you in 2018. Where were you in 2019 when Farrell and Easterbuy were heavily involved in the calamity.

    It doesn't matter cause Baird et al will all be internationals in 12 months time so i suppose everyone is just wasting their time. As i have conceded Farrell is the most progressive coach it seems so far. I just see this as a massively wasted opportunity for no reason other than to say you have to earn your stripes.. Cooney, McCloskey, Dillane i'm sure would all disagree on that one. Further to that i do think he and the coaching team are out of their depth, but the two aren't necessarily connected. In the future he'll possibly be a great head coach but we shouldn't have risked it on an inexperienced first timer.

    And what is this approach from NZ and Australia that you prefer?
    I get why some people would have been questioning whether Ringrose and Larmour were ready for international rugby in their first season. And I think thats fair enough. They were kids in their first season of pro-rugby. For all their talent, they had a lot of development to do before they were going to be ready for test rugby. Didn't Ringrose play most of his first season for Leinster on the wing? I think their progress has been about right.
    Do you think that Kelleher, who is obviously talented, still has much to learn and work on?

    Isn't Baird just back from an injury lay off? Was it hs second game at the weekend? Who would you have him ahead of in the Irish squad?

    Cooney, I agree. I would have had him in the squad ahead of Murray. Dillane and McCloskey have been in and around the Irish squad for 4 years now and just haven't cracked it. Obviously Dillane has had bad injury problems so is probably worth persisting with but there is obviously something about McCloskey that stops him getting game time.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,450 ✭✭✭Wegians89


    I know he’s injured atm but would Blade not be in line for a cap before Casey? Blade has proven himself over multiple seasons and has played in European games.

    Casey probably has a higher ceiling but I think the pair of them could be Ireland’s long term first and second choice 9s, with blade on the bench.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    Have a look at the average age of the two teams that played the last tests between NZ and Australia. Depending on his injury i would restore him into the squad.

    Ringrose, Larmour adapted quite quickly. Larmour is possibly struggling due to the position question and i think some of the x factor has unfortunately been coached out of him a bit. I don't get it cause its a never ending argument and here we are at it again, even though its a near certainty all of them will be capped within 12 months. Baird, Casey, H.Byrne, Lowry, maybe Moore, maybe Coombes, You'll never convince me and i will never be able to convince many on here. Thats even before we get to the mainstays of provincial European squads who are never given a shot. And yeah Blade enters the conversation as well. I just don;t think we're at any stage to say Keenan for example is much further ahead than a Blade, Lowry or whomever, but i wouldn't be surprised to see him continue and then in a few months be handed a central contract. and then the circle goes around again.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,641 ✭✭✭Dog Botherer


    niall my 9 year old is fierce bad for inventing things to be mad about. ye two should form a club.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    niall my 9 year old is fierce bad for inventing things to be mad about. ye two should form a club.

    ok sure thing.


  • Subscribers Posts: 41,836 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Niallof9 wrote: »
    Have a look at the average age of the two teams that played the last tests between NZ and Australia. Depending on his injury i would restore him into the squad.

    Ringrose, Larmour adapted quite quickly. Larmour is possibly struggling due to the position question and i think some of the x factor has unfortunately been coached out of him a bit. I don't get it cause its a never ending argument and here we are at it again, even though its a near certainty all of them will be capped within 12 months. Baird, Casey, H.Byrne, Lowry, maybe Moore, maybe Coombes, You'll never convince me and i will never be able to convince many on here. Thats even before we get to the mainstays of provincial European squads who are never given a shot.

    Niall, youre all over the place, youre not even making coherent sentences any more.
    what do you mean in the bolded sentence? It really makes no sense.

    are you saying that those players will inevitably get capped in the next 12 months, but because they will not be capped against georgia thats a bad thing?

    do you give andy farrell any kudos for capping 9 new players in 7 games ??

    do you have any consideration that players who are new to international rugby require experience alongside them?
    do you consider what england did against georgia to be a waste of a game?

    wales gave 3 players their debuts versus georgia, and made 13 changes from the previous week... and were absolute muck. Played a disjointed turgid headless game and the 18 - 0 win did absolutely nothing for a team on a 6 game losing streak.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    sydthebeat wrote: »
    Niall, youre all over the place, youre not even making coherent sentences any more.
    what do you mean in the bolded sentence? It really makes no sense.

    are you saying that those players will inevitably get capped in the next 12 months, but because they will not be capped against georgia thats a bad thing?

    do you give andy farrell any kudos for capping 9 new players in 7 games ??

    do you have any consideration that players who are new to international rugby require experience alongside them?
    do you consider what england did against georgia to be a waste of a game?

    wales gave 3 players their debuts versus georgia, and made 13 changes from the previous week... and were absolute muck. Played a disjointed turgid headless game and the 18 - 0 win did absolutely nothing for a team on a 6 game losing streak.

    i think its quite clear what i mean. these lads are elite talents, and most likely will be capped. go away with the nonsense, claiming i'm all over the place i've laid out the points pretty fairly at this stage. its tricky cause the circle jerk this forum has become when its not gametime means the same voices over and over again. You'd swear going by this forum alone its universally accepted. Both the Indo, the times and Murray Kinsella have referenced there would be criticism. its not like i'm ****ing alone in this thinking. People said hold your horses at squad announcement time, of course there will be changes many said. well here we are...

    I've said i have. He's the first coach in a while to back form. I've said this a number of times. Its still not enough.

    Yes i do. In fact the whole tournaments questionable at this stage. Picking Murray will be a nadir for me really. and it will be one of the first matches in about 28 years i have little interest in watching. I'd much rather some experimentation and hosing them, then hosing them in a nothing game with seasoned pros like Conor involved. And either Wales are muck as most suggest or they're not we can;t have it both ways. There's a reason they only beat them 18-0. Pivac is a new coach. Farrell and Easterbuy are both directly involved in one of our worst ever World Cups.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,641 ✭✭✭Dog Botherer


    yeah why pick your most experienced half back (a test Lion who can goal kick and cover 10) when your remaining options at 10 have five caps between them. madness. what will Farrell do next?


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,036 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    Niallof9 wrote: »
    Have a look at the average age of the two teams that played the last tests between NZ and Australia.

    What were the average ages? And how did they compare to Ireland v England? If you have a link, I'd be happy to look at it.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    Yeah cause thats what everyone would have guessed last season. If somebody had suggested that on here, next November we'd be picking Murray against Georgia in a nothing test, people would have called you a troll. Its a much deeper problem here. Cooney, Marmion, Blade are worth a shot as much as JGP. ditto with McGrath who has recovered well. Conor has got a bit of his mojo back but we learn nothing picking him. But no people have to say its madness picking a kid. Its nothing to do with bloody Casey. Who will be a multi cap international regardless. Anyway yeah who knows he's not a dead cert, but if he's picked you'll see i'm far from the only person who would round on that type of nothing selection. You might as well leave Cian in there for the same argument. Porter too. Sure why not just keep the same 15 for the craic.


  • Subscribers Posts: 41,836 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Niallof9 wrote: »
    ........ But no people have to say its madness picking a kid. Its nothing to do with bloody Casey. Who will be a multi cap international regardless. Anyway yeah who knows he's not a dead cert, but if he's picked ........

    youre still all over the place, its like something written by a schizophrenic.

    have a break, wait till the team is named, take some time to consider WHY certain selections are made...

    then come back and put a coherent argument together


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    sydthebeat wrote: »
    youre still all over the place, its like something written by a schizophrenic.

    have a break, wait till the team is named, take some time to consider WHY certain selections are made...

    then come back and put a coherent argument together

    absolutely ****ing disgraceful. i won't even dignify that with a response.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,772 ✭✭✭P.Walnuts


    Christ, I thought I did f*ck all at work


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,625 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Niallof9 wrote: »
    Yeah cause thats what everyone would have guessed last season. If somebody had suggested that on here, next November we'd be picking Murray against Georgia in a nothing test, people would have called you a troll. Its a much deeper problem here. Cooney, Marmion, Blade are worth a shot as much as JGP. ditto with McGrath who has recovered well. Conor has got a bit of his mojo back but we learn nothing picking him. But no people have to say its madness picking a kid. Its nothing to do with bloody Casey. Who will be a multi cap international regardless. Anyway yeah who knows he's not a dead cert, but if he's picked you'll see i'm far from the only person who would round on that type of nothing selection. You might as well leave Cian in there for the same argument. Porter too. Sure why not just keep the same 15 for the craic.

    You constantly over-exaggerate and misrepresent people's position on this. Absolutely no one is saying it would be madness to pick Casey.

    They are saying they think it'd be better for his development to be retained for Munster and get 80 mins alongside Healy in awful conditions, away to a niggly Glasgow team, for example.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    aloooof wrote: »
    You constantly over-exaggerate and misrepresent people's position on this. Absolutely no one is saying it would be madness to pick Casey.

    They are saying they think it'd be better for his development to be retained for Munster and get 80 mins alongside Healy in awful conditions, away to a niggly Glasgow team, for example.

    No i'm saying people are misrepresenting my position. I never argued for Casey, if you're going to constantly nitpick the points try and do it fairly. I'm saying people are conflating the idea of some change with picking the kids, thats not whats happening at all. The reaction to a few suggestions is as if its mad to suggest that. Its perfectly reasonable, so much so that Eaasterbuy even had to reference it in his presser today. When i complained at the initial selection people said hold your horses, wait for the gerogia game, it will be all change. Now, of course, the goalposts have shifted on here. Its a constant theme on this thread. as if its a sacred cow you cannot criticise. its utterly ridiculous.

    Anyway i'm out after the insult above. The threads been like this for years. There's far more balance on babblingbrook, munsterfans etc. For instance people have stopped talking about 2018. People don't tend to belittle any differing opinions either. I mean i could take it if you lads weren't clearly wrong nearly all of the time. I laid out a position. There should have been changes in the squad for this game and anybody suggesting say last year that Murray would be playing in a nothing game against Georgia would have laughed. . some of the responses have been wholly unreasonable for these basic arguments. I'm hardly alone in this thinking, its just they don't tend to post here, unfortunately.

    Anyway it is what it is i'll wait for the team to be named and enjoy the meltdown on other platforms.

    it was a blank canvas to try things. Who know's just maybe he's reserving it for other games. Like i said numerous times he's the most progressive coach so far. But its also not enough for me. Billy Burns would do fine with Marmion playing inside him. Playing an 80 ap veteran against a team ranked 12th is just wrong on so many levels. Particularly when this was such an issue only last season. I'll happily wipe the egg from my face if Murray isn't involved.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,625 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    "I don't think Murray should start against Georgia because..." is a perfectly reasonably argument.

    "I'd enjoy a coach that had a set of balls to play people who are performing" is not.

    You stray towards the latter type of rhetoric pretty often imo. It's a shame.

    As for this (and case in point):
    Niallof9 wrote: »
    There's far more balance on babblingbrook, munsterfans etc. People don't tend to belittle any differing opinions either. I mean i could take it if you lads weren't clearly wrong nearly all of the time.

    Do I need to point out the issue with this?? :pac:


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Well I just had the chance to rewatch the game, and I'm really struggling to see the positives. England were ok, and only playing at about 70% managed to absolutely bully us in about every facet of the game. Breakdown, set piece, gainline, it looked like men against boys for most of the game. Its really disheartening to see that we've gone absolutely nowhere since February 2019 and look no closer to challenging the big teams. It's all well and good throwing the ball around against Italy at home and the worst welsh team (that I've ever seen anyway). How can you compete with no set piece? And absolutely toothless in attack once more, one out runners off 9 and 10 all day. I've seen u15 teams with better, less predictable attacking shapes. Farrell was probably our best player but he should have finished the try. Omahony was ok too. Doris has huge potential but got absolutely beaten up. Kelleher was good around the park but needs to sort his set piece out. Gibson park was good v wales but his decision making was abysmal. Frankly it was embarrassing.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,641 ✭✭✭Dog Botherer


    we’ve already done this one i think


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,615 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Jaysus!


  • Registered Users Posts: 398 ✭✭Tommybojangles


    I avoided the forum for 2 weeks and literally the exact Same argument is happening


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 678 ✭✭✭Solutionking


    So the Georgia game
    Would like to see Ryan get a rest and a few other players,

    No idea who is actually fit in front row but Kelleher at hooker
    Hendo, Beirne
    Connors, VDF, Doris
    JGP, Burns
    McCloskey, Farrell
    Lowe, Stockdale, Keenan

    Still some of the players from England game but also give a chance to some new players


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,845 ✭✭✭shootermacg


    I would be happy if Ireland added a pick and jam to their game. It was way to easy for England to just target our midfield.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,812 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    Team announcement today, or tomorrow because it is a Sunday game?


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement